Round 20 — BAM Teams
13 matches. → cumulative standings · → board records
Round 20 results↑ top
Every match of the round — teams, board-a-match points and VPs. Click a table number or ‘protocol’ for the full board-by-board scorecard below.
| Table | Home team | Visiting team | BAM (home) | BAM (visit) | VP (home) | VP (visit) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | TAMEWARE | CHILE SENIORS | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 2 | PAKISTAN | DRINTEAM | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 3 | KIWI JAMR | GO HABS GO JETS | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 4 | INDIAN WOMEN | HOLLANDS | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 5 | GAUSS | SMILE | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 6 | GUADELOUPE | ALLEYCATS | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 7 | TUTTIFRUTTI | TU MAM | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 8 | HONG KONG CHINA OPEN | INDIA MEN | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 9 | CHINESE TAIPEI OPEN | VITAMINA | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 10 | AUSTRIA | BRIDGE UNLEASHED | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 11 | BLACK | LAS VELITAS | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 12 | SHOURIE | CON SUERTE | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 13 | CARACCI | PAME | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
Standings after round 20↑ top
Cumulative board-a-match points through round 20 — the league table as it stood after this round. → full standings, every round & players
| Place | Team | Pts | R20 | Pld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GAUSS | 54.00 | 4.00 | 20 |
| 2 | TU MAM | 52.00 | 2.00 | 20 |
| 3 | AUSTRIA | 51.00 | 3.00 | 20 |
| 4 | BLACK | 50.00 | 4.00 | 20 |
| 5 | HOLLANDS | 48.00 | 2.00 | 20 |
| 6 | HONG KONG CHINA OPEN | 47.00 | 2.00 | 20 |
| 7 | VITAMINA | 46.00 | 2.00 | 20 |
| 8 | TUTTIFRUTTI | 44.00 | 2.00 | 20 |
| 9 | DRINTEAM | 43.00 | 2.00 | 20 |
| 10 | SHOURIE | 42.00 | 2.00 | 20 |
| 10 | TAMEWARE | 42.00 | 3.00 | 20 |
| 12 | PAME | 41.20 | 2.00 | 20 |
| 13 | CHINESE TAIPEI OPEN | 41.00 | 2.00 | 20 |
| 13 | GO HABS GO JETS | 41.00 | 4.00 | 20 |
| 15 | PAKISTAN | 40.00 | 2.00 | 20 |
| 16 | INDIAN WOMEN | 39.00 | 2.00 | 20 |
| 16 | KIWI JAMR | 39.00 | 0.00 | 20 |
| 18 | ALLEYCATS | 38.00 | 1.00 | 20 |
| 19 | INDIA MEN | 37.00 | 2.00 | 20 |
| 20 | CARACCI | 36.00 | 2.00 | 20 |
| 21 | BRIDGE UNLEASHED | 33.00 | 1.00 | 20 |
| 22 | CON SUERTE | 32.00 | 2.00 | 20 |
| 22 | GUADELOUPE | 32.00 | 3.00 | 20 |
| 22 | LAS VELITAS | 32.00 | 0.00 | 20 |
| 25 | CHILE SENIORS | 25.00 | 1.00 | 20 |
| 26 | SMILE | 12.00 | 0.00 | 20 |
Board-a-match over this round's field — each pair's net boards won per board (2-0 win / 1-1 tie), shown as a board-a-match %.
