ANKLESARIA Keyzad · MAVERICKS
vs par split: bidding -0.26 · play +0.12
Strength of schedule: opponents averaged -0.05/bd (an average draw) → opponent-adjusted +0.01/bd
Card play — on target: opening leads 72.7% · declarer play 83.3% · defence 90.0%
Bidding activity — not a pass: 50.4% (69/137)
| vs NT | vs a suit | |
|---|---|---|
| Opening leads | 100.0% (2) | 66.7% (9) |
| Declarer play | 66.7% (3) | 88.9% (9) |
| Defence | 100.0% (4) | 87.5% (16) |
Opening leads by suit led: ♠ 0.0% (1) · ♥ 66.7% (3) · ♦ 100.0% (1) · ♣ 83.3% (6)
vs par by strain: NT +2.71 (7) · a suit -0.71 (35)
vs par by level: part-score +0.53 (17) · game +1.68 (19) · slam -7.83 (6)
By role: declaring -1.89/bd (-4.14 vs par · 22) · defending +2.21/bd (+4.25 vs par · 20)
By vulnerability: vulnerable +0.14/bd (+0.24 vs par · 21) · not vulnerable -0.02/bd (-0.52 vs par · 21)
By round↑ top
| Round | Partner | Opponents | Room | Bds | Butler | Avg | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Round 3 | D.Filipowicz | M.Wrobel – J.Kalisoras | Closed | 14 | +11.8 | +0.84 | +0.07 |
| Round 4 | D.Filipowicz | G.Shen – C.Dong | Closed | 14 | -29.6 | -2.11 | -1.57 |
| Round 7 | D.Filipowicz | K.Alsabah – D.Tylvad | Closed | 14 | +20.4 | +1.46 | +1.07 |
Every board — best Butler first↑ top
vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.
| Butler | Round | Opponents | Bd | Contract | Lead | Res | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +8.7 | Round 7 | TEAM PHOENIX | 4 | 4♥x | ♥4 | -3 | +5 |
| +8.2 | Round 7 | TEAM PHOENIX | 2 | 4♥ | ♣K | +3 | +14 |
| +6.6 | Round 4 | CHINA OPEN TEAM 1 | 22 | 3NT | ♥2 | -1 | +10 |
| +6.1 | Round 7 | TEAM PHOENIX | 13 | 5♣ | ♣2 | -1 | +12 |
| +5.6 | Round 7 | TEAM PHOENIX | 6 | 3NT | ♣2 | -3 | +9 |
| +5.2 | Round 7 | TEAM PHOENIX | 7 | 4♦x | ♣2 | -3 | +5 |
| +4.1 | Round 3 | EMI | 5 | 3♥ | ♠K | = | +7 |
| +3.9 | Round 7 | TEAM PHOENIX | 1 | 3NT | ♣2 | -4 | +3 |
| +3.7 | Round 3 | EMI | 12 | 4♥ | ♠K | +3 | +10 |
| +2.3 | Round 3 | EMI | 6 | 3NT | ♠A | +1 | +0 |
| +2.3 | Round 7 | TEAM PHOENIX | 3 | 4♥ | ♣5 | = | +0 |
| +2.1 | Round 3 | EMI | 10 | 6♠ | ♣K | +1 | -13 |
| +2.0 | Round 3 | EMI | 9 | 2♠ | ♣Q | -1 | +2 |
| +1.3 | Round 3 | EMI | 13 | 3NT | ♦4 | +1 | +0 |
| +1.2 | Round 3 | EMI | 11 | 3♠ | ♣T | -1 | +4 |
| +1.2 | Round 7 | TEAM PHOENIX | 9 | 4♠ | ♣9 | = | +0 |
| +1.0 | Round 3 | EMI | 8 | 3♥ | ♣A | -2 | +0 |
| +1.0 | Round 4 | CHINA OPEN TEAM 1 | 24 | 3NT | ♦5 | = | +2 |
| +0.9 | Round 4 | CHINA OPEN TEAM 1 | 21 | 3♥ | ♣T | = | -6 |
| +0.6 | Round 3 | EMI | 4 | 2♠ | ♣A | = | +0 |
| +0.3 | Round 7 | TEAM PHOENIX | 8 | 6♦x | ♣K | -2 | +0 |
| +0.2 | Round 4 | CHINA OPEN TEAM 1 | 17 | 4♦ | ♠5 | -2 | +0 |
| -0.2 | Round 3 | EMI | 2 | 3♠ | ♥3 | -1 | +5 |
| -0.2 | Round 3 | EMI | 3 | 2♥ | ♦9 | +2 | +2 |
| -0.2 | Round 4 | CHINA OPEN TEAM 1 | 20 | 3♣ | ♦Q | +1 | +0 |
| -0.3 | Round 4 | CHINA OPEN TEAM 1 | 23 | 6♠ | ♥7 | = | +0 |
| -0.4 | Round 3 | EMI | 14 | 4♠ | ♣2 | +1 | +0 |
| -0.6 | Round 3 | EMI | 1 | 2♥ | ♦Q | +1 | +0 |
| -1.0 | Round 7 | TEAM PHOENIX | 5 | 5♦ | ♣2 | = | +0 |
| -1.2 | Round 7 | TEAM PHOENIX | 14 | 5♠ | ♣3 | = | -11 |
| -1.4 | Round 4 | CHINA OPEN TEAM 1 | 18 | 2♠ | ♣A | +1 | +0 |
| -1.7 | Round 4 | CHINA OPEN TEAM 1 | 19 | 2♥ | ♣2 | +2 | +6 |
| -3.0 | Round 7 | TEAM PHOENIX | 11 | 4♠x | ♦K | -1 | -5 |
| -3.4 | Round 4 | CHINA OPEN TEAM 1 | 27 | 6♣ | ♠3 | +1 | -1 |
| -3.9 | Round 4 | CHINA OPEN TEAM 1 | 28 | 4♠ | ♥3 | -1 | -5 |
| -4.2 | Round 4 | CHINA OPEN TEAM 1 | 16 | 3♥ | ♠A | = | -6 |
| -4.2 | Round 7 | TEAM PHOENIX | 10 | 1NT | ♣2 | -1 | -5 |
| -5.1 | Round 3 | EMI | 7 | 6♦ | ♣6 | -2 | -16 |
| -5.9 | Round 4 | CHINA OPEN TEAM 1 | 26 | 4♠x | ♥K | -1 | +0 |
| -8.2 | Round 4 | CHINA OPEN TEAM 1 | 15 | 3♦x | ♠Q | -2 | -5 |
| -9.1 | Round 4 | CHINA OPEN TEAM 1 | 25 | 6♠ | ♣2 | -1 | -17 |
| -11.7 | Round 7 | TEAM PHOENIX | 12 | 5♥x | ♣K | -4 | -12 |