Knockout event — places follow from the bracket: shared places (e.g. 5-8) are teams eliminated in the same phase; an unplayed decider leaves the place shared. Click a team for its players below.

Final placement
Place	Team
1	SCHNEIDER
2	SPECTOR
3	CHINA OPEN
4-7	SOFIA PESSOA
4-7	SHUGART
4-7	HUSSEIN
4-7	SHATO ROSENOVO

Cumulative Butler by cross-IMPs. Each round's per-board Butler = mean cross-IMP vs that round's full field (raw / (N−1)), rounded to 0.1. Cumulative = sum of a player's per-board Butler over ALL played rounds ÷ total boards played, rounded to 0.01.

Rounds included so far (3 of 3): R1 R2 R3. Columns QF·1… = each player's Butler total in that stanza (each knockout phase is played in segments); they sum to Total.

Round	Opponent	IMP	opp IMP
1	SOFIA PESSOA	33	31	protocol →
	Open NSM.Khven – J.Khokhlov -4.1 / 16 bdClosed EWA.Dubinin – A.Gromov +10.7 / 16 bd
1	SOFIA PESSOA	40	16	protocol →
	Open EWJ.Khokhlov – M.Khven +16.5 / 16 bdClosed NSA.Gromov – A.Dubinin +9.3 / 16 bd
2	SCHNEIDER	21	32	protocol →
	Open NSA.Gromov – A.Dubinin -11.4 / 16 bdClosed EWJ.Khokhlov – M.Khven -7.4 / 16 bd
2	SCHNEIDER	27	27	protocol →
	Open EWJ.Khokhlov – M.Khven +6.0 / 16 bdClosed NSA.Gromov – A.Dubinin -5.6 / 16 bd
Total IMP	121

Round	Opponent	IMP	opp IMP
1	SHATO ROSENOVO	52	21	protocol →
	Open EWH.Shi – Z.Zhuang +4.3 / 16 bdClosed NSJ.Dai – L.Yang +30.3 / 16 bd
1	SHATO ROSENOVO	25	4	protocol →
	Open NSJ.Dai – L.Yang +20.4 / 16 bdClosed EWJ.Zhao – Z.Fu +4.8 / 16 bd
2	SPECTOR	20	36	protocol →
	Open NSJ.Dai – L.Yang -8.8 / 16 bdClosed EWJ.Zhao – Z.Fu -12.5 / 16 bd
2	SPECTOR	38	33	protocol →
	Open EWH.Shi – Z.Zhuang -4.7 / 16 bdClosed NSZ.Fu – J.Zhao +7.0 / 16 bd
Total IMP	135

Round	Opponent	IMP	opp IMP
1	SCHNEIDER	57	43	protocol →
	Open NSC.Gower – Y.Levit -6.0 / 16 bdClosed EWT.Sadek – A.Hussein +18.3 / 16 bd
1	SCHNEIDER	10	38	protocol →
	Open NSC.Gower – Y.Levit -16.3 / 16 bdClosed EWA.Hussein – T.Sadek -19.1 / 16 bd
Total IMP	67

Round	Opponent	IMP	opp IMP
1	HUSSEIN	43	57	protocol →
	Open EWM.Lesniewski – P.Gawrys +6.0 / 16 bdClosed NSG.Baze – P.Schneider -18.3 / 16 bd
1	HUSSEIN	38	10	protocol →
	Open EWM.Lesniewski – P.Gawrys +16.3 / 16 bdClosed NSG.Baze – P.Schneider +19.1 / 16 bd
2	777	32	21	protocol →
	Open EWP.Gawrys – M.Lesniewski +11.4 / 16 bdClosed NSG.Baze – P.Schneider +7.4 / 16 bd
2	777	27	27	protocol →
	Open NSG.Baze – P.Schneider -6.0 / 16 bdClosed EWP.Gawrys – M.Lesniewski +5.6 / 16 bd
3	SPECTOR	38	5	protocol →
	Open NSM.Lesniewski – P.Gawrys +33.0 / 16 bdClosed EWP.Schneider – G.Baze +33.0 / 16 bd
3	SPECTOR	37	32	protocol →
	Open NSP.Gawrys – M.Lesniewski +5.0 / 16 bdClosed EWP.Schneider – G.Baze +5.0 / 16 bd
3	SPECTOR	18	33	protocol →
	Open EWP.Gawrys – M.Lesniewski -15.0 / 16 bdClosed NSG.Baze – P.Schneider -15.0 / 16 bd
Total IMP	233

