Round 14 — U26 BAM Qualification
25 matches. → cumulative standings · → board records
Round 14 results↑ top
Every match of the round — teams, board-a-match points and VPs. Click a table number or ‘protocol’ for the full board-by-board scorecard below.
| Table | Home team | Visiting team | BAM (home) | BAM (visit) | VP (home) | VP (visit) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | INDIA-B U26 | FRANCE FUNBRIDGE | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 2 | CHINA RDFZ HOPE | ITALIA U21 | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 3 | DABROWKA PO | INDIA U21 | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 4 | SXSTARLORD | HAPPY BRIDGE | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 5 | PRISM FALCONS | SXTULIP | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 6 | GERMANY | INDIA-A U26 | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 7 | JAPAN U26 | RDFZ ZHIHAOLE | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 8 | SERBALICIOUS | AUSTRIA | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 9 | AZS WRATISLAVIA | MAN EATING COBRAS | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 10 | SERBIA U26W | EYE OF THE TIGER | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 11 | DABROWKA | CHINA RDFZ HU | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 12 | CHINA RDFZ | SHSLLS1 | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 13 | INDIA U16 | SERBIA U21 | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 14 | ISRAEL | ITALIA U26 | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 15 | ZHIHAOLE | CHILE | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 16 | CS21MSCHOOL | ITALIA 2 | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 17 | SXSPARK | BELGIUM | 0 | 0 | 2.40 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 18 | CHILE U26W | POLAND KIDS | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 19 | 50 50 | CAPRISUN | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 2.40 | protocol → |
| 20 | JAPAN U21 | HONG KONG | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 21 | SXDAISY | ITALIA U26W | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 22 | RDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT | BYE | 0 | 0 | 2.40 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 23 | CROATIA | TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 24 | URUGUAY | SXNEBULA | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 25 | CROATIA U16 | GREISNOR | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
Standings after round 14↑ top
Cumulative board-a-match points through round 14 — the league table as it stood after this round. → full standings, every round & players
| Place | Team | Pts | R14 | Pld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ITALIA U21 | 78.20 | 4.00 | 14 |
| 2 | GREISNOR | 76.60 | 3.00 | 14 |
| 3 | ITALIA U26 | 74.20 | 4.00 | 14 |
| 4 | INDIA-A U26 | 73.80 | 2.00 | 14 |
| 5 | JAPAN U26 | 71.60 | 2.00 | 14 |
| 6 | CHINA RDFZ | 71.20 | 3.00 | 14 |
| 7 | ISRAEL | 70.60 | 0.00 | 14 |
| 8 | AUSTRIA | 70.00 | 4.00 | 14 |
| 9 | SERBALICIOUS | 69.40 | 0.00 | 14 |
| 10 | SXNEBULA | 69.20 | 3.00 | 14 |
| 11 | SXSTARLORD | 65.60 | 4.00 | 14 |
| 12 | CHINA RDFZ HU | 65.40 | 2.00 | 14 |
| 13 | SERBIA U21 | 64.80 | 4.00 | 14 |
| 14 | FRANCE FUNBRIDGE | 64.20 | 2.00 | 14 |
| 15 | JAPAN U21 | 64.00 | 0.00 | 14 |
| 16 | AZS WRATISLAVIA | 63.80 | 2.00 | 14 |
| 17 | ITALIA U26W | 63.60 | 2.00 | 14 |
| 18 | CHILE U26W | 63.00 | 2.00 | 14 |
| 19 | INDIA-B U26 | 62.00 | 2.00 | 14 |
| 20 | GERMANY | 61.80 | 2.00 | 14 |
| 21 | SXDAISY | 61.00 | 2.00 | 14 |
| 22 | CHILE | 60.80 | 4.00 | 14 |
| 23 | RDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT | 60.60 | 2.40 | 14 |
| 24 | CROATIA | 60.20 | 4.00 | 14 |
| 24 | SXTULIP | 60.20 | 2.00 | 14 |
| 26 | EYE OF THE TIGER | 59.20 | 2.00 | 14 |
| 27 | INDIA U21 | 59.00 | 0.00 | 14 |
| 28 | DABROWKA PO | 57.80 | 4.00 | 14 |
| 29 | SHSLLS1 | 57.20 | 1.00 | 14 |
| 30 | DABROWKA | 56.80 | 2.00 | 14 |
| 30 | POLAND KIDS | 56.80 | 2.00 | 14 |
| 32 | MAN EATING COBRAS | 55.80 | 2.00 | 14 |
| 33 | SXSPARK | 54.20 | 2.40 | 14 |
| 34 | ITALIA 2 | 54.00 | 2.00 | 14 |
| 35 | ZHIHAOLE | 52.00 | 0.00 | 14 |
| 36 | SERBIA U26W | 51.00 | 2.00 | 14 |
| 37 | 50 50 | 50.80 | 0.00 | 14 |
| 38 | HONG KONG | 50.60 | 4.00 | 14 |
| 39 | RDFZ ZHIHAOLE | 50.40 | 2.00 | 14 |
| 40 | PRISM FALCONS | 46.40 | 2.00 | 14 |
