LINDAHL Solbritt · BEAUTIFUL YAN
vs par split: bidding -0.93 · play -0.93
Strength of schedule: opponents averaged +0.42/bd (a tough draw) → opponent-adjusted -0.98/bd
Card play — on target: opening leads 100.0% · declarer play 75.0% · defence 72.7%
| vs NT | vs a suit | |
|---|---|---|
| Opening leads | · | 100.0% (4) |
| Declarer play | 100.0% (1) | 71.4% (7) |
| Defence | 0.0% (1) | 80.0% (10) |
Opening leads by suit led: ♦ 100.0% (2) · ♣ 100.0% (2)
vs par by strain: NT -6.67 (3) · a suit -1.28 (25)
vs par by level: part-score -2.58 (19) · game -1.71 (7) · slam +4.50 (2)
By role: declaring -1.85/bd (-3.88 vs par · 17) · defending -0.71/bd (+1.27 vs par · 11)
By vulnerability: vulnerable -1.07/bd (-1.79 vs par · 14) · not vulnerable -1.73/bd (-1.93 vs par · 14)
By round↑ top
| Round | Partner | Opponents | Room | Bds | Butler | Avg | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Round of 64 | G.Engebretsen | R.Ritmeijer – M.Ticha | Open | 14 | -12.4 | -0.89 | -2.14 |
| Round of 64 | G.Engebretsen | R.Van Prooijen – A.Wilson | Open | 14 | -26.8 | -1.91 | -1.57 |
Every board — best Butler first↑ top
vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.
| Butler | Round | Opponents | Bd | Contract | Lead | Res | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +6.5 | Round of 64 | WILSON | 25 | 6♣ | ♦A | -3 | +11 |
| +5.2 | Round of 64 | WILSON | 22 | 6♦ | ♥K | = | -2 |
| +2.5 | Round of 64 | WILSON | 9 | 2♥ | ♦Q | -1 | -2 |
| +2.5 | Round of 64 | WILSON | 15 | 4♠ | ♥A | -2 | +5 |
| +2.4 | Round of 64 | WILSON | 27 | 1NT | ♣3 | +1 | +0 |
| +2.3 | Round of 64 | WILSON | 11 | 4♥ | ♦10 | = | +3 |
| +2.2 | Round of 64 | WILSON | 26 | 2♠ | ♣A | -1 | +5 |
| +1.2 | Round of 64 | WILSON | 7 | 1♥ | ♥8 | = | -1 |
| +1.0 | Round of 64 | WILSON | 6 | 3♠ | ♥10 | = | +7 |
| +0.3 | Round of 64 | WILSON | 3 | 2♦ | ♣J | = | -2 |
| +0.2 | Round of 64 | WILSON | 12 | 4♠ | ♣J | +1 | -11 |
| +0.2 | Round of 64 | WILSON | 23 | 4♠ | ♦K | +1 | +0 |
| +0.1 | Round of 64 | WILSON | 13 | 2♥ | ♣4 | +2 | -10 |
| +0.0 | Round of 64 | WILSON | 1 | 2♥ | ♦K | -1 | -3 |
| -1.0 | Round of 64 | WILSON | 2 | 2♥ | ♥7 | = | -1 |
| -1.0 | Round of 64 | WILSON | 17 | 3♥ | ♠Q | -1 | +2 |
| -2.4 | Round of 64 | WILSON | 14 | 3♠ | ♣K | -1 | -5 |
| -2.5 | Round of 64 | WILSON | 19 | 3♦ | ♥A | +1 | -1 |
| -2.8 | Round of 64 | WILSON | 24 | 2♥ | ♦K | +1 | +0 |
| -2.9 | Round of 64 | WILSON | 8 | 5♦ | ♣A | = | +11 |
| -3.1 | Round of 64 | WILSON | 18 | 4♣ | ♣4 | -2 | +0 |
| -3.7 | Round of 64 | WILSON | 4 | 1NT | ♥K | +1 | -6 |
| -3.7 | Round of 64 | WILSON | 21 | 5♣x | ♥A | -1 | -6 |
| -4.4 | Round of 64 | WILSON | 10 | 2♠ | ♥3 | +2 | -2 |
| -5.6 | Round of 64 | WILSON | 5 | 3♠ | ♣J | = | -8 |
| -9.1 | Round of 64 | WILSON | 28 | 3NT | ♠2 | +4 | -14 |
| -10.8 | Round of 64 | WILSON | 16 | 2♠x | ♣K | -3 | -9 |
| -12.8 | Round of 64 | WILSON | 20 | 3♣ | ♠4 | -2 | -13 |