HOU Xu · PD TIMES

50rank
+3.8Butler · 14 bds
+0.27per board
±4.5swing
-0.64vs par /bd
+0.46adjusted /bd
by round

vs par split: bidding -0.86 · play +0.21

Strength of schedule: opponents averaged +0.19/bd (a tough draw) → opponent-adjusted +0.46/bd

Card play — on target: opening leads 66.7% · declarer play 60.0% · defence 85.7%

Card play by contract type — on target
vs NTvs a suit
Opening leads50.0% (2)100.0% (1)
Declarer play50.0% (2)66.7% (3)
Defence100.0% (2)80.0% (5)

Opening leads by suit led: ♥ 0.0% (1) · ♣ 100.0% (2)

vs par by strain: NT +2.40 (5) · a suit -2.33 (9)

vs par by level: part-score -0.50 (2) · game +0.50 (10) · slam -6.50 (2)

By role: declaring +0.29/bd (-3.00 vs par · 7) · defending +0.26/bd (+1.71 vs par · 7)

By vulnerability: vulnerable +1.39/bd (-0.71 vs par · 7) · not vulnerable -0.84/bd (-0.57 vs par · 7)

By round↑ top

RoundPartnerOpponentsRoomBdsButlerAvgvs par
Round of 32Z.FuM.Szymanowski – P.BizonOpen14+3.8+0.27-0.64

Every board — best Butler first↑ top

vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.

ButlerRoundOpponentsBdContractLeadResvs par
+10.7Round of 32POLAND Seniors193NT♣Q-2+13
+3.5Round of 32POLAND Seniors284♠♥2-1+4
+3.1Round of 32POLAND Seniors236♠♥K=+0
+2.8Round of 32POLAND Seniors185♣♦3-1+5
+2.6Round of 32POLAND Seniors266♠♣J=-13
+0.5Round of 32POLAND Seniors161NT♥8+1-1
-0.2Round of 32POLAND Seniors273NT♥5=-1
-0.5Round of 32POLAND Seniors154♠♣2=+0
-0.5Round of 32POLAND Seniors225♣♠3=-1
-0.7Round of 32POLAND Seniors211NT♥4-1+0
-1.1Round of 32POLAND Seniors204♠♣6+1-1
-2.7Round of 32POLAND Seniors173NT♥6+1+1
-2.8Round of 32POLAND Seniors254♥♦6-1-5
-10.9Round of 32POLAND Seniors245♦x♥K=-10