THURSTON Paul · CANADA
1rank
+48.0Butler · 20 bds
+2.40per board
±4.3swing
+0.00adjusted /bd
by round
Strength of schedule: opponents averaged -2.40/bd (an easy draw) → opponent-adjusted +0.00/bd
By role: declaring +2.46/bd (13) · defending +2.29/bd (7)
By vulnerability: not vulnerable +2.40/bd (20)
By round↑ top
| Round | Partner | Opponents | Room | Bds | Butler | Avg | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Final | M.Caley | M.Lavine – J.Vega | Closed | 10 | +29.0 | +2.90 | · |
| Final | M.Caley | T.Mchenry – G.Geiger | Closed | 10 | +19.0 | +1.90 | · |
Every board — best Butler first↑ top
vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.
| Butler | Round | Opponents | Bd | Contract | Lead | Res | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +12.0 | Final | JOHN VEGA | 16 | 3NT | ♠5 | = | · |
| +11.0 | Final | JOHN VEGA | 2 | 4♠ | ♥5 | = | · |
| +10.0 | Final | JOHN VEGA | 6 | 4♥ | ♦9 | -1 | · |
| +5.0 | Final | JOHN VEGA | 15 | 3♥ | ♦A | = | · |
| +4.0 | Final | JOHN VEGA | 3 | 1NT | ♠4 | -1 | · |
| +4.0 | Final | JOHN VEGA | 5 | 2♠ | ♥8 | = | · |
| +3.0 | Final | JOHN VEGA | 19 | 3NT | ♠7 | = | · |
| +2.0 | Final | JOHN VEGA | 13 | 6NT | ♥J | = | · |
| +2.0 | Final | JOHN VEGA | 18 | 1NT | ♦4 | -1 | · |
| +1.0 | Final | JOHN VEGA | 7 | 3♣ | ♣10 | +2 | · |
| +1.0 | Final | JOHN VEGA | 12 | 2♠ | ♦5 | +1 | · |
| -0.0 | Final | JOHN VEGA | 1 | 3NT | ♦9 | -1 | · |
| -0.0 | Final | JOHN VEGA | 4 | 4♥ | ♣K | +1 | · |
| -0.0 | Final | JOHN VEGA | 8 | 4♠ | ♣10 | = | · |
| -0.0 | Final | JOHN VEGA | 10 | 4♠ | ♣4 | -1 | · |
| -0.0 | Final | JOHN VEGA | 11 | 3♥ | ♣K | -2 | · |
| -0.0 | Final | JOHN VEGA | 17 | 2♥ | ♦5 | +1 | · |
| -0.0 | Final | JOHN VEGA | 20 | 3NT | ♠10 | +2 | · |
| -1.0 | Final | JOHN VEGA | 9 | 4♠ | ♣10 | +1 | · |
| -6.0 | Final | JOHN VEGA | 14 | 3NT | ♠3 | +1 | · |