Round 3 — BAM Kids Qualifier
11 matches. → cumulative standings · → board records
Round 3 results↑ top
Every match of the round — teams, board-a-match points and VPs. Click a table number or ‘protocol’ for the full board-by-board scorecard below.
| Table | Home team | Visiting team | BAM (home) | BAM (visit) | VP (home) | VP (visit) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | INDIA | CHINA RDFZ BLUE | 1 | 5 | 1.00 | 5.00 | protocol → |
| 2 | AUVERGNE RHONE ALPES | CHINESE TAIPEI MLGS | 2 | 4 | 2.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 3 | SHENGXING GREEN | GERMANY | 4 | 2 | 4.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 4 | SHENGXING JUPITER | CHINA RDFZ HOPE 1 | 6 | 0 | 6.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 5 | CHINA SHJS 3 | SHENGXING MARS | 2 | 4 | 2.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 6 | NORWAY U16 | CHINA RDFZ YELLOW | 3 | 3 | 3.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 7 | CHINA SHJS 2 | CHILE | 2 | 4 | 2.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 8 | ITALY | CHINA RDFZ HOPE 3 | 2 | 4 | 2.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 9 | SHENGXING RED | CHINA SHJS 1 | 6 | 0 | 6.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 10 | TJ BRIDGE 2 | TJ BRIDGE 1 | 4 | 2 | 4.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 11 | SHENGXING YELLOW | CHINA RDFZ HOPE 2 | 4 | 2 | 4.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
Standings after round 3↑ top
Cumulative board-a-match points through round 3 — the league table as it stood after this round. → full standings, every round & players
| Place | Team | Pts | R3 | Pld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 🇹🇼 CHINESE TAIPEI MLGS | 12.00 | 4.00 | 3 |
| 1 | SHENGXING YELLOW | 12.00 | 4.00 | 3 |
| 3 | 🇩🇪 GERMANY | 11.00 | 2.00 | 3 |
| 3 | SHENGXING MARS | 11.00 | 4.00 | 3 |
| 3 | SHENGXING RED | 11.00 | 6.00 | 3 |
| 3 | TJ BRIDGE 2 | 11.00 | 4.00 | 3 |
| 7 | 🇨🇳 CHINA RDFZ YELLOW | 10.00 | 3.00 | 3 |
| 7 | 🇨🇳 CHINA SHJS 1 | 10.00 | 0.00 | 3 |
| 7 | SHENGXING JUPITER | 10.00 | 6.00 | 3 |
| 10 | 🇨🇱 CHILE | 9.00 | 4.00 | 3 |
| 10 | 🇨🇳 CHINA RDFZ HOPE 1 | 9.00 | 0.00 | 3 |
| 10 | 🇨🇳 CHINA SHJS 2 | 9.00 | 2.00 | 3 |
| 10 | 🇮🇹 ITALY | 9.00 | 2.00 | 3 |
| 10 | 🇳🇴 NORWAY U16 | 9.00 | 3.00 | 3 |
| 10 | SHENGXING GREEN | 9.00 | 4.00 | 3 |
| 10 | TJ BRIDGE 1 | 9.00 | 2.00 | 3 |
| 17 | 🇨🇳 CHINA RDFZ HOPE 3 | 8.00 | 4.00 | 3 |
| 18 | 🇮🇳 INDIA | 7.00 | 1.00 | 3 |
| 19 | AUVERGNE RHONE ALPES | 6.00 | 2.00 | 3 |
| 19 | 🇨🇳 CHINA SHJS 3 | 6.00 | 2.00 | 3 |
| 21 | 🇨🇳 CHINA RDFZ BLUE | 5.00 | 5.00 | 3 |
| 21 | 🇨🇳 CHINA RDFZ HOPE 2 | 5.00 | 2.00 | 3 |
Board-a-match over this round's field — each pair's net boards won per board (2-0 win / 1-1 tie), shown as a board-a-match %.
