Round 2 — BAM Teams
6 matches. → cumulative standings · → board records
Round 2 results↑ top
Every match of the round — teams, board-a-match points and VPs. Click a table number or ‘protocol’ for the full board-by-board scorecard below.
| Table | Home team | Visiting team | BAM (home) | BAM (visit) | VP (home) | VP (visit) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ARGENTINA | GREEN PRIMARY SCHOOL | 6 | 2 | 6.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 2 | CHINA WFL | CALIFORNIAN ACES | 2 | 6 | 2.00 | 6.00 | protocol → |
| 3 | ITALIA | CHINA SX CLUB | 6 | 2 | 6.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 4 | MIDNIGHT SUNS | VENEZUELA | 0 | 8 | 0.00 | 8.00 | protocol → |
| 5 | CHINA GIRLS SX CLUB | FCBC | 6 | 2 | 6.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 6 | CHINA QFL | WERNIS | 2 | 6 | 2.00 | 6.00 | protocol → |
Standings after round 2↑ top
Cumulative board-a-match points through round 2 — the league table as it stood after this round. → full standings, every round & players
| Place | Team | Pts | R2 | Pld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CALIFORNIAN ACES | 74.86 | 6.00 | 2 |
| 2 | VENEZUELA | 73.80 | 8.00 | 2 |
| 3 | ARGENTINA | 71.48 | 6.00 | 2 |
| 4 | ITALIA | 69.80 | 6.00 | 2 |
| 5 | CHINA GIRLS SX CLUB | 56.80 | 6.00 | 2 |
| 6 | WERNIS | 53.80 | 6.00 | 2 |
| 7 | CHINA SX CLUB | 51.80 | 2.00 | 2 |
| 8 | CHINA WFL | 50.80 | 2.00 | 2 |
| 9 | CHINA QFL | 44.80 | 2.00 | 2 |
| 10 | ZHIHAOLE SCHOOL | 37.60 | 4.80 | 2 |
| 11 | FCBC | 35.80 | 2.00 | 2 |
| 12 | GREEN PRIMARY SCHOOL | 32.60 | 2.00 | 2 |
| 13 | MIDNIGHT SUNS | 20.40 | 0.00 | 2 |
Board-a-match over this round's field — each pair's net boards won per board (2-0 win / 1-1 tie), shown as a board-a-match %.
Round 2 board-a-match standings↑ top
| Place | Player | Team | Boards | R2 | BAM% |
|---|
ARGENTINA vs GREEN PRIMARY SCHOOL 6 : 2 VP (match 10782) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ARGENTINA | GREEN PRIMARY SCHOOL | |
| 5 | 2♠ | N | ♦8 | -2 | 200 | 55% | 3NT | W | ♠4 | = | 400 | 77% | 2 | |||
| 6 | 3♠ | N | ♦Q | = | 140 | 100% | 4♥ | E | ♣6 | +2 | 680 | 95% | 2 | |||
| 7 | 5♣ | E | ♦2 | = | 600 | 59% | 3NT | E | ♥5 | +2 | 660 | 77% | 2 | |||
| 8 | 4♥ | N | ♠7 | -2 | 100 | 100% | 4♥ | N | ♠7 | -1 | 50 | 73% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.1 | NS-2.5 | 6 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 5 | 2♠ | N | -2 | 200 | 55% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | W | = | 400 | 77% | ||||
| 6 | 3♠ | N | = | 140 | 100% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | E | +2 | 680 | 95% | ||||
| 7 | 5♣ | E | = | 600 | 59% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | E | +2 | 660 | 77% | ||||
| 8 | 4♥ | N | -2 | 100 | 100% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | N | -1 | 50 | 73% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.1 | 6 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-2.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CHINA WFL vs CALIFORNIAN ACES 2 : 6 VP (match 10783) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHINA WFL | CALIFORNIAN ACES | |
| 5 | 3NT | W | ♠2 | = | 400 | 77% | 3NT | W | ♠7 | -1 | 50 | 77% | 2 | |||
| 6 | 4♥ | E | ♣A | +2 | 680 | 95% | 4♥ | W | ♠A | = | 620 | 55% | 2 | |||
| 7 | 3NT | W | ♠5 | = | 600 | 59% | 6♣ | W | ♣8 | = | 1370 | 95% | 2 | |||
| 8 | 3♥ | N | ♠7 | = | 140 | 59% | 4♥ | N | ♣3 | = | 420 | 91% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.1 | NS+0.4 | 2 | 6 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 5 | 3NT | W | = | 400 | 77% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | W | -1 | 50 | 77% | ||||
| 6 | 4♥ | E | +2 | 680 | 95% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | W | = | 620 | 55% | ||||
| 7 | 3NT | W | = | 600 | 59% | 2 | ||
| 6♣ | W | = | 1370 | 95% | ||||
| 8 | 3♥ | N | = | 140 | 59% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | N | = | 420 | 91% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.1 | 2 | 6 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
