GIUBILO Valerio · ITA-ANGELINI BRIDGE S.R.L.

4rank
+25.0Butler · 16 bds
+1.56per board
±6.1swing
+0.25vs par /bd
+0.68adjusted /bd
by round

vs par split: bidding +0.62 · play -0.38

Strength of schedule: opponents averaged -0.88/bd (an easy draw) → opponent-adjusted +0.68/bd

Card play — on target: opening leads 100.0% · declarer play 83.3% · defence 77.8%

Card play by contract type — on target
vs NTvs a suit
Opening leads100.0% (1)100.0% (2)
Declarer play100.0% (1)80.0% (5)
Defence50.0% (4)100.0% (5)

Opening leads by suit led: ♦ 100.0% (1) · ♣ 100.0% (2)

vs par by strain: NT +0.20 (5) · a suit +0.27 (11)

vs par by level: part-score -3.75 (4) · game +1.50 (8) · slam +1.75 (4)

By role: declaring +0.76/bd (-2.71 vs par · 7) · defending +2.19/bd (+2.56 vs par · 9)

By vulnerability: vulnerable +4.25/bd (+1.75 vs par · 8) · not vulnerable -1.12/bd (-1.25 vs par · 8)

By round↑ top

RoundPartnerOpponentsRoomBdsButlerAvgvs par
FinalL.CimaS.Gillis – E.SaelensmindeClosed16+25.0+1.56+0.25

Every board — best Butler first↑ top

vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.

ButlerRoundOpponentsBdContractLeadResvs par
+14.0FinalENG-EBU TEAM56♥♦9=+13
+9.5FinalENG-EBU TEAM26♥♦K-1+11
+9.5FinalENG-EBU TEAM76♠♦A=+0
+9.0FinalENG-EBU TEAM63NT♦4-2+13
+2.9FinalENG-EBU TEAM84♥♣A-1+4
+1.5FinalENG-EBU TEAM42♥♥3+1+0
+0.6FinalENG-EBU TEAM133♦♣4=+0
+0.3FinalENG-EBU TEAM102♥♠4+2-10
-0.5FinalENG-EBU TEAM34♥♦Q-1+0
-0.5FinalENG-EBU TEAM94♠♥10-1+2
-0.5FinalENG-EBU TEAM113NT♠7+1+0
-0.6FinalENG-EBU TEAM154♥♣A=+0
-0.8FinalENG-EBU TEAM123NT♠2=+0
-2.0FinalENG-EBU TEAM141NT♦8=-5
-6.6FinalENG-EBU TEAM13NT♦10-3-7
-10.8FinalENG-EBU TEAM167♠♠3-1-17