Round	Opponent	IMP	opp IMP
1	CHINA OPEN	21	52	protocol →
	Open NSN.Barantiev – I.Peichev -4.3 / 16 bdClosed EWI.Bonev – V.Batov -30.3 / 16 bd
1	CHINA OPEN	4	25	protocol →
	Open EWI.Bonev – V.Batov -20.4 / 16 bdClosed NSI.Peichev – N.Barantiev -4.8 / 16 bd
Total IMP	25

Round	Opponent	IMP	opp IMP
1	SPECTOR	33	27	protocol →
	Open EWA.Zmudzinski – C.Balicki -4.2 / 16 bdClosed NSA.Robson – R.Shugart +8.5 / 16 bd
1	SPECTOR	0	39	protocol →
	Open NSC.Balicki – A.Zmudzinski -18.7 / 16 bdClosed EWR.Shugart – A.Robson -7.6 / 16 bd
Total IMP	33

Round	Opponent	IMP	opp IMP
1	777	31	33	protocol →
	Open EWJ.Castanheira – S.Costa Pessoa +4.1 / 16 bdClosed NSP.Goncalves Pereira – N.Paz -10.7 / 16 bd
1	777	16	40	protocol →
	Open NSN.Paz – R.Santos -16.5 / 16 bdClosed EWJ.Castanheira – S.Costa Pessoa -9.3 / 16 bd
Total IMP	47

Round	Opponent	IMP	opp IMP
1	SHUGART	27	33	protocol →
	Open NSR.Welland – B.Fallenius +4.2 / 16 bdClosed EWW.Spector – B.Bramley -8.5 / 16 bd
1	SHUGART	39	0	protocol →
	Open EWB.Fallenius – R.Welland +18.7 / 16 bdClosed NSC.Martel – M.Feldman +7.6 / 16 bd
2	CHINA OPEN	36	20	protocol →
	Open EWW.Spector – B.Bramley +8.8 / 16 bdClosed NSC.Martel – M.Feldman +12.5 / 16 bd
2	CHINA OPEN	33	38	protocol →
	Open NSR.Welland – B.Fallenius +4.7 / 16 bdClosed EWC.Martel – M.Feldman -7.0 / 16 bd
3	SCHNEIDER	5	38	protocol →
	Open EWW.Spector – B.Bramley -33.0 / 16 bdClosed NSR.Welland – B.Fallenius -33.0 / 16 bd
3	SCHNEIDER	32	37	protocol →
	Open EWC.Martel – M.Feldman -5.0 / 16 bdClosed NSB.Fallenius – R.Welland -5.0 / 16 bd
3	SCHNEIDER	33	18	protocol →
	Open NSC.Martel – M.Feldman +15.0 / 16 bdClosed EWR.Welland – B.Fallenius +15.0 / 16 bd
Total IMP	205

