Round 22 — BAM Teams
20 matches. → cumulative standings · → board records
Round 22 results↑ top
Every match of the round — teams, board-a-match points and VPs. Click a table number or ‘protocol’ for the full board-by-board scorecard below.
| Table | Home team | Visiting team | BAM (home) | BAM (visit) | VP (home) | VP (visit) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | TIANYA BRIDGE FATE | WARHORSE | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 2 | YUNNAN | BBC THAILAND | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 3 | CCSA | XINJIANGYILI | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 4 | THAILAND Mixed | WUHAN ENGINEERING | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 5 | AUSTRALIA OPEN | BEIJINGXUGUANG | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 6 | HUAXINHUANBAO | SCOTLAND BLUE | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 7 | HUANG YU | INDONESIA Open | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 8 | ZHEJIANG JINJIANG | NEWB | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 9 | PIONEERS | MIX DENMARK | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 10 | PD HEART | JSQX NJZS BRIDGECLUB | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 11 | JELLY BELLY | INDIA TSANGPO | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 12 | WUHAN | CHINA HUOCHETOU | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 13 | UICC WUHAN | CANADA CHINA UNITED | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 14 | MONA | TO WIN | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 15 | HUBEI BRIDGE TEAM | HIMOTOR | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 16 | HUBEI FUXING | DONGFENG AUTO CO LTD | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 17 | ENSEMBLE | GUIZHOU ZHENGYE | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 18 | USA SR 1 | BANGKOK MIND SPORT | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 19 | POLAND Women | ONE ESSENTIAL OF RED | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 20 | LATVIA | KBA | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
Standings after round 22↑ top
Cumulative board-a-match points through round 22 — the league table as it stood after this round. → full standings, every round & players
| Place | Team | Pts | R22 | Pld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ONE ESSENTIAL OF RED | 60.00 | 2.00 | 22 |
| 2 | JSQX NJZS BRIDGECLUB | 57.00 | 4.00 | 22 |
| 3 | PIONEERS | 56.00 | 2.00 | 22 |
| 4 | LATVIA | 55.00 | 2.00 | 22 |
| 5 | AUSTRALIA OPEN | 53.00 | 2.00 | 22 |
| 5 | UICC WUHAN | 53.00 | 4.00 | 22 |
| 7 | HUAXINHUANBAO | 52.00 | 1.00 | 22 |
| 8 | INDONESIA Open | 51.00 | 4.00 | 22 |
| 9 | CHINA HUOCHETOU | 50.00 | 4.00 | 22 |
| 9 | WARHORSE | 50.00 | 4.00 | 22 |
| 11 | KBA | 49.40 | 2.00 | 22 |
| 12 | HIMOTOR | 47.00 | 2.00 | 22 |
| 12 | USA SR 1 | 47.00 | 4.00 | 22 |
| 12 | YUNNAN | 47.00 | 2.00 | 22 |
| 15 | BBC THAILAND | 46.00 | 2.00 | 22 |
| 15 | JELLY BELLY | 46.00 | 2.00 | 22 |
| 15 | WUHAN | 46.00 | 0.00 | 22 |
| 18 | GUIZHOU ZHENGYE | 44.00 | 4.00 | 22 |
| 18 | SCOTLAND BLUE | 44.00 | 3.00 | 22 |
| 18 | TO WIN | 44.00 | 3.00 | 22 |
| 18 | XINJIANGYILI | 44.00 | 2.00 | 22 |
| 22 | MIX DENMARK | 43.00 | 2.00 | 22 |
| 22 | WUHAN ENGINEERING | 43.00 | 4.00 | 22 |
| 24 | CCSA | 42.00 | 2.00 | 22 |
| 24 | MONA | 42.00 | 1.00 | 22 |
| 24 | ZHEJIANG JINJIANG | 42.00 | 2.00 | 22 |
| 27 | BEIJINGXUGUANG | 40.00 | 2.00 | 22 |
| 27 | POLAND Women | 40.00 | 2.00 | 22 |
| 29 | INDIA TSANGPO | 39.00 | 2.00 | 22 |
| 29 | THAILAND Mixed | 39.00 | 0.00 | 22 |
| 31 | DONGFENG AUTO CO LTD | 38.00 | 2.00 | 22 |
| 32 | BANGKOK MIND SPORT | 37.00 | 0.00 | 22 |
| 32 | CANADA CHINA UNITED | 37.00 | 0.00 | 22 |
| 32 | HUANG YU | 37.00 | 0.00 | 22 |
| 35 | HUBEI BRIDGE TEAM | 35.60 | 2.00 | 22 |
| 36 | TIANYA BRIDGE FATE | 35.00 | 0.00 | 22 |
| 37 | NEWB | 34.00 | 2.00 | 22 |
| 38 | HUBEI FUXING | 33.00 | 2.00 | 22 |
| 39 | PD HEART | 32.00 | 0.00 | 22 |
| 40 | ENSEMBLE | 30.00 | 0.00 | 22 |
Board-a-match over this round's field — each pair's net boards won per board (2-0 win / 1-1 tie), shown as a board-a-match %.