Round 3 board-a-match standings↑ top
| Place | Player | Team | Boards | R3 | BAM% |
|---|
🇮🇳 INDIA vs 🇨🇳 CHINA RDFZ BLUE 1 : 5 VP (match 52660) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | INDIA | CHINA RDFZ BLUE | |
| 7 | 4♠ | S | ♦4 | -1 | 100 | 69% | 3NT | N | ♠5 | +1 | 630 | 93% | 2 | |||
| 8 | 3♣ | W | ♥2 | = | 110 | 79% | 3♥ | N | ♣5 | +1 | 170 | 81% | 2 | |||
| 9 | 2♥ | S | ♣K | -1 | 50 | 95% | 3NT | S | ♣K | -1 | 50 | 95% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.9 | NS+0.6 | 1 | 5 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇮🇳 | 🇨🇳 | |||||||
| 7 | 4♠ | S | -1 | 100 | 69% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | N | +1 | 630 | 93% | ||||
| 8 | 3♣ | W | = | 110 | 79% | 2 | ||
| 3♥ | N | +1 | 170 | 81% | ||||
| 9 | 2♥ | S | -1 | 50 | 95% | 1 | 1 | |
| 3NT | S | -1 | 50 | 95% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.9 | 1 | 5 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
AUVERGNE RHONE ALPES vs CHINESE TAIPEI MLGS 2 : 4 VP (match 52661) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | AUVERGNE RHONE ALPES | CHINESE TAIPEI MLGS | |
| 7 | 3♠ | S | ♦2 | -1 | 100 | 69% | 4♥ | S | ♦2 | = | 620 | 81% | 2 | |||
| 8 | 3♣ | W | ♥Q | = | 110 | 79% | 3♣ | E | ♥A | = | 110 | 79% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 9 | 2♠ | N | ♣10 | +1 | 140 | 57% | 2♠ | N | ♥K | +1 | 140 | 57% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.1 | NS-0.1 | 2 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 3♠ | S | -1 | 100 | 69% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | S | = | 620 | 81% | ||||
| 8 | 3♣ | W | = | 110 | 79% | 1 | 1 | |
| 3♣ | E | = | 110 | 79% | ||||
| 9 | 2♠ | N | +1 | 140 | 57% | 1 | 1 | |
| 2♠ | N | +1 | 140 | 57% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.1 | 2 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SHENGXING GREEN vs GERMANY 4 : 2 VP (match 52662) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SHENGXING GREEN | GERMANY | |
| 7 | 4♠x | S | ♦4 | -2 | 500 | 100% | 3NT | N | ♦J | = | 600 | 67% | 2 | |||
| 8 | 4♥x | N | ♥6 | = | 590 | 100% | 4♠ | W | ♣6 | -3 | 150 | 76% | 2 | |||
| 9 | 2♠ | N | ♣10 | = | 110 | 74% | 3♣ | W | ♥A | -1 | 100 | 83% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.5 | NS+0.2 | 4 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 4♠x | S | -2 | 500 | 100% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | N | = | 600 | 67% | ||||
| 8 | 4♥x | N | = | 590 | 100% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | W | -3 | 150 | 76% | ||||
| 9 | 2♠ | N | = | 110 | 74% | 2 | ||
| 3♣ | W | -1 | 100 | 83% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.5 | 4 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SHENGXING JUPITER vs CHINA RDFZ HOPE 1 6 : 0 VP (match 52663) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SHENGXING JUPITER | CHINA RDFZ HOPE 1 | |
| 7 | 3NT | N | ♣K | +1 | 630 | 93% | 3♠ | S | ♦4 | = | 140 | 55% | 2 | |||
| 8 | 4♥ | N | ♣A | -1 | 50 | 60% | 4♥x | S | ♣A | -2 | 300 | 100% | 2 | |||
| 9 | 3♣ | W | ♥A | -2 | 200 | 64% | 2♠ | N | ♥K | +1 | 140 | 57% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.0 | NS-1.0 | 6 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 3NT | N | +1 | 630 | 93% | 2 | ||
