🇺🇸 GONG Nathan · USA1
43rank
-25.1Butler · 14 bds
-1.79per board
±5.2swing
-0.50vs par /bd
-1.42adjusted /bd
by round
Strength of schedule: opponents averaged +0.37/bd (a tough draw) → opponent-adjusted -1.42/bd
Bidding activity — not a pass: 21.7% (10/46)
vs par by strain: NT +0.00 (2) · a suit -0.58 (12)
vs par by level: part-score -2.29 (7) · game +4.20 (5) · slam -6.00 (2)
By role: declaring +0.37/bd (+2.00 vs par · 3) · defending -2.38/bd (-1.18 vs par · 11)
By vulnerability: vulnerable -2.11/bd (-0.71 vs par · 7) · not vulnerable -1.47/bd (-0.29 vs par · 7)
By round↑ top
| Round | Partner | Opponents | Room | Bds | Butler | Avg | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Quarterfinal | A.Gong | R.Xiao – J.Yue | Open | 14 | -25.1 | -1.79 | -0.50 |
Every board — best Butler first↑ top
vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.
| Butler | Round | Opponents | Bd | Contract | Lead | Res | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +9.6 | Quarterfinal | 🇺🇸 USA2 | 35 | 4♥ | = | +10 | |
| +4.7 | Quarterfinal | 🇺🇸 USA2 | 29 | 5♥ | +1 | +11 | |
| +4.1 | Quarterfinal | 🇺🇸 USA2 | 39 | 5♥ | -2 | +0 | |
| +0.6 | Quarterfinal | 🇺🇸 USA2 | 38 | 3♥ | -1 | +1 | |
| -0.3 | Quarterfinal | 🇺🇸 USA2 | 41 | 3♦ | +1 | +0 | |
| -0.6 | Quarterfinal | 🇺🇸 USA2 | 30 | 3♦ | +1 | +0 | |
| -1.1 | Quarterfinal | 🇺🇸 USA2 | 42 | 3♥ | = | -1 | |
| -2.4 | Quarterfinal | 🇺🇸 USA2 | 36 | 3NT | = | +0 | |
| -3.6 | Quarterfinal | 🇺🇸 USA2 | 34 | 2♦ | = | -5 | |
| -4.6 | Quarterfinal | 🇺🇸 USA2 | 37 | 2♠ | = | -6 | |
| -7.1 | Quarterfinal | 🇺🇸 USA2 | 40 | 3NT | = | +0 | |
| -7.4 | Quarterfinal | 🇺🇸 USA2 | 31 | 6♠ | +1 | -1 | |
| -7.9 | Quarterfinal | 🇺🇸 USA2 | 33 | 6♠ | = | -11 | |
| -9.1 | Quarterfinal | 🇺🇸 USA2 | 32 | 3♦x | -3 | -5 |