| 41 | INDIA U16 | 45.60 | 0.00 | 14 |
| 42 | URUGUAY | 45.00 | 1.00 | 14 |
| 43 | HAPPY BRIDGE | 40.00 | 0.00 | 14 |
| 44 | CROATIA U16 | 35.80 | 1.00 | 14 |
| 45 | CS21MSCHOOL | 33.40 | 2.00 | 14 |
| 46 | CHINA RDFZ HOPE | 27.80 | 0.00 | 14 |
| 47 | CAPRISUN | 27.40 | 2.40 | 14 |
| 48 | TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL | 26.40 | 0.00 | 14 |
| 49 | BELGIUM | 0.00 | 0.00 | 14 |
Board-a-match over this round's field — each pair's net boards won per board (2-0 win / 1-1 tie), shown as a board-a-match %.
Round 14 board-a-match standings↑ top
| Place | Player | Team | Boards | R14 | BAM% |
|---|
INDIA-B U26 vs FRANCE FUNBRIDGE 2 : 2 VP (match 84461) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | INDIA-B U26 | FRANCE FUNBRIDGE | |
| 3♠ | E | ♦K | -2 | 200 | 98% | 3♠ | E | ♣A | = | 140 | 72% | 2 | ||||
| 4♥ | S | ♣T | -1 | 100 | 65% | 3N | S | ♣T | = | 600 | 69% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.7 | NS-0.1 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♠ | E | -2 | 200 | 98% | 2 | |||
| 3♠ | E | = | 140 | 72% | ||||
| 4♥ | S | -1 | 100 | 65% | 2 | |||
| 3N | S | = | 600 | 69% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.7 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CHINA RDFZ HOPE vs ITALIA U21 0 : 4 VP (match 84462) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHINA RDFZ HOPE | ITALIA U21 | |
| 3♠ | E | ♦K | = | 140 | 72% | 3♣ | N | ♥3 | -2 | 100 | 64% | 2 | ||||
| 4♥ | S | ♣T | -2 | 200 | 91% | 3N | S | ♣T | +1 | 630 | 92% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.3 | NS+1.1 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♠ | E | = | 140 | 72% | 2 | |||
| 3♣ | N | -2 | 100 | 64% | ||||
| 4♥ | S | -2 | 200 | 91% | 2 | |||
| 3N | S | +1 | 630 | 92% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.3 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
DABROWKA PO vs INDIA U21 4 : 0 VP (match 84463) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | DABROWKA PO | INDIA U21 | |
| 3♠ | E | ♠T | -1 | 100 | 88% | 3♠ | E | ♠3 | = | 140 | 72% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | S | ♣T | = | 600 | 69% | 4♥ | S | ♣9 | -1 | 100 | 65% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.1 | NS-0.7 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♠ | E | -1 | 100 | 88% | 2 | |||
| 3♠ | E | = | 140 | 72% | ||||
| 3N | S | = | 600 | 69% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | S | -1 | 100 | 65% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.1 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SXSTARLORD vs HAPPY BRIDGE 4 : 0 VP (match 84464) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SXSTARLORD | HAPPY BRIDGE | |
| 1N | N | ♠5 | -1 | 50 | 79% | 2♠ | E | ♦K | +1 | 140 | 72% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | S | ♣T | +1 | 630 | 92% | 4♥ | S | ♣T | -2 | 200 | 91% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.4 | NS-1.3 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 1N | N | -1 | 50 | 79% | 2 | |||
| 2♠ | E | +1 | 140 | 72% | ||||
| 3N | S | +1 | 630 | 92% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | S | -2 | 200 | 91% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.4 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
PRISM FALCONS vs SXTULIP 2 : 2 VP (match 84465) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | PRISM FALCONS | SXTULIP | |
| 1N | N | ♠5 | -1 | 50 | 79% | 3♠ | E | ♦K | +1 | 170 | 95% | 2 | ||||
| 5♥ | N | ♦9 | -2 | 200 | 91% | 3N | S | ♦5 | +1 | 630 | 92% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.2 | NS-0.1 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 1N | N | -1 | 50 | 79% | 2 | |||
| 3♠ | E | +1 | 170 | 95% | ||||
| 5♥ | N | -2 | 200 | 91% | 2 | |||
| 3N | S | +1 | 630 | 92% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.2 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
GERMANY vs INDIA-A U26 2 : 2 VP (match 84466) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | GERMANY | INDIA-A U26 | |
| 3♠ | E | ♠3 | = | 140 | 72% | 3♠ | E | ♦K | = | 140 | 72% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 4♥ | N | ♣6 | -1 | 100 | 65% | 4♥ | S | ♣T | -1 | 100 | 65% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.7 | NS-0.7 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♠ | E | = | 140 | 72% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3♠ | E | = | 140 | 72% | ||||
