Round 45 — BAM Kids Qualifier
13 matches. → cumulative standings · → board records
Round 45 results↑ top
Every match of the round — teams, board-a-match points and VPs. Click a table number or ‘protocol’ for the full board-by-board scorecard below.
| Table | Home team | Visiting team | BAM (home) | BAM (visit) | VP (home) | VP (visit) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CHINA RDFZ RED | GERMANY | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 2 | INDIA | CHINA RDFZ HOPE 3 | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 3 | ITALY | CHINA SHJS 1 | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 4 | POLAND | CHINA SHJS 2 | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 5 | CHINA SHJS 3 | SHENGXING JUPITER | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 6 | CHINA RDFZ HOPE 2 | SHENGXING GREEN | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 7 | NORWAY U16 | CHINA RDFZ YELLOW | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 8 | SHENGXING RED | AUVERGNE RHONE ALPES | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 9 | CHILE | TJ BRIDGE 2 | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 10 | CHINESE TAIPEI MLGS | SHENGXING YELLOW | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 11 | CHINA RDFZ HOPE 1 | SHENGXING MARS | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 12 | SHENGXING MERCURY | CHINA RDFZ BLUE | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 13 | TJ BRIDGE 1 | MAGIC EYES THAILAND | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
Standings after round 45↑ top
Cumulative board-a-match points through round 45 — the league table as it stood after this round. → full standings, every round & players
| Place | Team | Pts | R45 | Pld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | MAGIC EYES THAILAND | 173.80 | 4.00 | 45 |
| 2 | 🇳🇴 NORWAY U16 | 163.00 | 3.00 | 45 |
| 3 | SHENGXING MARS | 161.00 | 1.00 | 45 |
| 4 | 🇹🇼 CHINESE TAIPEI MLGS | 159.00 | 1.00 | 45 |
| 5 | SHENGXING MERCURY | 158.00 | 2.00 | 45 |
| 6 | SHENGXING YELLOW | 150.00 | 3.00 | 45 |
| 7 | 🇨🇳 CHINA RDFZ RED | 149.00 | 2.00 | 45 |
| 8 | 🇨🇳 CHINA SHJS 2 | 146.00 | 4.00 | 45 |
| 9 | 🇵🇱 POLAND | 144.00 | 0.00 | 45 |
| 10 | 🇨🇳 CHINA RDFZ YELLOW | 139.00 | 1.00 | 45 |
| 11 | AUVERGNE RHONE ALPES | 138.00 | 4.00 | 45 |
| 11 | 🇨🇳 CHINA RDFZ BLUE | 138.00 | 2.00 | 45 |
| 13 | 🇨🇳 CHINA RDFZ HOPE 1 | 137.00 | 3.00 | 45 |
| 13 | 🇨🇳 CHINA SHJS 3 | 137.00 | 3.00 | 45 |
| 15 | 🇮🇹 ITALY | 136.20 | 3.00 | 45 |
| 16 | 🇨🇳 CHINA SHJS 1 | 135.00 | 1.00 | 45 |
| 17 | 🇩🇪 GERMANY | 134.00 | 2.00 | 45 |
| 17 | SHENGXING JUPITER | 134.00 | 1.00 | 45 |
| 19 | SHENGXING RED | 132.00 | 0.00 | 45 |
| 20 | 🇨🇳 CHINA RDFZ HOPE 3 | 126.80 | 0.00 | 45 |
| 21 | SHENGXING GREEN | 116.00 | 0.00 | 45 |
| 22 | 🇨🇱 CHILE | 109.00 | 3.00 | 45 |
| 23 | TJ BRIDGE 1 | 107.00 | 0.00 | 45 |
| 24 | 🇮🇳 INDIA | 103.00 | 4.00 | 45 |
| 25 | 🇨🇳 CHINA RDFZ HOPE 2 | 102.00 | 4.00 | 45 |
| 26 | TJ BRIDGE 2 | 89.80 | 1.00 | 45 |
Board-a-match over this round's field — each pair's net boards won per board (2-0 win / 1-1 tie), shown as a board-a-match %.
