Round 6 — BAM Teams
21 matches. → cumulative standings · → board records
Round 6 results↑ top
Every match of the round — teams, board-a-match points and VPs. Click a table number or ‘protocol’ for the full board-by-board scorecard below.
| Table | Home team | Visiting team | BAM (home) | BAM (visit) | VP (home) | VP (visit) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | TO WIN | REIGNWOOD | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 2 | XINJIANGYILI | DALIAN AOXIN | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 3 | WHIBLEY | DINKIN | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 4 | WE THE NORTH | BBC THAILAND | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 5 | HUBEI FUXING | USA 2 MIXED | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 6 | EXCELLENT FOUR | CHINA HUOCHETOU | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 7 | LATVIA | BANGKOK MIND SPORT | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 8 | INDONESIA Seniors | TAMEWARE | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 9 | WUHAN | SEOUL | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 10 | HUAXINHUANBAO | UICC WUHAN | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 11 | TEAM 31 | SWISS TEAM | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 2.40 | protocol → |
| 12 | WUHAN ENGINEERING | ENSEMBLE | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 13 | JINSHUO | WARHORSE | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 14 | TIANYA BRIDGE FATE | DONGFENG FENGSHEN | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 15 | NEWB | BEIJINGXUGUANG | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 16 | GUIZHOU ZHENGYE | HUANG HU | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 17 | INDONESIA Open | FORMIDABLES | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 18 | POLAND Women | INDIA TSANGPO | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 19 | ANIT NEGRA | HUBEI BRIDGE TEAM | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 20 | THAILAND Mixed | CHINA JUNIORS | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 21 | CANADA CHINA UNITED | DONGFENG AUTO CO LTD | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
Standings after round 6↑ top
Cumulative board-a-match points through round 6 — the league table as it stood after this round. → full standings, every round & players
| Place | Team | Pts | R6 | Pld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | REIGNWOOD | 17.40 | 4.00 | 6 |
| 2 | BANGKOK MIND SPORT | 17.00 | 2.00 | 6 |
| 2 | INDONESIA Open | 17.00 | 2.00 | 6 |
| 4 | BBC THAILAND | 16.40 | 4.00 | 6 |
| 5 | CHINA JUNIORS | 16.00 | 4.00 | 6 |
| 5 | JINSHUO | 16.00 | 3.00 | 6 |
| 7 | TAMEWARE | 15.00 | 3.00 | 6 |
| 8 | SWISS TEAM | 14.40 | 2.40 | 6 |
| 9 | CANADA CHINA UNITED | 14.00 | 2.00 | 6 |
| 9 | CHINA HUOCHETOU | 14.00 | 1.00 | 6 |
| 9 | EXCELLENT FOUR | 14.00 | 3.00 | 6 |
| 9 | FORMIDABLES | 14.00 | 2.00 | 6 |
| 13 | DALIAN AOXIN | 13.40 | 4.00 | 6 |
| 13 | DINKIN | 13.40 | 4.00 | 6 |
| 13 | USA 2 MIXED | 13.40 | 2.00 | 6 |
| 16 | ANIT NEGRA | 13.00 | 2.00 | 6 |
| 16 | INDIA TSANGPO | 13.00 | 1.00 | 6 |
| 16 | TIANYA BRIDGE FATE | 13.00 | 3.00 | 6 |
| 16 | WUHAN ENGINEERING | 13.00 | 2.00 | 6 |
| 20 | HUAXINHUANBAO | 12.00 | 2.00 | 6 |
| 20 | SEOUL | 12.00 | 4.00 | 6 |
| 20 | THAILAND Mixed | 12.00 | 0.00 | 6 |
| 20 | UICC WUHAN | 12.00 | 2.00 | 6 |
| 24 | BEIJINGXUGUANG | 11.00 | 4.00 | 6 |
| 24 | GUIZHOU ZHENGYE | 11.00 | 0.00 | 6 |
| 24 | INDONESIA Seniors | 11.00 | 1.00 | 6 |
| 24 | LATVIA | 11.00 | 2.00 | 6 |
| 24 | POLAND Women | 11.00 | 3.00 | 6 |
| 29 | DONGFENG FENGSHEN | 10.00 | 1.00 | 6 |
| 29 | HUBEI BRIDGE TEAM | 10.00 | 2.00 | 6 |
| 29 | NEWB | 10.00 | 0.00 | 6 |
