Round 18 — U26 BAM Qualification
25 matches. → cumulative standings · → board records
Round 18 results↑ top
Every match of the round — teams, board-a-match points and VPs. Click a table number or ‘protocol’ for the full board-by-board scorecard below.
| Table | Home team | Visiting team | BAM (home) | BAM (visit) | VP (home) | VP (visit) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | INDIA-B U26 | BYE | 0 | 0 | 2.40 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 2 | CHINA RDFZ HOPE | TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 3 | DABROWKA PO | SXNEBULA | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 4 | SXSTARLORD | GREISNOR | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 5 | PRISM FALCONS | FRANCE FUNBRIDGE | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 6 | GERMANY | ITALIA U21 | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 7 | JAPAN U26 | INDIA U21 | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 8 | SERBALICIOUS | HAPPY BRIDGE | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 9 | AZS WRATISLAVIA | SXTULIP | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 10 | SERBIA U26W | INDIA-A U26 | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 11 | DABROWKA | RDFZ ZHIHAOLE | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 12 | CHINA RDFZ | AUSTRIA | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 13 | INDIA U16 | MAN EATING COBRAS | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 14 | ISRAEL | EYE OF THE TIGER | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 15 | ZHIHAOLE | CHINA RDFZ HU | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 16 | CS21MSCHOOL | SHSLLS1 | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 17 | SXSPARK | SERBIA U21 | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 18 | CHILE U26W | ITALIA U26 | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 19 | 50 50 | CHILE | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 2.40 | protocol → |
| 20 | JAPAN U21 | ITALIA 2 | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 21 | SXDAISY | BELGIUM | 0 | 0 | 2.40 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 22 | RDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT | POLAND KIDS | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 23 | CROATIA | CAPRISUN | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 24 | URUGUAY | HONG KONG | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 25 | CROATIA U16 | ITALIA U26W | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
Standings after round 18↑ top
Cumulative board-a-match points through round 18 — the league table as it stood after this round. → full standings, every round & players
| Place | Team | Pts | R18 | Pld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ITALIA U26 | 90.20 | 4.00 | 18 |
| 2 | GREISNOR | 88.60 | 3.00 | 18 |
| 3 | ITALIA U21 | 88.20 | 0.00 | 18 |
| 4 | JAPAN U26 | 82.60 | 3.00 | 18 |
| 5 | SXNEBULA | 82.20 | 4.00 | 18 |
| 6 | INDIA-A U26 | 81.80 | 3.00 | 18 |
| 7 | ISRAEL | 81.60 | 3.00 | 18 |
| 8 | AUSTRIA | 79.00 | 2.00 | 18 |
| 9 | CHINA RDFZ HU | 78.40 | 4.00 | 18 |
| 9 | SERBALICIOUS | 78.40 | 3.00 | 18 |
| 11 | CHINA RDFZ | 76.20 | 2.00 | 18 |
| 12 | GERMANY | 74.80 | 4.00 | 18 |
| 13 | CROATIA | 73.60 | 4.00 | 18 |
| 14 | JAPAN U21 | 73.40 | 3.00 | 18 |
| 15 | SERBIA U21 | 72.80 | 2.00 | 18 |
| 16 | ITALIA U26W | 72.60 | 4.00 | 18 |
| 16 | SXSTARLORD | 72.60 | 1.00 | 18 |
| 18 | FRANCE FUNBRIDGE | 72.20 | 2.00 | 18 |
| 19 | AZS WRATISLAVIA | 71.80 | 4.00 | 18 |
| 20 | SXDAISY | 71.40 | 2.40 | 18 |
| 21 | CHILE U26W | 70.40 | 0.00 | 18 |
| 22 | RDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT | 68.60 | 0.00 | 18 |
| 23 | CHILE | 68.20 | 2.40 | 18 |
| 24 | INDIA-B U26 | 67.40 | 2.40 | 18 |
| 25 | POLAND KIDS | 67.20 | 4.00 | 18 |
| 25 | SHSLLS1 | 67.20 | 4.00 | 18 |
| 27 | DABROWKA | 66.80 | 2.00 | 18 |
| 28 | MAN EATING COBRAS | 65.80 | 3.00 | 18 |
| 29 | INDIA U21 | 65.00 | 1.00 | 18 |