Round 20 board-a-match standings↑ top
| Place | Player | Team | Boards | R20 | BAM% |
|---|
TAMEWARE vs CHILE SENIORS 3 : 1 VP (match 126566) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | TAMEWARE | CHILE SENIORS | |
| 1NT | S | ♣3 | +1 | 120 | 52% | 1NT | S | ♣4 | +1 | 120 | 52% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 3NT | S | ♠4 | +2 | 460 | 92% | 3NT | S | ♠4 | = | 400 | 58% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.9 | NS-0.1 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 1NT | S | +1 | 120 | 52% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 1NT | S | +1 | 120 | 52% | ||||
| 3NT | S | +2 | 460 | 92% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | S | = | 400 | 58% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.9 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
PAKISTAN vs DRINTEAM 2 : 2 VP (match 126567) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | PAKISTAN | DRINTEAM | |
| 1NT | S | ♣4 | +1 | 120 | 52% | 1NT | S | ♣4 | +1 | 120 | 52% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 3NT | S | ♠7 | = | 400 | 58% | 3NT | N | ♥2 | = | 400 | 58% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.1 | NS-0.1 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 1NT | S | +1 | 120 | 52% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 1NT | S | +1 | 120 | 52% | ||||
| 3NT | S | = | 400 | 58% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3NT | N | = | 400 | 58% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.1 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
KIWI JAMR vs GO HABS GO JETS 0 : 4 VP (match 126568) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | KIWI JAMR | GO HABS GO JETS | |
| 1NT | S | ♥10 | = | 90 | 92% | 2♠ | N | ♥Q | +1 | 140 | 88% | 2 | ||||
| 3NT | S | ♠7 | = | 400 | 58% | 3NT | S | ♠7 | +1 | 430 | 82% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.0 | NS+1.4 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 1NT | S | = | 90 | 92% | 2 | |||
| 2♠ | N | +1 | 140 | 88% | ||||
| 3NT | S | = | 400 | 58% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | S | +1 | 430 | 82% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.0 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
INDIAN WOMEN vs HOLLANDS 2 : 2 VP (match 126569) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | INDIAN WOMEN | HOLLANDS | |
| 1NT | S | ♣4 | +2 | 150 | 94% | 1NT | S | ♣4 | +1 | 120 | 52% | 2 | ||||
| 3NT | S | ♠4 | = | 400 | 58% | 2♠x | W | ♦J | -3 | 500 | 100% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.7 | NS+1.0 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 1NT | S | +2 | 150 | 94% | 2 | |||
| 1NT | S | +1 | 120 | 52% | ||||
| 3NT | S | = | 400 | 58% | 2 | |||
| 2♠x | W | -3 | 500 | 100% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.7 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
GAUSS vs SMILE 4 : 0 VP (match 126570) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | GAUSS | SMILE | |
| 1NT | S | ♣3 | +3 | 180 | 100% | 1NT | S | ♣4 | +1 | 120 | 52% | 2 | ||||
| 3NT | S | ♣2 | = | 400 | 58% | 5♣ | N | ♠A | -3 | 150 | 100% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.8 | NS-1.0 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 1NT | S | +3 | 180 | 100% | 2 | |||
| 1NT | S | +1 | 120 | 52% | ||||
| 3NT | S | = | 400 | 58% | 2 | |||
| 5♣ | N | -3 | 150 | 100% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.8 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
GUADELOUPE vs ALLEYCATS 3 : 1 VP (match 126571) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | GUADELOUPE | ALLEYCATS | |
| 1NT | S | ♣9 | +1 | 120 | 52% | 1NT | S | ♣4 | +1 | 120 | 52% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 3NT | S | ♠7 | +2 | 460 | 92% | 3NT | S | ♠7 | = | 400 | 58% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.9 | NS-0.1 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 1NT | S | +1 | 120 | 52% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 1NT | S | +1 | 120 | 52% | ||||
| 3NT | S | +2 | 460 | 92% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | S | = | 400 | 58% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.9 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
TUTTIFRUTTI vs TU MAM 2 : 2 VP (match 126572) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | TUTTIFRUTTI | TU MAM | |
| 1NT | S | ♣3 | +2 | 150 | 94% | 1NT | S | ♣4 | +1 | 120 | 52% | 2 | ||||
| 3NT | S | ♥4 | -1 | 50 | 96% | 3NT | N | ♥2 | = | 400 | 58% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.0 | NS-0.1 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 1NT | S | +2 | 150 | 94% | 2 | |||
| 1NT | S | +1 | 120 | 52% | ||||
| 3NT | S | -1 | 50 | 96% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | N | = | 400 | 58% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.0 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
HONG KONG CHINA OPEN vs INDIA MEN 2 : 2 VP (match 126573) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | HONG KONG CHINA OPEN | INDIA MEN | |