Round 22 board-a-match standings↑ top
| Place | Player | Team | Boards | R22 | BAM% |
|---|
TIANYA BRIDGE FATE vs WARHORSE 0 : 4 VP (match 88723) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | TIANYA BRIDGE FATE | WARHORSE | |
| 11 | 4♥ | W | ♠6 | +1 | 450 | 85% | 2♠ | E | ♥Q | +1 | 140 | 65% | 2 | |||
| 12 | 5♥x | N | ♣A | -3 | 800 | 96% | 5♣x | W | ♠K | = | 550 | 76% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.6 | NS-0.2 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 11 | 4♥ | W | +1 | 450 | 85% | 2 | ||
| 2♠ | E | +1 | 140 | 65% | ||||
| 12 | 5♥x | N | -3 | 800 | 96% | 2 | ||
| 5♣x | W | = | 550 | 76% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.6 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
YUNNAN vs BBC THAILAND 2 : 2 VP (match 88724) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | YUNNAN | BBC THAILAND | |
| 11 | 4♠ | E | ♠7 | -1 | 50 | 88% | 3NT | W | ♦7 | = | 400 | 59% | 2 | |||
| 12 | 5♣x | W | ♠A | = | 550 | 76% | 4♥ | N | ♦A | -2 | 200 | 70% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.3 | NS+0.2 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 11 | 4♠ | E | -1 | 50 | 88% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | W | = | 400 | 59% | ||||
| 12 | 5♣x | W | = | 550 | 76% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | N | -2 | 200 | 70% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.3 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CCSA vs XINJIANGYILI 2 : 2 VP (match 88725) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CCSA | XINJIANGYILI | |
| 11 | 4♥ | W | ♠6 | +1 | 450 | 85% | 4♥ | W | ♦7 | = | 420 | 67% | 2 | |||
| 12 | 4♥x | N | ♦K | -2 | 500 | 60% | 5♣x | W | ♠Q | = | 550 | 76% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.9 | NS-0.8 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 11 | 4♥ | W | +1 | 450 | 85% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | W | = | 420 | 67% | ||||
| 12 | 4♥x | N | -2 | 500 | 60% | 2 | ||
| 5♣x | W | = | 550 | 76% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.9 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
THAILAND Mixed vs WUHAN ENGINEERING 0 : 4 VP (match 88726) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | THAILAND Mixed | WUHAN ENGINEERING | |
| 11 | 4♠ | E | ♦K | = | 420 | 67% | 2♠ | E | ♦K | +1 | 140 | 65% | 2 | |||
| 12 | 5♥x | N | ♦A | -1 | 200 | 70% | 7♣ | W | ♠A | -2 | 100 | 95% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.1 | NS+1.2 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 11 | 4♠ | E | = | 420 | 67% | 2 | ||
| 2♠ | E | +1 | 140 | 65% | ||||
| 12 | 5♥x | N | -1 | 200 | 70% | 2 | ||
| 7♣ | W | -2 | 100 | 95% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.1 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
AUSTRALIA OPEN vs BEIJINGXUGUANG 2 : 2 VP (match 88727) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | AUSTRALIA OPEN | BEIJINGXUGUANG | |
| 11 | 4♥ | W | ♣4 | -1 | 50 | 88% | 4♥ | W | ♦5 | = | 420 | 67% | 2 | |||
| 12 | 5♣x | W | ♠K | = | 550 | 76% | 5♣ | W | ♠A | = | 400 | 54% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.3 | NS-0.3 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 11 | 4♥ | W | -1 | 50 | 88% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | W | = | 420 | 67% | ||||
| 12 | 5♣x | W | = | 550 | 76% | 2 | ||