| 30 | EYE OF THE TIGER | 64.20 | 1.00 | 18 |
| 31 | RDFZ ZHIHAOLE | 63.40 | 2.00 | 18 |
| 32 | SXTULIP | 63.20 | 0.00 | 18 |
| 33 | DABROWKA PO | 62.80 | 0.00 | 18 |
| 34 | ITALIA 2 | 61.40 | 1.00 | 18 |
| 35 | SXSPARK | 60.20 | 2.00 | 18 |
| 36 | HONG KONG | 57.60 | 3.00 | 18 |
| 37 | SERBIA U26W | 55.00 | 1.00 | 18 |
| 38 | ZHIHAOLE | 54.00 | 0.00 | 18 |
| 39 | PRISM FALCONS | 53.40 | 2.00 | 18 |
| 40 | INDIA U16 | 52.60 | 1.00 | 18 |
| 41 | URUGUAY | 51.40 | 1.00 | 18 |
| 42 | 50 50 | 50.80 | 0.00 | 18 |
| 43 | HAPPY BRIDGE | 43.00 | 1.00 | 18 |
| 44 | CROATIA U16 | 42.20 | 0.00 | 18 |
| 45 | CS21MSCHOOL | 37.40 | 0.00 | 18 |
| 46 | TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL | 34.40 | 2.00 | 18 |
| 47 | CHINA RDFZ HOPE | 32.80 | 2.00 | 18 |
| 48 | CAPRISUN | 30.40 | 0.00 | 18 |
| 49 | BELGIUM | 0.00 | 0.00 | 18 |
Board-a-match over this round's field — each pair's net boards won per board (2-0 win / 1-1 tie), shown as a board-a-match %.
Round 18 board-a-match standings↑ top
| Place | Player | Team | Boards | R18 | BAM% |
|---|
INDIA-B U26 vs BYE 2.4 : 0 VP (match 84561)↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | INDIA-B U26 | BYE | |
| – | — | – | — | |||||||||||||
| – | — | – | — | |||||||||||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS0.0 | NS0.0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| – | ||||||||
| – | ||||||||
| – | ||||||||
| – | ||||||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS0.0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CHINA RDFZ HOPE vs TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL 2 : 2 VP (match 84562) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHINA RDFZ HOPE | TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL | |
| 3♥ | E | ♣Q | = | 140 | 88% | 3N | W | ♦J | +2 | 460 | 73% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | W | ♣K | = | 400 | 86% | 3♥ | W | ♣K | +1 | 170 | 91% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.5 | NS+0.3 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♥ | E | = | 140 | 88% | 2 | |||
| 3N | W | +2 | 460 | 73% | ||||
| 3N | W | = | 400 | 86% | 2 | |||
| 3♥ | W | +1 | 170 | 91% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.5 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
DABROWKA PO vs SXNEBULA 0 : 4 VP (match 84563) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | DABROWKA PO | SXNEBULA | |
| 3N | E | ♠3 | +2 | 460 | 73% | 2♣ | E | ♦A | +2 | 130 | 91% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | E | ♣4 | +2 | 460 | 93% | 4♥ | W | ♦J | +1 | 450 | 60% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.3 | NS+0.6 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | E | +2 | 460 | 73% | 2 | |||
| 2♣ | E | +2 | 130 | 91% | ||||
| 3N | E | +2 | 460 | 93% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | W | +1 | 450 | 60% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.3 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SXSTARLORD vs GREISNOR 1 : 3 VP (match 84564) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SXSTARLORD | GREISNOR | |
| 3N | W | ♦J | +1 | 430 | 54% | 2♥ | E | ♦3 | +2 | 170 | 80% | 2 | ||||
| 4♥ | W | ♦J | +1 | 450 | 60% | 4♥ | W | ♣K | +1 | 450 | 60% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.1 | NS+0.4 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | W | +1 | 430 | 54% | 2 | |||
| 2♥ | E | +2 | 170 | 80% | ||||
| 4♥ | W | +1 | 450 | 60% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♥ | W | +1 | 450 | 60% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.1 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
PRISM FALCONS vs FRANCE FUNBRIDGE 2 : 2 VP (match 84565) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | PRISM FALCONS | FRANCE FUNBRIDGE | |
| 3N | W | ♦J | +2 | 460 | 73% | 3N | W | ♦J | +2 | 460 | 73% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 4♥ | W | ♣K | +1 | 450 | 60% | 4♥ | W | ♣K | +1 | 450 | 60% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.7 | NS-0.7 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | W | +2 | 460 | 73% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3N | W | +2 | 460 | 73% | ||||
