HU Xiao · PING AN CHINA
vs par split: bidding +0.09 · play -0.27
Strength of schedule: opponents averaged +0.24/bd (a tough draw) → opponent-adjusted -0.25/bd
Card play — on target: opening leads 72.2% #189 of 277 · declarer play 55.6% #257 of 277 · defence 84.8% #134 of 277
| vs NT | vs a suit | |
|---|---|---|
| Opening leads | 85.7% (7) | 63.6% (11) |
| Declarer play | 50.0% (2) | 57.1% (7) |
| Defence | 80.0% (10) | 87.0% (23) |
Opening leads by suit led: ♠ 100.0% (3) · ♥ 80.0% (5) · ♦ 71.4% (7) · ♣ 33.3% (3)
vs par by strain: NT +1.93 (14) · a suit -0.88 (42)
vs par by level: part-score -0.28 (25) · game -1.04 (27) · slam +6.25 (4)
By role: declaring -1.79/bd (-2.83 vs par · 23) · defending +0.41/bd (+1.67 vs par · 33)
By vulnerability: vulnerable -0.85/bd (-1.61 vs par · 26) · not vulnerable -0.19/bd (+1.07 vs par · 30)
By round↑ top
| Round | Partner | Opponents | Room | Bds | Butler | Avg | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Round 1 | Y.Huang | Y.Zhang – S.Tan | Closed | 7 | -18.8 | -2.69 | -2.43 |
| Round 2 | Y.Huang | Y.Li – J.Luo | Closed | 7 | -5.7 | -0.81 | -2.86 |
| Round 3 | Y.Huang | G.Manna – K.Samant | Closed | 7 | +4.9 | +0.70 | +1.57 |
| Round 4 | Y.Huang | G.Li – Q.Li | Closed | 7 | -8.5 | -1.21 | +0.57 |
| Round 5 | Y.Huang | A.Aydin – U.Suzer | Closed | 7 | +5.1 | +0.73 | +2.00 |
| Round 6 | Y.Huang | I.Ivanov – R.Gunev | Closed | 7 | -1.5 | -0.21 | -0.86 |
| Round 7 | Y.Huang | V.Yildiz – U.Tarhan | Closed | 7 | +0.3 | +0.04 | +1.00 |
| Round 8 | Y.Huang | J.Chen – C.Lin | Closed | 7 | -3.4 | -0.49 | -0.43 |
Every board — best Butler first↑ top
vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.
| Butler | Round | Opponents | Bd | Contract | Lead | Res | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +11.3 | Round 7 | TURKEY | 16 | 7♥x | ♦2 | -4 | +12 |
| +4.0 | Round 2 | GUANGZHOU PEARL RIVE | 9 | 3NT | ♣J | -1 | +6 |
| +3.7 | Round 6 | HAUGE | 9 | 5♣x | ♥2 | -1 | +0 |
| +3.7 | Round 6 | HAUGE | 10 | 3NT | ♠4 | -1 | +6 |
| +3.6 | Round 8 | CTBA | 27 | 4♠ | ♦Q | +1 | +1 |
| +3.5 | Round 7 | TURKEY | 15 | 4♠ | ♥2 | -1 | +12 |
| +3.2 | Round 5 | AYDIN | 4 | 4♠ | ♦K | -1 | +6 |
| +3.0 | Round 3 | PODDAR DEVELOPERS | 18 | 4♥ | ♦5 | -1 | +0 |
| +3.0 | Round 5 | AYDIN | 2 | 3♥ | ♠6 | -2 | +2 |
| +2.6 | Round 8 | CTBA | 24 | 4♠ | ♦4 | -1 | +5 |
| +2.5 | Round 3 | PODDAR DEVELOPERS | 17 | 4♠ | ♣8 | -1 | +8 |
| +2.4 | Round 2 | GUANGZHOU PEARL RIVE | 14 | 2♠ | ♦2 | +1 | +1 |
| +2.2 | Round 3 | PODDAR DEVELOPERS | 21 | 4♦ | ♣3 | -2 | +11 |
| +2.1 | Round 5 | AYDIN | 5 | 3♣ | ♥K | -2 | -6 |
