Round 9 — BAM Teams
13 matches. → cumulative standings · → board records
Round 9 results↑ top
Every match of the round — teams, board-a-match points and VPs. Click a table number or ‘protocol’ for the full board-by-board scorecard below.
| Table | Home team | Visiting team | BAM (home) | BAM (visit) | VP (home) | VP (visit) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SHOURIE | CHILE SENIORS | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 2 | CARACCI | BLACK | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 3 | PAME | AUSTRIA | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 4 | CON SUERTE | CHINESE TAIPEI OPEN | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 5 | LAS VELITAS | HONG KONG CHINA OPEN | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 6 | BRIDGE UNLEASHED | TUTTIFRUTTI | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 7 | GUADELOUPE | VITAMINA | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 8 | INDIA MEN | GAUSS | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 9 | TU MAM | INDIAN WOMEN | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 10 | ALLEYCATS | KIWI JAMR | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 11 | SMILE | PAKISTAN | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 12 | HOLLANDS | TAMEWARE | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 13 | GO HABS GO JETS | DRINTEAM | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
Standings after round 9↑ top
Cumulative board-a-match points through round 9 — the league table as it stood after this round. → full standings, every round & players
| Place | Team | Pts | R9 | Pld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | TU MAM | 28.00 | 2.00 | 9 |
| 2 | INDIAN WOMEN | 24.00 | 2.00 | 9 |
| 3 | ALLEYCATS | 22.00 | 4.00 | 9 |
| 3 | BLACK | 22.00 | 2.00 | 9 |
| 3 | GAUSS | 22.00 | 3.00 | 9 |
| 3 | TUTTIFRUTTI | 22.00 | 2.00 | 9 |
| 7 | HONG KONG CHINA OPEN | 21.00 | 2.00 | 9 |
| 8 | DRINTEAM | 20.00 | 4.00 | 9 |
| 8 | HOLLANDS | 20.00 | 3.00 | 9 |
| 8 | TAMEWARE | 20.00 | 1.00 | 9 |
| 11 | AUSTRIA | 19.00 | 4.00 | 9 |
| 11 | VITAMINA | 19.00 | 0.00 | 9 |
| 13 | CHINESE TAIPEI OPEN | 18.00 | 2.00 | 9 |
| 13 | GUADELOUPE | 18.00 | 4.00 | 9 |
| 13 | PAKISTAN | 18.00 | 2.00 | 9 |
| 16 | CON SUERTE | 17.00 | 2.00 | 9 |
| 16 | SHOURIE | 17.00 | 4.00 | 9 |
| 18 | BRIDGE UNLEASHED | 16.00 | 2.00 | 9 |
| 18 | INDIA MEN | 16.00 | 1.00 | 9 |
| 18 | KIWI JAMR | 16.00 | 0.00 | 9 |
| 18 | PAME | 16.00 | 0.00 | 9 |
| 22 | LAS VELITAS | 15.00 | 2.00 | 9 |
| 23 | GO HABS GO JETS | 13.00 | 0.00 | 9 |
| 24 | CARACCI | 12.00 | 2.00 | 9 |
| 25 | CHILE SENIORS | 10.00 | 0.00 | 9 |
| 26 | SMILE | 7.00 | 2.00 | 9 |
Board-a-match over this round's field — each pair's net boards won per board (2-0 win / 1-1 tie), shown as a board-a-match %.