Cumulative Butler standings — all players↑ top

Place	Player	Team	Boards	Total	Avg/bd	QF·1	QF·2	SF·1	SF·2	F·1	F·2	F·3
1	J.Dai	CHINA OPEN	48	+41.9	+0.87	+30.3	+20.4	-8.8	·	·	·	·
1	L.Yang	CHINA OPEN	48	+41.9	+0.87	+30.3	+20.4	-8.8	·	·	·	·
3	P.Gawrys	SCHNEIDER	112	+62.3	+0.56	+6.0	+16.3	+11.4	+5.6	+33.0	+5.0	-15.0
3	M.Lesniewski	SCHNEIDER	112	+62.3	+0.56	+6.0	+16.3	+11.4	+5.6	+33.0	+5.0	-15.0
5	M.Feldman	SPECTOR	80	+23.1	+0.29	+7.6	·	+12.5	-7.0	-5.0	+15.0	·
5	C.Martel	SPECTOR	80	+23.1	+0.29	+7.6	·	+12.5	-7.0	-5.0	+15.0	·
7	G.Baze	SCHNEIDER	112	+25.2	+0.23	-18.3	+19.1	+7.4	-6.0	+33.0	+5.0	-15.0
7	P.Schneider	SCHNEIDER	112	+25.2	+0.23	-18.3	+19.1	+7.4	-6.0	+33.0	+5.0	-15.0
9	J.Khokhlov	777	64	+11.0	+0.17	-4.1	+16.5	-7.4	+6.0	·	·	·
9	M.Khven	777	64	+11.0	+0.17	-4.1	+16.5	-7.4	+6.0	·	·	·
11	B.Fallenius	SPECTOR	96	+4.6	+0.05	+4.2	+18.7	+4.7	·	-33.0	-5.0	+15.0
11	R.Welland	SPECTOR	96	+4.6	+0.05	+4.2	+18.7	+4.7	·	-33.0	-5.0	+15.0
13	A.Dubinin	777	64	+3.0	+0.05	+10.7	+9.3	-11.4	-5.6	·	·	·
13	A.Gromov	777	64	+3.0	+0.05	+10.7	+9.3	-11.4	-5.6	·	·	·
15	A.Robson	SHUGART	32	+0.9	+0.03	+8.5	-7.6	·	·	·	·	·
15	R.Shugart	SHUGART	32	+0.9	+0.03	+8.5	-7.6	·	·	·	·	·
17	H.Shi	CHINA OPEN	32	-0.4	-0.01	+4.3	·	-4.7	·	·	·	·
17	Z.Zhuang	CHINA OPEN	32	-0.4	-0.01	+4.3	·	-4.7	·	·	·	·
19	Z.Fu	CHINA OPEN	48	-0.7	-0.01	+4.8	·	-12.5	+7.0	·	·	·
19	J.Zhao	CHINA OPEN	48	-0.7	-0.01	+4.8	·	-12.5	+7.0	·	·	·
21	A.Hussein	HUSSEIN	32	-0.8	-0.03	+18.3	-19.1	·	·	·	·	·
21	T.Sadek	HUSSEIN	32	-0.8	-0.03	+18.3	-19.1	·	·	·	·	·
23	J.Castanheira	SOFIA PESSOA	32	-5.2	-0.16	+4.1	-9.3	·	·	·	·	·
23	S.Costa Pessoa	SOFIA PESSOA	32	-5.2	-0.16	+4.1	-9.3	·	·	·	·	·
25	N.Barantiev	SHATO ROSENOVO	32	-9.1	-0.28	-4.3	-4.8	·	·	·	·	·
25	I.Peichev	SHATO ROSENOVO	32	-9.1	-0.28	-4.3	-4.8	·	·	·	·	·
27	P.Goncalves Pereira	SOFIA PESSOA	16	-10.7	-0.67	-10.7	·	·	·	·	·	·
28	B.Bramley	SPECTOR	48	-32.7	-0.68	-8.5	·	+8.8	·	-33.0	·	·
28	W.Spector	SPECTOR	48	-32.7	-0.68	-8.5	·	+8.8	·	-33.0	·	·
30	C.Gower	HUSSEIN	32	-22.3	-0.70	-6.0	-16.3	·	·	·	·	·
30	Y.Levit	HUSSEIN	32	-22.3	-0.70	-6.0	-16.3	·	·	·	·	·
32	C.Balicki	SHUGART	32	-22.9	-0.72	-4.2	-18.7	·	·	·	·	·
32	A.Zmudzinski	SHUGART	32	-22.9	-0.72	-4.2	-18.7	·	·	·	·	·
34	N.Paz	SOFIA PESSOA	32	-27.2	-0.85	-10.7	-16.5	·	·	·	·	·
35	R.Santos	SOFIA PESSOA	16	-16.5	-1.03	-16.5	·	·	·	·	·	·
36	V.Batov	SHATO ROSENOVO	32	-50.7	-1.58	-30.3	-20.4	·	·	·	·	·
36	I.Bonev	SHATO ROSENOVO	32	-50.7	-1.58	-30.3	-20.4	·	·	·	·	·

Player statistics — leaders↑ top

Top 12 in each metric — or, with a team picked as ★ My team, that team’s players. Open the full player-statistics page for every player, sortable by any column — including an opponent-adjusted (strength-of-schedule) Butler. Double-dummy is idealised — the true best play needs all four hands — so read these as tendencies, not verdicts.

vs parfull table →

#	Player	vs par
1	J.Dai	+1.65
1	L.Yang	+1.65
3	M.Feldman	+1.39
3	C.Martel	+1.39
5	G.Baze	+0.43
5	P.Schneider	+0.43
7	J.Khokhlov	+0.16
7	M.Khven	+0.16
9	P.Gawrys	+0.09
9	M.Lesniewski	+0.09
11	A.Dubinin	+0.00
11	A.Gromov	+0.00
1	J.Dai	+1.65
1	L.Yang	+1.65
3	M.Feldman	+1.39
3	C.Martel	+1.39
5	G.Baze	+0.43
5	P.Schneider	+0.43
7	J.Khokhlov	+0.16
7	M.Khven	+0.16
9	P.Gawrys	+0.09
9	M.Lesniewski	+0.09
11	A.Dubinin	+0.00
11	A.Gromov	+0.00
13	B.Fallenius	-0.70
13	R.Welland	-0.70
15	B.Bramley	-0.79
15	W.Spector	-0.79
17	Z.Fu	-1.25
17	J.Zhao	-1.25
19	H.Shi	+0.66
19	Z.Zhuang	+0.66
21	N.Barantiev	+0.38
21	I.Peichev	+0.38
23	A.Robson	-0.25
23	R.Shugart	-0.25
23	C.Balicki	-0.25
23	A.Zmudzinski	-0.25
23	R.Santos	-0.25
28	N.Paz	-0.31
29	A.Hussein	-0.34
29	T.Sadek	-0.34
31	P.Goncalves Pereira	-0.38
32	J.Castanheira	-0.41
32	S.Costa Pessoa	-0.41
34	C.Gower	-0.44
34	Y.Levit	-0.44
36	V.Batov	-1.94
36	I.Bonev	-1.94

