Round 1 — BAM Teams
13 matches. → cumulative standings · → board records
Round 1 results↑ top
Every match of the round — teams, board-a-match points and VPs. Click a table number or ‘protocol’ for the full board-by-board scorecard below.
| Table | Home team | Visiting team | BAM (home) | BAM (visit) | VP (home) | VP (visit) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | TU MAM | CHILE SENIORS | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 2 | ALLEYCATS | INDIA MEN | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 3 | SMILE | VITAMINA | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 4 | HOLLANDS | BRIDGE UNLEASHED | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 5 | GO HABS GO JETS | LAS VELITAS | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 6 | DRINTEAM | CON SUERTE | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 7 | TAMEWARE | PAME | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 8 | PAKISTAN | CARACCI | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 9 | KIWI JAMR | SHOURIE | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 10 | INDIAN WOMEN | BLACK | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 11 | GAUSS | AUSTRIA | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 12 | GUADELOUPE | CHINESE TAIPEI OPEN | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 13 | TUTTIFRUTTI | HONG KONG CHINA OPEN | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
Standings after round 1↑ top
Cumulative board-a-match points through round 1 — the league table as it stood after this round. → full standings, every round & players
| Place | Team | Pts | R1 | Pld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ALLEYCATS | 4.00 | 4.00 | 1 |
| 1 | DRINTEAM | 4.00 | 4.00 | 1 |
| 1 | GO HABS GO JETS | 4.00 | 4.00 | 1 |
| 1 | PAKISTAN | 4.00 | 4.00 | 1 |
| 1 | TU MAM | 4.00 | 4.00 | 1 |
| 1 | VITAMINA | 4.00 | 4.00 | 1 |
| 7 | BLACK | 3.00 | 3.00 | 1 |
| 7 | GAUSS | 3.00 | 3.00 | 1 |
| 7 | GUADELOUPE | 3.00 | 3.00 | 1 |
| 7 | TAMEWARE | 3.00 | 3.00 | 1 |
| 11 | BRIDGE UNLEASHED | 2.00 | 2.00 | 1 |
| 11 | HOLLANDS | 2.00 | 2.00 | 1 |
| 11 | HONG KONG CHINA OPEN | 2.00 | 2.00 | 1 |
| 11 | KIWI JAMR | 2.00 | 2.00 | 1 |
| 11 | SHOURIE | 2.00 | 2.00 | 1 |
| 11 | TUTTIFRUTTI | 2.00 | 2.00 | 1 |
| 17 | AUSTRIA | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1 |
| 17 | CHINESE TAIPEI OPEN | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1 |
| 17 | INDIAN WOMEN | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1 |
| 17 | PAME | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1 |
| 21 | CARACCI | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1 |
| 21 | CHILE SENIORS | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1 |
| 21 | CON SUERTE | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1 |
| 21 | INDIA MEN | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1 |
| 21 | LAS VELITAS | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1 |
| 21 | SMILE | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1 |
Board-a-match over this round's field — each pair's net boards won per board (2-0 win / 1-1 tie), shown as a board-a-match %.
Round 1 board-a-match standings↑ top
| Place | Player | Team | Boards | R1 | BAM% |
|---|
TU MAM vs CHILE SENIORS 4 : 0 VP (match 126319) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | TU MAM | CHILE SENIORS | |
| 7♠ | N | ♥2 | = | 1510 | 90% | 4♠x | N | ♥2 | +3 | 890 | 80% | 2 | ||||
| 5♦ | S | ♥A | = | 600 | 62% | 5♦ | S | ♥A | -1 | 100 | 88% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.0 | NS-1.4 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7♠ | N | = | 1510 | 90% | 2 | |||
| 4♠x | N | +3 | 890 | 80% | ||||
| 5♦ | S | = | 600 | 62% | 2 | |||
| 5♦ | S | -1 | 100 | 88% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.0 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
ALLEYCATS vs INDIA MEN 4 : 0 VP (match 126320) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ALLEYCATS | INDIA MEN | |
| 7♠ | N | ♥2 | = | 1510 | 90% | 6♠ | N | ♣Q | +1 | 1010 | 56% | 2 | ||||
