LEWIS Linda · VEGAS STRONG
255rank
-17.0Butler · 28 bds
-0.61per board
±4.4swing
+0.32vs par /bd
-1.01adjusted /bd
by round
vs par split: bidding +0.54 · play -0.21
Strength of schedule: opponents averaged -0.40/bd (an easy draw) → opponent-adjusted -1.01/bd
Card play — on target: opening leads 80.0% · declarer play 77.8% · defence 86.7%
| vs NT | vs a suit | |
|---|---|---|
| Opening leads | 100.0% (1) | 75.0% (4) |
| Declarer play | · | 77.8% (9) |
| Defence | 75.0% (4) | 90.9% (11) |
Opening leads by suit led: ♦ 50.0% (2) · ♣ 100.0% (3)
vs par by strain: NT +2.40 (5) · a suit -0.13 (23)
vs par by level: part-score +2.67 (15) · game -2.38 (13)
By role: declaring -1.64/bd (-3.77 vs par · 13) · defending +0.29/bd (+3.87 vs par · 15)
By vulnerability: vulnerable -0.06/bd (+2.14 vs par · 14) · not vulnerable -1.15/bd (-1.50 vs par · 14)
By round↑ top
| Round | Partner | Opponents | Room | Bds | Butler | Avg | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Round of 64 | P.Lewis | J.Martel – C.Martel | Closed | 14 | -9.8 | -0.70 | +0.36 |
| Round of 64 | P.Lewis | G.Hampson – L.Pearlman | Open | 14 | -7.2 | -0.51 | +0.29 |
Every board — best Butler first↑ top
vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.
| Butler | Round | Opponents | Bd | Contract | Lead | Res | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +8.1 | Round of 64 | HAMPSON | 15 | 5♥x | ♣K | -1 | +11 |
| +5.7 | Round of 64 | HAMPSON | 4 | 2♦x | ♠8 | -1 | +8 |
| +4.9 | Round of 64 | HAMPSON | 5 | 3♠ | ♣J | +1 | +7 |
| +4.4 | Round of 64 | HAMPSON | 25 | 3♥ | ♦2 | -1 | +10 |
| +4.2 | Round of 64 | HAMPSON | 19 | 3♣ | ♦A | = | +6 |
| +3.5 | Round of 64 | HAMPSON | 8 | 5♦ | ♣A | +1 | -11 |
| +3.5 | Round of 64 | HAMPSON | 9 | 5♣ | ♦4 | -2 | +7 |
| +3.5 | Round of 64 | HAMPSON | 10 | 2♠ | ♦K | +1 | +1 |
| +2.2 | Round of 64 | HAMPSON | 26 | 3♠ | ♣A | -1 | +5 |
| +1.4 | Round of 64 | HAMPSON | 21 | 4♠ | ♣K | = | -1 |
| +1.1 | Round of 64 | HAMPSON | 16 | 2NT | ♠J | +2 | +6 |
| +0.2 | Round of 64 | HAMPSON | 23 | 4♠ | ♦K | +1 | +0 |
| -0.3 | Round of 64 | HAMPSON | 3 | 2♣ | ♦A | = | +2 |
| -0.8 | Round of 64 | HAMPSON | 20 | 3NT | ♠4 | +1 | -1 |
| -1.0 | Round of 64 | HAMPSON | 1 | 1NT | ♥3 | = | +2 |
| -1.0 | Round of 64 | HAMPSON | 17 | 2♥ | ♠Q | -1 | +2 |
| -1.3 | Round of 64 | HAMPSON | 12 | 3NT | ♣8 | +3 | +11 |
| -1.7 | Round of 64 | HAMPSON | 14 | 2♠ | ♥4 | = | +1 |
| -1.7 | Round of 64 | HAMPSON | 24 | 2♠ | ♦3 | -2 | +1 |
| -2.3 | Round of 64 | HAMPSON | 11 | 4♥ | ♦10 | = | -3 |
| -3.8 | Round of 64 | HAMPSON | 27 | 2♣ | ♠4 | -2 | -6 |
| -4.3 | Round of 64 | HAMPSON | 7 | 2♣ | ♥5 | -2 | -3 |
| -4.6 | Round of 64 | HAMPSON | 18 | 3♥ | ♦6 | +1 | -2 |
| -5.6 | Round of 64 | HAMPSON | 6 | 4♠ | ♦J | -1 | -10 |
| -6.2 | Round of 64 | HAMPSON | 2 | 3NT | ♣10 | = | -6 |
| -6.3 | Round of 64 | HAMPSON | 22 | 4♠ | ♥A | +2 | -13 |
| -8.2 | Round of 64 | HAMPSON | 13 | 4♥ | ♦8 | = | -1 |
| -10.6 | Round of 64 | HAMPSON | 28 | 5♣ | ♦5 | +2 | -14 |