BJERTNES Sten · NOTTEROY
vs par split: bidding -0.79 · play -1.93
Strength of schedule: opponents averaged -0.83/bd (an easy draw) → opponent-adjusted -4.08/bd
Card play — on target: opening leads 80.0% · declarer play 33.3% · defence 66.7%
| vs NT | vs a suit | |
|---|---|---|
| Opening leads | · | 80.0% (5) |
| Declarer play | · | 33.3% (3) |
| Defence | 66.7% (3) | 66.7% (6) |
Opening leads by suit led: ♦ 66.7% (3) · ♣ 100.0% (2)
vs par by strain: NT +1.00 (4) · a suit -4.20 (10)
vs par by level: part-score -4.14 (7) · game +0.67 (6) · slam -13.00 (1)
By role: declaring -2.20/bd (-5.20 vs par · 5) · defending -3.84/bd (-1.33 vs par · 9)
By vulnerability: vulnerable -2.19/bd (-1.14 vs par · 7) · not vulnerable -4.33/bd (-4.29 vs par · 7)
By round↑ top
| Round | Partner | Opponents | Room | Bds | Butler | Avg | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Semifinal | K.Kjernsrod | O.Gravraak – B.Tornberg Simonsen | Closed | 14 | -45.6 | -3.26 | -2.71 |
Every board — best Butler first↑ top
vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.
| Butler | Round | Opponents | Bd | Contract | Lead | Res | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +4.3 | Semifinal | SAGG | 18 | 3NT | ♦Q | +1 | +11 |
| +3.0 | Semifinal | SAGG | 21 | 2♥ | ♦5 | +1 | -10 |
| +0.7 | Semifinal | SAGG | 24 | 4♥ | ♦K | -2 | -5 |
| +0.0 | Semifinal | SAGG | 26 | 2♠ | ♦5 | -1 | +0 |
| -2.3 | Semifinal | SAGG | 17 | 4♠ | ♣A | +1 | +0 |
| -3.3 | Semifinal | SAGG | 28 | 3♦ | ♥Q | = | -1 |
| -4.0 | Semifinal | SAGG | 16 | 1NT | ♣10 | = | -6 |
| -5.0 | Semifinal | SAGG | 15 | 4NT | ♥J | +1 | -2 |
| -5.3 | Semifinal | SAGG | 23 | 3♥ | ♣A | +2 | +7 |
| -6.0 | Semifinal | SAGG | 19 | 3NT | ♦A | = | +1 |
| -6.0 | Semifinal | SAGG | 22 | 3♣ | ♣Q | +3 | -13 |
| -6.0 | Semifinal | SAGG | 27 | 2♥ | ♦A | +1 | -6 |
| -6.7 | Semifinal | SAGG | 25 | 4♠ | ♣6 | = | -1 |
| -9.0 | Semifinal | SAGG | 20 | 6♣ | ♠8 | -2 | -13 |