BAREL Michael · ROSENTHAL
vs par split: bidding -0.48 · play +0.00
Strength of schedule: opponents averaged +0.17/bd (a tough draw) → opponent-adjusted -0.10/bd
Card play — on target: opening leads 100.0% · declarer play 77.8% · defence 90.5%
| vs NT | vs a suit | |
|---|---|---|
| Opening leads | 100.0% (2) | 100.0% (9) |
| Declarer play | 100.0% (1) | 75.0% (8) |
| Defence | 75.0% (4) | 94.1% (17) |
Opening leads by suit led: ♠ 100.0% (3) · ♥ 100.0% (5) · ♦ 100.0% (1) · ♣ 100.0% (2)
vs par by strain: NT -1.56 (9) · a suit -0.18 (33)
vs par by level: part-score +0.05 (20) · game -0.53 (19) · slam -3.67 (3)
By role: declaring +0.63/bd (-1.14 vs par · 21) · defending -1.16/bd (+0.19 vs par · 21)
By vulnerability: vulnerable -0.69/bd (-1.29 vs par · 21) · not vulnerable +0.17/bd (+0.33 vs par · 21)
By round↑ top
| Round | Partner | Opponents | Room | Bds | Butler | Avg | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Round of 64 | M.Zur-Campanile | N.Frey – E.Mauberquez | Open | 14 | -11.2 | -0.80 | -1.00 |
| Round of 32 | M.Zur-Campanile | S.Auken – R.Welland | Open | 14 | +15.4 | +1.10 | +1.86 |
| Round of 16 | M.Zur-Campanile | S.Shan – L.Gan | Open | 14 | -15.3 | -1.09 | -2.29 |
Every board — best Butler first↑ top
vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.
| Butler | Round | Opponents | Bd | Contract | Lead | Res | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +10.2 | Round of 32 | NOLAND | 16 | 3♠x | ♥3 | = | +11 |
| +6.3 | Round of 64 | REESS | 22 | 4♠ | ♥A | +2 | +13 |
| +5.6 | Round of 32 | NOLAND | 26 | 4♠ | ♣A | = | +10 |
| +5.3 | Round of 64 | REESS | 25 | 4♥ | ♦2 | = | +0 |
| +5.1 | Round of 32 | NOLAND | 21 | 4♦ | ♠6 | +1 | +10 |
| +3.3 | Round of 32 | NOLAND | 19 | 3♠ | ♦K | +2 | +6 |
| +2.3 | Round of 16 | LU DONG | 19 | 2♥ | ♦6 | = | +11 |
| +2.1 | Round of 32 | NOLAND | 27 | 4♥ | ♠J | -1 | +4 |
| +2.1 | Round of 16 | LU DONG | 17 | 5♣ | ♠A | -2 | +5 |
| +1.8 | Round of 64 | REESS | 15 | 4♠x | ♥A | -2 | +0 |
| +1.8 | Round of 32 | NOLAND | 15 | 3♥ | ♠5 | = | +6 |
| +1.7 | Round of 64 | REESS | 19 | 3♦ | ♥A | = | +0 |
| +1.7 | Round of 64 | REESS | 24 | 2♠ | ♦9 | -2 | -1 |
| +1.3 | Round of 32 | NOLAND | 23 | 3NT | ♥5 | +2 | +1 |
| +1.1 | Round of 32 | NOLAND | 24 | 6NT | ♥3 | = | +0 |
| +0.9 | Round of 16 | LU DONG | 28 | 2♥ | ♦10 | = | -1 |
| +0.8 | Round of 32 | NOLAND | 20 | 4♠ | ♦A | = | +1 |
| +0.7 | Round of 16 | LU DONG | 16 | 4♠ | ♥A | = | +0 |
| +0.7 | Round of 16 | LU DONG | 25 | 1NT | ♣4 | = | -1 |
| +0.5 | Round of 32 | NOLAND | 18 | 3NT | ♠6 | = | -1 |
| -0.1 | Round of 16 | LU DONG | 21 | 4♥ | ♠J | +1 | -13 |
| -0.2 | Round of 64 | REESS | 23 | 4♠ | ♦K | +1 | +0 |
| -0.3 | Round of 16 | LU DONG | 24 | 2♣ | ♣3 | +2 | -1 |
| -0.7 | Round of 32 | NOLAND | 22 | 3♠ | ♥A | -1 | -2 |
| -0.8 | Round of 16 | LU DONG | 26 | 3♥ | ♦A | -2 | -2 |
| -1.2 | Round of 64 | REESS | 20 | 3NT | ♥9 | +3 | -1 |
| -1.2 | Round of 16 | LU DONG | 22 | 4♥ | ♣K | -1 | -5 |
| -1.3 | Round of 32 | NOLAND | 17 | 6♠ | ♥2 | +1 | -11 |
| -1.5 | Round of 16 | LU DONG | 18 | 2♦ | ♥9 | -1 | +1 |
| -1.7 | Round of 64 | REESS | 18 | 1NT | ♥6 | = | -5 |
| -2.2 | Round of 64 | REESS | 26 | 3♠ | ♣A | -1 | -5 |
| -2.3 | Round of 64 | REESS | 21 | 5♥ | ♠J | = | +0 |
| -2.3 | Round of 16 | LU DONG | 15 | 3♠ | ♥3 | -1 | -2 |
| -2.4 | Round of 64 | REESS | 27 | 1NT | ♣3 | +1 | +0 |
| -2.9 | Round of 64 | REESS | 17 | 2♥ | ♠Q | = | -5 |
| -3.7 | Round of 16 | LU DONG | 27 | 3NT | ♠8 | -3 | -6 |
| -4.6 | Round of 32 | NOLAND | 25 | 2♦ | ♣J | -2 | -8 |
| -6.0 | Round of 16 | LU DONG | 20 | 4♥x | ♣K | -1 | -7 |
| -6.1 | Round of 16 | LU DONG | 23 | 3♠ | ♥A | -1 | -11 |
| -6.3 | Round of 64 | REESS | 16 | 5♦ | ♥2 | -1 | -10 |
| -8.8 | Round of 64 | REESS | 28 | 7♣ | ♥6 | = | +0 |
| -9.8 | Round of 32 | NOLAND | 28 | 3NT | ♣4 | +2 | -1 |