Round 7 — BAM Final B
17 matches. → cumulative standings · → board records
Round 7 results↑ top
Every match of the round — teams, board-a-match points and VPs. Click a table number or ‘protocol’ for the full board-by-board scorecard below.
| Table | Home team | Visiting team | BAM (home) | BAM (visit) | VP (home) | VP (visit) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | INDIA U21 | PRISM FALCONS | 0 | 0 | 2.40 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 2 | BELGIUM | 50 50 | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 3 | HAPPY BRIDGE | SXSPARK | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 4 | INDIA U16 | ITALIA U26W | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 5 | AZS WRATISLAVIA | DABROWKA | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 6 | ZHIHAOLE | CAPRISUN | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 7 | SERBIA U26W | ITALIA 2 | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 8 | HONG KONG | INDIA-B U26 | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 9 | SHSLLS1 | SXTULIP | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 10 | SERBIA U21 | FRANCE FUNBRIDGE | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 11 | CROATIA | CROATIA U16 | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 12 | CHILE U26W | MAN EATING COBRAS | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 13 | JAPAN U21 | URUGUAY | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 14 | CHINA RDFZ HOPE | RDFZ ZHIHAOLE | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 15 | CHILE | EYE OF THE TIGER | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 16 | RDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT | TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 17 | DABROWKA PO | POLAND KIDS | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
Standings after round 7↑ top
Cumulative board-a-match points through round 7 — the league table as it stood after this round. → full standings, every round & players
| Place | Team | Pts | R7 | Pld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CROATIA | 21.00 | 4.00 | 7 |
| 2 | JAPAN U21 | 20.94 | 2.00 | 7 |
| 3 | ITALIA U26W | 20.79 | 0.00 | 7 |
| 4 | HONG KONG | 20.48 | 2.00 | 7 |
| 5 | INDIA-B U26 | 19.85 | 2.00 | 7 |
| 6 | FRANCE FUNBRIDGE | 18.91 | 1.00 | 7 |
| 7 | ITALIA 2 | 18.85 | 2.00 | 7 |
| 8 | SHSLLS1 | 18.67 | 2.00 | 7 |
| 9 | SXSPARK | 17.76 | 2.00 | 7 |
| 10 | BELGIUM | 17.00 | 4.00 | 7 |
| 11 | SXTULIP | 16.58 | 2.00 | 7 |
| 12 | URUGUAY | 16.21 | 2.00 | 7 |
| 13 | DABROWKA | 16.04 | 4.00 | 7 |
| 14 | SERBIA U21 | 15.97 | 3.00 | 7 |
| 15 | AZS WRATISLAVIA | 15.88 | 0.00 | 7 |
| 16 | EYE OF THE TIGER | 15.73 | 2.00 | 7 |
| 17 | POLAND KIDS | 15.52 | 2.00 | 7 |
| 18 | RDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT | 14.82 | 4.00 | 7 |
| 19 | CHILE | 14.76 | 2.00 | 7 |
| 20 | SERBIA U26W | 14.33 | 2.00 | 7 |
| 21 | INDIA U16 | 12.67 | 4.00 | 7 |
| 22 | 50 50 | 12.58 | 0.00 | 7 |
| 23 | RDFZ ZHIHAOLE | 12.39 | 3.00 | 7 |
| 24 | CHINA RDFZ HOPE | 12.09 | 1.00 | 7 |
| 25 | MAN EATING COBRAS | 11.55 | 1.00 | 7 |
| 26 | CAPRISUN | 11.52 | 1.00 | 7 |
| 27 | CHILE U26W | 10.61 | 3.00 | 7 |
| 28 | HAPPY BRIDGE | 10.24 | 2.00 | 7 |
| 29 | INDIA U21 | 9.82 | 2.40 | 7 |
| 30 | DABROWKA PO | 7.70 | 2.00 | 7 |
| 31 | TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL | 7.06 | 0.00 | 7 |
| 32 | ZHIHAOLE | 6.30 | 3.00 | 7 |
| 33 | CROATIA U16 | 6.15 | 0.00 | 7 |
| 34 | PRISM FALCONS | 0.00 | 0.00 | 7 |
Board-a-match over this round's field — each pair's net boards won per board (2-0 win / 1-1 tie), shown as a board-a-match %.
