GOLD David · ALLFREY ENG
23rank
+12.7Butler · 32 bds
+0.40per board
±4.6swing
+0.72adjusted /bd
by round
Strength of schedule: opponents averaged +0.32/bd (a tough draw) → opponent-adjusted +0.72/bd
By role: declaring +0.49/bd (11) · defending +0.35/bd (21)
By vulnerability: not vulnerable +0.40/bd (32)
By round↑ top
| Round | Partner | Opponents | Room | Bds | Butler | Avg | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Semifinal | T.Forrester | W.Starkowski – S.Golebiowski | Closed | 16 | +17.9 | +1.12 | · |
| Semifinal | T.Forrester | W.Starkowski – S.Golebiowski | Closed | 16 | -5.2 | -0.33 | · |
| Final | T.Forrester | G.Helgemo – T.Helness | Closed | 0 | +0.0 | +0.00 | · |
Every board — best Butler first↑ top
vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.
| Butler | Round | Opponents | Bd | Contract | Lead | Res | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +15.7 | Semifinal | RUCH SA WROCLAW POL | 13 | 5♦xx | ♥10 | -1 | · |
| +9.0 | Semifinal | RUCH SA WROCLAW POL | 23 | 1♠x | ♠6 | = | · |
| +7.3 | Semifinal | RUCH SA WROCLAW POL | 1 | 4♠ | ♥6 | +2 | · |
| +4.9 | Semifinal | RUCH SA WROCLAW POL | 14 | 3♠ | ♥3 | +2 | · |
| +4.8 | Semifinal | RUCH SA WROCLAW POL | 27 | 5♣x | ♠A | -1 | · |
| +3.5 | Semifinal | RUCH SA WROCLAW POL | 32 | 3♥ | ♠A | -4 | · |
| +2.6 | Semifinal | RUCH SA WROCLAW POL | 19 | 4♥ | ♠A | +1 | · |
| +1.8 | Semifinal | RUCH SA WROCLAW POL | 6 | 3♣ | ♠5 | = | · |
| +1.8 | Semifinal | RUCH SA WROCLAW POL | 30 | 3♥ | ♠3 | -1 | · |
| +1.7 | Semifinal | RUCH SA WROCLAW POL | 3 | 3♣ | ♠K | +1 | · |
| +1.1 | Semifinal | RUCH SA WROCLAW POL | 28 | 2♥ | ♦2 | +1 | · |
| +0.9 | Semifinal | RUCH SA WROCLAW POL | 26 | 3NT | ♦2 | = | · |
| +0.7 | Semifinal | RUCH SA WROCLAW POL | 9 | 2♠ | ♥K | -1 | · |
| +0.5 | Semifinal | RUCH SA WROCLAW POL | 31 | 1NT | ♠3 | -1 | · |
| +0.4 | Semifinal | RUCH SA WROCLAW POL | 8 | 4♠ | ♠6 | -1 | · |
| +0.3 | Semifinal | RUCH SA WROCLAW POL | 10 | 3♦ | ♥K | -1 | · |
| +0.3 | Semifinal | RUCH SA WROCLAW POL | 16 | 4♠ | ♣2 | +1 | · |
| +0.0 | Semifinal | RUCH SA WROCLAW POL | 29 | 4♠ | ♦5 | = | · |
| -0.3 | Semifinal | RUCH SA WROCLAW POL | 11 | 2♥x | ♥2 | -2 | · |
| -0.5 | Semifinal | RUCH SA WROCLAW POL | 7 | 4♥ | ♦K | -1 | · |
| -1.0 | Semifinal | RUCH SA WROCLAW POL | 2 | 3NT | ♣5 | -1 | · |
| -1.0 | Semifinal | RUCH SA WROCLAW POL | 5 | 5♠ | ♥6 | = | · |
| -1.1 | Semifinal | RUCH SA WROCLAW POL | 17 | 4♠ | ♦3 | +3 | · |
| -1.6 | Semifinal | RUCH SA WROCLAW POL | 12 | 2♠ | ♣K | +1 | · |
| -2.4 | Semifinal | RUCH SA WROCLAW POL | 4 | 4♠ | ♦6 | -1 | · |
| -2.9 | Semifinal | RUCH SA WROCLAW POL | 22 | 5♦ | ♠K | +2 | · |
| -3.1 | Semifinal | RUCH SA WROCLAW POL | 18 | 4♠x | ♦A | = | · |
| -4.6 | Semifinal | RUCH SA WROCLAW POL | 24 | 4♠ | ♦4 | = | · |
| -5.2 | Semifinal | RUCH SA WROCLAW POL | 20 | 3NT | ♠7 | -2 | · |
| -5.8 | Semifinal | RUCH SA WROCLAW POL | 21 | 4♥ | ♥J | -1 | · |
| -6.7 | Semifinal | RUCH SA WROCLAW POL | 25 | 5♥x | ♠10 | -1 | · |
| -8.4 | Semifinal | RUCH SA WROCLAW POL | 15 | 3♦x | ♥7 | = | · |