Mohamed HESHMAT · RATRUT
vs par split: bidding +3.00 · play +0.10
Strength of schedule: opponents averaged -1.00/bd (an easy draw) → opponent-adjusted +0.79/bd
Card play — on target: opening leads 100.0% · declarer play 100.0% · defence 75.0%
Bidding activity — not a pass: 46.7% (14/30)
| vs NT | vs a suit | |
|---|---|---|
| Opening leads | · | 100.0% (2) |
| Declarer play | · | 100.0% (3) |
| Defence | · | 75.0% (4) |
Opening leads by suit led: ♦ 100.0% (1) · ♣ 100.0% (1)
vs par by strain: a suit +3.10 (10)
vs par by level: part-score +0.00 (2) · game +3.33 (6) · slam +5.50 (2)
By role: declaring +4.62/bd (+1.83 vs par · 6) · defending -2.45/bd (+5.00 vs par · 4)
By vulnerability: vulnerable +7.95/bd (+9.00 vs par · 4) · not vulnerable -2.32/bd (-0.83 vs par · 6)
By round↑ top
| Round | Partner | Opponents | Room | Bds | Butler | Avg | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Round 11 | Rita GHOSN | Necla ERKEL – Omer EKINCI | Open | 10 | +17.9 | +1.79 | +3.10 |
Every board — best Butler first↑ top
vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.
| Butler | Round | Opponents | Bd | Contract | Lead | Res | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +12.4 | Round 11 | CEYCEY | 42 | 6♥ | ♦4 | = | +13 |
| +10.1 | Round 11 | CEYCEY | 48 | 4♥x | ♠Q | = | +14 |
| +9.2 | Round 11 | CEYCEY | 45 | 6♣ | ♥4 | +1 | -2 |
| +3.7 | Round 11 | CEYCEY | 46 | 2♥ | ♦J | +1 | +1 |
| +2.0 | Round 11 | CEYCEY | 49 | 4♥ | ♦Q | -1 | +10 |
| +0.1 | Round 11 | CEYCEY | 41 | 4♥ | ♣K | +2 | +11 |
| -1.5 | Round 11 | CEYCEY | 50 | 4♥ | ♠8 | -1 | -5 |
| -4.9 | Round 11 | CEYCEY | 44 | 3♠ | ♦4 | = | -1 |
| -6.2 | Round 11 | CEYCEY | 47 | 4♥ | ♠4 | -1 | -10 |
| -7.0 | Round 11 | CEYCEY | 43 | 4♠ | ♦J | = | +0 |