| 29 | WARHORSE | 10.00 | 1.00 | 6 |
| 33 | DONGFENG AUTO CO LTD | 9.00 | 2.00 | 6 |
| 33 | ENSEMBLE | 9.00 | 2.00 | 6 |
| 33 | HUBEI FUXING | 9.00 | 2.00 | 6 |
| 33 | WE THE NORTH | 9.00 | 0.00 | 6 |
| 37 | HUANG HU | 8.00 | 4.00 | 6 |
| 37 | TO WIN | 8.00 | 0.00 | 6 |
| 37 | WHIBLEY | 8.00 | 0.00 | 6 |
| 37 | WUHAN | 8.00 | 0.00 | 6 |
| 41 | XINJIANGYILI | 6.00 | 0.00 | 6 |
| 42 | TEAM 31 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 6 |
Board-a-match over this round's field — each pair's net boards won per board (2-0 win / 1-1 tie), shown as a board-a-match %.
Round 6 board-a-match standings↑ top
| Place | Player | Team | Boards | R6 | BAM% |
|---|
TO WIN vs REIGNWOOD 0 : 4 VP (match 89291) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | TO WIN | REIGNWOOD | |
| 27 | 3NT | S | ♥10 | -3 | 150 | 92% | 3NT | S | ♣6 | -2 | 100 | 62% | 2 | |||
| 28 | 2NT | E | ♦J | = | 120 | 82% | 3♠ | E | ♠3 | -1 | 50 | 76% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.5 | NS+0.3 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 27 | 3NT | S | -3 | 150 | 92% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | S | -2 | 100 | 62% | ||||
| 28 | 2NT | E | = | 120 | 82% | 2 | ||
| 3♠ | E | -1 | 50 | 76% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.5 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
XINJIANGYILI vs DALIAN AOXIN 0 : 4 VP (match 89292) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | XINJIANGYILI | DALIAN AOXIN | |
| 27 | 3NT | S | ♠K | -2 | 100 | 62% | 3NT | S | ♠8 | -1 | 50 | 72% | 2 | |||
| 28 | 1NT | E | ♦Q | +1 | 120 | 82% | 1NT | W | ♥6 | -1 | 50 | 76% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.9 | NS+1.0 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 27 | 3NT | S | -2 | 100 | 62% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | S | -1 | 50 | 72% | ||||
| 28 | 1NT | E | +1 | 120 | 82% | 2 | ||
| 1NT | W | -1 | 50 | 76% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.9 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
WHIBLEY vs DINKIN 0 : 4 VP (match 89293) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | WHIBLEY | DINKIN | |
| 27 | 3NT | S | ♠8 | -1 | 50 | 72% | 1NT | S | ♠K | = | 90 | 91% | 2 | |||
| 28 | 2NT | W | ♣2 | = | 120 | 82% | 3♣ | W | ♦K | -2 | 100 | 94% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.2 | NS+1.7 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 27 | 3NT | S | -1 | 50 | 72% | 2 | ||
| 1NT | S | = | 90 | 91% | ||||
| 28 | 2NT | W | = | 120 | 82% | 2 | ||
| 3♣ | W | -2 | 100 | 94% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.2 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
WE THE NORTH vs BBC THAILAND 0 : 4 VP (match 89294) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | WE THE NORTH | BBC THAILAND | |
| 27 | 3NT | S | ♠A | -2 | 100 | 62% | 3NT | S | ♠8 | -1 | 50 | 72% | 2 | |||
| 28 | 1♣ | W | ♥3 | +1 | 90 | 51% | 2NT | W | ♣3 | -1 | 50 | 76% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.2 | NS+1.0 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 27 | 3NT | S | -2 | 100 | 62% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | S | -1 | 50 | 72% | ||||
| 28 | 1♣ | W | +1 | 90 | 51% | 2 | ||
| 2NT | W | -1 | 50 | 76% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.2 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
HUBEI FUXING vs USA 2 MIXED 2 : 2 VP (match 89295) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | HUBEI FUXING | USA 2 MIXED | |
| 27 | 2♠ | W | ♦A | -1 | 50 | 88% | 3NT | S | ♠K | -2 | 100 | 62% | 2 | |||
| 28 | 1NT | W | ♥4 | +1 | 120 | 82% | 1NT | W | ♥3 | = | 90 | 51% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.1 | NS-0.2 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 27 | 2♠ | W | -1 | 50 | 88% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | S | -2 | 100 | 62% | ||||