| 3♠ | S | = | 140 | 55% | ||||
| 8 | 4♥ | N | -1 | 50 | 60% | 2 | ||
| 4♥x | S | -2 | 300 | 100% | ||||
| 9 | 3♣ | W | -2 | 200 | 64% | 2 | ||
| 2♠ | N | +1 | 140 | 57% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.0 | 6 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CHINA SHJS 3 vs SHENGXING MARS 2 : 4 VP (match 52664) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHINA SHJS 3 | SHENGXING MARS | |
| 7 | 3NT | N | ♦J | -2 | 200 | 88% | 4♥ | S | ♣2 | = | 620 | 81% | 2 | |||
| 8 | 4♥ | S | ♦Q | -2 | 100 | 67% | 4♥ | S | ♣Q | = | 420 | 90% | 2 | |||
| 9 | 2♥ | E | ♠9 | -4 | 400 | 93% | 2♥ | E | ♦K | -3 | 300 | 81% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.2 | NS+2.0 | 2 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 3NT | N | -2 | 200 | 88% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | S | = | 620 | 81% | ||||
| 8 | 4♥ | S | -2 | 100 | 67% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | S | = | 420 | 90% | ||||
| 9 | 2♥ | E | -4 | 400 | 93% | 2 | ||
| 2♥ | E | -3 | 300 | 81% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.2 | 2 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+2.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
🇳🇴 NORWAY U16 vs 🇨🇳 CHINA RDFZ YELLOW 3 : 3 VP (match 52665) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | NORWAY U16 | CHINA RDFZ YELLOW | |
| 7 | 3NT | N | ♠K | = | 600 | 67% | 4♠x | S | ♥A | -1 | 200 | 88% | 2 | |||
| 8 | 3♥ | S | ♣Q | = | 140 | 62% | 3♥ | N | ♣A | = | 140 | 62% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 9 | 2NT | S | ♣K | = | 120 | 67% | 3♣x | W | ♣7 | -1 | 200 | 64% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.2 | NS-0.2 | 3 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇳🇴 | 🇨🇳 | |||||||
| 7 | 3NT | N | = | 600 | 67% | 2 | ||
| 4♠x | S | -1 | 200 | 88% | ||||
| 8 | 3♥ | S | = | 140 | 62% | 1 | 1 | |
| 3♥ | N | = | 140 | 62% | ||||
| 9 | 2NT | S | = | 120 | 67% | 2 | ||
| 3♣x | W | -1 | 200 | 64% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.2 | 3 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
🇨🇳 CHINA SHJS 2 vs 🇨🇱 CHILE 2 : 4 VP (match 52666) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHINA SHJS 2 | CHILE | |
| 7 | 3NT | N | ♦J | -1 | 100 | 69% | 3NT | N | ♦J | = | 600 | 67% | 2 | |||
| 8 | 3♥ | N | ♠8 | = | 140 | 62% | 4♥ | S | ♣Q | = | 420 | 90% | 2 | |||
| 9 | 2♥ | E | ♠9 | -4 | 400 | 93% | 3♣ | W | ♠A | -3 | 300 | 81% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.7 | NS+1.8 | 2 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇨🇳 | 🇨🇱 | |||||||
| 7 | 3NT | N | -1 | 100 | 69% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | N | = | 600 | 67% | ||||
| 8 | 3♥ | N | = | 140 | 62% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | S | = | 420 | 90% | ||||
| 9 | 2♥ | E | -4 | 400 | 93% | 2 | ||
| 3♣ | W | -3 | 300 | 81% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.7 | 2 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
🇮🇹 ITALY vs 🇨🇳 CHINA RDFZ HOPE 3 2 : 4 VP (match 52667) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ITALY | CHINA RDFZ HOPE 3 | |