Round 7 board-a-match standings↑ top
| Place | Player | Team | Boards | R7 | BAM% |
|---|
INDIA U21 vs PRISM FALCONS 2.4 : 0 VP (match 85048)↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | INDIA U21 | PRISM FALCONS | |
| – | — | – | — | |||||||||||||
| – | — | – | — | |||||||||||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS0.0 | NS0.0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| – | ||||||||
| – | ||||||||
| – | ||||||||
| – | ||||||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS0.0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BELGIUM vs 50 50 4 : 0 VP (match 85049) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BELGIUM | 50 50 | |
| 6♦x | W | ♠T | -1 | 200 | 92% | 5♥x | N | ♠A | -3 | 800 | 97% | 2 | ||||
| 3♠ | W | ♣4 | -1 | 50 | 86% | 2♥x | S | ♣A | -2 | 300 | 74% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.5 | NS-0.5 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 6♦x | W | -1 | 200 | 92% | 2 | |||
| 5♥x | N | -3 | 800 | 97% | ||||
| 3♠ | W | -1 | 50 | 86% | 2 | |||
| 2♥x | S | -2 | 300 | 74% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.5 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
HAPPY BRIDGE vs SXSPARK 2 : 2 VP (match 85050) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | HAPPY BRIDGE | SXSPARK | |
| 5♦ | W | ♥T | = | 600 | 84% | 4♥x | N | ♠K | -1 | 200 | 52% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | E | ♣T | +2 | 460 | 64% | 3N | E | ♥5 | +3 | 490 | 87% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.0 | NS-0.7 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 5♦ | W | = | 600 | 84% | 2 | |||
| 4♥x | N | -1 | 200 | 52% | ||||
| 3N | E | +2 | 460 | 64% | 2 | |||
| 3N | E | +3 | 490 | 87% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.0 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
INDIA U16 vs ITALIA U26W 4 : 0 VP (match 85051) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | INDIA U16 | ITALIA U26W | |
| 4♠ | W | ♦A | -2 | 200 | 92% | 4♥ | N | ♠A | -1 | 100 | 63% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | E | ♣T | +2 | 460 | 64% | 3N | E | ♥8 | +3 | 490 | 87% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.5 | NS-0.5 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♠ | W | -2 | 200 | 92% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | N | -1 | 100 | 63% | ||||
| 3N | E | +2 | 460 | 64% | 2 | |||
| 3N | E | +3 | 490 | 87% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.5 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
AZS WRATISLAVIA vs DABROWKA 0 : 4 VP (match 85052) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | AZS WRATISLAVIA | DABROWKA | |
| 5♥x | S | ♠Q | -2 | 500 | 66% | 6♦ | W | ♥T | -1 | 100 | 76% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | E | ♥7 | +3 | 490 | 87% | 6♦x | E | ♠A | -1 | 100 | 94% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.1 | NS+1.4 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 5♥x | S | -2 | 500 | 66% | 2 | |||
| 6♦ | W | -1 | 100 | 76% | ||||
| 3N | E | +3 | 490 | 87% | 2 | |||
| 6♦x | E | -1 | 100 | 94% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.1 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
ZHIHAOLE vs CAPRISUN 3 : 1 VP (match 85053) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ZHIHAOLE | CAPRISUN | |
| 5♣ | E | ♦7 | -1 | 100 | 76% | 6♦ | E | ♣Q | -1 | 100 | 76% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 3N | E | ♣T | = | 400 | 68% | 3N | E | ♥5 | +1 | 430 | 52% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.9 | NS+0.5 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 5♣ | E | -1 | 100 | 76% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 6♦ | E | -1 | 100 | 76% | ||||
| 3N | E | = | 400 | 68% | 2 | |||
| 3N | E | +1 | 430 | 52% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.9 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SERBIA U26W vs ITALIA 2 2 : 2 VP (match 85054) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SERBIA U26W | ITALIA 2 | |