Round 45 board-a-match standings↑ top
| Place | Player | Team | Boards | R45 | BAM% |
|---|
🇨🇳 CHINA RDFZ RED vs 🇩🇪 GERMANY 2 : 2 VP (match 55871) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHINA RDFZ RED | GERMANY | |
| 7 | 1NT | W | ♥3 | +2 | 150 | 82% | 4♠ | W | ♦Q | -2 | 200 | 98% | 2 | |||
| 8 | 3♠ | W | ♣A | -1 | 50 | 70% | 1♠ | W | ♣A | +1 | 110 | 70% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.0 | NS+0.6 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇨🇳 | 🇩🇪 | |||||||
| 7 | 1NT | W | +2 | 150 | 82% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | W | -2 | 200 | 98% | ||||
| 8 | 3♠ | W | -1 | 50 | 70% | 2 | ||
| 1♠ | W | +1 | 110 | 70% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.0 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
🇮🇳 INDIA vs 🇨🇳 CHINA RDFZ HOPE 3 4 : 0 VP (match 55872) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | INDIA | CHINA RDFZ HOPE 3 | |
| 7 | 4♠ | W | ♦Q | = | 620 | 62% | 4♠ | E | ♣J | +1 | 650 | 78% | 2 | |||
| 8 | 2♠ | W | ♣A | -2 | 100 | 84% | 1NT | W | ♥3 | -1 | 50 | 70% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.9 | NS-0.2 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇮🇳 | 🇨🇳 | |||||||
| 7 | 4♠ | W | = | 620 | 62% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | E | +1 | 650 | 78% | ||||
| 8 | 2♠ | W | -2 | 100 | 84% | 2 | ||
| 1NT | W | -1 | 50 | 70% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.9 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
🇮🇹 ITALY vs 🇨🇳 CHINA SHJS 1 3 : 1 VP (match 55873) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ITALY | CHINA SHJS 1 | |
| 7 | 3NT | W | ♥4 | +1 | 630 | 50% | 3NT | W | ♣4 | +1 | 630 | 50% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 8 | 1♠ | W | ♥5 | +1 | 110 | 70% | 2♠ | W | ♣A | +1 | 140 | 94% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.4 | NS-0.9 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇮🇹 | 🇨🇳 | |||||||
| 7 | 3NT | W | +1 | 630 | 50% | 1 | 1 | |
| 3NT | W | +1 | 630 | 50% | ||||
| 8 | 1♠ | W | +1 | 110 | 70% | 2 | ||
| 2♠ | W | +1 | 140 | 94% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.4 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.9 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
🇵🇱 POLAND vs 🇨🇳 CHINA SHJS 2 0 : 4 VP (match 55874) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | POLAND | CHINA SHJS 2 | |
| 7 | 4♠ | W | ♠5 | +1 | 650 | 78% | 4♠ | W | ♦Q | = | 620 | 62% | 2 | |||
| 8 | 1♠ | W | ♥5 | +1 | 110 | 70% | 1♦ | W | ♣A | -3 | 150 | 98% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.0 | NS+1.2 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇵🇱 | 🇨🇳 | |||||||
| 7 | 4♠ | W | +1 | 650 | 78% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | W | = | 620 | 62% | ||||
| 8 | 1♠ | W | +1 | 110 | 70% | 2 | ||
| 1♦ | W | -3 | 150 | 98% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.0 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CHINA SHJS 3 vs SHENGXING JUPITER 3 : 1 VP (match 55875) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHINA SHJS 3 | SHENGXING JUPITER | |
| 7 | 4♠ | W | ♣4 | +1 | 650 | 78% | 4♠ | W | ♠3 | +1 | 650 | 78% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 8 | 4♠ | W | ♣A | -2 | 100 | 84% | 2NT | N | ♥2 | -1 | 50 | 56% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.1 | NS-0.4 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 4♠ | W | +1 | 650 | 78% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♠ | W | +1 | 650 | 78% | ||||
| 8 | 4♠ | W | -2 | 100 | 84% | 2 | ||
| 2NT | N | -1 | 50 | 56% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.1 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CHINA RDFZ HOPE 2 vs SHENGXING GREEN 4 : 0 VP (match 55876) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHINA RDFZ HOPE 2 | SHENGXING GREEN | |
| 7 | 3NT | W | ♥3 | -2 | 200 | 98% | 4♠ | W | ♥2 | +1 | 650 | 78% | 2 | |||
| 8 | 1♦ | W | ♣A | -2 | 100 | 84% | 2♦ | N | ♠2 | -1 | 50 | 56% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.6 | NS-0.4 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 3NT | W | -2 | 200 | 98% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | W | +1 | 650 | 78% | ||||
| 8 | 1♦ | W | -2 | 100 | 84% | 2 | ||
| 2♦ | N | -1 | 50 | 56% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.6 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
🇳🇴 NORWAY U16 vs 🇨🇳 CHINA RDFZ YELLOW 3 : 1 VP (match 55877) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | NORWAY U16 | CHINA RDFZ YELLOW | |
| 7 | 3NT | W | ♣4 | = | 600 | 74% | 4♠ | W | ♦Q | +1 | 650 | 78% | 2 | |||