| 28 | 1NT | W | +1 | 120 | 82% | 2 | ||
| 1NT | W | = | 90 | 51% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.1 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
EXCELLENT FOUR vs CHINA HUOCHETOU 3 : 1 VP (match 89296) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | EXCELLENT FOUR | CHINA HUOCHETOU | |
| 27 | 3NT | S | ♠K | -2 | 100 | 62% | 3NT | S | ♣6 | -2 | 100 | 62% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 28 | 2♥ | W | ♦K | -2 | 100 | 94% | 1NT | E | ♦Q | = | 90 | 51% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.6 | NS-0.2 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 27 | 3NT | S | -2 | 100 | 62% | 1 | 1 | |
| 3NT | S | -2 | 100 | 62% | ||||
| 28 | 2♥ | W | -2 | 100 | 94% | 2 | ||
| 1NT | E | = | 90 | 51% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.6 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
LATVIA vs BANGKOK MIND SPORT 2 : 2 VP (match 89297) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | LATVIA | BANGKOK MIND SPORT | |
| 27 | 3NT | S | ♠A | -2 | 100 | 62% | 3NT | S | ♠K | -2 | 100 | 62% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 28 | 1♣ | W | ♣3 | +2 | 110 | 70% | 2♠ | W | ♦K | = | 110 | 70% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.7 | NS-0.7 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 27 | 3NT | S | -2 | 100 | 62% | 1 | 1 | |
| 3NT | S | -2 | 100 | 62% | ||||
| 28 | 1♣ | W | +2 | 110 | 70% | 1 | 1 | |
| 2♠ | W | = | 110 | 70% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.7 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
INDONESIA Seniors vs TAMEWARE 1 : 3 VP (match 89298) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | INDONESIA Seniors | TAMEWARE | |
| 27 | 3NT | S | ♦8 | -2 | 100 | 62% | 3NT | S | ♣6 | -2 | 100 | 62% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 28 | 2♦x | S | ♠K | -1 | 200 | 91% | 1♦ | W | ♥A | -1 | 50 | 76% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.1 | NS+0.3 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 27 | 3NT | S | -2 | 100 | 62% | 1 | 1 | |
| 3NT | S | -2 | 100 | 62% | ||||
| 28 | 2♦x | S | -1 | 200 | 91% | 2 | ||
| 1♦ | W | -1 | 50 | 76% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.1 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
WUHAN vs SEOUL 0 : 4 VP (match 89299) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | WUHAN | SEOUL | |
| 27 | 1NT | S | ♠A | = | 90 | 91% | 3NT | N | ♠8 | = | 400 | 100% | 2 | |||
| 28 | 4♥x | N | ♦10 | -5 | 1400 | 100% | 2♠ | W | ♥7 | = | 110 | 70% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.2 | NS+0.6 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 27 | 1NT | S | = | 90 | 91% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | N | = | 400 | 100% | ||||
| 28 | 4♥x | N | -5 | 1400 | 100% | 2 | ||
| 2♠ | W | = | 110 | 70% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.2 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
HUAXINHUANBAO vs UICC WUHAN 2 : 2 VP (match 89300) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | HUAXINHUANBAO | UICC WUHAN | |
| 27 | 3NT | N | ♠4 | -2 | 100 | 62% | 3NTx | N | ♥3 | -3 | 500 | 100% | 2 | |||
| 28 | 2♦x | S | ♠K | -1 | 200 | 91% | 2♠ | W | ♣7 | -1 | 50 | 76% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.1 | NS-0.5 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 27 | 3NT | N | -2 | 100 | 62% | 2 | ||
| 3NTx | N | -3 | 500 | 100% | ||||
| 28 | 2♦x | S | -1 | 200 | 91% | 2 | ||
| 2♠ | W | -1 | 50 | 76% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.1 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
