BIANCHEDI Alejandro · ITA-G.S. ALLEGRA
vs par split: bidding +0.33 · play +0.75
Strength of schedule: opponents averaged -0.72/bd (an easy draw) → opponent-adjusted +0.55/bd
Card play — on target: opening leads 100.0% #1 of 59 · declarer play 55.6% #58 of 59 · defence 100.0% #1 of 59
| vs NT | vs a suit | |
|---|---|---|
| Opening leads | · | 100.0% (3) |
| Declarer play | 33.3% (3) | 60.0% (15) |
| Defence | 100.0% (6) | 100.0% (20) |
Opening leads by suit led: ♣ 100.0% (3)
vs par by strain: NT +0.00 (12) · a suit +1.44 (36)
vs par by level: part-score +0.11 (18) · game +0.71 (28) · slam +15.00 (2)
By role: declaring +1.37/bd (-0.18 vs par · 22) · defending +1.19/bd (+2.15 vs par · 26)
By vulnerability: vulnerable +1.38/bd (+2.62 vs par · 24) · not vulnerable +1.16/bd (-0.46 vs par · 24)
By round↑ top
| Round | Partner | Opponents | Room | Bds | Butler | Avg | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Semifinal | A.Madala | A.Versace – L.Lauria | Closed | 16 | +19.4 | +1.21 | -0.19 |
| Semifinal | A.Madala | M.Tokay – A.Sementa | Closed | 16 | +23.8 | +1.49 | +1.31 |
| Final | A.Madala | B.Van Den Bos – J.Van Lankveld | Open | 16 | +17.9 | +1.12 | +2.12 |
Every board — best Butler first↑ top
vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.
| Butler | Round | Opponents | Bd | Contract | Lead | Res | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +10.8 | Final | NED-BC’T ONSTEIN | 16 | 7♠ | ♠2 | -1 | +17 |
| +9.9 | Semifinal | ITA-ANGELINI BRIDGE S.R.L. | 32 | 6♦ | ♥3 | = | +13 |
| +8.3 | Semifinal | ITA-ANGELINI BRIDGE S.R.L. | 23 | 3NT | ♥3 | -1 | +12 |
| +7.2 | Semifinal | ITA-ANGELINI BRIDGE S.R.L. | 21 | 5♦xx | ♥3 | -1 | +12 |
| +6.5 | Semifinal | ITA-ANGELINI BRIDGE S.R.L. | 7 | 3♦ | ♥3 | = | +6 |
| +6.5 | Semifinal | ITA-ANGELINI BRIDGE S.R.L. | 11 | 5♠x | ♥A | = | +11 |
| +6.0 | Semifinal | ITA-ANGELINI BRIDGE S.R.L. | 22 | 2♠x | ♥3 | -2 | +3 |
| +5.6 | Semifinal | ITA-ANGELINI BRIDGE S.R.L. | 16 | 4♥ | ♥3 | = | -11 |
| +5.5 | Final | NED-BC’T ONSTEIN | 1 | 4♠ | ♣K | -2 | +6 |
| +4.6 | Semifinal | ITA-ANGELINI BRIDGE S.R.L. | 8 | 4♥ | ♠A | = | -1 |
| +4.5 | Semifinal | ITA-ANGELINI BRIDGE S.R.L. | 13 | 3NT | ♠3 | -1 | +5 |
| +4.5 | Final | NED-BC’T ONSTEIN | 6 | 3NT | ♦4 | = | -1 |
| +4.5 | Final | NED-BC’T ONSTEIN | 7 | 5♠ | ♥J | +1 | +13 |
| +3.7 | Semifinal | ITA-ANGELINI BRIDGE S.R.L. | 18 | 4♠ | ♥3 | = | +10 |