| +2.0 | Round 2 | GUANGZHOU PEARL RIVE | 8 | 1NT | ♦J | +1 | +0 |
| +1.8 | Round 2 | GUANGZHOU PEARL RIVE | 12 | 5♦ | ♣2 | -2 | +0 |
| +1.8 | Round 5 | AYDIN | 3 | 3NT | ♥10 | = | +0 |
| +1.6 | Round 7 | TURKEY | 20 | 3♥ | ♦2 | -1 | +0 |
| +1.4 | Round 4 | HONG KONG HAI JIU | 23 | 2♣ | ♦5 | +2 | +0 |
| +1.3 | Round 7 | TURKEY | 19 | 2♥ | ♥2 | -2 | -1 |
| +1.1 | Round 6 | HAUGE | 8 | 2♥ | ♦Q | -1 | -2 |
| +0.8 | Round 8 | CTBA | 28 | 4♠ | ♣7 | = | +3 |
| +0.7 | Round 2 | GUANGZHOU PEARL RIVE | 11 | 3♠ | ♦2 | +1 | +2 |
| +0.6 | Round 3 | PODDAR DEVELOPERS | 15 | 4♥ | ♠10 | +2 | -11 |
| +0.6 | Round 4 | HONG KONG HAI JIU | 26 | 2♥ | ♣Q | = | +0 |
| +0.5 | Round 3 | PODDAR DEVELOPERS | 16 | 1NT | ♠4 | = | +8 |
| +0.4 | Round 1 | QINGDAO BRIDGE ASSOSIATION | 5 | 2♠ | ♠2 | -1 | +1 |
| +0.4 | Round 5 | AYDIN | 1 | 4♥ | ♠K | = | +1 |
| +0.2 | Round 1 | QINGDAO BRIDGE ASSOSIATION | 6 | 1NT | ♥4 | +1 | +10 |
| +0.2 | Round 4 | HONG KONG HAI JIU | 25 | 3NT | ♦4 | = | +0 |
| +0.2 | Round 8 | CTBA | 25 | 1NT | ♥4 | -1 | -1 |
| -0.0 | Round 6 | HAUGE | 14 | 2♥ | ♠Q | +1 | +1 |
| -0.4 | Round 4 | HONG KONG HAI JIU | 24 | 2♣ | ♠5 | -1 | +2 |
| -0.7 | Round 1 | QINGDAO BRIDGE ASSOSIATION | 3 | 2♠ | ♣K | -1 | +3 |
| -0.7 | Round 5 | AYDIN | 6 | 6NT | ♦Q | = | +11 |
| -1.1 | Round 4 | HONG KONG HAI JIU | 27 | 4♠ | ♣7 | +2 | +11 |
| -1.1 | Round 7 | TURKEY | 17 | 4♥ | ♦2 | -2 | -7 |
| -1.4 | Round 8 | CTBA | 23 | 3♣ | ♠K | = | +0 |
| -1.6 | Round 3 | PODDAR DEVELOPERS | 19 | 4♠ | ♦K | = | -6 |
| -1.8 | Round 6 | HAUGE | 12 | 4♥ | ♣2 | +1 | +0 |
| -2.3 | Round 1 | QINGDAO BRIDGE ASSOSIATION | 2 | 3♥ | ♣A | +1 | -10 |
| -2.3 | Round 3 | PODDAR DEVELOPERS | 20 | 2NT | ♦6 | +1 | +1 |
| -3.5 | Round 4 | HONG KONG HAI JIU | 28 | 4♠ | ♦K | -2 | -9 |
| -3.8 | Round 6 | HAUGE | 13 | 4♠ | ♥J | -1 | -5 |
| -3.9 | Round 1 | QINGDAO BRIDGE ASSOSIATION | 4 | 1NT | ♣K | +1 | -12 |
| -4.2 | Round 1 | QINGDAO BRIDGE ASSOSIATION | 1 | 3NT | ♦5 | +2 | -1 |
| -4.2 | Round 8 | CTBA | 22 | 2NT | ♠4 | -3 | -1 |
| -4.4 | Round 6 | HAUGE | 11 | 3♦ | ♣7 | -3 | -6 |
| -4.7 | Round 5 | AYDIN | 7 | 6♥ | ♣4 | = | +0 |
| -5.0 | Round 8 | CTBA | 26 | 2♠ | ♦5 | +2 | -10 |
| -5.7 | Round 4 | HONG KONG HAI JIU | 22 | 3NT | ♠2 | = | +0 |
| -6.7 | Round 2 | GUANGZHOU PEARL RIVE | 13 | 4♠ | ♦4 | +2 | -17 |
| -8.0 | Round 7 | TURKEY | 18 | 6♦ | ♦2 | = | +2 |
| -8.3 | Round 1 | QINGDAO BRIDGE ASSOSIATION | 7 | 5♥x | ♠A | -2 | -8 |
| -8.3 | Round 7 | TURKEY | 21 | 4♠ | ♦2 | +2 | -11 |
| -9.9 | Round 2 | GUANGZHOU PEARL RIVE | 10 | 4♥ | ♠K | -1 | -12 |