GONG Min · PHOENIX LEGEND

258rank
-12.6Butler · 14 bds
-0.90per board
±5.6swing
-2.29vs par /bd
-1.31adjusted /bd
Butler per round: -11.8 -0.8by round

vs par split: bidding -1.08 · play -0.46

Strength of schedule: opponents averaged -0.41/bd (an easy draw) → opponent-adjusted -1.31/bd

Card play — on target: opening leads 100.0% · declarer play 100.0% · defence 16.7%

Card play by contract type — on target
vs NTvs a suit
Opening leads100.0% (1)100.0% (2)
Declarer play100.0% (1)100.0% (2)
Defence0.0% (1)20.0% (5)

Opening leads by suit led: ♥ 100.0% (1) · ♣ 100.0% (2)

vs par by strain: NT +3.00 (3) · a suit -2.90 (10)

vs par by level: part-score -1.29 (7) · game +0.40 (5) · slam -13.00 (1)

By role: declaring +0.82/bd (-1.25 vs par · 8) · defending -3.20/bd (-3.67 vs par · 6)

By vulnerability: vulnerable -0.73/bd (-4.67 vs par · 6) · not vulnerable -1.02/bd (-0.50 vs par · 8)

By round↑ top

RoundPartnerOpponentsRoomBdsButlerAvgvs par
Round 2H.GeX.Chen – L.CaiClosed7-11.8-1.69-5.57
Round 6C.FengN.Banerji – BANERJI TAPAS KUMAROpen7-0.8-0.11+1.00

Every board — best Butler first↑ top

vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.

ButlerRoundOpponentsBdContractLeadResvs par
+10.2Round 6WEINSTOCK103NT♠2+1+11
+7.0Round 2COFCO YALONG BAY136♠♥4+1-13
+4.4Round 6WEINSTOCK144♠♦A-1+4
+2.9Round 6WEINSTOCK82♥♦K=+5
+0.9Round 2COFCO YALONG BAY81NT♠2=-1
+0.7Round 2COFCO YALONG BAY113♠♦7+1+2
-2.3Round 2COFCO YALONG BAY144♠♦J-1-4
-2.3Round 6WEINSTOCK95♣♦7-1+2
-2.5Round 6WEINSTOCK112NT♥3=-1
-3.0Round 6WEINSTOCK131♠♦Q+3-2
-3.1Round 2COFCO YALONG BAY123♦♣2=-5
-5.0Round 2COFCO YALONG BAY103♠x♥6-1-7
-10.0Round 2COFCO YALONG BAY94♠♣K+1-11
-10.5Round 6WEINSTOCK12Pass-12