| 8 | 2♠ | W | ♣A | = | 110 | 70% | 2♠ | W | ♥5 | = | 110 | 70% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.1 | NS-1.0 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇳🇴 | 🇨🇳 | |||||||
| 7 | 3NT | W | = | 600 | 74% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | W | +1 | 650 | 78% | ||||
| 8 | 2♠ | W | = | 110 | 70% | 1 | 1 | |
| 2♠ | W | = | 110 | 70% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.1 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SHENGXING RED vs AUVERGNE RHONE ALPES 0 : 4 VP (match 55878) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SHENGXING RED | AUVERGNE RHONE ALPES | |
| 7 | 4♠ | W | ♥9 | +1 | 650 | 78% | 3NT | W | ♥8 | = | 600 | 74% | 2 | |||
| 8 | 2♠ | W | ♥9 | = | 110 | 70% | 3♠ | W | ♣4 | -1 | 50 | 70% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.0 | NS+0.9 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 4♠ | W | +1 | 650 | 78% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | W | = | 600 | 74% | ||||
| 8 | 2♠ | W | = | 110 | 70% | 2 | ||
| 3♠ | W | -1 | 50 | 70% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.0 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.9 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CHILE vs TJ BRIDGE 2 3 : 1 VP (match 55879) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHILE | TJ BRIDGE 2 | |
| 7 | 2NT | W | ♥6 | +1 | 150 | 82% | 4♠ | E | ♥Q | +1 | 650 | 78% | 2 | |||
| 8 | 2♠ | W | ♣A | +1 | 140 | 94% | 1♠ | W | ♣A | +2 | 140 | 94% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.2 | NS-1.4 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 2NT | W | +1 | 150 | 82% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | E | +1 | 650 | 78% | ||||
| 8 | 2♠ | W | +1 | 140 | 94% | 1 | 1 | |
| 1♠ | W | +2 | 140 | 94% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.2 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CHINESE TAIPEI MLGS vs SHENGXING YELLOW 1 : 3 VP (match 55880) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHINESE TAIPEI MLGS | SHENGXING YELLOW | |
| 7 | 3NT | W | ♣5 | -1 | 100 | 90% | 3NT | W | ♠4 | -1 | 100 | 90% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 8 | 3♠ | W | ♣A | = | 140 | 94% | 2♦ | W | ♣A | -3 | 150 | 98% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.1 | NS+1.8 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 3NT | W | -1 | 100 | 90% | 1 | 1 | |
| 3NT | W | -1 | 100 | 90% | ||||
| 8 | 3♠ | W | = | 140 | 94% | 2 | ||
| 2♦ | W | -3 | 150 | 98% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.1 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CHINA RDFZ HOPE 1 vs SHENGXING MARS 3 : 1 VP (match 55881) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHINA RDFZ HOPE 1 | SHENGXING MARS | |
| 7 | 4♠ | W | ♦Q | +1 | 650 | 78% | 4♠ | W | ♦Q | +1 | 650 | 78% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 8 | 2♦ | N | ♥6 | -1 | 50 | 56% | 1♠ | W | ♣A | +1 | 110 | 70% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.4 | NS-1.0 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 4♠ | W | +1 | 650 | 78% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♠ | W | +1 | 650 | 78% | ||||
| 8 | 2♦ | N | -1 | 50 | 56% | 2 | ||
| 1♠ | W | +1 | 110 | 70% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.4 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SHENGXING MERCURY vs CHINA RDFZ BLUE 2 : 2 VP (match 55882) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SHENGXING MERCURY | CHINA RDFZ BLUE | |
| 7 | 4♠ | W | ♠4 | = | 620 | 62% | 4♠ | W | ♣A | +1 | 650 | 78% | 2 | |||
| 8 | 1♠ | W | ♣A | +1 | 110 | 70% | 1♠ | W | ♣A | = | 80 | 52% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.2 | NS-0.6 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 4♠ | W | = | 620 | 62% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | W | +1 | 650 | 78% | ||||
| 8 | 1♠ | W | +1 | 110 | 70% | 2 | ||
| 1♠ | W | = | 80 | 52% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.2 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
TJ BRIDGE 1 vs MAGIC EYES THAILAND 0 : 4 VP (match 55883) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | TJ BRIDGE 1 | MAGIC EYES THAILAND | |
| 7 | 4♠ | W | ♥3 | +1 | 650 | 78% | 4♠ | E | ♥Q | = | 620 | 62% | 2 | |||
| 8 | 1♦ | W | ♠4 | -1 | 50 | 70% | 2NT | S | ♠Q | = | 120 | 92% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.2 | NS+1.1 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 4♠ | W | +1 | 650 | 78% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | E | = | 620 | 62% | ||||
| 8 | 1♦ | W | -1 | 50 | 70% | 2 | ||
| 2NT | S | = | 120 | 92% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.2 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|