| 4♥ | N | -1 | 100 | 65% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♥ | S | -1 | 100 | 65% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.7 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
JAPAN U26 vs RDFZ ZHIHAOLE 2 : 2 VP (match 84467) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | JAPAN U26 | RDFZ ZHIHAOLE | |
| 3♣ | S | ♠Q | -1 | 50 | 79% | 3♣x | N | ♠A | -1 | 100 | 64% | 2 | ||||
| 4♥ | S | ♣T | -1 | 100 | 65% | 4♥ | S | ♣T | = | 620 | 79% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.3 | NS+0.9 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♣ | S | -1 | 50 | 79% | 2 | |||
| 3♣x | N | -1 | 100 | 64% | ||||
| 4♥ | S | -1 | 100 | 65% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | S | = | 620 | 79% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.3 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.9 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SERBALICIOUS vs AUSTRIA 0 : 4 VP (match 84468) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SERBALICIOUS | AUSTRIA | |
| 3♣x | S | ♠Q | -2 | 300 | 100% | 4♠ | E | ♣A | -2 | 200 | 98% | 2 | ||||
| 5♥ | S | ♣T | -2 | 200 | 91% | 3♥ | N | ♠4 | = | 140 | 60% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.8 | NS+1.2 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♣x | S | -2 | 300 | 100% | 2 | |||
| 4♠ | E | -2 | 200 | 98% | ||||
| 5♥ | S | -2 | 200 | 91% | 2 | |||
| 3♥ | N | = | 140 | 60% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.8 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
AZS WRATISLAVIA vs MAN EATING COBRAS 2 : 2 VP (match 84469) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | AZS WRATISLAVIA | MAN EATING COBRAS | |
| 3♠ | E | ♣A | = | 140 | 72% | 2♠ | E | ♠T | +1 | 140 | 72% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 3N | S | ♣T | +1 | 630 | 92% | 3N | S | ♠8 | +1 | 630 | 92% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.4 | NS+0.4 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♠ | E | = | 140 | 72% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 2♠ | E | +1 | 140 | 72% | ||||
| 3N | S | +1 | 630 | 92% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3N | S | +1 | 630 | 92% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.4 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SERBIA U26W vs EYE OF THE TIGER 2 : 2 VP (match 84470) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SERBIA U26W | EYE OF THE TIGER | |
| 2♠ | E | ♥5 | = | 110 | 51% | 4♣ | N | ♥3 | -3 | 150 | 92% | 2 | ||||
| 4♥ | S | ♣T | -2 | 200 | 91% | 4♥ | S | ♦5 | = | 620 | 79% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.8 | NS-0.3 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2♠ | E | = | 110 | 51% | 2 | |||
| 4♣ | N | -3 | 150 | 92% | ||||
| 4♥ | S | -2 | 200 | 91% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | S | = | 620 | 79% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.8 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
DABROWKA vs CHINA RDFZ HU 2 : 2 VP (match 84471) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | DABROWKA | CHINA RDFZ HU | |
| 3♠ | E | ♦K | = | 140 | 72% | 3♣ | N | ♦5 | -2 | 100 | 64% | 2 | ||||
| 2♦ | N | ♣6 | +2 | 130 | 58% | 4♥ | S | ♣9 | -1 | 100 | 65% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.3 | NS-0.0 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♠ | E | = | 140 | 72% | 2 | |||
| 3♣ | N | -2 | 100 | 64% | ||||
| 2♦ | N | +2 | 130 | 58% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | S | -1 | 100 | 65% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.3 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CHINA RDFZ vs SHSLLS1 3 : 1 VP (match 84472) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHINA RDFZ | SHSLLS1 | |
| 3♠ | E | ♠T | -1 | 100 | 88% | 2♠ | E | ♣A | = | 110 | 51% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | S | ♣7 | -1 | 100 | 65% | 4♥ | S | ♣T | -1 | 100 | 65% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.5 | NS-0.3 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♠ | E | -1 | 100 | 88% | 2 | |||
| 2♠ | E | = | 110 | 51% | ||||
| 3N | S | -1 | 100 | 65% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♥ | S | -1 | 100 | 65% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.5 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
INDIA U16 vs SERBIA U21 0 : 4 VP (match 84473) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | INDIA U16 | SERBIA U21 | |