| 5♥x | N | ♠A | -2 | 500 | 66% | 4♥x | N | ♠A | -1 | 200 | 52% | 2 | ||||
| 5♦ | E | ♣T | +1 | 420 | 61% | 3N | E | ♥3 | +2 | 460 | 64% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.1 | NS-0.3 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 5♥x | N | -2 | 500 | 66% | 2 | |||
| 4♥x | N | -1 | 200 | 52% | ||||
| 5♦ | E | +1 | 420 | 61% | 2 | |||
| 3N | E | +2 | 460 | 64% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.1 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
HONG KONG vs INDIA-B U26 2 : 2 VP (match 85055) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | HONG KONG | INDIA-B U26 | |
| 5♦ | W | ♥T | = | 600 | 84% | 6♦ | E | ♥A | -1 | 100 | 76% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | E | ♠2 | -1 | 50 | 86% | 3N | W | ♣3 | = | 400 | 68% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.0 | NS+0.9 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 5♦ | W | = | 600 | 84% | 2 | |||
| 6♦ | E | -1 | 100 | 76% | ||||
| 3N | E | -1 | 50 | 86% | 2 | |||
| 3N | W | = | 400 | 68% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.0 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.9 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SHSLLS1 vs SXTULIP 2 : 2 VP (match 85056) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SHSLLS1 | SXTULIP | |
| 3♥ | N | ♠A | = | 140 | 87% | 4♥x | N | ♠A | -1 | 200 | 52% | 2 | ||||
| 4N | E | ♥5 | +2 | 490 | 87% | 3N | E | ♣T | = | 400 | 68% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS0.0 | NS+0.4 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♥ | N | = | 140 | 87% | 2 | |||
| 4♥x | N | -1 | 200 | 52% | ||||
| 4N | E | +2 | 490 | 87% | 2 | |||
| 3N | E | = | 400 | 68% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS0.0 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SERBIA U21 vs FRANCE FUNBRIDGE 3 : 1 VP (match 85057) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SERBIA U21 | FRANCE FUNBRIDGE | |
| 5♥x | N | ♠K | -2 | 500 | 66% | 5♣ | E | ♠3 | = | 600 | 84% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | E | ♥7 | +3 | 490 | 87% | 3N | E | ♥7 | +3 | 490 | 87% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.1 | NS-1.4 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 5♥x | N | -2 | 500 | 66% | 2 | |||
| 5♣ | E | = | 600 | 84% | ||||
| 3N | E | +3 | 490 | 87% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3N | E | +3 | 490 | 87% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.1 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CROATIA vs CROATIA U16 4 : 0 VP (match 85058) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CROATIA | CROATIA U16 | |
| 4♥ | N | ♠A | = | 620 | 97% | 4♠ | W | ♦A | = | 620 | 94% | 2 | ||||
| 4♥ | E | ♦5 | -4 | 200 | 100% | 3N | W | ♣8 | +1 | 430 | 52% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.9 | NS-0.8 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♥ | N | = | 620 | 97% | 2 | |||
| 4♠ | W | = | 620 | 94% | ||||
| 4♥ | E | -4 | 200 | 100% | 2 | |||
| 3N | W | +1 | 430 | 52% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.9 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CHILE U26W vs MAN EATING COBRAS 3 : 1 VP (match 85059) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHILE U26W | MAN EATING COBRAS | |
| 5♥x | N | ♠K | -1 | 200 | 52% | 5♥x | N | ♠A | -2 | 500 | 66% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | E | ♥7 | +3 | 490 | 87% | 3N | E | ♥7 | +3 | 490 | 87% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.7 | NS-1.1 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 5♥x | N | -1 | 200 | 52% | 2 | |||
| 5♥x | N | -2 | 500 | 66% | ||||
| 3N | E | +3 | 490 | 87% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3N | E | +3 | 490 | 87% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.7 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
JAPAN U21 vs URUGUAY 2 : 2 VP (match 85060) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | JAPAN U21 | URUGUAY | |
