Salsoyouth 2022 — player statistics

Four double-dummy measures per player plus bidding activity, over every board they played, and an opponent-adjusted (strength-of-schedule) Butler. Each table lists all players and is sortable by any column. Double-dummy is idealised — the true best play needs all four hands — so read these as tendencies, not verdicts.

Butler vs double-dummy par↑ top

IMPs per board scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s minimax par — what real bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect double-dummy play. Players with few boards are greyed. Click a column header to sort; filter by name or team.

#PlayerTeamBoards/boardTotal
1G.GiubiloITALY U26 GREEN84+2.30+193.0
2H.LubaUSA U2656+1.52+85.0
3B.ZhuUSA U2656+1.52+85.0
4A.GaiottiITALY U26 GREEN84+1.12+94.0
5N.KhutorskyBRIDGENOOBS112+1.06+119.0
6A.ZeitakBRIDGENOOBS112+1.06+119.0
7Z.GrossackUSA U26112+0.50+56.0
8K.RosenbergUSA U26112+0.50+56.0
9E.HanssonBRIDGESTARS84+0.36+30.0
10C.MannBRIDGESTARS84+0.36+30.0
11J.FreemanBRIDGENOOBS112+0.06+7.0
12S.Van OostenBRIDGENOOBS112+0.06+7.0
13G.DonatiITALY U26 GREEN84-0.14-12.0
14S.ClementssonBRIDGESTARS84-0.90-76.0
15A.SandinBRIDGESTARS84-0.90-76.0
16S.ScataITALY U26 GREEN84-1.32-111.0
17F.KolesnikUSA U2656-1.34-75.0
18M.XuUSA U2656-1.34-75.0
19C.BensFRANCE U2228+0.86+24.0
20M.RochesFRANCE U2228+0.86+24.0
21K.ChanCUHK14+0.64+9.0
22S.LeeCUHK14+0.64+9.0
23I.StephaniREVOKESTARS28+0.54+15.0
24E.WoodREVOKESTARS28+0.54+15.0
25T.RodriguesINDIA28-0.57-16.0
26S.SarkarINDIA28-0.57-16.0
27P.BedouetFRANCE U2228-1.00-28.0
28E.ValletFRANCE U2228-1.00-28.0
29W.CheungCUHK14-1.86-26.0
30M.WuCUHK14-1.86-26.0
31L.BellicaudREVOKESTARS28-2.11-59.0
32R.GuthREVOKESTARS28-2.11-59.0
33T.HungCUHK28-2.21-62.0
34A.LamCUHK28-2.21-62.0
35T.ChowdhuryINDIA14-2.64-37.0
36PRAJJWAL -INDIA14-2.64-37.0
37J.PintoINDIA14-3.43-48.0
38D.SelvarajINDIA14-3.43-48.0

Opening-lead accuracy↑ top

How often a player’s opening lead held declarer to the same tricks as the best defensive lead double-dummy. Players with few boards are greyed. Click a column header to sort; filter by name or team.

