GEIGER Gen · JOHN VEGA
5rank
-48.0Butler · 20 bds
-2.40per board
±4.3swing
+0.00adjusted /bd
by round
Strength of schedule: opponents averaged +2.40/bd (a tough draw) → opponent-adjusted +0.00/bd
By role: declaring -2.71/bd (7) · defending -2.23/bd (13)
By vulnerability: not vulnerable -2.40/bd (20)
By round↑ top
| Round | Partner | Opponents | Room | Bds | Butler | Avg | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Final | T.Mchenry | J.Smith – J.Zaluski | Open | 10 | -29.0 | -2.90 | · |
| Final | T.Mchenry | M.Caley – P.Thurston | Closed | 10 | -19.0 | -1.90 | · |
Every board — best Butler first↑ top
vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.
| Butler | Round | Opponents | Bd | Contract | Lead | Res | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +6.0 | Final | CANADA | 14 | 3NT | ♠3 | +1 | · |
| +1.0 | Final | CANADA | 9 | 4♠ | ♦2 | = | · |
| -0.0 | Final | CANADA | 1 | 3NT | ♥3 | -1 | · |
| -0.0 | Final | CANADA | 4 | 4♥ | ♣Q | +1 | · |
| -0.0 | Final | CANADA | 8 | 4♠ | ♦2 | = | · |
| -0.0 | Final | CANADA | 10 | 4♠ | ♦3 | -1 | · |
| +0.0 | Final | CANADA | 11 | 3♥ | ♣K | -2 | · |
| +0.0 | Final | CANADA | 17 | 2♥ | ♦5 | +1 | · |
| +0.0 | Final | CANADA | 20 | 3NT | ♠10 | +2 | · |
| -1.0 | Final | CANADA | 7 | 2♠ | ♥3 | = | · |
| -1.0 | Final | CANADA | 12 | 2♠ | ♦5 | +1 | · |
| -2.0 | Final | CANADA | 13 | 6NT | ♥J | = | · |
| -2.0 | Final | CANADA | 18 | 1NT | ♦4 | -1 | · |
| -3.0 | Final | CANADA | 19 | 3NT | ♠7 | = | · |
| -4.0 | Final | CANADA | 3 | 2♠ | ♦2 | = | · |
| -4.0 | Final | CANADA | 5 | 3♠ | ♦3 | -1 | · |
| -5.0 | Final | CANADA | 15 | 3♥ | ♦A | = | · |
| -10.0 | Final | CANADA | 6 | 4♥ | ♦2 | = | · |
| -11.0 | Final | CANADA | 2 | 4♠ | ♦Q | -3 | · |
| -12.0 | Final | CANADA | 16 | 3NT | ♠5 | = | · |