| 4♥ | W | +1 | 450 | 60% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♥ | W | +1 | 450 | 60% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.7 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
GERMANY vs ITALIA U21 4 : 0 VP (match 84566) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | GERMANY | ITALIA U21 | |
| 3N | W | ♦J | = | 400 | 72% | 3N | W | ♦J | +1 | 430 | 54% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | W | ♣K | +1 | 430 | 71% | 4♥ | W | ♣K | +2 | 480 | 99% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.9 | NS-0.9 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | W | = | 400 | 72% | 2 | |||
| 3N | W | +1 | 430 | 54% | ||||
| 3N | W | +1 | 430 | 71% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | W | +2 | 480 | 99% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.9 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.9 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
JAPAN U26 vs INDIA U21 3 : 1 VP (match 84567) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | JAPAN U26 | INDIA U21 | |
| 3N | W | ♦J | +1 | 430 | 54% | 3N | W | ♦J | +2 | 460 | 73% | 2 | ||||
| 4♥ | W | ♣K | +1 | 450 | 60% | 4♥ | W | ♣K | +1 | 450 | 60% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.1 | NS-0.7 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | W | +1 | 430 | 54% | 2 | |||
| 3N | W | +2 | 460 | 73% | ||||
| 4♥ | W | +1 | 450 | 60% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♥ | W | +1 | 450 | 60% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.1 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SERBALICIOUS vs HAPPY BRIDGE 3 : 1 VP (match 84568) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SERBALICIOUS | HAPPY BRIDGE | |
| 5♣ | W | ♥9 | = | 400 | 72% | 3♦x | S | ♥Q | -3 | 500 | 100% | 2 | ||||
| 4♥ | W | ♣K | +1 | 450 | 60% | 4♥ | W | ♠7 | +1 | 450 | 60% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.2 | NS-1.2 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 5♣ | W | = | 400 | 72% | 2 | |||
| 3♦x | S | -3 | 500 | 100% | ||||
| 4♥ | W | +1 | 450 | 60% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♥ | W | +1 | 450 | 60% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.2 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
AZS WRATISLAVIA vs SXTULIP 4 : 0 VP (match 84569) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | AZS WRATISLAVIA | SXTULIP | |
| 3♥ | E | ♥4 | -1 | 50 | 98% | 2♥ | E | ♠Q | +2 | 170 | 80% | 2 | ||||
| 4♥ | W | ♣K | = | 420 | 79% | 3N | W | ♣K | +1 | 430 | 71% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.5 | NS+1.0 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♥ | E | -1 | 50 | 98% | 2 | |||
| 2♥ | E | +2 | 170 | 80% | ||||
| 4♥ | W | = | 420 | 79% | 2 | |||
| 3N | W | +1 | 430 | 71% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.5 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SERBIA U26W vs INDIA-A U26 1 : 3 VP (match 84570) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SERBIA U26W | INDIA-A U26 | |
| 3N | E | ♥4 | +2 | 460 | 73% | 3N | E | ♠3 | +2 | 460 | 73% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 4♥ | W | ♦J | +1 | 450 | 60% | 4♥ | W | ♠7 | -1 | 50 | 99% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.7 | NS+0.5 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | E | +2 | 460 | 73% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3N | E | +2 | 460 | 73% | ||||
| 4♥ | W | +1 | 450 | 60% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | W | -1 | 50 | 99% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.7 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
DABROWKA vs RDFZ ZHIHAOLE 2 : 2 VP (match 84571) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | DABROWKA | RDFZ ZHIHAOLE | |
| 3N | W | ♦J | +1 | 430 | 54% | 3N | W | ♦J | +2 | 460 | 73% | 2 | ||||