Opening leadsfull table →

#	Player	on tgt
1	B.Bramley	100.0%
1	W.Spector	100.0%
3	A.Dubinin	92.9%
4	L.Yang	90.0%
4	A.Gromov	90.0%
6	J.Dai	88.9%
7	B.Fallenius	87.5%
8	M.Lesniewski	87.5%
9	G.Baze	84.6%
10	R.Welland	83.3%
11	C.Martel	80.0%
12	J.Zhao	77.8%
1	B.Bramley	100.0%
1	W.Spector	100.0%
3	A.Dubinin	92.9%
4	L.Yang	90.0%
4	A.Gromov	90.0%
6	J.Dai	88.9%
7	B.Fallenius	87.5%
8	M.Lesniewski	87.5%
9	G.Baze	84.6%
10	R.Welland	83.3%
11	C.Martel	80.0%
12	J.Zhao	77.8%
13	M.Khven	75.0%
13	Z.Fu	75.0%
15	P.Gawrys	75.0%
16	P.Schneider	70.6%
17	M.Feldman	70.0%
18	J.Khokhlov	40.0%
19	H.Shi	100.0%
19	S.Costa Pessoa	100.0%
19	C.Balicki	100.0%
22	A.Hussein	85.7%
23	A.Robson	83.3%
24	Z.Zhuang	80.0%
24	N.Barantiev	80.0%
26	Y.Levit	75.0%
27	J.Castanheira	75.0%
28	I.Peichev	71.4%
28	I.Bonev	71.4%
30	A.Zmudzinski	70.0%
31	T.Sadek	66.7%
31	P.Goncalves Pereira	66.7%
31	R.Santos	66.7%
31	V.Batov	66.7%
35	N.Paz	60.0%
36	R.Shugart	55.6%
37	C.Gower	50.0%

Declarer playfull table →

#	Player	on tgt
1	J.Dai	100.0%
1	A.Gromov	100.0%
1	W.Spector	100.0%
4	J.Khokhlov	93.3%
5	C.Martel	93.3%
6	G.Baze	87.0%
7	J.Zhao	85.7%
8	A.Dubinin	77.8%
9	M.Feldman	76.5%
10	P.Gawrys	76.5%
11	B.Fallenius	75.0%
11	R.Welland	75.0%
1	J.Dai	100.0%
1	A.Gromov	100.0%
1	W.Spector	100.0%
4	J.Khokhlov	93.3%
5	C.Martel	93.3%
6	G.Baze	87.0%
7	J.Zhao	85.7%
8	A.Dubinin	77.8%
9	M.Feldman	76.5%
10	P.Gawrys	76.5%
11	B.Fallenius	75.0%
11	R.Welland	75.0%
13	M.Khven	72.7%
14	B.Bramley	71.4%
15	M.Lesniewski	71.4%
16	L.Yang	66.7%
17	P.Schneider	58.3%
18	Z.Fu	50.0%
19	Z.Zhuang	100.0%
19	C.Balicki	100.0%
19	I.Bonev	100.0%
22	Y.Levit	85.7%
23	I.Peichev	85.7%
24	A.Robson	83.3%
24	J.Castanheira	83.3%
26	H.Shi	80.0%
26	R.Santos	80.0%
28	S.Costa Pessoa	80.0%
29	N.Paz	77.8%
30	R.Shugart	75.0%
30	A.Zmudzinski	75.0%
32	C.Gower	75.0%
33	V.Batov	71.4%
34	A.Hussein	66.7%
35	N.Barantiev	60.0%
36	T.Sadek	50.0%
37	P.Goncalves Pereira	0.0%