TEAM 31 vs SWISS TEAM 0 : 2.4 VP (match 89301) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | TEAM 31 | SWISS TEAM | |
| 27 | – | — | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 85% | ||||||||
| 28 | – | — | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 65% | ||||||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS0.0 | NS+1.0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 27 | – | |||||||
| Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 85% | ||||
| 28 | – | |||||||
| Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 65% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS0.0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
WUHAN ENGINEERING vs ENSEMBLE 2 : 2 VP (match 89374) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | WUHAN ENGINEERING | ENSEMBLE | |
| 27 | 3NT | S | ♠K | -2 | 100 | 62% | 3NT | S | ♦3 | -1 | 50 | 72% | 2 | |||
| 28 | 3♣ | W | ♠7 | -2 | 100 | 94% | 1NT | W | ♠4 | = | 90 | 51% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.6 | NS+0.5 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 27 | 3NT | S | -2 | 100 | 62% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | S | -1 | 50 | 72% | ||||
| 28 | 3♣ | W | -2 | 100 | 94% | 2 | ||
| 1NT | W | = | 90 | 51% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.6 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
JINSHUO vs WARHORSE 3 : 1 VP (match 89375) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | JINSHUO | WARHORSE | |
| 27 | 2NT | S | ♠K | -1 | 50 | 72% | 3NT | S | ♠A | -2 | 100 | 62% | 2 | |||
| 28 | 1NT | W | ♥3 | = | 90 | 51% | 1NT | W | ♥6 | = | 90 | 51% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.5 | NS-0.2 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 27 | 2NT | S | -1 | 50 | 72% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | S | -2 | 100 | 62% | ||||
| 28 | 1NT | W | = | 90 | 51% | 1 | 1 | |
| 1NT | W | = | 90 | 51% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.5 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
TIANYA BRIDGE FATE vs DONGFENG FENGSHEN 3 : 1 VP (match 89376) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | TIANYA BRIDGE FATE | DONGFENG FENGSHEN | |
| 27 | 3NT | S | ♠K | -2 | 100 | 62% | 3NT | S | ♠K | -2 | 100 | 62% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 28 | 2♥ | W | ♠A | -1 | 50 | 76% | 1NT | W | ♥6 | = | 90 | 51% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.3 | NS-0.2 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 27 | 3NT | S | -2 | 100 | 62% | 1 | 1 | |
| 3NT | S | -2 | 100 | 62% | ||||
| 28 | 2♥ | W | -1 | 50 | 76% | 2 | ||
| 1NT | W | = | 90 | 51% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.3 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
NEWB vs BEIJINGXUGUANG 0 : 4 VP (match 89377) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | NEWB | BEIJINGXUGUANG | |
| 27 | 3NT | S | ♠9 | -1 | 50 | 72% | 1♥ | S | ♠A | +2 | 140 | 96% | 2 | |||
| 28 | 1NT | W | ♥3 | = | 90 | 51% | 2♠ | E | ♦K | -1 | 50 | 76% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.5 | NS+1.5 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 27 | 3NT | S | -1 | 50 | 72% | 2 | ||
| 1♥ | S | +2 | 140 | 96% | ||||
| 28 | 1NT | W | = | 90 | 51% | 2 | ||
| 2♠ | E | -1 | 50 | 76% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.5 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
GUIZHOU ZHENGYE vs HUANG HU 0 : 4 VP (match 89378) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | GUIZHOU ZHENGYE | HUANG HU | |
| 27 | 3NT | N | ♥2 | -3 | 150 | 92% | 3♥ | S | ♠K | = | 140 | 96% | 2 | |||
| 28 | 1♠ | E | ♦Q | +1 | 110 | 70% | 1NT | E | ♥6 | = | 90 | 51% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.2 | NS+1.0 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 27 | 3NT | N | -3 | 150 | 92% | 2 | ||