ITALIA vs CHINA SX CLUB 6 : 2 VP (match 10784) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ITALIA | CHINA SX CLUB | |
| 5 | 3NT | W | ♠3 | -2 | 100 | 100% | 3NT | W | ♠7 | = | 400 | 77% | 2 | |||
| 6 | 4♥ | W | ♠A | = | 620 | 55% | 4♠x | N | ♥A | -2 | 300 | 73% | 2 | |||
| 7 | 5♣ | W | ♣8 | = | 600 | 59% | 6♣ | W | ♣5 | = | 1370 | 95% | 2 | |||
| 8 | 3NT | S | ♠3 | = | 400 | 73% | 4♥ | N | ♦8 | -1 | 50 | 73% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.5 | NS-1.5 | 6 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 5 | 3NT | W | -2 | 100 | 100% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | W | = | 400 | 77% | ||||
| 6 | 4♥ | W | = | 620 | 55% | 2 | ||
| 4♠x | N | -2 | 300 | 73% | ||||
| 7 | 5♣ | W | = | 600 | 59% | 2 | ||
| 6♣ | W | = | 1370 | 95% | ||||
| 8 | 3NT | S | = | 400 | 73% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | N | -1 | 50 | 73% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.5 | 6 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
MIDNIGHT SUNS vs VENEZUELA 0 : 8 VP (match 10785) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MIDNIGHT SUNS | VENEZUELA | |
| 5 | 3NT | W | ♠10 | +1 | 430 | 100% | 2NT | W | ♣5 | = | 120 | 55% | 2 | |||
| 6 | 4♥ | E | ♣A | = | 620 | 55% | 4♥ | E | ♠4 | -1 | 100 | 91% | 2 | |||
| 7 | 3NT | W | ♠5 | +2 | 660 | 77% | 4♣ | W | ♠J | +1 | 150 | 86% | 2 | |||
| 8 | 4♥ | N | ♦8 | -1 | 50 | 73% | 4♥ | N | ♣2 | = | 420 | 91% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-2.1 | NS+2.5 | 0 | 8 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 5 | 3NT | W | +1 | 430 | 100% | 2 | ||
| 2NT | W | = | 120 | 55% | ||||
| 6 | 4♥ | E | = | 620 | 55% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | E | -1 | 100 | 91% | ||||
| 7 | 3NT | W | +2 | 660 | 77% | 2 | ||
| 4♣ | W | +1 | 150 | 86% | ||||
| 8 | 4♥ | N | -1 | 50 | 73% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | N | = | 420 | 91% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-2.1 | 0 | 8 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+2.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CHINA GIRLS SX CLUB vs FCBC 6 : 2 VP (match 10786) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHINA GIRLS SX CLUB | FCBC | |
| 5 | 3NT | W | ♣5 | -1 | 50 | 77% | 3NT | W | ♠7 | -1 | 50 | 77% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 6 | 4♥ | W | ♠A | = | 620 | 55% | 4♥ | W | ♠A | +1 | 650 | 82% | 2 | |||
| 7 | 5♣ | W | ♦2 | = | 600 | 59% | 5♣ | W | ♠10 | +1 | 620 | 64% | 2 | |||
| 8 | 4♥ | N | ♦2 | -1 | 50 | 73% | 4♥ | N | ♠7 | -1 | 50 | 73% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.2 | NS-0.8 | 6 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 5 | 3NT | W | -1 | 50 | 77% | 1 | 1 | |
| 3NT | W | -1 | 50 | 77% | ||||
| 6 | 4♥ | W | = | 620 | 55% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | W | +1 | 650 | 82% | ||||
| 7 | 5♣ | W | = | 600 | 59% | 2 | ||
| 5♣ | W | +1 | 620 | 64% | ||||
| 8 | 4♥ | N | -1 | 50 | 73% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♥ | N | -1 | 50 | 73% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.2 | 6 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CHINA QFL vs WERNIS 2 : 6 VP (match 10787) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHINA QFL | WERNIS | |
| 5 | 3NT | W | ♠7 | = | 400 | 77% | 2NT | W | ♥6 | -1 | 50 | 77% | 2 | |||
| 6 | 4♥ | W | ♦7 | = | 620 | 55% | 2NT | E | ♠3 | = | 120 | 82% | 2 | |||
| 7 | 6♣ | E | ♠3 | -1 | 100 | 100% | 2♣ | W | ♣8 | +3 | 150 | 86% | 2 | |||
| 8 | 3♥ | N | ♠7 | = | 140 | 59% | 4♥ | N | ♦2 | = | 420 | 91% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.5 | NS+2.7 | 2 | 6 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 5 | 3NT | W | = | 400 | 77% | 2 | ||
| 2NT | W | -1 | 50 | 77% | ||||
| 6 | 4♥ | W | = | 620 | 55% | 2 | ||
| 2NT | E | = | 120 | 82% | ||||
| 7 | 6♣ | E | -1 | 100 | 100% | 2 | ||
| 2♣ | W | +3 | 150 | 86% | ||||
| 8 | 3♥ | N | = | 140 | 59% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | N | = | 420 | 91% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.5 | 2 | 6 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+2.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|