SAADA Nathalie · PATRICK SAADA
vs par split: bidding -0.29 · play -0.46
Strength of schedule: opponents averaged -0.19/bd (an easy draw) → opponent-adjusted -1.31/bd
Card play — on target: opening leads 77.8% · declarer play 33.3% · defence 58.8%
Bidding activity — not a pass: 48.6% (35/72)
| vs NT | vs a suit | |
|---|---|---|
| Opening leads | 100.0% (1) | 75.0% (8) |
| Declarer play | · | 33.3% (3) |
| Defence | 50.0% (4) | 61.5% (13) |
Opening leads by suit led: ♠ 100.0% (1) · ♥ 66.7% (3) · ♦ 66.7% (3) · ♣ 100.0% (2)
vs par by strain: NT +2.57 (7) · a suit -1.86 (21)
vs par by level: part-score -2.22 (9) · game -0.06 (18) · slam +0.00 (1)
By role: declaring +0.01/bd (-0.46 vs par · 11) · defending -1.85/bd (-0.94 vs par · 17)
By vulnerability: vulnerable -0.42/bd (-0.93 vs par · 14) · not vulnerable -1.81/bd (-0.57 vs par · 14)
By round↑ top
| Round | Partner | Opponents | Room | Bds | Butler | Avg | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Round of 64 | I.Bareket | G.Shen – C.Dong | Open | 14 | -11.8 | -0.84 | +1.57 |
| Round of 64 | I.Bareket | C.Ju – Z.Shi | Open | 14 | -19.5 | -1.39 | -3.07 |
Every board — best Butler first↑ top
vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.
| Butler | Round | Opponents | Bd | Contract | Lead | Res | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +5.2 | Round of 64 | CHINA OPEN TEAM 1 | 12 | 3NT | ♦T | = | +5 |
| +3.3 | Round of 64 | CHINA OPEN TEAM 1 | 7 | 3NT | ♦4 | +3 | +5 |
| +3.1 | Round of 64 | CHINA OPEN TEAM 1 | 25 | 4♥ | ♣3 | -2 | +0 |
| +2.5 | Round of 64 | CHINA OPEN TEAM 1 | 19 | 5♦ | ♣K | = | +0 |
| +2.2 | Round of 64 | CHINA OPEN TEAM 1 | 8 | 4♠x | ♥A | -2 | +0 |
| +1.8 | Round of 64 | CHINA OPEN TEAM 1 | 18 | 3NT | ♣5 | = | -1 |
| +1.4 | Round of 64 | CHINA OPEN TEAM 1 | 15 | 4♣ | ♦4 | -1 | +6 |
| +0.7 | Round of 64 | CHINA OPEN TEAM 1 | 3 | 2♥ | ♦Q | -2 | -1 |
| +0.5 | Round of 64 | CHINA OPEN TEAM 1 | 26 | 4♠ | ♥3 | +1 | +0 |
| +0.4 | Round of 64 | CHINA OPEN TEAM 1 | 2 | 4♠ | ♣Q | = | +11 |
| +0.1 | Round of 64 | CHINA OPEN TEAM 1 | 9 | 2♦ | ♣A | +2 | +7 |
| +0.1 | Round of 64 | CHINA OPEN TEAM 1 | 22 | 4♠ | ♥T | = | +3 |
| -0.1 | Round of 64 | CHINA OPEN TEAM 1 | 5 | 3NT | ♦J | -1 | +12 |
| -0.1 | Round of 64 | CHINA OPEN TEAM 1 | 16 | 3NT | ♠6 | +2 | +0 |
| -0.3 | Round of 64 | CHINA OPEN TEAM 1 | 1 | 3♠ | ♥2 | -1 | -8 |
| -0.3 | Round of 64 | CHINA OPEN TEAM 1 | 10 | 4♥ | ♦K | = | +0 |
| -0.7 | Round of 64 | CHINA OPEN TEAM 1 | 27 | 4♠ | ♦A | +1 | -1 |
| -1.5 | Round of 64 | CHINA OPEN TEAM 1 | 23 | 3♦ | ♥K | +1 | -10 |
| -1.7 | Round of 64 | CHINA OPEN TEAM 1 | 21 | 3♠ | ♥7 | = | -1 |
| -3.0 | Round of 64 | CHINA OPEN TEAM 1 | 4 | 3NT | ♠8 | +1 | -1 |
| -3.2 | Round of 64 | CHINA OPEN TEAM 1 | 13 | 3♥ | ♠5 | -1 | +6 |
| -4.0 | Round of 64 | CHINA OPEN TEAM 1 | 20 | 4♥ | ♥2 | = | -10 |
| -4.1 | Round of 64 | CHINA OPEN TEAM 1 | 6 | 1♠ | ♣T | = | -12 |
| -4.8 | Round of 64 | CHINA OPEN TEAM 1 | 11 | 3NT | ♠8 | +3 | -2 |
| -4.8 | Round of 64 | CHINA OPEN TEAM 1 | 24 | 2♠ | ♠7 | +2 | -7 |
| -7.1 | Round of 64 | CHINA OPEN TEAM 1 | 28 | 4♠ | ♦A | -2 | -11 |
| -7.9 | Round of 64 | CHINA OPEN TEAM 1 | 14 | 7♠ | ♣7 | = | +0 |
| -9.0 | Round of 64 | CHINA OPEN TEAM 1 | 17 | 4♠x | ♥A | +1 | -11 |