| 5♣ | W | = | 400 | 54% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.3 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
HUAXINHUANBAO vs SCOTLAND BLUE 1 : 3 VP (match 88728) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | HUAXINHUANBAO | SCOTLAND BLUE | |
| 11 | 3NT | W | ♦4 | +1 | 430 | 76% | 4♥ | W | ♣6 | -1 | 50 | 88% | 2 | |||
| 12 | 5♦ | E | ♥4 | -1 | 50 | 86% | 6♣ | W | ♠K | -1 | 50 | 86% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.2 | NS+1.5 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 11 | 3NT | W | +1 | 430 | 76% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | W | -1 | 50 | 88% | ||||
| 12 | 5♦ | E | -1 | 50 | 86% | 1 | 1 | |
| 6♣ | W | -1 | 50 | 86% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.2 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
HUANG YU vs INDONESIA Open 0 : 4 VP (match 88729) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | HUANG YU | INDONESIA Open | |
| 11 | 4♦x | N | ♠K | -3 | 500 | 97% | 3♠ | E | ♠10 | +1 | 170 | 51% | 2 | |||
| 12 | 5♥x | N | ♣6 | -2 | 500 | 60% | 5♦x | E | ♥9 | -1 | 100 | 95% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.2 | NS+0.9 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 11 | 4♦x | N | -3 | 500 | 97% | 2 | ||
| 3♠ | E | +1 | 170 | 51% | ||||
| 12 | 5♥x | N | -2 | 500 | 60% | 2 | ||
| 5♦x | E | -1 | 100 | 95% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.2 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.9 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
ZHEJIANG JINJIANG vs NEWB 2 : 2 VP (match 88730) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ZHEJIANG JINJIANG | NEWB | |
| 11 | 4♠ | E | ♥Q | -1 | 50 | 88% | 2♣ | W | ♠6 | = | 90 | 80% | 2 | |||
| 12 | 5♥x | N | ♦A | -3 | 800 | 96% | 5♣ | E | ♠3 | = | 400 | 54% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.2 | NS+0.7 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 11 | 4♠ | E | -1 | 50 | 88% | 2 | ||
| 2♣ | W | = | 90 | 80% | ||||
| 12 | 5♥x | N | -3 | 800 | 96% | 2 | ||
| 5♣ | E | = | 400 | 54% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.2 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
PIONEERS vs MIX DENMARK 2 : 2 VP (match 88731) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | PIONEERS | MIX DENMARK | |
| 11 | 3♠ | E | ♦K | = | 140 | 65% | 2♥ | W | ♠6 | +2 | 170 | 51% | 2 | |||
| 12 | 5♣x | E | ♠3 | = | 550 | 76% | 4♥ | N | ♦A | -2 | 200 | 70% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.2 | NS+0.4 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 11 | 3♠ | E | = | 140 | 65% | 2 | ||
| 2♥ | W | +2 | 170 | 51% | ||||
| 12 | 5♣x | E | = | 550 | 76% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | N | -2 | 200 | 70% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.2 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
PD HEART vs JSQX NJZS BRIDGECLUB 0 : 4 VP (match 88732) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | PD HEART | JSQX NJZS BRIDGECLUB | |
| 11 | 4♥ | W | ♠6 | +1 | 450 | 85% | 3♠ | E | ♠7 | = | 140 | 65% | 2 | |||
| 12 | 5♣x | W | ♦6 | = | 550 | 76% | 4♣ | W | ♠A | +1 | 150 | 81% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.2 | NS+0.9 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 11 | 4♥ | W | +1 | 450 | 85% | 2 | ||
| 3♠ | E | = | 140 | 65% | ||||
| 12 | 5♣x | W | = | 550 | 76% | 2 | ||