Round 9 board-a-match standings↑ top
| Place | Player | Team | Boards | R9 | BAM% |
|---|
SHOURIE vs CHILE SENIORS 4 : 0 VP (match 126423) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SHOURIE | CHILE SENIORS | |
| 1NT | N | ♠3 | = | 90 | 88% | 2♠ | E | ♦6 | +2 | 170 | 86% | 2 | ||||
| 6♦ | W | ♥8 | +1 | 940 | 72% | 7NT | W | ♠10 | = | 1520 | 100% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.2 | NS-1.7 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 1NT | N | = | 90 | 88% | 2 | |||
| 2♠ | E | +2 | 170 | 86% | ||||
| 6♦ | W | +1 | 940 | 72% | 2 | |||
| 7NT | W | = | 1520 | 100% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.2 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CARACCI vs BLACK 2 : 2 VP (match 126424) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CARACCI | BLACK | |
| 2♠ | E | ♣J | +3 | 200 | 96% | 3♠ | E | ♣J | +1 | 170 | 86% | 2 | ||||
| 6♦ | W | ♠5 | +1 | 940 | 72% | 6NT | W | ♦9 | +1 | 1020 | 62% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.5 | NS-1.0 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2♠ | E | +3 | 200 | 96% | 2 | |||
| 3♠ | E | +1 | 170 | 86% | ||||
| 6♦ | W | +1 | 940 | 72% | 2 | |||
| 6NT | W | +1 | 1020 | 62% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.5 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
PAME vs AUSTRIA 0 : 4 VP (match 126425) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | PAME | AUSTRIA | |
| 3♠ | E | ♣J | +1 | 170 | 86% | 3♠ | E | ♥Q | = | 140 | 56% | 2 | ||||
| 6♦ | E | ♠2 | +1 | 940 | 72% | 3NT | W | ♠7 | +4 | 520 | 92% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.3 | NS+0.7 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♠ | E | +1 | 170 | 86% | 2 | |||
| 3♠ | E | = | 140 | 56% | ||||
| 6♦ | E | +1 | 940 | 72% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | W | +4 | 520 | 92% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.3 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CON SUERTE vs CHINESE TAIPEI OPEN 2 : 2 VP (match 126426) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CON SUERTE | CHINESE TAIPEI OPEN | |
| 3♠ | E | ♣3 | -1 | 50 | 84% | 1NT | N | ♣4 | -1 | 50 | 76% | 2 | ||||
| 6NT | W | ♦9 | +1 | 1020 | 62% | 3NT | W | ♠7 | +4 | 520 | 92% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.4 | NS+1.4 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♠ | E | -1 | 50 | 84% | 2 | |||
| 1NT | N | -1 | 50 | 76% | ||||
| 6NT | W | +1 | 1020 | 62% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | W | +4 | 520 | 92% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.4 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
LAS VELITAS vs HONG KONG CHINA OPEN 2 : 2 VP (match 126427) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | LAS VELITAS | HONG KONG CHINA OPEN | |
| 2♠ | E | ♣J | +1 | 140 | 56% | 1NT | N | ♣2 | -1 | 50 | 76% | 2 | ||||
| 6♦ | E | ♥2 | +1 | 940 | 72% | 7♦ | W | ♦9 | = | 1440 | 88% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.3 | NS-0.2 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2♠ | E | +1 | 140 | 56% | 2 | |||
| 1NT | N | -1 | 50 | 76% | ||||
| 6♦ | E | +1 | 940 | 72% | 2 | |||
| 7♦ | W | = | 1440 | 88% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.3 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BRIDGE UNLEASHED vs TUTTIFRUTTI 2 : 2 VP (match 126428) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BRIDGE UNLEASHED | TUTTIFRUTTI | |
| 4♠ | E | ♠9 | -2 | 100 | 92% | 3♠ | E | ♥Q | = | 140 | 56% | 2 | ||||
| 6NT | E | ♠6 | = | 990 | 56% | 6♦ | W | ♠5 | +1 | 940 | 72% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.0 | NS+0.3 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♠ | E | -2 | 100 | 92% | 2 | |||
| 3♠ | E | = | 140 | 56% | ||||
| 6NT | E | = | 990 | 56% | 2 | |||
| 6♦ | W | +1 | 940 | 72% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.0 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
GUADELOUPE vs VITAMINA 4 : 0 VP (match 126429) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | GUADELOUPE | VITAMINA | |
| 1NT | N | ♣4 | -1 | 50 | 76% | 3♠ | E | ♣J | +1 | 170 | 86% | 2 | ||||
| 7NT | E | ♦6 | -1 | 50 | 100% | 6♦ | W | ♣3 | +1 | 940 | 72% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.5 | NS-0.3 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 1NT | N | -1 | 50 | 76% | 2 | |||
| 3♠ | E | +1 | 170 | 86% | ||||
| 7NT | E | -1 | 50 | 100% | 2 | |||
| 6♦ | W | +1 | 940 | 72% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.5 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
INDIA MEN vs GAUSS 1 : 3 VP (match 126430) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | INDIA MEN | GAUSS | |