| 5♦ | W | ♠T | = | 600 | 84% | 5♥x | N | ♠A | -2 | 500 | 66% | 2 | ||||
| 4♥ | E | ♣T | -3 | 150 | 97% | 3N | E | ♥7 | +3 | 490 | 87% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.3 | NS-1.1 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 5♦ | W | = | 600 | 84% | 2 | |||
| 5♥x | N | -2 | 500 | 66% | ||||
| 4♥ | E | -3 | 150 | 97% | 2 | |||
| 3N | E | +3 | 490 | 87% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.3 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CHINA RDFZ HOPE vs RDFZ ZHIHAOLE 1 : 3 VP (match 85061) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHINA RDFZ HOPE | RDFZ ZHIHAOLE | |
| 4♥ | S | ♦2 | -1 | 100 | 63% | 4♠ | W | ♥8 | -1 | 100 | 76% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | E | ♥5 | +2 | 460 | 64% | 3N | E | ♥8 | +2 | 460 | 64% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.0 | NS+0.2 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♥ | S | -1 | 100 | 63% | 2 | |||
| 4♠ | W | -1 | 100 | 76% | ||||
| 3N | E | +2 | 460 | 64% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3N | E | +2 | 460 | 64% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.0 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CHILE vs EYE OF THE TIGER 2 : 2 VP (match 85062) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHILE | EYE OF THE TIGER | |
| 5♦ | W | ♠T | = | 600 | 84% | 5♥x | S | ♠J | -2 | 500 | 66% | 2 | ||||
| 3♦ | E | ♣T | +1 | 130 | 77% | 3N | W | ♣6 | +1 | 430 | 52% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.1 | NS-0.3 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 5♦ | W | = | 600 | 84% | 2 | |||
| 5♥x | S | -2 | 500 | 66% | ||||
| 3♦ | E | +1 | 130 | 77% | 2 | |||
| 3N | W | +1 | 430 | 52% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.1 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
RDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT vs TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL 4 : 0 VP (match 85063) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | RDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT | TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL | |
| 4♥x | N | ♠A | = | 790 | 100% | 4♥x | S | ♦2 | -1 | 200 | 52% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | E | ♠2 | -1 | 50 | 86% | 3N | E | ♥3 | +1 | 430 | 52% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.7 | NS+0.1 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♥x | N | = | 790 | 100% | 2 | |||
| 4♥x | S | -1 | 200 | 52% | ||||
| 3N | E | -1 | 50 | 86% | 2 | |||
| 3N | E | +1 | 430 | 52% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.7 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
DABROWKA PO vs POLAND KIDS 2 : 2 VP (match 85064) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | DABROWKA PO | POLAND KIDS | |
| 2♠x | S | ♣6 | -4 | 1100 | 100% | 6♦ | E | ♥A | -1 | 100 | 76% | 2 | ||||
| 6♦ | E | ♠A | -1 | 50 | 86% | 3N | E | ♣T | +1 | 430 | 52% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.3 | NS+0.5 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2♠x | S | -4 | 1100 | 100% | 2 | |||
| 6♦ | E | -1 | 100 | 76% | ||||
| 6♦ | E | -1 | 50 | 86% | 2 | |||
| 3N | E | +1 | 430 | 52% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.3 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
| ♠ T94 ♥ KT9863 ♦ A ♣ T53 | ||
| ♠ QJ872 ♥ – ♦ Q9642 ♣ 962 | 13 Dlr N Both | ♠ AK ♥ Q ♦ KJT83 ♣ AJ874 |
| ♠ 653 ♥ AJ7542 ♦ 75 ♣ KQ |
| NT | ♠ | ♥ | ♦ | ♣ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 7 | 2 | 9 | 2 | 2 |
| S | 7 | 2 | 9 | 2 | 2 |
| E | 5 | 9 | 4 | 11 | 10 |
| W | 5 | 9 | 4 | 11 | 10 |
| ♠ KJ96 ♥ AJ4 ♦ 32 ♣ 8643 | ||
| ♠ QT543 ♥ 9 ♦ AQJ ♣ AK75 | 14 Dlr E None | ♠ 8 ♥ KQT2 ♦ KT864 ♣ QJ9 |
| ♠ A72 ♥ 87653 ♦ 975 ♣ T2 |
| NT | ♠ | ♥ | ♦ | ♣ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 4 | 5 | 5 | 2 | 2 |
| S | 4 | 5 | 5 | 2 | 2 |
| E | 8 | 8 | 8 | 11 | 10 |
| W | 9 | 8 | 8 | 11 | 10 |