| 4♣ | W | +1 | 150 | 81% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.2 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.9 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
JELLY BELLY vs INDIA TSANGPO 2 : 2 VP (match 88803) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | JELLY BELLY | INDIA TSANGPO | |
| 11 | 4♥ | W | ♠6 | +1 | 450 | 85% | 3♥ | W | ♣6 | = | 140 | 65% | 2 | |||
| 12 | 5♣ | W | ♠A | -2 | 100 | 95% | 5♣ | W | ♠A | = | 400 | 54% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.2 | NS+0.4 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 11 | 4♥ | W | +1 | 450 | 85% | 2 | ||
| 3♥ | W | = | 140 | 65% | ||||
| 12 | 5♣ | W | -2 | 100 | 95% | 2 | ||
| 5♣ | W | = | 400 | 54% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.2 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
WUHAN vs CHINA HUOCHETOU 0 : 4 VP (match 88804) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | WUHAN | CHINA HUOCHETOU | |
| 11 | 4♥ | E | ♦7 | +1 | 450 | 85% | 4♥ | W | ♣6 | = | 420 | 67% | 2 | |||
| 12 | 5♣x | W | ♠Q | = | 550 | 76% | 5♣ | W | ♠K | = | 400 | 54% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.2 | NS-0.3 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 11 | 4♥ | E | +1 | 450 | 85% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | W | = | 420 | 67% | ||||
| 12 | 5♣x | W | = | 550 | 76% | 2 | ||
| 5♣ | W | = | 400 | 54% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.2 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
UICC WUHAN vs CANADA CHINA UNITED 4 : 0 VP (match 88805) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | UICC WUHAN | CANADA CHINA UNITED | |
| 11 | 2♦x | N | ♠A | -1 | 100 | 77% | 3♥ | W | ♠6 | +1 | 170 | 51% | 2 | |||
| 12 | 4♣ | E | ♥K | +2 | 170 | 77% | 5♣x | W | ♠K | = | 550 | 76% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.1 | NS-0.5 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 11 | 2♦x | N | -1 | 100 | 77% | 2 | ||
| 3♥ | W | +1 | 170 | 51% | ||||
| 12 | 4♣ | E | +2 | 170 | 77% | 2 | ||
| 5♣x | W | = | 550 | 76% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.1 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
MONA vs TO WIN 1 : 3 VP (match 88806) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MONA | TO WIN | |
| 11 | 2♠ | E | ♠10 | +1 | 140 | 65% | 2♥ | W | ♣7 | +1 | 140 | 65% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 12 | 5♣ | W | ♠A | = | 400 | 54% | 4♥x | N | ♦K | -1 | 200 | 70% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.4 | NS+0.7 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 11 | 2♠ | E | +1 | 140 | 65% | 1 | 1 | |
| 2♥ | W | +1 | 140 | 65% | ||||
| 12 | 5♣ | W | = | 400 | 54% | 2 | ||
| 4♥x | N | -1 | 200 | 70% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.4 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
HUBEI BRIDGE TEAM vs HIMOTOR 2 : 2 VP (match 88807) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | HUBEI BRIDGE TEAM | HIMOTOR | |
| 11 | 3NT | E | ♦3 | +2 | 460 | 94% | 2♠ | E | ♦K | +2 | 170 | 51% | 2 | |||
| 12 | 5♣ | E | ♥10 | = | 400 | 54% | 4♣x | E | ♠3 | +1 | 610 | 90% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.8 | NS-0.8 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 11 | 3NT | E | +2 | 460 | 94% | 2 | ||
| 2♠ | E | +2 | 170 | 51% | ||||
| 12 | 5♣ | E | = | 400 | 54% | 2 | ||
| 4♣x | E | +1 | 610 | 90% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.8 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