| 3♠ | E | ♠5 | = | 140 | 56% | 3♠ | E | ♣J | = | 140 | 56% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 7♣ | W | ♣8 | = | 1440 | 88% | 6NT | W | ♣3 | +1 | 1020 | 62% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.9 | NS-0.4 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♠ | E | = | 140 | 56% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3♠ | E | = | 140 | 56% | ||||
| 7♣ | W | = | 1440 | 88% | 2 | |||
| 6NT | W | +1 | 1020 | 62% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.9 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
TU MAM vs INDIAN WOMEN 2 : 2 VP (match 126431) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | TU MAM | INDIAN WOMEN | |
| 3♠ | E | ♥Q | = | 140 | 56% | 2♠ | E | ♥Q | +1 | 140 | 56% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 6NT | W | ♦9 | +1 | 1020 | 62% | 6NT | W | ♣8 | +1 | 1020 | 62% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.4 | NS-0.4 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♠ | E | = | 140 | 56% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 2♠ | E | +1 | 140 | 56% | ||||
| 6NT | W | +1 | 1020 | 62% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 6NT | W | +1 | 1020 | 62% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.4 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
ALLEYCATS vs KIWI JAMR 4 : 0 VP (match 126432) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ALLEYCATS | KIWI JAMR | |
| 2♠ | E | ♠9 | = | 110 | 68% | 2♠ | E | ♣J | +1 | 140 | 56% | 2 | ||||
| 3NT | W | ♠5 | +4 | 520 | 92% | 6NT | W | ♥8 | +1 | 1020 | 62% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.2 | NS-0.4 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2♠ | E | = | 110 | 68% | 2 | |||
| 2♠ | E | +1 | 140 | 56% | ||||
| 3NT | W | +4 | 520 | 92% | 2 | |||
| 6NT | W | +1 | 1020 | 62% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.2 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SMILE vs PAKISTAN 2 : 2 VP (match 126433) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SMILE | PAKISTAN | |
| 3♠ | E | ♥Q | = | 140 | 56% | 1NT | N | ♣Q | +2 | 150 | 96% | 2 | ||||
| 6♦ | E | ♥2 | +1 | 940 | 72% | 7♦ | W | ♦9 | = | 1440 | 88% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.3 | NS+0.2 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♠ | E | = | 140 | 56% | 2 | |||
| 1NT | N | +2 | 150 | 96% | ||||
| 6♦ | E | +1 | 940 | 72% | 2 | |||
| 7♦ | W | = | 1440 | 88% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.3 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
HOLLANDS vs TAMEWARE 3 : 1 VP (match 126434) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | HOLLANDS | TAMEWARE | |
| 2♠ | E | ♥Q | +1 | 140 | 56% | 2♠ | E | ♣J | +1 | 140 | 56% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 6NT | W | ♠5 | +1 | 1020 | 62% | 7♦ | E | ♠3 | = | 1440 | 88% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.4 | NS-0.9 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2♠ | E | +1 | 140 | 56% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 2♠ | E | +1 | 140 | 56% | ||||
| 6NT | W | +1 | 1020 | 62% | 2 | |||
| 7♦ | E | = | 1440 | 88% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.4 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.9 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
GO HABS GO JETS vs DRINTEAM 0 : 4 VP (match 126435) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | GO HABS GO JETS | DRINTEAM | |
| 2♦x | S | ♥10 | -2 | 300 | 100% | 1NTx | N | ♣4 | = | 180 | 100% | 2 | ||||
| 7♦ | E | ♦2 | = | 1440 | 88% | 6NT | W | ♣7 | +1 | 1020 | 62% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.8 | NS+0.8 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2♦x | S | -2 | 300 | 100% | 2 | |||
| 1NTx | N | = | 180 | 100% | ||||
| 7♦ | E | = | 1440 | 88% | 2 | |||
| 6NT | W | +1 | 1020 | 62% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.8 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
| ♠ KQ4 ♥ A764 ♦ 543 ♣ AK7 | ||
| ♠ T862 ♥ T9832 ♦ AKQ ♣ 8 | 17 Dlr N None | ♠ AJ73 ♥ K ♦ JT9 ♣ Q9642 |
| ♠ 95 ♥ QJ5 ♦ 8762 ♣ JT53 |
| NT | ♠ | ♥ | ♦ | ♣ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 6 | 3 | 6 | 6 | 6 |
| S | 6 | 3 | 6 | 6 | 6 |
| E | 6 | 9 | 7 | 6 | 7 |
| W | 6 | 9 | 7 | 6 | 7 |
| ♠ KT8754 ♥ 84 ♦ 98 ♣ 873 | ||
| ♠ AQ ♥ AT95 ♦ AKJT5 ♣ AQ | 18 Dlr E N-S | ♠ J ♥ QJ3 ♦ Q743 ♣ KJ962 |
| ♠ 9632 ♥ K762 ♦ 62 ♣ T54 |
| NT | ♠ | ♥ | ♦ | ♣ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| S | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| E | 13 | 8 | 13 | 13 | 13 |
| W | 13 | 9 | 13 | 13 | 13 |