#PlayerTeamLeadsOn targetConceded
1K.RosenbergUSA U262592.0%0.08
2S.Van OostenBRIDGENOOBS2889.3%0.11
3B.ZhuUSA U261788.2%0.12
4E.HanssonBRIDGESTARS2286.4%0.27
5A.GaiottiITALY U26 GREEN2982.8%0.21
6N.KhutorskyBRIDGENOOBS2882.1%0.25
7H.LubaUSA U261681.2%0.19
8C.MannBRIDGESTARS2181.0%0.19
9A.ZeitakBRIDGENOOBS4180.5%0.20
10M.XuUSA U261580.0%0.27
11Z.GrossackUSA U262277.3%0.27
12S.ScataITALY U26 GREEN1776.5%0.23
13S.ClementssonBRIDGESTARS2475.0%0.25
14G.DonatiITALY U26 GREEN2272.7%0.36
15A.SandinBRIDGESTARS1872.2%0.33
16F.KolesnikUSA U26771.4%0.29
17G.GiubiloITALY U26 GREEN1866.7%0.33
18J.FreemanBRIDGENOOBS2864.3%0.39
19P.BedouetFRANCE U226100.0%0.00
20K.ChanCUHK3100.0%0.00
21T.ChowdhuryINDIA1100.0%0.00
22T.HungCUHK8100.0%0.00
23R.GuthREVOKESTARS988.9%0.11
24E.ValletFRANCE U22887.5%0.12
25C.BensFRANCE U22785.7%0.14
26I.StephaniREVOKESTARS785.7%0.14
27M.RochesFRANCE U22683.3%0.17
28J.PintoINDIA580.0%0.20
29M.WuCUHK475.0%0.25
30T.RodriguesINDIA771.4%0.29
31E.WoodREVOKESTARS771.4%0.43
32PRAJJWAL -INDIA366.7%0.33
33L.BellicaudREVOKESTARS966.7%0.44
34S.SarkarINDIA666.7%1.17
35D.SelvarajINDIA450.0%0.75
36W.CheungCUHK540.0%1.40
37A.LamCUHK10.0%1.00

Declarer-play accuracy↑ top

How often declarer took at least the double-dummy makeable tricks after the actual opening lead — i.e. didn’t leave tricks on the table. Players with few boards are greyed. Click a column header to sort; filter by name or team.

#PlayerTeamContractsOn targetConceded
1B.ZhuUSA U269100.0%0.00
2H.LubaUSA U261492.9%0.07
3C.MannBRIDGESTARS1883.3%0.28
4N.KhutorskyBRIDGENOOBS2382.6%0.22
5E.HanssonBRIDGESTARS2382.6%0.22
6A.GaiottiITALY U26 GREEN2281.8%0.18
7F.KolesnikUSA U262181.0%0.19
8G.DonatiITALY U26 GREEN2680.8%0.23
9A.ZeitakBRIDGENOOBS2080.0%0.20
10S.ScataITALY U26 GREEN2080.0%0.25
11G.GiubiloITALY U26 GREEN1478.6%0.36
12M.XuUSA U261376.9%0.23
13S.ClementssonBRIDGESTARS2176.2%0.24
14A.SandinBRIDGESTARS2176.2%0.33
15Z.GrossackUSA U263775.7%0.32
16J.FreemanBRIDGENOOBS3473.5%0.29
17S.Van OostenBRIDGENOOBS2272.7%0.32
18K.RosenbergUSA U262867.9%0.32
19P.BedouetFRANCE U226100.0%0.00
20K.ChanCUHK5100.0%0.00
21S.LeeCUHK6100.0%0.00
22M.WuCUHK3100.0%0.00
23L.BellicaudREVOKESTARS4100.0%0.00
24I.StephaniREVOKESTARS988.9%0.22
25E.ValletFRANCE U22887.5%0.12
26C.BensFRANCE U22785.7%0.14
27T.ChowdhuryINDIA683.3%0.17
28R.GuthREVOKESTARS683.3%0.17
29S.SarkarINDIA977.8%0.22
30T.HungCUHK977.8%0.44
31D.SelvarajINDIA366.7%0.33
32M.RochesFRANCE U22862.5%0.50
33E.WoodREVOKESTARS560.0%0.40
34A.LamCUHK1060.0%0.60
35T.RodriguesINDIA650.0%0.50
36PRAJJWAL -INDIA450.0%0.50
37J.PintoINDIA250.0%0.50
38W.CheungCUHK20.0%1.00

Defensive accuracy↑ top

How often the defenders held declarer to the double-dummy makeable (or fewer) — charged to both defenders on the board. Players with few boards are greyed. Click a column header to sort; filter by name or team.