| 5♦ | S | ♥A | = | 600 | 62% | 4♦ | N | ♥3 | = | 130 | 72% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.0 | NS-0.6 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7♠ | N | = | 1510 | 90% | 2 | |||
| 6♠ | N | +1 | 1010 | 56% | ||||
| 5♦ | S | = | 600 | 62% | 2 | |||
| 4♦ | N | = | 130 | 72% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.0 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SMILE vs VITAMINA 0 : 4 VP (match 126321) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SMILE | VITAMINA | |
| 3♠ | N | ♥2 | +4 | 260 | 100% | 6♠x | N | ♥Q | +1 | 1310 | 74% | 2 | ||||
| 5♦ | S | ♥A | -1 | 100 | 88% | 5♦ | S | ♣9 | = | 600 | 62% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.8 | NS+0.7 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♠ | N | +4 | 260 | 100% | 2 | |||
| 6♠x | N | +1 | 1310 | 74% | ||||
| 5♦ | S | -1 | 100 | 88% | 2 | |||
| 5♦ | S | = | 600 | 62% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.8 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
HOLLANDS vs BRIDGE UNLEASHED 2 : 2 VP (match 126322) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | HOLLANDS | BRIDGE UNLEASHED | |
| 7♠x | N | ♥3 | = | 1770 | 100% | 4♠ | N | ♥2 | +3 | 510 | 88% | 2 | ||||
| 3♥x | W | ♠6 | -2 | 300 | 68% | 5♦ | S | ♠4 | = | 600 | 62% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.6 | NS-0.5 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7♠x | N | = | 1770 | 100% | 2 | |||
| 4♠ | N | +3 | 510 | 88% | ||||
| 3♥x | W | -2 | 300 | 68% | 2 | |||
| 5♦ | S | = | 600 | 62% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.6 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
GO HABS GO JETS vs LAS VELITAS 4 : 0 VP (match 126323) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | GO HABS GO JETS | LAS VELITAS | |
| 6♠ | N | ♥2 | +1 | 1010 | 56% | 4♠ | N | ♥2 | +3 | 510 | 88% | 2 | ||||
| 6♦ | S | ♥A | -1 | 100 | 88% | 6♦ | S | ♥A | -2 | 200 | 100% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.9 | NS-1.8 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 6♠ | N | +1 | 1010 | 56% | 2 | |||
| 4♠ | N | +3 | 510 | 88% | ||||
| 6♦ | S | -1 | 100 | 88% | 2 | |||
| 6♦ | S | -2 | 200 | 100% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.9 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
DRINTEAM vs CON SUERTE 4 : 0 VP (match 126324) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | DRINTEAM | CON SUERTE | |
| 6♠ | N | ♥4 | +1 | 1010 | 56% | 7♥x | W | ♦K | -3 | 500 | 96% | 2 | ||||
| 5♦ | S | ♣9 | = | 600 | 62% | 5♦ | S | ♥A | -1 | 100 | 88% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.1 | NS-1.7 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 6♠ | N | +1 | 1010 | 56% | 2 | |||
| 7♥x | W | -3 | 500 | 96% | ||||
| 5♦ | S | = | 600 | 62% | 2 | |||
| 5♦ | S | -1 | 100 | 88% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.1 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
TAMEWARE vs PAME 3 : 1 VP (match 126325) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | TAMEWARE | PAME | |
| 6♠x | N | ♥2 | +1 | 1310 | 74% | 6♠ | N | ♣Q | +1 | 1010 | 56% | 2 | ||||
| 5♦ | S | ♥A | = | 600 | 62% | 3NT | S | ♥7 | = | 600 | 62% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.7 | NS+0.1 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 6♠x | N | +1 | 1310 | 74% | 2 | |||
| 6♠ | N | +1 | 1010 | 56% | ||||
| 5♦ | S | = | 600 | 62% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3NT | S | = | 600 | 62% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.7 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
PAKISTAN vs CARACCI 4 : 0 VP (match 126326) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | PAKISTAN | CARACCI | |
| 6♠x | N | ♥2 | +1 | 1310 | 74% | 6♠ | N | ♥3 | +1 | 1010 | 56% | 2 | ||||
| 5♣ | S | ♥A | = | 600 | 62% | 2♠ | E | ♣K | -1 | 50 | 76% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.7 | NS-0.6 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 6♠x | N | +1 | 1310 | 74% | 2 | |||
| 6♠ | N | +1 | 1010 | 56% | ||||
| 5♣ | S | = | 600 | 62% | 2 | |||
