🇹🇼 CHU Chih-Wei · CHINESE TAIPEI
9rank
+5.9Butler · 12 bds
+0.49per board
±3.7swing
+0.42vs par /bd
-0.46adjusted /bd
by round
Strength of schedule: opponents averaged -0.95/bd (an easy draw) → opponent-adjusted -0.46/bd
Bidding activity — not a pass: 35.3% (12/34)
vs par by strain: NT +4.00 (1) · a suit +0.09 (11)
vs par by level: part-score -1.25 (4) · game +3.83 (6) · slam -6.50 (2)
By role: declaring +2.12/bd (+0.67 vs par · 6) · defending -1.13/bd (+0.17 vs par · 6)
By vulnerability: vulnerable +1.40/bd (+0.17 vs par · 6) · not vulnerable -0.42/bd (+0.67 vs par · 6)
By round↑ top
| Round | Partner | Opponents | Room | Bds | Butler | Avg | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Quarterfinal | S.Chen | A.Mehta – J.Narang | Open | 12 | +5.9 | +0.49 | +0.42 |
Every board — best Butler first↑ top
vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.
| Butler | Round | Opponents | Bd | Contract | Lead | Res | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +9.9 | Quarterfinal | 🇮🇳 INDIA | 26 | 4♠ | = | +11 | |
| +4.0 | Quarterfinal | 🇮🇳 INDIA | 36 | 1NT | -1 | +4 | |
| +2.1 | Quarterfinal | 🇮🇳 INDIA | 30 | 4♠ | = | +11 | |
| +1.1 | Quarterfinal | 🇮🇳 INDIA | 32 | 4♥ | = | +0 | |
| +0.9 | Quarterfinal | 🇮🇳 INDIA | 29 | 6♥ | -1 | -13 | |
| +0.4 | Quarterfinal | 🇮🇳 INDIA | 33 | 4♥ | -1 | +2 | |
| +0.0 | Quarterfinal | 🇮🇳 INDIA | 28 | 4♠ | +1 | +0 | |
| -0.6 | Quarterfinal | 🇮🇳 INDIA | 27 | 2♠ | +1 | -7 | |
| -1.0 | Quarterfinal | 🇮🇳 INDIA | 34 | 3♣ | +1 | -1 | |
| -1.4 | Quarterfinal | 🇮🇳 INDIA | 25 | 4♥ | +1 | -1 | |
| -4.1 | Quarterfinal | 🇮🇳 INDIA | 35 | 2♠ | +2 | -1 | |
| -5.4 | Quarterfinal | 🇮🇳 INDIA | 31 | 6♥ | = | +0 |