| +3.7 | Semifinal | ITA-ANGELINI BRIDGE S.R.L. | 20 | 1NT | ♥3 | = | +5 |
| +2.7 | Semifinal | ITA-ANGELINI BRIDGE S.R.L. | 9 | 4♥ | ♦A | -2 | +7 |
| +2.6 | Final | NED-BC’T ONSTEIN | 9 | 4♠ | ♣2 | -2 | -1 |
| +2.5 | Final | NED-BC’T ONSTEIN | 14 | 2♥ | ♣Q | = | +5 |
| +2.4 | Semifinal | ITA-ANGELINI BRIDGE S.R.L. | 25 | 2♠ | ♥3 | -1 | +0 |
| +2.0 | Semifinal | ITA-ANGELINI BRIDGE S.R.L. | 26 | 1♥ | ♥3 | +2 | +1 |
| +1.9 | Semifinal | ITA-ANGELINI BRIDGE S.R.L. | 15 | 2♥ | ♥3 | +2 | +1 |
| +1.8 | Semifinal | ITA-ANGELINI BRIDGE S.R.L. | 17 | 4♠ | ♥3 | -1 | +4 |
| +0.8 | Final | NED-BC’T ONSTEIN | 12 | 3NT | ♠2 | = | +0 |
| +0.6 | Semifinal | ITA-ANGELINI BRIDGE S.R.L. | 1 | 1NT | ♥3 | = | +0 |
| +0.6 | Semifinal | ITA-ANGELINI BRIDGE S.R.L. | 12 | 3NT | ♥7 | -1 | -6 |
| +0.6 | Final | NED-BC’T ONSTEIN | 10 | 2♥ | ♥6 | +1 | +10 |
| +0.6 | Final | NED-BC’T ONSTEIN | 15 | 4♥ | ♣A | = | +0 |
| +0.5 | Final | NED-BC’T ONSTEIN | 3 | 4♥ | ♦Q | -1 | +0 |
| +0.4 | Semifinal | ITA-ANGELINI BRIDGE S.R.L. | 10 | 4♥ | ♥3 | = | -1 |
| +0.3 | Semifinal | ITA-ANGELINI BRIDGE S.R.L. | 2 | 1NT | ♥3 | = | +2 |
| +0.1 | Semifinal | ITA-ANGELINI BRIDGE S.R.L. | 28 | 3♣ | ♥3 | -2 | -1 |
| +0.0 | Semifinal | ITA-ANGELINI BRIDGE S.R.L. | 14 | 2NT | ♥4 | = | -6 |
| -0.1 | Final | NED-BC’T ONSTEIN | 8 | 4♦ | ♣2 | -1 | -2 |
| -0.4 | Semifinal | ITA-ANGELINI BRIDGE S.R.L. | 3 | 4♥ | ♥3 | +1 | +0 |
| -0.5 | Final | NED-BC’T ONSTEIN | 11 | 3NT | ♣Q | = | -1 |
| -0.6 | Final | NED-BC’T ONSTEIN | 13 | 3♦ | ♣5 | = | +0 |
| -1.1 | Semifinal | ITA-ANGELINI BRIDGE S.R.L. | 6 | 4♠ | ♥A | -1 | -10 |
| -1.8 | Semifinal | ITA-ANGELINI BRIDGE S.R.L. | 31 | 2♥ | ♥4 | = | -5 |
| -2.0 | Semifinal | ITA-ANGELINI BRIDGE S.R.L. | 19 | 4♠ | ♦2 | -2 | -6 |
| -2.6 | Final | NED-BC’T ONSTEIN | 5 | 4♥ | ♣J | +1 | +0 |
| -2.9 | Semifinal | ITA-ANGELINI BRIDGE S.R.L. | 24 | 3♦ | ♦3 | -2 | +0 |
| -3.0 | Semifinal | ITA-ANGELINI BRIDGE S.R.L. | 30 | 2♠ | ♥K | -1 | -9 |
| -3.2 | Semifinal | ITA-ANGELINI BRIDGE S.R.L. | 5 | 4♠ | ♥3 | +1 | +0 |
| -4.4 | Final | NED-BC’T ONSTEIN | 2 | 4♠x | ♥A | -1 | -6 |
| -4.6 | Semifinal | ITA-ANGELINI BRIDGE S.R.L. | 27 | 4♦ | ♠A | -2 | -8 |
| -6.8 | Final | NED-BC’T ONSTEIN | 4 | 4♥ | ♠K | -1 | -6 |
| -7.0 | Semifinal | ITA-ANGELINI BRIDGE S.R.L. | 29 | 3NT | ♥3 | +1 | -10 |
| -10.1 | Semifinal | ITA-ANGELINI BRIDGE S.R.L. | 4 | 3NT | ♣A | = | +0 |