| 2♠ | E | ♦K | +1 | 140 | 72% | 2♠ | E | ♣2 | = | 110 | 51% | 2 | ||||
| 4♥ | S | ♣T | -2 | 200 | 91% | 3N | S | ♦5 | = | 600 | 69% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.3 | NS+0.4 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2♠ | E | +1 | 140 | 72% | 2 | |||
| 2♠ | E | = | 110 | 51% | ||||
| 4♥ | S | -2 | 200 | 91% | 2 | |||
| 3N | S | = | 600 | 69% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.3 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
ISRAEL vs ITALIA U26 0 : 4 VP (match 84474) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ISRAEL | ITALIA U26 | |
| 2♠ | E | ♥5 | = | 110 | 51% | 1N | N | ♠5 | -1 | 50 | 79% | 2 | ||||
| 4♥ | S | ♣T | -1 | 100 | 65% | 3N | S | ♣9 | = | 600 | 69% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.3 | NS+1.0 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2♠ | E | = | 110 | 51% | 2 | |||
| 1N | N | -1 | 50 | 79% | ||||
| 4♥ | S | -1 | 100 | 65% | 2 | |||
| 3N | S | = | 600 | 69% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.3 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
ZHIHAOLE vs CHILE 0 : 4 VP (match 84475) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ZHIHAOLE | CHILE | |
| 3N | N | ♦5 | -5 | 250 | 98% | 2♦ | E | ♠T | = | 90 | 72% | 2 | ||||
| 4♥ | S | ♣T | -2 | 200 | 91% | Pass | N | — | 0 | 54% | 2 | |||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.8 | NS+0.5 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | N | -5 | 250 | 98% | 2 | |||
| 2♦ | E | = | 90 | 72% | ||||
| 4♥ | S | -2 | 200 | 91% | 2 | |||
| Pass | N | 0 | 54% | |||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.8 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CS21MSCHOOL vs ITALIA 2 2 : 2 VP (match 84476) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CS21MSCHOOL | ITALIA 2 | |
| 4♠ | E | ♣A | -1 | 100 | 88% | 1N | N | ♠2 | -1 | 50 | 79% | 2 | ||||
| 4♥ | N | ♦9 | = | 620 | 79% | 3N | S | ♣T | +1 | 630 | 92% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.3 | NS+1.4 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♠ | E | -1 | 100 | 88% | 2 | |||
| 1N | N | -1 | 50 | 79% | ||||
| 4♥ | N | = | 620 | 79% | 2 | |||
| 3N | S | +1 | 630 | 92% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.3 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SXSPARK vs BELGIUM 2.4 : 0 VP (match 84477)↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SXSPARK | BELGIUM | |
| – | — | – | — | |||||||||||||
| – | — | – | — | |||||||||||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS0.0 | NS0.0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| – | ||||||||
| – | ||||||||
| – | ||||||||
| – | ||||||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS0.0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CHILE U26W vs POLAND KIDS 2 : 2 VP (match 84478) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHILE U26W | POLAND KIDS | |
| 3♠ | E | ♣A | = | 140 | 72% | 4♠ | W | ♦4 | -2 | 200 | 98% | 2 | ||||
| 4♥ | N | ♦8 | +2 | 680 | 100% | 3N | S | ♣T | -1 | 100 | 65% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.6 | NS+0.7 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♠ | E | = | 140 | 72% | 2 | |||
| 4♠ | W | -2 | 200 | 98% | ||||
| 4♥ | N | +2 | 680 | 100% | 2 | |||
| 3N | S | -1 | 100 | 65% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.6 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
50 50 vs CAPRISUN 0 : 2.4 VP (match 84479)↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | 50 50 | CAPRISUN | |
| – | — | – | — | |||||||||||||
| – | — | – | — | |||||||||||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS0.0 | NS0.0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| – | ||||||||
| – | ||||||||
| – | ||||||||
| – | ||||||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS0.0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
JAPAN U21 vs HONG KONG 0 : 4 VP (match 84480) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | JAPAN U21 | HONG KONG | |
| 2♠ | E | ♦K | +1 | 140 | 72% | 3♣ | S | ♠Q | -2 | 100 | 64% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | S | ♣T | -3 | 300 | 100% | 4♥ | S | ♣T | -1 | 100 | 65% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.4 | NS-0.0 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2♠ | E | +1 | 140 | 72% | 2 | |||
| 3♣ | S | -2 | 100 | 64% | ||||
