Wroclaw 2022 — Knockout
📅 19 August - 3 September 2022 · Wroclaw, Poland
🔗 Official site: db.worldbridge.org →
Knockout bracket↑ top
Tournament standings — final placement↑ top
Knockout event — places follow from the bracket: shared places (e.g. 5-8) are teams eliminated in the same phase; an unplayed decider leaves the place shared. Click a team for its players below.
Cumulative Butler by cross-IMPs. Each round's per-board Butler = mean cross-IMP vs that round's full field (raw / (N−1)), rounded to 0.1. Cumulative = sum of a player's per-board Butler over ALL played rounds ÷ total boards played, rounded to 0.01.
Rounds included so far (2 of 2): R1 R2. Columns SF·1… = each player's Butler total in that stanza (each knockout phase is played in segments); they sum to Total.
Cumulative Butler standings — all players↑ top
| Place | Player | Team | Boards | Total | Avg/bd | Trend | Qual. | SF·1 | F·1 | F·2 | F·3 | F·4 | F·5 | F·6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | D.Kazmucha | EDMONDS | 14 | +23.4 | +1.67 | +38.0 | +23.4 | · | · | · | · | · | · | |
| 1 | A.Sarniak | EDMONDS | 14 | +23.4 | +1.67 | +38.0 | +23.4 | · | · | · | · | · | · | |
| 3 | B.Fischer | BRODY | 14 | +9.0 | +0.64 | -15.5 | · | +9.0 | · | · | · | · | · | |
| 4 | S.Brock | BAKER | 14 | +7.1 | +0.51 | +7.7 | +7.1 | · | · | · | · | · | · | |
| 4 | F.Brown | BAKER | 14 | +7.1 | +0.51 | +7.7 | +7.1 | · | · | · | · | · | · | |
| 6 | M.Michielsen | BRODY | 98 | +36.2 | +0.37 | +205.3 | +29.2 | +9.0 | +3.0 | +2.0 | -14.0 | +6.0 | +1.0 | |
| 6 | C.Rimstedt | BRODY | 98 | +36.2 | +0.37 | +205.3 | +29.2 | +9.0 | +3.0 | +2.0 | -14.0 | +6.0 | +1.0 | |
| 8 | H.Eythorsdottir | TRI POLAR | 98 | +6.0 | +0.06 | +17.2 | +13.0 | -9.0 | -3.0 | -2.0 | +14.0 | -6.0 | -1.0 | |
| 8 | J.Seamon-Molson | TRI POLAR | 98 | +6.0 | +0.06 | +17.2 | +13.0 | -9.0 | -3.0 | -2.0 | +14.0 | -6.0 | -1.0 | |
| 10 | S.Rimstedt | BRODY | 98 | -0.1 | -0.00 | -5.8 | -7.1 | +9.0 | +3.0 | +2.0 | -14.0 | +6.0 | +1.0 | |
| 11 | J.Brody | BRODY | 84 | -9.1 | -0.11 | +9.7 | -7.1 | +3.0 | +2.0 | -14.0 | +6.0 | +1.0 | · | |
| 12 | K.Bertheau | TRI POLAR | 98 | -30.4 | -0.31 | +29.9 | -23.4 | -9.0 | -3.0 | -2.0 | +14.0 | -6.0 | -1.0 | |
| 12 | J.Larsson | TRI POLAR | 98 | -30.4 | -0.31 | +29.9 | -23.4 | -9.0 | -3.0 | -2.0 | +14.0 | -6.0 | -1.0 | |
| 14 | J.Edmonds | EDMONDS | 14 | -13.0 | -0.93 | +26.4 | -13.0 | · | · | · | · | · | · | |
| 14 | I.Levitina | EDMONDS | 14 | -13.0 | -0.93 | +26.4 | -13.0 | · | · | · | · | · | · | |
| 16 | L.Baker | BAKER | 14 | -29.2 | -2.09 | +7.9 | -29.2 | · | · | · | · | · | · | |
| 16 | K.Mccallum | BAKER | 14 | -29.2 | -2.09 | +7.9 | -29.2 | · | · | · | · | · | · |
Player statistics — leaders↑ top
Top 12 in each metric — or, with a team picked as ★ My team, that team’s players. Open the full player-statistics page for every player, sortable by any column — including an opponent-adjusted (strength-of-schedule) Butler. Double-dummy is idealised — the true best play needs all four hands — so read these as tendencies, not verdicts.