Defencefull table →

#	Player	on tgt
1	Z.Fu	100.0%
1	J.Zhao	100.0%
1	B.Bramley	100.0%
1	W.Spector	100.0%
5	J.Khokhlov	95.5%
5	M.Khven	95.5%
7	M.Feldman	95.0%
7	C.Martel	95.0%
9	G.Baze	93.0%
9	P.Schneider	93.0%
11	B.Fallenius	92.9%
11	R.Welland	92.9%
1	Z.Fu	100.0%
1	J.Zhao	100.0%
1	B.Bramley	100.0%
1	W.Spector	100.0%
5	J.Khokhlov	95.5%
5	M.Khven	95.5%
7	M.Feldman	95.0%
7	C.Martel	95.0%
9	G.Baze	93.0%
9	P.Schneider	93.0%
11	B.Fallenius	92.9%
11	R.Welland	92.9%
13	P.Gawrys	90.0%
13	M.Lesniewski	90.0%
15	J.Dai	89.5%
15	L.Yang	89.5%
17	A.Dubinin	87.5%
17	A.Gromov	87.5%
19	A.Robson	100.0%
19	R.Shugart	100.0%
19	J.Castanheira	100.0%
19	S.Costa Pessoa	100.0%
19	N.Barantiev	100.0%
19	I.Peichev	100.0%
19	R.Santos	100.0%
19	V.Batov	100.0%
19	I.Bonev	100.0%
28	C.Balicki	91.7%
28	A.Zmudzinski	91.7%
30	H.Shi	90.9%
30	Z.Zhuang	90.9%
32	N.Paz	81.8%
33	A.Hussein	76.9%
33	T.Sadek	76.9%
35	C.Gower	71.4%
35	Y.Levit	71.4%
37	P.Goncalves Pereira	66.7%

Biggest swings — the wildest boards↑ top

Same deal, opposite fortunes: boards where the field’s cross-IMP Butler split the widest. Swing = the best NS result’s Butler minus the best EW result’s, in IMPs; the two columns show those poles (contract, score and Butler). Click a board for its full record.

Board	Tables	Swing	Best for NS	Best for EW
Semifinal · Bd 26	4	24.6	1Nx +1100 CHINA OPEN (+15.3)	3N +300 777 (+9.3)
Quarterfinal · Bd 6	8	23.3	6♠ +100 SHUGART (+10.4)	6♠ +1430 SOFIA PESSOA (+12.9)
Quarterfinal · Bd 4	8	20.0	3N +100 SCHNEIDER (+9.9)	2♣x +800 SHUGART (+10.1)
Quarterfinal · Bd 10	8	19.3	2♥ -110 CHINA OPEN (+6.7)	3♦x +1100 CHINA OPEN (+12.6)
Semifinal · Bd 6	4	18.7	5♣ +100 SCHNEIDER (+10.0)	5♣ +600 SCHNEIDER (+8.7)
Semifinal · Bd 29	4	18.4	4♠ +650 777 (+8.7)	4♠ +200 777 (+9.7)
Semifinal · Bd 22	4	17.3	4♠x +500 SPECTOR (+9.3)	2♠ +110 SPECTOR (+8.0)
Quarterfinal · Bd 26	8	16.2	3♦ +110 SCHNEIDER (+5.6)	4♥ +620 SCHNEIDER (+10.6)
Quarterfinal · Bd 32	8	16.0	3N +200 SOFIA PESSOA (+5.4)	3N +600 SOFIA PESSOA (+10.6)
Semifinal · Bd 13	4	16.0	3N +600 SCHNEIDER (+4.0)	3N +100 SCHNEIDER (+12.0)
Semifinal · Bd 19	4	16.0	2♥ +100 SCHNEIDER (+4.0)	3N +600 SCHNEIDER (+12.0)
Semifinal · Bd 12	4	15.0	3N +100 777 (+4.3)	3N +400 SPECTOR (+10.7)
Quarterfinal · Bd 23	8	14.8	3N +100 777 (+10.7)	3N +660 SPECTOR (+4.1)
Quarterfinal · Bd 12	8	13.7	4♠ +620 777 (+1.7)	6♠ +100 HUSSEIN (+12.0)

Stages

Tables

Rounds

Estoril 2005 — Knockout

Knockout bracket↑ top

Tournament standings — final placement↑ top

777 — results↑ top

CHINA OPEN — results↑ top

HUSSEIN — results↑ top

SCHNEIDER — results↑ top

SHATO ROSENOVO — results↑ top

SHUGART — results↑ top

SOFIA PESSOA — results↑ top

SPECTOR — results↑ top

Cumulative Butler standings — all players↑ top

Player statistics — leaders↑ top

Biggest swings — the wildest boards↑ top