HU Jihong · HUANG LONG TEAM

261rank
-12.7Butler · 14 bds
-0.91per board
±5.4swing
-0.86vs par /bd
-0.74adjusted /bd
Butler per round: -10.7 -2by round

vs par split: bidding +0.29 · play -1.14

Strength of schedule: opponents averaged +0.17/bd (a tough draw) → opponent-adjusted -0.74/bd

Card play — on target: opening leads 75.0% · declarer play 50.0% · defence 88.9%

Card play by contract type — on target
vs NTvs a suit
Opening leads100.0% (1)66.7% (3)
Declarer play100.0% (1)0.0% (1)
Defence100.0% (2)85.7% (7)

Opening leads by suit led: ♠ 0.0% (1) · ♦ 100.0% (2) · ♣ 100.0% (1)

vs par by strain: NT +1.25 (4) · a suit -1.70 (10)

vs par by level: part-score +0.14 (7) · game -2.17 (6) · slam +0.00 (1)

By role: declaring +0.88/bd (-2.60 vs par · 5) · defending -1.90/bd (+0.11 vs par · 9)

By vulnerability: vulnerable +0.20/bd (+1.00 vs par · 7) · not vulnerable -2.01/bd (-2.71 vs par · 7)

By round↑ top

RoundPartnerOpponentsRoomBdsButlerAvgvs par
Round 3J.DaiY.Liu – Y.LiuOpen7-10.7-1.53+0.00
Round 4C.LooI.Coldea – B.MarinaOpen7-2.0-0.29-1.71

Every board — best Butler first↑ top

vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.

ButlerRoundOpponentsBdContractLeadResvs par
+10.3Round 4ROMANIA276♠♣4=+0
+8.0Round 3CHONGQINGBANNAN203NT♠9+1+11
+5.9Round 4ROMANIA232♥x♦6-2+8
+0.7Round 3CHONGQINGBANNAN213♣♥4+2+10
-0.2Round 4ROMANIA253NT♠J=+0
-0.6Round 4ROMANIA262♥♣2=+0
-1.6Round 3CHONGQINGBANNAN163♥♦J+1+6
-1.6Round 3CHONGQINGBANNAN194♠♦K=-6
-3.1Round 3CHONGQINGBANNAN183♥♠J=-6
-3.1Round 4ROMANIA242♦♠7=-5
-5.2Round 3CHONGQINGBANNAN152♥♠10+5-12
-5.8Round 4ROMANIA283NT♣3=-3
-7.9Round 3CHONGQINGBANNAN173NT♣Q=-3
-8.5Round 4ROMANIA224♥♦2-1-12