| # | Player | vs par |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | M.Michielsen | +0.91 |
| 1 | C.Rimstedt | +0.91 |
| 3 | K.Bertheau | +0.38 |
| 3 | J.Larsson | +0.38 |
| 5 | S.Rimstedt | -0.35 |
| 6 | J.Brody | -0.79 |
| 7 | H.Eythorsdottir | -0.93 |
| 7 | J.Seamon-Molson | -0.93 |
| # | Player | on tgt |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | S.Rimstedt | 86.4% |
| 2 | M.Michielsen | 85.7% |
| 3 | C.Rimstedt | 84.4% |
| 4 | J.Larsson | 83.3% |
| 5 | J.Brody | 83.3% |
| 6 | H.Eythorsdottir | 78.3% |
| 7 | K.Bertheau | 68.0% |
| 8 | J.Seamon-Molson | 60.0% |
| # | Player | on tgt |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | M.Michielsen | 87.5% |
| 2 | S.Rimstedt | 83.3% |
| 3 | C.Rimstedt | 81.8% |
| 4 | K.Bertheau | 81.8% |
| 5 | J.Larsson | 81.0% |
| 6 | H.Eythorsdottir | 75.9% |
| 7 | J.Brody | 70.0% |
| 8 | J.Seamon-Molson | 58.1% |
| # | Player | on tgt |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | M.Michielsen | 91.7% |
| 1 | C.Rimstedt | 91.7% |
| 3 | K.Bertheau | 87.3% |
| 3 | J.Larsson | 87.3% |
| 5 | H.Eythorsdottir | 84.2% |
| 5 | J.Seamon-Molson | 84.2% |
| 7 | S.Rimstedt | 84.1% |
| 8 | J.Brody | 80.6% |
Biggest swings — the wildest boards↑ top
Same deal, opposite fortunes: boards where the field’s cross-IMP Butler split the widest. Swing = the best NS result’s Butler minus the best EW result’s, in IMPs; the two columns show those poles (contract, score and Butler). Click a board for its full record.
| Board | Tables | Swing | Best for NS | Best for EW |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Semifinal · Bd 2 | 4 | 23.4 | 3NT +600 EDMONDS (+11.7) | 5♦ +400 EDMONDS (+11.7) |
| Semifinal · Bd 10 | 4 | 21.0 | 2♠ +200 TRI POLAR (+9.7) | 4♥ +620 TRI POLAR (+11.3) |
| Semifinal · Bd 51 | 4 | 19.6 | 3♠ +200 EDMONDS (+7.3) | 4♠ +620 EDMONDS (+12.3) |
| Semifinal · Bd 22 | 4 | 17.7 | 3♠ +100 TRI POLAR (+10.0) | 3NT +630 TRI POLAR (+7.7) |
| Semifinal · Bd 20 | 4 | 17.4 | 6♦ -1390 BRODY (+8.7) | 7♣ +2140 BRODY (+8.7) |
| Semifinal · Bd 56 | 4 | 17.4 | 5♠ +650 BRODY (+8.7) | 6♠ +100 BRODY (+8.7) |
| Semifinal · Bd 4 | 4 | 17.3 | 4♥ +200 BRODY (+7.0) | 3♠x +500 BRODY (+10.3) |
| Semifinal · Bd 13 | 4 | 17.3 | 4♥ +620 TRI POLAR (+7.3) | 4♥ +100 BRODY (+10.0) |
| Semifinal · Bd 38 | 4 | 17.3 | 6♣ +100 BAKER (+12.3) | 3NT +660 BAKER (+5.0) |
| Semifinal · Bd 54 | 4 | 17.3 | 3NT +600 BRODY (+4.3) | 3NT +200 EDMONDS (+13.0) |
| Semifinal · Bd 12 | 4 | 16.0 | 6♦ +1390 BAKER (+8.0) | 4♠ -680 BAKER (+8.0) |
| Semifinal · Bd 44 | 4 | 15.4 | 3♠ -50 BAKER (+4.7) | 5♦ +600 TRI POLAR (+10.7) |
| Semifinal · Bd 7 | 4 | 15.3 | 4♠ +650 TRI POLAR (+8.0) | 3♦ -130 BRODY (+7.3) |
| Semifinal · Bd 24 | 4 | 15.3 | 5♥x +100 TRI POLAR (+5.0) | 4♥ +420 BRODY (+10.3) |