| 4♥ | W | ♠5 | +1 | 450 | 60% | 4♥ | W | ♣K | = | 420 | 79% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.1 | NS+0.1 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | W | +1 | 430 | 54% | 2 | |||
| 3N | W | +2 | 460 | 73% | ||||
| 4♥ | W | +1 | 450 | 60% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | W | = | 420 | 79% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.1 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CHINA RDFZ vs AUSTRIA 2 : 2 VP (match 84572) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHINA RDFZ | AUSTRIA | |
| 3N | W | ♦J | +2 | 460 | 73% | 3N | W | ♦J | +2 | 460 | 73% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 4♥ | W | ♣K | +1 | 450 | 60% | 4♥ | W | ♣K | +1 | 450 | 60% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.7 | NS-0.7 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | W | +2 | 460 | 73% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3N | W | +2 | 460 | 73% | ||||
| 4♥ | W | +1 | 450 | 60% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♥ | W | +1 | 450 | 60% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.7 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
INDIA U16 vs MAN EATING COBRAS 1 : 3 VP (match 84573) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | INDIA U16 | MAN EATING COBRAS | |
| 3N | W | ♦J | +2 | 460 | 73% | 3N | E | ♥4 | +1 | 430 | 54% | 2 | ||||
| 4♥ | W | ♣K | +1 | 450 | 60% | 4♥ | W | ♣K | +1 | 450 | 60% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.7 | NS-0.1 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | W | +2 | 460 | 73% | 2 | |||
| 3N | E | +1 | 430 | 54% | ||||
| 4♥ | W | +1 | 450 | 60% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♥ | W | +1 | 450 | 60% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.7 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
ISRAEL vs EYE OF THE TIGER 3 : 1 VP (match 84574) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ISRAEL | EYE OF THE TIGER | |
| 2♥ | E | ♠Q | -1 | 50 | 98% | 3N | W | ♦J | +2 | 460 | 73% | 2 | ||||
| 4♥ | W | ♣K | +1 | 450 | 60% | 4♥ | W | ♣K | +1 | 450 | 60% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.7 | NS-0.7 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2♥ | E | -1 | 50 | 98% | 2 | |||
| 3N | W | +2 | 460 | 73% | ||||
| 4♥ | W | +1 | 450 | 60% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♥ | W | +1 | 450 | 60% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.7 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
ZHIHAOLE vs CHINA RDFZ HU 0 : 4 VP (match 84575) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ZHIHAOLE | CHINA RDFZ HU | |
| 4♥ | E | ♠Q | = | 420 | 65% | 3N | W | ♦J | = | 400 | 72% | 2 | ||||
| 4♥ | W | ♣K | +1 | 450 | 60% | 4♥ | W | ♣K | -1 | 50 | 99% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.1 | NS+1.4 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♥ | E | = | 420 | 65% | 2 | |||
| 3N | W | = | 400 | 72% | ||||
| 4♥ | W | +1 | 450 | 60% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | W | -1 | 50 | 99% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.1 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CS21MSCHOOL vs SHSLLS1 0 : 4 VP (match 84576) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CS21MSCHOOL | SHSLLS1 | |
| 3N | W | ♦9 | +2 | 460 | 73% | 3♦ | S | ♥Q | -3 | 150 | 86% | 2 | ||||
| 4♥ | W | ♣K | +2 | 480 | 99% | 2♥ | W | ♣K | +1 | 140 | 94% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.4 | NS+1.6 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | W | +2 | 460 | 73% | 2 | |||
| 3♦ | S | -3 | 150 | 86% | ||||
| 4♥ | W | +2 | 480 | 99% | 2 | |||
| 2♥ | W | +1 | 140 | 94% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.4 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SXSPARK vs SERBIA U21 2 : 2 VP (match 84577) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SXSPARK | SERBIA U21 | |
