Tromso 2015 — Knockout IV
📅 27 June - 11 July 2015 · Tromso, Norway
🔗 Official site: db.eurobridge.org →
Knockout bracket↑ top
Tournament standings — final placement↑ top
Knockout event — places follow from the bracket: shared places (e.g. 5-8) are teams eliminated in the same phase; an unplayed decider leaves the place shared. Click a team for its players below.
Cumulative Butler by cross-IMPs. Each round's per-board Butler = mean cross-IMP vs that round's full field (raw / (N−1)), rounded to 0.1. Cumulative = sum of a player's per-board Butler over ALL played rounds ÷ total boards played, rounded to 0.01.
Rounds included so far (2 of 2): R1 R2. Columns SF·1… = each player's Butler total in that stanza (each knockout phase is played in segments); they sum to Total.
Cumulative Butler standings — all players↑ top
| Place | Player | Team | Boards | Total | Avg/bd | Trend | Qual. | SF·1 | SF·2 | F·1 | F·2 | F·3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | K.Aldeborg | TAKE | 70 | +120.7 | +1.72 | +100.1 | +42.6 | -6.9 | +26.0 | +21.0 | +38.0 | |
| 1 | K.Karlsson | TAKE | 70 | +120.7 | +1.72 | +100.1 | +42.6 | -6.9 | +26.0 | +21.0 | +38.0 | |
| 3 | G.Elmroth | TAKE | 70 | +100.9 | +1.44 | +87.6 | +41.8 | -25.9 | +26.0 | +21.0 | +38.0 | |
| 3 | L.Trapp | TAKE | 70 | +100.9 | +1.44 | +87.6 | +41.8 | -25.9 | +26.0 | +21.0 | +38.0 | |
| 5 | P.Sundseth | NOTTEROY | 14 | +19.7 | +1.41 | +46.3 | +19.7 | · | · | · | · | |
| 6 | A.Lorentzen | NOTTEROY | 28 | -8.4 | -0.30 | +39.4 | +18.4 | -26.8 | · | · | · | |
| 6 | T.Walle | NOTTEROY | 28 | -8.4 | -0.30 | +26.5 | +18.4 | -26.8 | · | · | · | |
| 8 | E.Bolviken | SORVOLL | 28 | -15.9 | -0.57 | +28.7 | -41.8 | +25.9 | · | · | · | |
| 8 | T.Clemetsen | SORVOLL | 28 | -15.9 | -0.57 | +28.7 | -41.8 | +25.9 | · | · | · | |
| 10 | O.Gravraak | SAGG | 70 | -57.8 | -0.83 | +86.7 | -18.4 | +45.6 | -26.0 | -21.0 | -38.0 | |
| 10 | B.Tornberg Simonsen | SAGG | 70 | -57.8 | -0.83 | +86.7 | -18.4 | +45.6 | -26.0 | -21.0 | -38.0 | |
| 12 | K.Kjernsrod | NOTTEROY | 28 | -25.9 | -0.93 | +44.3 | +19.7 | -45.6 | · | · | · | |
| 13 | P.Aronsen | SAGG | 70 | -77.9 | -1.11 | +12.9 | -19.7 | +26.8 | -26.0 | -21.0 | -38.0 | |
| 13 | P.Goldenheim | SAGG | 70 | -77.9 | -1.11 | +12.9 | -19.7 | +26.8 | -26.0 | -21.0 | -38.0 | |
| 15 | S.Koch | SORVOLL | 28 | -35.7 | -1.27 | +3.9 | -42.6 | +6.9 | · | · | · | |
| 15 | J.Sorvoll | SORVOLL | 28 | -35.7 | -1.27 | +3.9 | -42.6 | +6.9 | · | · | · | |
| 17 | S.Bjertnes | NOTTEROY | 14 | -45.6 | -3.26 | +13.5 | -45.6 | · | · | · | · |
Player statistics — leaders↑ top
Top 12 in each metric — or, with a team picked as ★ My team, that team’s players. Open the full player-statistics page for every player, sortable by any column — including an opponent-adjusted (strength-of-schedule) Butler. Double-dummy is idealised — the true best play needs all four hands — so read these as tendencies, not verdicts.