| 3♥ | S | = | 140 | 96% | ||||
| 28 | 1♠ | E | +1 | 110 | 70% | 2 | ||
| 1NT | E | = | 90 | 51% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.2 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
INDONESIA Open vs FORMIDABLES 2 : 2 VP (match 89379) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | INDONESIA Open | FORMIDABLES | |
| 27 | 3NT | S | ♥10 | -3 | 150 | 92% | 3NT | N | ♥3 | -1 | 50 | 72% | 2 | |||
| 28 | 2♠ | W | ♣2 | -2 | 100 | 94% | 2♦x | S | ♠K | -2 | 500 | 96% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.0 | NS-0.5 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 27 | 3NT | S | -3 | 150 | 92% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | N | -1 | 50 | 72% | ||||
| 28 | 2♠ | W | -2 | 100 | 94% | 2 | ||
| 2♦x | S | -2 | 500 | 96% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.0 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
POLAND Women vs INDIA TSANGPO 3 : 1 VP (match 89380) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | POLAND Women | INDIA TSANGPO | |
| 27 | 3NT | S | ♦8 | -2 | 100 | 62% | 4♥ | S | ♠A | -3 | 150 | 92% | 2 | |||
| 28 | 2NTx | W | ♦K | -1 | 100 | 94% | 3♠ | E | ♦Q | -2 | 100 | 94% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.6 | NS+0.0 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 27 | 3NT | S | -2 | 100 | 62% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | S | -3 | 150 | 92% | ||||
| 28 | 2NTx | W | -1 | 100 | 94% | 1 | 1 | |
| 3♠ | E | -2 | 100 | 94% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.6 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
ANIT NEGRA vs HUBEI BRIDGE TEAM 2 : 2 VP (match 89381) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ANIT NEGRA | HUBEI BRIDGE TEAM | |
| 27 | 3NT | S | ♠8 | -1 | 50 | 72% | 3NT | S | ♣2 | -2 | 100 | 62% | 2 | |||
| 28 | 2♠ | E | ♠3 | = | 110 | 70% | 1NT | E | ♠8 | -1 | 50 | 76% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.0 | NS+0.3 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 27 | 3NT | S | -1 | 50 | 72% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | S | -2 | 100 | 62% | ||||
| 28 | 2♠ | E | = | 110 | 70% | 2 | ||
| 1NT | E | -1 | 50 | 76% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.0 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
THAILAND Mixed vs CHINA JUNIORS 0 : 4 VP (match 89382) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | THAILAND Mixed | CHINA JUNIORS | |
| 27 | 3NT | S | ♠A | -2 | 100 | 62% | 2NT | S | ♠A | -1 | 50 | 72% | 2 | |||
| 28 | 2♦ | S | ♠K | -1 | 100 | 62% | 1NT | W | ♥7 | = | 90 | 51% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.5 | NS+0.5 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 27 | 3NT | S | -2 | 100 | 62% | 2 | ||
| 2NT | S | -1 | 50 | 72% | ||||
| 28 | 2♦ | S | -1 | 100 | 62% | 2 | ||
| 1NT | W | = | 90 | 51% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.5 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CANADA CHINA UNITED vs DONGFENG AUTO CO LTD 2 : 2 VP (match 89383) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CANADA CHINA UNITED | DONGFENG AUTO CO LTD | |
| 27 | 3NT | S | ♠K | -2 | 100 | 62% | 3NT | S | ♠A | -3 | 150 | 92% | 2 | |||
| 28 | 2♦x | N | ♠5 | -2 | 500 | 96% | 1NT | W | ♣3 | +1 | 120 | 82% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.2 | NS-1.5 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 27 | 3NT | S | -2 | 100 | 62% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | S | -3 | 150 | 92% | ||||
| 28 | 2♦x | N | -2 | 500 | 96% | 2 | ||
| 1NT | W | +1 | 120 | 82% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.2 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|