| 7 | 2♥ | S | ♠6 | = | 110 | 52% | 3♥ | S | ♠9 | = | 140 | 55% | 2 | |||
| 8 | 5♣ | W | ♥Q | -2 | 100 | 52% | 3♥ | S | ♣Q | = | 140 | 62% | 2 | |||
| 9 | 3NT | E | ♠9 | -3 | 300 | 81% | 2♥ | E | ♠9 | -2 | 200 | 64% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.5 | NS+0.6 | 2 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇮🇹 | 🇨🇳 | |||||||
| 7 | 2♥ | S | = | 110 | 52% | 2 | ||
| 3♥ | S | = | 140 | 55% | ||||
| 8 | 5♣ | W | -2 | 100 | 52% | 2 | ||
| 3♥ | S | = | 140 | 62% | ||||
| 9 | 3NT | E | -3 | 300 | 81% | 2 | ||
| 2♥ | E | -2 | 200 | 64% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.5 | 2 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SHENGXING RED vs CHINA SHJS 1 6 : 0 VP (match 52668) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SHENGXING RED | CHINA SHJS 1 | |
| 7 | 4♥ | S | ♦4 | = | 620 | 81% | 3♠ | S | ♦4 | -1 | 100 | 69% | 2 | |||
| 8 | 4♥ | S | ♣K | = | 420 | 90% | 3♥ | N | ♣7 | = | 140 | 62% | 2 | |||
| 9 | 2NT | S | ♣K | +2 | 180 | 52% | 2♥ | S | ♣K | = | 110 | 74% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.5 | NS-0.6 | 6 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 4♥ | S | = | 620 | 81% | 2 | ||
| 3♠ | S | -1 | 100 | 69% | ||||
| 8 | 4♥ | S | = | 420 | 90% | 2 | ||
| 3♥ | N | = | 140 | 62% | ||||
| 9 | 2NT | S | +2 | 180 | 52% | 2 | ||
| 2♥ | S | = | 110 | 74% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.5 | 6 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
TJ BRIDGE 2 vs TJ BRIDGE 1 4 : 2 VP (match 52669) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | TJ BRIDGE 2 | TJ BRIDGE 1 | |
| 7 | 4♥ | S | ♣7 | -3 | 300 | 95% | 3NT | N | ♠K | -1 | 100 | 69% | 2 | |||
| 8 | 3♣ | W | ♠2 | = | 110 | 79% | 3♣ | W | ♠3 | +1 | 130 | 93% | 2 | |||
| 9 | 3♣ | W | ♥A | -2 | 200 | 64% | 3NT | S | ♣K | -1 | 50 | 95% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.2 | NS-2.1 | 4 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 4♥ | S | -3 | 300 | 95% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | N | -1 | 100 | 69% | ||||
| 8 | 3♣ | W | = | 110 | 79% | 2 | ||
| 3♣ | W | +1 | 130 | 93% | ||||
| 9 | 3♣ | W | -2 | 200 | 64% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | S | -1 | 50 | 95% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.2 | 4 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-2.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SHENGXING YELLOW vs CHINA RDFZ HOPE 2 4 : 2 VP (match 52670) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SHENGXING YELLOW | CHINA RDFZ HOPE 2 | |
| 7 | 4♠ | S | ♦2 | -1 | 100 | 69% | 2♠x | S | ♣2 | = | 670 | 100% | 2 | |||
| 8 | 4♥ | N | ♣5 | -1 | 50 | 60% | 4♣ | W | ♥Q | = | 130 | 93% | 2 | |||
| 9 | 2♥x | E | ♦K | -3 | 800 | 100% | 3♣ | W | ♥A | -1 | 100 | 83% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.4 | NS-0.5 | 4 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 4♠ | S | -1 | 100 | 69% | 2 | ||
| 2♠x | S | = | 670 | 100% | ||||
| 8 | 4♥ | N | -1 | 50 | 60% | 2 | ||
| 4♣ | W | = | 130 | 93% | ||||
| 9 | 2♥x | E | -3 | 800 | 100% | 2 | ||
| 3♣ | W | -1 | 100 | 83% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.4 | 4 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|