| 2♠ | E | -1 | 50 | 76% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.7 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
KIWI JAMR vs SHOURIE 2 : 2 VP (match 126327) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | KIWI JAMR | SHOURIE | |
| 4♠ | N | ♥2 | +3 | 510 | 88% | 7♠ | N | ♥3 | = | 1510 | 90% | 2 | ||||
| 5♦ | S | ♥A | = | 600 | 62% | 6♦ | S | ♥A | -1 | 100 | 88% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.5 | NS+0.0 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♠ | N | +3 | 510 | 88% | 2 | |||
| 7♠ | N | = | 1510 | 90% | ||||
| 5♦ | S | = | 600 | 62% | 2 | |||
| 6♦ | S | -1 | 100 | 88% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.5 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
INDIAN WOMEN vs BLACK 1 : 3 VP (match 126328) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | INDIAN WOMEN | BLACK | |
| 6♠ | N | ♥8 | +1 | 1010 | 56% | 6♠ | N | ♥3 | +1 | 1010 | 56% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 5♦ | S | ♥A | = | 600 | 62% | 3NT | S | ♥7 | +2 | 660 | 94% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.1 | NS+0.8 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 6♠ | N | +1 | 1010 | 56% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 6♠ | N | +1 | 1010 | 56% | ||||
| 5♦ | S | = | 600 | 62% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | S | +2 | 660 | 94% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.1 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
GAUSS vs AUSTRIA 3 : 1 VP (match 126329) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | GAUSS | AUSTRIA | |
| 7♠ | N | ♣Q | = | 1510 | 90% | 6♠ | N | ♥2 | +1 | 1010 | 56% | 2 | ||||
| 5♦ | S | ♥A | = | 600 | 62% | 5♦ | S | ♥A | = | 600 | 62% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.0 | NS+0.1 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7♠ | N | = | 1510 | 90% | 2 | |||
| 6♠ | N | +1 | 1010 | 56% | ||||
| 5♦ | S | = | 600 | 62% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 5♦ | S | = | 600 | 62% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.0 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
GUADELOUPE vs CHINESE TAIPEI OPEN 3 : 1 VP (match 126330) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | GUADELOUPE | CHINESE TAIPEI OPEN | |
| 6♠ | N | ♥2 | +1 | 1010 | 56% | 6♠ | N | ♥2 | +1 | 1010 | 56% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 3NT | S | ♥7 | +3 | 690 | 100% | 5♣ | S | ♥A | = | 600 | 62% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.9 | NS+0.1 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 6♠ | N | +1 | 1010 | 56% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 6♠ | N | +1 | 1010 | 56% | ||||
| 3NT | S | +3 | 690 | 100% | 2 | |||
| 5♣ | S | = | 600 | 62% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.9 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
TUTTIFRUTTI vs HONG KONG CHINA OPEN 2 : 2 VP (match 126331) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | TUTTIFRUTTI | HONG KONG CHINA OPEN | |
| 6♠ | N | ♥3 | +1 | 1010 | 56% | 6♠x | N | ♣Q | +1 | 1310 | 74% | 2 | ||||
| 3NT | S | ♥7 | +2 | 660 | 94% | 5♣ | S | ♣9 | = | 600 | 62% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.8 | NS+0.7 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 6♠ | N | +1 | 1010 | 56% | 2 | |||
| 6♠x | N | +1 | 1310 | 74% | ||||
| 3NT | S | +2 | 660 | 94% | 2 | |||
| 5♣ | S | = | 600 | 62% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.8 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
| ♠ AQJT853 ♥ – ♦ AKJT72 ♣ – | ||
| ♠ 97 ♥ AKT75 ♦ 983 ♣ AK4 | 1 Dlr N None | ♠ 64 ♥ Q8432 ♦ 54 ♣ QJ86 |
| ♠ K2 ♥ J96 ♦ Q6 ♣ T97532 |
| NT | ♠ | ♥ | ♦ | ♣ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 4 | 13 | 3 | 13 | 6 |
| S | 4 | 13 | 3 | 13 | 6 |
| E | 0 | 0 | 9 | 0 | 6 |
| W | 0 | 0 | 9 | 0 | 6 |
| ♠ A8765 ♥ 6 ♦ A942 ♣ A64 | ||
| ♠ K94 ♥ A9872 ♦ K53 ♣ 98 | 2 Dlr E N-S | ♠ QJT32 ♥ Q543 ♦ Q ♣ T32 |
| ♠ – ♥ KJT ♦ JT876 ♣ KQJ75 |
| NT | ♠ | ♥ | ♦ | ♣ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 9 | 7 | 6 | 11 | 11 |
| S | 9 | 7 | 6 | 11 | 11 |
| E | 3 | 6 | 7 | 2 | 2 |
| W | 3 | 6 | 7 | 2 | 2 |