Round 5 — BAM Teams
13 matches. → cumulative standings · → board records
Round 5 results↑ top
Every match of the round — teams, board-a-match points and VPs. Click a table number or ‘protocol’ for the full board-by-board scorecard below.
| Table | Home team | Visiting team | BAM (home) | BAM (visit) | VP (home) | VP (visit) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | LAS VELITAS | CHILE SENIORS | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 2 | BRIDGE UNLEASHED | CON SUERTE | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 3 | VITAMINA | PAME | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 4 | INDIA MEN | CARACCI | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 5 | TU MAM | SHOURIE | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 6 | ALLEYCATS | BLACK | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 7 | SMILE | AUSTRIA | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 8 | HOLLANDS | CHINESE TAIPEI OPEN | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 9 | GO HABS GO JETS | HONG KONG CHINA OPEN | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 10 | DRINTEAM | TUTTIFRUTTI | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 11 | TAMEWARE | GUADELOUPE | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 12 | PAKISTAN | GAUSS | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 13 | KIWI JAMR | INDIAN WOMEN | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
Standings after round 5↑ top
Cumulative board-a-match points through round 5 — the league table as it stood after this round. → full standings, every round & players
| Place | Team | Pts | R5 | Pld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | TU MAM | 17.00 | 3.00 | 5 |
| 2 | ALLEYCATS | 15.00 | 3.00 | 5 |
| 2 | HONG KONG CHINA OPEN | 15.00 | 4.00 | 5 |
| 4 | BLACK | 14.00 | 1.00 | 5 |
| 5 | TAMEWARE | 13.00 | 2.00 | 5 |
| 5 | TUTTIFRUTTI | 13.00 | 1.00 | 5 |
| 7 | HOLLANDS | 12.00 | 4.00 | 5 |
| 7 | INDIAN WOMEN | 12.00 | 2.00 | 5 |
| 9 | DRINTEAM | 11.00 | 3.00 | 5 |
| 9 | GO HABS GO JETS | 11.00 | 0.00 | 5 |
| 9 | VITAMINA | 11.00 | 3.00 | 5 |
| 12 | GAUSS | 10.00 | 3.00 | 5 |
| 12 | INDIA MEN | 10.00 | 2.00 | 5 |
| 12 | KIWI JAMR | 10.00 | 2.00 | 5 |
| 15 | GUADELOUPE | 9.00 | 2.00 | 5 |
| 15 | LAS VELITAS | 9.00 | 4.00 | 5 |
| 15 | SHOURIE | 9.00 | 1.00 | 5 |
| 18 | AUSTRIA | 8.00 | 4.00 | 5 |
| 18 | CHINESE TAIPEI OPEN | 8.00 | 0.00 | 5 |
| 18 | CON SUERTE | 8.00 | 1.00 | 5 |
| 18 | PAKISTAN | 8.00 | 1.00 | 5 |
| 22 | BRIDGE UNLEASHED | 7.00 | 3.00 | 5 |
| 22 | PAME | 7.00 | 1.00 | 5 |
| 24 | CARACCI | 6.00 | 2.00 | 5 |
| 25 | CHILE SENIORS | 4.00 | 0.00 | 5 |
| 26 | SMILE | 3.00 | 0.00 | 5 |
Board-a-match over this round's field — each pair's net boards won per board (2-0 win / 1-1 tie), shown as a board-a-match %.