| # | Player | vs par |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | G.Elmroth | +2.01 |
| 1 | L.Trapp | +2.01 |
| 3 | O.Gravraak | +1.07 |
| 3 | B.Tornberg Simonsen | +1.07 |
| 5 | K.Aldeborg | -0.61 |
| 5 | K.Karlsson | -0.61 |
| 7 | P.Aronsen | -1.56 |
| 7 | P.Goldenheim | -1.56 |
| # | Player | on tgt |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | K.Aldeborg | 83.3% |
| 2 | K.Karlsson | 81.2% |
| 3 | P.Aronsen | 80.0% |
| 4 | P.Goldenheim | 75.9% |
| 5 | L.Trapp | 75.0% |
| 6 | B.Tornberg Simonsen | 71.4% |
| 7 | O.Gravraak | 63.2% |
| 8 | G.Elmroth | 61.1% |
| # | Player | on tgt |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | L.Trapp | 92.3% |
| 2 | K.Karlsson | 90.0% |
| 3 | G.Elmroth | 88.9% |
| 4 | O.Gravraak | 73.7% |
| 5 | P.Aronsen | 71.4% |
| 6 | K.Aldeborg | 62.5% |
| 7 | B.Tornberg Simonsen | 61.1% |
| 8 | P.Goldenheim | 60.0% |
| # | Player | on tgt |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | G.Elmroth | 86.7% |
| 1 | L.Trapp | 86.7% |
| 3 | O.Gravraak | 84.8% |
| 3 | B.Tornberg Simonsen | 84.8% |
| 5 | K.Aldeborg | 82.4% |
| 5 | K.Karlsson | 82.4% |
| 7 | P.Aronsen | 82.1% |
| 7 | P.Goldenheim | 82.1% |
Biggest swings — the wildest boards↑ top
Same deal, opposite fortunes: boards where the field’s cross-IMP Butler split the widest. Swing = the best NS result’s Butler minus the best EW result’s, in IMPs; the two columns show those poles (contract, score and Butler). Click a board for its full record.
| Board | Tables | Swing | Best for NS | Best for EW |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Semifinal · Bd 8 | 4 | 25.3 | 6♥ +100 NOTTEROY (+12.3) | 2♠x +1100 TAKE (+13.0) |
| Semifinal · Bd 5 | 4 | 24.0 | 3♣x +670 TAKE (+12.3) | 4♠ +420 TAKE (+11.7) |
| Semifinal · Bd 40 | 4 | 22.0 | 2♠x +1100 TAKE (+15.7) | 6NTx +200 TAKE (+6.3) |
| Semifinal · Bd 9 | 4 | 19.3 | 3NT +200 NOTTEROY (+11.3) | 4♠ +650 SORVOLL (+8.0) |
| Semifinal · Bd 13 | 4 | 19.3 | 6♠ +200 TAKE (+7.3) | 3NT +690 NOTTEROY (+12.0) |
| Semifinal · Bd 20 | 4 | 19.3 | 5♣x +750 SORVOLL (+10.3) | 6♣x +200 NOTTEROY (+9.0) |
| Semifinal · Bd 37 | 4 | 18.6 | 2♠ +110 NOTTEROY (+8.3) | 4♥ +620 TAKE (+10.3) |
| Semifinal · Bd 23 | 4 | 18.0 | 3NT +630 TAKE (+12.7) | 3♥ +200 NOTTEROY (+5.3) |
| Semifinal · Bd 18 | 4 | 16.3 | 3NT +630 SORVOLL (+4.3) | 3NT +100 SORVOLL (+12.0) |
| Semifinal · Bd 12 | 4 | 15.3 | 3NT +100 TAKE (+4.3) | 1NTx +480 TAKE (+11.0) |
| Semifinal · Bd 15 | 4 | 15.3 | 6♦ +50 SORVOLL (+10.3) | 4NT +460 SAGG (+5.0) |
| Semifinal · Bd 33 | 4 | 15.3 | 4♥ +100 SAGG (+5.0) | 4♥ +420 SAGG (+10.3) |
| Semifinal · Bd 3 | 4 | 14.7 | 4♠ +450 TAKE (+11.0) | 6♦ +50 TAKE (+3.7) |
| Semifinal · Bd 19 | 4 | 14.3 | 3♥ -140 SORVOLL (+7.3) | 3NT +630 SORVOLL (+7.0) |