LENGY Assaf · EMERALD
vs par split: bidding -0.57 · play -0.45
Strength of schedule: opponents averaged +0.94/bd (a tough draw) → opponent-adjusted -0.27/bd
Card play — on target: opening leads 40.0% · declarer play 69.2% · defence 76.5%
| vs NT | vs a suit | |
|---|---|---|
| Opening leads | 25.0% (4) | 50.0% (6) |
| Declarer play | 75.0% (4) | 66.7% (9) |
| Defence | 80.0% (5) | 75.0% (12) |
Opening leads by suit led: ♠ 33.3% (3) · ♦ 60.0% (5) · ♣ 0.0% (2)
vs par by strain: NT +0.31 (13) · a suit -1.62 (29)
vs par by level: part-score -1.11 (18) · game -1.76 (21) · slam +4.67 (3)
By role: declaring -0.41/bd (-1.88 vs par · 25) · defending -2.38/bd (+0.23 vs par · 17)
By vulnerability: vulnerable -0.73/bd (+0.05 vs par · 21) · not vulnerable -1.68/bd (-2.10 vs par · 21)
By round↑ top
| Round | Partner | Opponents | Room | Bds | Butler | Avg | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Round of 64 | I.Bareket | T.Bessis – F.Volcker | Closed | 14 | -25.4 | -1.81 | -2.14 |
| Round of 64 | I.Bareket | T.Bessis – F.Volcker | Closed | 14 | -19.4 | -1.39 | -1.57 |
| Round of 64 | I.Bareket | F.Volcker – T.Bessis | Closed | 14 | -5.9 | -0.42 | +0.64 |
Every board — best Butler first↑ top
vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.
| Butler | Round | Opponents | Bd | Contract | Lead | Res | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +13.0 | Round of 64 | FROGS | 54 | 6♠ | ♥3 | = | +13 |
| +8.3 | Round of 64 | FROGS | 7 | 3NT | ♣3 | +1 | +1 |
| +2.9 | Round of 64 | FROGS | 4 | 1NT | ♦Q | -1 | +6 |
| +2.8 | Round of 64 | FROGS | 35 | 3♠ | ♥2 | = | +7 |
| +2.3 | Round of 64 | FROGS | 33 | 3♣ | ♠4 | = | +0 |
| +1.6 | Round of 64 | FROGS | 9 | 3NT | ♠J | = | +1 |
| +1.6 | Round of 64 | FROGS | 32 | 5♦ | ♥3 | -1 | -1 |
| +1.3 | Round of 64 | FROGS | 6 | 3♦ | ♠A | = | +0 |
| +1.1 | Round of 64 | FROGS | 55 | 3♥ | ♦K | +1 | -6 |
| +1.0 | Round of 64 | FROGS | 46 | 2♠ | ♦3 | -2 | -1 |
| +0.9 | Round of 64 | FROGS | 40 | 4♠ | ♥3 | +2 | +11 |
| +0.8 | Round of 64 | FROGS | 50 | 1NT | ♠3 | = | +5 |
| +0.5 | Round of 64 | FROGS | 3 | 1NT | ♥3 | -1 | +2 |
| +0.5 | Round of 64 | FROGS | 12 | 4♦ | ♠J | +1 | -10 |
| +0.3 | Round of 64 | FROGS | 52 | 4♠ | ♣9 | +2 | +1 |
| +0.2 | Round of 64 | FROGS | 5 | 2♠ | ♦K | -1 | -1 |
| +0.2 | Round of 64 | FROGS | 45 | 1NT | ♥Q | +1 | -1 |
| +0.2 | Round of 64 | FROGS | 53 | 3NT | ♠2 | +1 | +0 |
| +0.1 | Round of 64 | FROGS | 14 | 4♠ | ♥K | +1 | +0 |
| -0.1 | Round of 64 | FROGS | 38 | 4♥ | ♣6 | +1 | +0 |
| -0.2 | Round of 64 | FROGS | 29 | 4♠ | ♥K | = | +0 |
| -0.7 | Round of 64 | FROGS | 41 | 2♠ | ♥A | +2 | -1 |
| -0.9 | Round of 64 | FROGS | 30 | 4♠ | ♦Q | +1 | -1 |
| -1.1 | Round of 64 | FROGS | 34 | 6♠ | ♣7 | -1 | -10 |
| -1.1 | Round of 64 | FROGS | 47 | 1NT | ♣3 | = | -1 |
| -1.3 | Round of 64 | FROGS | 49 | 3♥ | ♠A | -1 | +8 |
| -1.8 | Round of 64 | FROGS | 56 | 3NT | ♣J | +1 | -1 |
| -2.3 | Round of 64 | FROGS | 36 | 3♣ | ♣2 | -2 | -5 |
| -3.2 | Round of 64 | FROGS | 1 | 1NT | ♠5 | +2 | -7 |
| -3.2 | Round of 64 | FROGS | 11 | 2♥ | ♣5 | -1 | -5 |
| -3.2 | Round of 64 | FROGS | 48 | 3NT | ♠3 | +3 | +12 |
| -3.4 | Round of 64 | FROGS | 51 | 4♠ | ♥A | = | -3 |
| -4.0 | Round of 64 | FROGS | 8 | 6♦ | ♠10 | = | +11 |
| -4.6 | Round of 64 | FROGS | 44 | 5♦x | ♥2 | -4 | -7 |
| -4.7 | Round of 64 | FROGS | 31 | 5♦ | ♠K | = | +0 |
| -4.7 | Round of 64 | FROGS | 39 | 4NT | ♠3 | -3 | -7 |
| -4.8 | Round of 64 | FROGS | 42 | 3NT | ♣2 | -2 | -6 |
| -7.1 | Round of 64 | FROGS | 43 | 3♥ | ♣A | = | -10 |
| -7.5 | Round of 64 | FROGS | 37 | 4♥x | ♠6 | -2 | -9 |
| -9.8 | Round of 64 | FROGS | 2 | 4♥ | ♦Q | = | -11 |
| -9.9 | Round of 64 | FROGS | 13 | 4♠ | ♦K | = | +0 |
| -10.7 | Round of 64 | FROGS | 10 | 5♦ | ♠A | -2 | -17 |