HUBEI FUXING vs DONGFENG AUTO CO LTD 2 : 2 VP (match 88808) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | HUBEI FUXING | DONGFENG AUTO CO LTD | |
| 11 | 2♥ | W | ♣7 | +1 | 140 | 65% | 3NT | W | ♦7 | +1 | 430 | 76% | 2 | |||
| 12 | 5♥x | N | ♣Q | -3 | 800 | 96% | 6♣x | E | ♦3 | -1 | 100 | 95% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.6 | NS+0.4 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 11 | 2♥ | W | +1 | 140 | 65% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | W | +1 | 430 | 76% | ||||
| 12 | 5♥x | N | -3 | 800 | 96% | 2 | ||
| 6♣x | E | -1 | 100 | 95% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.6 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
ENSEMBLE vs GUIZHOU ZHENGYE 0 : 4 VP (match 88809) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ENSEMBLE | GUIZHOU ZHENGYE | |
| 11 | 4♥ | E | ♠6 | = | 420 | 67% | 3♦ | E | ♥Q | -2 | 100 | 99% | 2 | |||
| 12 | 6♥x | N | ♦A | -3 | 800 | 96% | 5♣ | E | ♣6 | = | 400 | 54% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.3 | NS+1.1 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 11 | 4♥ | E | = | 420 | 67% | 2 | ||
| 3♦ | E | -2 | 100 | 99% | ||||
| 12 | 6♥x | N | -3 | 800 | 96% | 2 | ||
| 5♣ | E | = | 400 | 54% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.3 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
USA SR 1 vs BANGKOK MIND SPORT 4 : 0 VP (match 88810) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | USA SR 1 | BANGKOK MIND SPORT | |
| 11 | 4♠ | E | ♦K | -1 | 50 | 88% | 3NT | W | ♦7 | +2 | 460 | 94% | 2 | |||
| 12 | 5♣ | W | ♠Q | = | 400 | 54% | 5♣x | W | ♠K | = | 550 | 76% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.8 | NS-1.4 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 11 | 4♠ | E | -1 | 50 | 88% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | W | +2 | 460 | 94% | ||||
| 12 | 5♣ | W | = | 400 | 54% | 2 | ||
| 5♣x | W | = | 550 | 76% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.8 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
POLAND Women vs ONE ESSENTIAL OF RED 2 : 2 VP (match 88811) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | POLAND Women | ONE ESSENTIAL OF RED | |
| 11 | 4♠ | E | ♦K | -2 | 100 | 99% | 5♦x | N | ♠K | -4 | 800 | 100% | 2 | |||
| 12 | 5♣x | W | ♠A | = | 550 | 76% | 4♣ | W | ♠A | +1 | 150 | 81% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.5 | NS-0.4 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 11 | 4♠ | E | -2 | 100 | 99% | 2 | ||
| 5♦x | N | -4 | 800 | 100% | ||||
| 12 | 5♣x | W | = | 550 | 76% | 2 | ||
| 4♣ | W | +1 | 150 | 81% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.5 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
LATVIA vs KBA 2 : 2 VP (match 88812) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | LATVIA | KBA | |
| 11 | 4♠ | E | ♦K | -1 | 50 | 88% | 3♥ | W | ♠6 | +1 | 170 | 51% | 2 | |||
| 12 | 5♣ | W | ♠A | = | 400 | 54% | 5♦x | E | ♠3 | -1 | 100 | 95% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.8 | NS+0.9 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 11 | 4♠ | E | -1 | 50 | 88% | 2 | ||
| 3♥ | W | +1 | 170 | 51% | ||||
| 12 | 5♣ | W | = | 400 | 54% | 2 | ||
| 5♦x | E | -1 | 100 | 95% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.8 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.9 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|