Round 5 board-a-match standings↑ top
| Place | Player | Team | Boards | R5 | BAM% |
|---|
LAS VELITAS vs CHILE SENIORS 4 : 0 VP (match 126371) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | LAS VELITAS | CHILE SENIORS | |
| 5♦ | W | ♥A | -3 | 300 | 100% | 3NT | E | ♦K | +1 | 630 | 92% | 2 | ||||
| 3NT | W | ♥2 | +1 | 630 | 60% | 4♠ | E | ♦10 | +1 | 650 | 60% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.2 | NS-1.0 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 5♦ | W | -3 | 300 | 100% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | E | +1 | 630 | 92% | ||||
| 3NT | W | +1 | 630 | 60% | 2 | |||
| 4♠ | E | +1 | 650 | 60% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.2 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BRIDGE UNLEASHED vs CON SUERTE 3 : 1 VP (match 126372) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BRIDGE UNLEASHED | CON SUERTE | |
| 3NT | E | ♦K | -2 | 200 | 92% | 3NT | E | ♦K | +2 | 660 | 100% | 2 | ||||
| 4♠ | E | ♥4 | = | 620 | 84% | 4♠ | E | ♦10 | = | 620 | 84% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.5 | NS-0.3 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3NT | E | -2 | 200 | 92% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | E | +2 | 660 | 100% | ||||
| 4♠ | E | = | 620 | 84% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♠ | E | = | 620 | 84% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.5 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
VITAMINA vs PAME 3 : 1 VP (match 126373) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | VITAMINA | PAME | |
| 2♥x | N | ♠10 | -2 | 300 | 64% | 3NT | E | ♦K | = | 600 | 80% | 2 | ||||
| 3NT | W | ♦4 | +2 | 660 | 88% | 3NT | E | ♣10 | +2 | 660 | 88% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.0 | NS-1.4 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2♥x | N | -2 | 300 | 64% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | E | = | 600 | 80% | ||||
| 3NT | W | +2 | 660 | 88% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3NT | E | +2 | 660 | 88% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.0 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
INDIA MEN vs CARACCI 2 : 2 VP (match 126374) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | INDIA MEN | CARACCI | |
| 2♥x | N | ♠10 | -3 | 500 | 72% | 3NT | E | ♦Q | = | 600 | 80% | 2 | ||||
| 4♠ | E | ♣A | +1 | 650 | 60% | 3NT | E | ♥9 | +1 | 630 | 60% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.6 | NS-0.4 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2♥x | N | -3 | 500 | 72% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | E | = | 600 | 80% | ||||
| 4♠ | E | +1 | 650 | 60% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | E | +1 | 630 | 60% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.6 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
TU MAM vs SHOURIE 3 : 1 VP (match 126375) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | TU MAM | SHOURIE | |
| 3♦ | E | ♥8 | -1 | 100 | 70% | 3NT | W | ♥A | +1 | 630 | 92% | 2 | ||||
| 3NT | E | ♣10 | +2 | 660 | 88% | 3NT | E | ♣3 | +2 | 660 | 88% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.4 | NS-1.6 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♦ | E | -1 | 100 | 70% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | W | +1 | 630 | 92% | ||||
| 3NT | E | +2 | 660 | 88% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3NT | E | +2 | 660 | 88% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.4 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
ALLEYCATS vs BLACK 3 : 1 VP (match 126376) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ALLEYCATS | BLACK | |
| 3NT | E | ♥8 | -1 | 100 | 70% | 2♥x | N | ♠10 | -2 | 300 | 64% | 2 | ||||
| 4♠ | E | ♥4 | = | 620 | 84% | 4♠ | E | ♣A | = | 620 | 84% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.1 | NS+0.4 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3NT | E | -1 | 100 | 70% | 2 | |||
| 2♥x | N | -2 | 300 | 64% | ||||
| 4♠ | E | = | 620 | 84% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♠ | E | = | 620 | 84% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.1 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SMILE vs AUSTRIA 0 : 4 VP (match 126377) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SMILE | AUSTRIA | |
| 3NT | E | ♦K | +1 | 630 | 92% | 2♥ | N | ♠10 | -3 | 150 | 50% | 2 | ||||
| 3NT | W | ♣7 | +2 | 660 | 88% | 4♠ | E | ♥4 | = | 620 | 84% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.6 | NS+0.7 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3NT | E | +1 | 630 | 92% | 2 | |||
| 2♥ | N | -3 | 150 | 50% | ||||
| 3NT | W | +2 | 660 | 88% | 2 | |||
| 4♠ | E | = | 620 | 84% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.6 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