| 3N | S | -3 | 300 | 100% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | S | -1 | 100 | 65% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.4 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SXDAISY vs ITALIA U26W 2 : 2 VP (match 84481) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SXDAISY | ITALIA U26W | |
| 3♣x | N | ♠A | -1 | 100 | 64% | 3♣ | S | ♦9 | -3 | 150 | 92% | 2 | ||||
| 4♥ | N | ♥2 | -1 | 100 | 65% | 4♥ | S | ♣T | = | 620 | 79% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.0 | NS-0.3 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♣x | N | -1 | 100 | 64% | 2 | |||
| 3♣ | S | -3 | 150 | 92% | ||||
| 4♥ | N | -1 | 100 | 65% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | S | = | 620 | 79% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.0 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
RDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT vs BYE 2.4 : 0 VP (match 84482)↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | RDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT | BYE | |
| – | — | – | — | |||||||||||||
| – | — | – | — | |||||||||||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS0.0 | NS0.0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| – | ||||||||
| – | ||||||||
| – | ||||||||
| – | ||||||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS0.0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CROATIA vs TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL 4 : 0 VP (match 84483) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CROATIA | TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL | |
| 3♣ | N | ♥6 | -2 | 100 | 64% | 3♠ | E | ♥8 | = | 140 | 72% | 2 | ||||
| 1♦x | W | ♠K | -1 | 200 | 63% | 1N | S | ♣T | = | 90 | 56% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.5 | NS-0.3 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♣ | N | -2 | 100 | 64% | 2 | |||
| 3♠ | E | = | 140 | 72% | ||||
| 1♦x | W | -1 | 200 | 63% | 2 | |||
| 1N | S | = | 90 | 56% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.5 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
URUGUAY vs SXNEBULA 1 : 3 VP (match 84484) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | URUGUAY | SXNEBULA | |
| 2♠ | E | ♦K | +1 | 140 | 72% | 3♠ | E | ♦K | = | 140 | 72% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 4♥ | S | ♣T | -1 | 100 | 65% | 4♥ | N | ♣6 | = | 620 | 79% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.7 | NS+0.1 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2♠ | E | +1 | 140 | 72% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3♠ | E | = | 140 | 72% | ||||
| 4♥ | S | -1 | 100 | 65% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | N | = | 620 | 79% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.7 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CROATIA U16 vs GREISNOR 1 : 3 VP (match 84485) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CROATIA U16 | GREISNOR | |
| 2♠ | E | ♦K | = | 110 | 51% | 1N | S | ♣K | +1 | 120 | 93% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | S | ♣9 | -1 | 100 | 65% | 4♥ | S | ♣T | -1 | 100 | 65% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.3 | NS+0.6 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2♠ | E | = | 110 | 51% | 2 | |||
| 1N | S | +1 | 120 | 93% | ||||
| 3N | S | -1 | 100 | 65% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♥ | S | -1 | 100 | 65% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.3 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
| ♠ K74 ♥ AT4 ♦ J4 ♣ J9763 | ||
| ♠ QJ9 ♥ J972 ♦ 97 ♣ KQT4 | 3 Dlr S E-W | ♠ A8652 ♥ K63 ♦ AT852 ♣ – |
| ♠ T3 ♥ Q85 ♦ KQ63 ♣ A852 |
| NT | ♠ | ♥ | ♦ | ♣ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 6 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| S | 5 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 7 |
| E | 7 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 6 |
| W | 7 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 6 |
| ♠ K ♥ QJ63 ♦ QJ432 ♣ Q54 | ||
| ♠ A87 ♥ K ♦ AT65 ♣ T9872 | 4 Dlr W Both | ♠ Q6542 ♥ T852 ♦ 98 ♣ 63 |
| ♠ JT93 ♥ A974 ♦ K7 ♣ AKJ |
| NT | ♠ | ♥ | ♦ | ♣ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 10 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 8 |
| S | 10 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 8 |
| E | 3 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 5 |
| W | 3 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 5 |