#PlayerTeamBoardsOn targetConceded
1F.KolesnikUSA U262290.9%0.09
2M.XuUSA U262290.9%0.09
3H.LubaUSA U263390.9%0.12
4B.ZhuUSA U263390.9%0.12
5S.ClementssonBRIDGESTARS4290.5%0.10
6A.SandinBRIDGESTARS4290.5%0.10
7Z.GrossackUSA U264785.1%0.15
8K.RosenbergUSA U264785.1%0.15
9N.KhutorskyBRIDGENOOBS6981.2%0.26
10A.ZeitakBRIDGENOOBS6981.2%0.26
11S.ScataITALY U26 GREEN3781.1%0.19
12A.GaiottiITALY U26 GREEN4780.9%0.19
13G.GiubiloITALY U26 GREEN4979.6%0.22
14G.DonatiITALY U26 GREEN3979.5%0.23
15J.FreemanBRIDGENOOBS5678.6%0.23
16S.Van OostenBRIDGENOOBS5678.6%0.23
17E.HanssonBRIDGESTARS4369.8%0.33
18C.MannBRIDGESTARS4369.8%0.33
19T.ChowdhuryINDIA4100.0%0.00
20PRAJJWAL -INDIA4100.0%0.00
21I.StephaniREVOKESTARS1492.9%0.07
22E.WoodREVOKESTARS1492.9%0.07
23W.CheungCUHK988.9%0.11
24M.WuCUHK988.9%0.11
25L.BellicaudREVOKESTARS1888.9%0.11
26R.GuthREVOKESTARS1888.9%0.11
27P.BedouetFRANCE U221485.7%0.14
28E.ValletFRANCE U221485.7%0.14
29C.BensFRANCE U221384.6%0.15
30M.RochesFRANCE U221384.6%0.15
31T.HungCUHK977.8%0.22
32A.LamCUHK977.8%0.22
33T.RodriguesINDIA1369.2%0.31
34S.SarkarINDIA1369.2%0.31
35K.ChanCUHK366.7%0.67
36S.LeeCUHK366.7%0.67
37J.PintoINDIA955.6%0.44
38D.SelvarajINDIA955.6%0.44

Strength of schedule — opponent-adjusted Butler↑ top

On every board a player meets a specific opposing pair, and strong opponents defend and bid well — which quietly depresses your cross-IMP. Opp /bd is the mean cumulative Butler of the pairs faced, i.e. the strength of the draw (+ tough, − easy). Adj /bd adds it back — a tough draw is credited, an easy one discounted — and Δ is the resulting move against the raw Butler order. Regulars only (≥ 40% of the boards). Click a column header to sort; filter by name or team.

#PlayerTeamBoardsOpp /bdRaw /bdAdj /bdΔ
1H.LubaUSA U2656+0.47+0.56+1.03▲7
2B.ZhuUSA U2656+0.47+0.56+1.03▲7
3F.KolesnikUSA U2656+0.39+0.59+0.98▲3
4M.XuUSA U2656+0.39+0.59+0.98▲3
5N.KhutorskyBRIDGENOOBS112-0.07+0.90+0.83▼3
6A.ZeitakBRIDGENOOBS112-0.07+0.90+0.83▼3
7G.GiubiloITALY U26 GREEN98-0.08+0.91+0.83▼6
8A.GaiottiITALY U26 GREEN98+0.19+0.52+0.70▲2
9Z.GrossackUSA U26112-0.22+0.69+0.47▼5
10K.RosenbergUSA U26112-0.22+0.69+0.47▼5
11G.DonatiITALY U26 GREEN98-0.22+0.41+0.19·
12S.ScataITALY U26 GREEN98+0.05+0.02+0.07▲4
13E.HanssonBRIDGESTARS98-0.21+0.05-0.15▲1
14C.MannBRIDGESTARS98-0.21+0.05-0.15▲1
15J.FreemanBRIDGENOOBS112-0.38+0.07-0.31▼3
16S.Van OostenBRIDGENOOBS112-0.38+0.07-0.31▼3
17S.ClementssonBRIDGESTARS98-0.14-0.89-1.03·
18A.SandinBRIDGESTARS98-0.14-0.89-1.03·