ZACK Yaniv · Israel Blue

59rank
-11.0Butler · 16 bds
-0.69per board
±4.9swing
-1.44vs par /bd
-0.26adjusted /bd
by round

vs par split: bidding -0.12 · play -1.31

Strength of schedule: opponents averaged +0.43/bd (a tough draw) → opponent-adjusted -0.26/bd

Card play — on target: opening leads 33.3% · declarer play 75.0% · defence 87.5%

Card play by contract type — on target
vs NTvs a suit
Opening leads0.0% (1)40.0% (5)
Declarer play100.0% (1)66.7% (3)
Defence100.0% (2)83.3% (6)

Opening leads by suit led: ♥ 0.0% (1) · ♦ 0.0% (1) · ♣ 50.0% (4)

vs par by strain: NT -2.25 (4) · a suit -1.17 (12)

vs par by level: part-score +1.00 (8) · game -2.86 (7) · slam -11.00 (1)

By role: declaring +0.23/bd (-2.62 vs par · 8) · defending -1.60/bd (-0.25 vs par · 8)

By vulnerability: vulnerable -0.99/bd (-0.25 vs par · 8) · not vulnerable -0.39/bd (-2.62 vs par · 8)

By round↑ top

RoundPartnerOpponentsRoomBdsButlerAvgvs par
SemifinalM.BarelR.Van Prooijen – J.VerheesClosed16-11.0-0.69-1.44

Every board — best Butler first↑ top

vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.

ButlerRoundOpponentsBdContractLeadResvs par
+7.0SemifinalHet Witte Huis91NTx♦Q-3-3
+5.7SemifinalHet Witte Huis116♣♦2+1-11
+4.3SemifinalHet Witte Huis134♠x♦4-2+8
+3.6SemifinalHet Witte Huis12♠♣5+1+1
+1.8SemifinalHet Witte Huis53♦♠K=+5
+1.7SemifinalHet Witte Huis33♦♣2=+0
+1.5SemifinalHet Witte Huis21NT♦A=+0
+0.6SemifinalHet Witte Huis72♥♣7+1+10
+0.2SemifinalHet Witte Huis122♠♦4+1+0
-0.1SemifinalHet Witte Huis163NT♥5+1-1
-3.2SemifinalHet Witte Huis155♦♣K=+0
-4.0SemifinalHet Witte Huis142NT♠5-1-5
-5.0SemifinalHet Witte Huis44♥♣6=-10
-6.3SemifinalHet Witte Huis104♠♣4=+1
-8.7SemifinalHet Witte Huis84♥♠4-1-11
-10.1SemifinalHet Witte Huis64♠♣6=-7