HOLLANDS vs CHINESE TAIPEI OPEN 4 : 0 VP (match 126378) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | HOLLANDS | CHINESE TAIPEI OPEN | |
| 4♣ | E | ♥8 | -2 | 200 | 92% | 3NT | W | ♠6 | -1 | 100 | 70% | 2 | ||||
| 4♠ | E | ♣A | +1 | 650 | 60% | 3NT | W | ♥2 | +2 | 660 | 88% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.6 | NS-0.4 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♣ | E | -2 | 200 | 92% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | W | -1 | 100 | 70% | ||||
| 4♠ | E | +1 | 650 | 60% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | W | +2 | 660 | 88% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.6 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
GO HABS GO JETS vs HONG KONG CHINA OPEN 0 : 4 VP (match 126379) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | GO HABS GO JETS | HONG KONG CHINA OPEN | |
| 3♣ | N | ♠10 | -6 | 300 | 64% | 2♦ | N | ♣A | -3 | 150 | 50% | 2 | ||||
| 4♠ | E | ♥4 | +1 | 650 | 60% | 4♠ | E | ♥4 | = | 620 | 84% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.5 | NS+0.7 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♣ | N | -6 | 300 | 64% | 2 | |||
| 2♦ | N | -3 | 150 | 50% | ||||
| 4♠ | E | +1 | 650 | 60% | 2 | |||
| 4♠ | E | = | 620 | 84% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.5 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
DRINTEAM vs TUTTIFRUTTI 3 : 1 VP (match 126380) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | DRINTEAM | TUTTIFRUTTI | |
| 1NT | W | ♣5 | -1 | 100 | 70% | 2NT | E | ♦K | +4 | 240 | 56% | 2 | ||||
| 4♠ | E | ♥4 | = | 620 | 84% | 4♠ | E | ♦10 | = | 620 | 84% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.1 | NS+0.6 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 1NT | W | -1 | 100 | 70% | 2 | |||
| 2NT | E | +4 | 240 | 56% | ||||
| 4♠ | E | = | 620 | 84% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♠ | E | = | 620 | 84% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.1 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
TAMEWARE vs GUADELOUPE 2 : 2 VP (match 126381) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | TAMEWARE | GUADELOUPE | |
| 3♠ | W | ♥A | -1 | 100 | 70% | 3♦ | W | ♥A | -1 | 100 | 70% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 4♠ | E | ♥4 | +1 | 650 | 60% | 4♠ | E | ♣A | +1 | 650 | 60% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.2 | NS+0.2 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♠ | W | -1 | 100 | 70% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3♦ | W | -1 | 100 | 70% | ||||
| 4♠ | E | +1 | 650 | 60% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♠ | E | +1 | 650 | 60% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.2 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
PAKISTAN vs GAUSS 1 : 3 VP (match 126382) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | PAKISTAN | GAUSS | |
| 3NT | W | ♥A | -1 | 100 | 70% | 3NT | E | ♦K | -1 | 100 | 70% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 3NT | E | ♣10 | +2 | 660 | 88% | 4♠ | E | ♥4 | = | 620 | 84% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.4 | NS+1.1 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3NT | W | -1 | 100 | 70% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3NT | E | -1 | 100 | 70% | ||||
| 3NT | E | +2 | 660 | 88% | 2 | |||
| 4♠ | E | = | 620 | 84% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.4 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
KIWI JAMR vs INDIAN WOMEN 2 : 2 VP (match 126383) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | KIWI JAMR | INDIAN WOMEN | |
| 3NT | E | ♦K | = | 600 | 80% | 3♣ | E | ♦K | -2 | 200 | 92% | 2 | ||||
| 3NT | E | ♥4 | +1 | 630 | 60% | 5♠ | E | ♣A | = | 650 | 60% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.4 | NS+0.6 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3NT | E | = | 600 | 80% | 2 | |||
| 3♣ | E | -2 | 200 | 92% | ||||
| 3NT | E | +1 | 630 | 60% | 2 | |||
| 5♠ | E | = | 650 | 60% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.4 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
| ♠ 8654 ♥ AKJ72 ♦ – ♣ 9853 | ||
| ♠ AKJ32 ♥ T94 ♦ J876 ♣ K | 9 Dlr N E-W | ♠ T ♥ Q63 ♦ A542 ♣ AQ742 |
| ♠ Q97 ♥ 85 ♦ KQT93 ♣ JT6 |
| NT | ♠ | ♥ | ♦ | ♣ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 4 | 3 | 5 | 4 | 4 |
| S | 4 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 5 |
| E | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 7 |
| W | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 7 |
| ♠ QJ2 ♥ K752 ♦ 5432 ♣ 76 | ||
| ♠ A96 ♥ JT6 ♦ AQJ6 ♣ KJ2 | 10 Dlr E All | ♠ KT743 ♥ A83 ♦ K87 ♣ Q8 |
| ♠ 85 ♥ Q94 ♦ T9 ♣ AT9543 |
| NT | ♠ | ♥ | ♦ | ♣ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 3 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 5 |
| S | 3 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 5 |
| E | 10 | 10 | 8 | 10 | 8 |
| W | 10 | 10 | 9 | 10 | 8 |