COPE Simon · SIMON GILLIS
vs par split: bidding +2.14 · play +0.38
Strength of schedule: opponents averaged -0.13/bd (an easy draw) → opponent-adjusted +0.58/bd
Card play — on target: opening leads 84.6% · declarer play 90.0% · defence 87.0%
Bidding activity — not a pass: 38.8% (45/116)
| vs NT | vs a suit | |
|---|---|---|
| Opening leads | 80.0% (5) | 87.5% (8) |
| Declarer play | 75.0% (4) | 100.0% (6) |
| Defence | 71.4% (7) | 93.8% (16) |
Opening leads by suit led: ♠ 100.0% (5) · ♥ 50.0% (2) · ♦ 66.7% (3) · ♣ 100.0% (3)
vs par by strain: NT +2.75 (12) · a suit +2.43 (30)
vs par by level: part-score +2.33 (15) · game +2.38 (24) · slam +4.67 (3)
By role: declaring +1.42/bd (+0.26 vs par · 19) · defending +0.13/bd (+4.39 vs par · 23)
By vulnerability: vulnerable -0.16/bd (+1.52 vs par · 21) · not vulnerable +1.59/bd (+3.52 vs par · 21)
By round↑ top
| Round | Partner | Opponents | Room | Bds | Butler | Avg | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Round 5 | P.Crouch | J.Thomsen – R.Hemberg | Open | 14 | -1.9 | -0.14 | +3.64 |
| Round 7 | P.Crouch | M.Smolen – J.Luczeczko | Open | 14 | +37.3 | +2.66 | +3.21 |
| Round 8 | P.Crouch | J.Ran – Z.Liao | Open | 14 | -5.4 | -0.39 | +0.71 |
Every board — best Butler first↑ top
vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.
| Butler | Round | Opponents | Bd | Contract | Lead | Res | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +12.7 | Round 7 | GDANSK | 8 | 5♥x | ♣5 | = | +11 |
| +8.7 | Round 8 | BEIJING RUHAI | 18 | 4♥x | ♦Q | -2 | +9 |
| +6.5 | Round 5 | DANGERS AND A HAZARD | 5 | 3NT | ♦J | +1 | +1 |
| +5.9 | Round 8 | BEIJING RUHAI | 17 | 5♦ | ♠K | = | +0 |
| +5.8 | Round 7 | GDANSK | 11 | 2♠ | ♣Q | +3 | +6 |
| +5.6 | Round 5 | DANGERS AND A HAZARD | 11 | 3NT | ♣K | -1 | +10 |
| +5.4 | Round 5 | DANGERS AND A HAZARD | 1 | 6NT | ♥T | -1 | +14 |
| +4.5 | Round 7 | GDANSK | 9 | 4♥ | ♠9 | -1 | +10 |
| +4.2 | Round 8 | BEIJING RUHAI | 15 | 4♠x | ♣7 | +1 | +6 |
| +3.9 | Round 5 | DANGERS AND A HAZARD | 10 | 5♥ | ♣A | = | +4 |
| +3.8 | Round 7 | GDANSK | 7 | 2♠ | ♠4 | -1 | -1 |
| +3.7 | Round 7 | GDANSK | 1 | 3♥ | ♣Q | -1 | +4 |
| +3.3 | Round 7 | GDANSK | 10 | 4♥ | ♦3 | = | +0 |
| +3.0 | Round 7 | GDANSK | 2 | 1♠ | ♥J | = | +5 |
| +2.1 | Round 5 | DANGERS AND A HAZARD | 4 | 3NT | ♠2 | -1 | +12 |
| +1.7 | Round 7 | GDANSK | 4 | 1NT | ♥A | +1 | +0 |
| +1.6 | Round 8 | BEIJING RUHAI | 16 | 4♠ | ♣K | +1 | +0 |
| +1.4 | Round 7 | GDANSK | 5 | 2♥ | ♦7 | = | +0 |
| +1.3 | Round 7 | GDANSK | 12 | 3♠ | ♣8 | = | +12 |
| +1.2 | Round 5 | DANGERS AND A HAZARD | 14 | 2♠ | ♠2 | +2 | +2 |
| +0.8 | Round 7 | GDANSK | 6 | 4♥ | ♠A | = | +0 |
| +0.5 | Round 5 | DANGERS AND A HAZARD | 8 | 3NT | ♠3 | +1 | +0 |
| +0.5 | Round 8 | BEIJING RUHAI | 25 | 2♥ | ♥J | -1 | -2 |
| +0.4 | Round 8 | BEIJING RUHAI | 22 | 2♠ | ♣K | +1 | +7 |
| -0.2 | Round 8 | BEIJING RUHAI | 24 | 2♥ | ♦5 | = | -1 |
| -0.4 | Round 5 | DANGERS AND A HAZARD | 13 | 3NT | ♥A | -1 | +5 |
| -0.6 | Round 8 | BEIJING RUHAI | 28 | 1♠ | ♠8 | +3 | +10 |
| -0.9 | Round 7 | GDANSK | 14 | 4♥ | ♠3 | = | -1 |
| -1.1 | Round 7 | GDANSK | 3 | 4♥ | ♠2 | +1 | +0 |
| -1.7 | Round 8 | BEIJING RUHAI | 20 | 1NT | ♥T | = | +1 |
| -1.8 | Round 8 | BEIJING RUHAI | 21 | 2NT | ♣6 | +1 | -6 |
| -2.7 | Round 7 | GDANSK | 13 | 3NT | ♦5 | +2 | -1 |
| -2.8 | Round 5 | DANGERS AND A HAZARD | 9 | 5♣ | ♣7 | +1 | +1 |
| -3.1 | Round 5 | DANGERS AND A HAZARD | 2 | 3NT | ♠6 | +2 | -1 |
| -3.1 | Round 5 | DANGERS AND A HAZARD | 12 | 4♠ | ♣7 | +1 | +11 |
| -3.6 | Round 5 | DANGERS AND A HAZARD | 7 | 4♥ | ♣4 | = | +0 |
| -4.0 | Round 8 | BEIJING RUHAI | 23 | 5♣ | ♠J | -1 | -6 |
| -5.7 | Round 8 | BEIJING RUHAI | 27 | 6♠ | ♦K | = | +0 |
| -6.3 | Round 8 | BEIJING RUHAI | 19 | 4♠ | ♥A | = | -6 |
| -6.4 | Round 5 | DANGERS AND A HAZARD | 6 | 4♥x | ♣T | -3 | -8 |
| -6.4 | Round 8 | BEIJING RUHAI | 26 | 2NT | ♥7 | -2 | -2 |
| -7.7 | Round 5 | DANGERS AND A HAZARD | 3 | 6♣ | ♦T | = | +0 |