| 1NT | S | ♣4 | +1 | 120 | 52% | 1NT | S | ♣4 | +1 | 120 | 52% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 5♦ | S | ♠5 | = | 400 | 58% | 3NT | S | ♠7 | = | 400 | 58% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.1 | NS-0.1 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 1NT | S | +1 | 120 | 52% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 1NT | S | +1 | 120 | 52% | ||||
| 5♦ | S | = | 400 | 58% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3NT | S | = | 400 | 58% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.1 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CHINESE TAIPEI OPEN vs VITAMINA 2 : 2 VP (match 126574) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHINESE TAIPEI OPEN | VITAMINA | |
| 1NT | S | ♣4 | +1 | 120 | 52% | 1NT | S | ♣4 | +1 | 120 | 52% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 3NT | S | ♠7 | = | 400 | 58% | 3NT | N | ♠3 | = | 400 | 58% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.1 | NS-0.1 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 1NT | S | +1 | 120 | 52% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 1NT | S | +1 | 120 | 52% | ||||
| 3NT | S | = | 400 | 58% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3NT | N | = | 400 | 58% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.1 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
AUSTRIA vs BRIDGE UNLEASHED 3 : 1 VP (match 126575) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | AUSTRIA | BRIDGE UNLEASHED | |
| 1NT | S | ♣4 | +1 | 120 | 52% | 1NT | S | ♣4 | = | 90 | 92% | 2 | ||||
| 3NT | S | ♠7 | = | 400 | 58% | 3NT | S | ♠7 | = | 400 | 58% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.1 | NS-1.0 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 1NT | S | +1 | 120 | 52% | 2 | |||
| 1NT | S | = | 90 | 92% | ||||
| 3NT | S | = | 400 | 58% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3NT | S | = | 400 | 58% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.1 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BLACK vs LAS VELITAS 4 : 0 VP (match 126576) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BLACK | LAS VELITAS | |
| 1NT | S | ♣3 | +1 | 120 | 52% | 4♠ | S | ♥10 | -2 | 200 | 100% | 2 | ||||
| 3NT | S | ♠7 | +1 | 430 | 82% | 3NT | S | ♦Q | = | 400 | 58% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.7 | NS-1.2 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 1NT | S | +1 | 120 | 52% | 2 | |||
| 4♠ | S | -2 | 200 | 100% | ||||
| 3NT | S | +1 | 430 | 82% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | S | = | 400 | 58% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.7 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SHOURIE vs CON SUERTE 2 : 2 VP (match 126577) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SHOURIE | CON SUERTE | |
| 1NT | S | ♣4 | = | 90 | 92% | 2♠ | N | ♥Q | = | 110 | 84% | 2 | ||||
| 3NT | N | ♠3 | +2 | 460 | 92% | 3NT | N | ♠A | = | 400 | 58% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS0.0 | NS-0.8 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 1NT | S | = | 90 | 92% | 2 | |||
| 2♠ | N | = | 110 | 84% | ||||
| 3NT | N | +2 | 460 | 92% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | N | = | 400 | 58% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS0.0 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CARACCI vs PAME 2 : 2 VP (match 126578) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CARACCI | PAME | |
| 1NT | S | ♣3 | +1 | 120 | 52% | 1NT | S | ♣4 | +1 | 120 | 52% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 3NT | S | ♠5 | = | 400 | 58% | 3NT | N | ♠A | = | 400 | 58% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.1 | NS-0.1 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 1NT | S | +1 | 120 | 52% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 1NT | S | +1 | 120 | 52% | ||||
| 3NT | S | = | 400 | 58% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3NT | N | = | 400 | 58% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.1 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
| ♠ T743 ♥ 732 ♦ KJ2 ♣ QJ7 | ||
| ♠ J85 ♥ KT9 ♦ T4 ♣ A9543 | 7 Dlr S All | ♠ K2 ♥ QJ85 ♦ 9863 ♣ KT8 |
| ♠ AQ96 ♥ A64 ♦ AQ75 ♣ 62 |
| NT | ♠ | ♥ | ♦ | ♣ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 8 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 6 |
| S | 8 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 6 |
| E | 5 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 7 |
| W | 5 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 7 |
| ♠ 82 ♥ K7 ♦ KJT ♣ AJT754 | ||
| ♠ 9754 ♥ 984 ♦ Q4 ♣ Q962 | 8 Dlr W None | ♠ AK63 ♥ JT32 ♦ 982 ♣ K8 |
| ♠ QJT ♥ AQ65 ♦ A7653 ♣ 3 |
| NT | ♠ | ♥ | ♦ | ♣ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 10 | 7 | 10 | 11 | 9 |
| S | 10 | 7 | 10 | 11 | 9 |
| E | 3 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| W | 3 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 3 |