| 3N | W | ♦J | +2 | 460 | 73% | 3N | E | ♠Q | +2 | 460 | 73% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 4♥ | W | ♣K | +1 | 450 | 60% | 4♥ | W | ♥3 | +1 | 450 | 60% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.7 | NS-0.7 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | W | +2 | 460 | 73% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3N | E | +2 | 460 | 73% | ||||
| 4♥ | W | +1 | 450 | 60% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♥ | W | +1 | 450 | 60% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.7 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CHILE U26W vs ITALIA U26 0 : 4 VP (match 84578) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHILE U26W | ITALIA U26 | |
| 3N | W | ♦J | +3 | 490 | 95% | 3N | W | ♦J | +1 | 430 | 54% | 2 | ||||
| 4♥ | W | ♣K | +1 | 450 | 60% | 4♥ | W | ♣K | = | 420 | 79% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.1 | NS+0.7 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | W | +3 | 490 | 95% | 2 | |||
| 3N | W | +1 | 430 | 54% | ||||
| 4♥ | W | +1 | 450 | 60% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | W | = | 420 | 79% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.1 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
50 50 vs CHILE 0 : 2.4 VP (match 84579)↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | 50 50 | CHILE | |
| – | — | – | — | |||||||||||||
| – | — | – | — | |||||||||||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS0.0 | NS0.0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| – | ||||||||
| – | ||||||||
| – | ||||||||
| – | ||||||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS0.0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
JAPAN U21 vs ITALIA 2 3 : 1 VP (match 84580) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | JAPAN U21 | ITALIA 2 | |
| 4♥ | E | ♠Q | = | 420 | 65% | 3N | W | ♦J | +3 | 490 | 95% | 2 | ||||
| 4♥ | W | ♣K | +1 | 450 | 60% | 4♥ | W | ♦J | +1 | 450 | 60% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.1 | NS-1.1 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♥ | E | = | 420 | 65% | 2 | |||
| 3N | W | +3 | 490 | 95% | ||||
| 4♥ | W | +1 | 450 | 60% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♥ | W | +1 | 450 | 60% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.1 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SXDAISY vs BELGIUM 2.4 : 0 VP (match 84581)↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SXDAISY | BELGIUM | |
| – | — | – | — | |||||||||||||
| – | — | – | — | |||||||||||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS0.0 | NS0.0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| – | ||||||||
| – | ||||||||
| – | ||||||||
| – | ||||||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS0.0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
RDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT vs POLAND KIDS 0 : 4 VP (match 84582) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | RDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT | POLAND KIDS | |
| 4♥ | W | ♦J | = | 420 | 65% | 2♥ | E | ♠Q | +2 | 170 | 80% | 2 | ||||
| 4♥ | W | ♣K | = | 420 | 79% | 2♥ | W | ♠5 | +4 | 230 | 88% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.9 | NS+1.4 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♥ | W | = | 420 | 65% | 2 | |||
| 2♥ | E | +2 | 170 | 80% | ||||
| 4♥ | W | = | 420 | 79% | 2 | |||
| 2♥ | W | +4 | 230 | 88% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.9 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CROATIA vs CAPRISUN 4 : 0 VP (match 84583) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CROATIA | CAPRISUN | |
| 3♥ | E | ♦A | +1 | 170 | 80% | 3N | W | ♦J | +3 | 490 | 95% | 2 | ||||
| 4♥ | W | ♦J | = | 420 | 79% | 3N | E | ♣2 | +2 | 460 | 93% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.2 | NS-1.8 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♥ | E | +1 | 170 | 80% | 2 | |||
| 3N | W | +3 | 490 | 95% | ||||
| 4♥ | W | = | 420 | 79% | 2 | |||
| 3N | E | +2 | 460 | 93% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.2 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
URUGUAY vs HONG KONG 1 : 3 VP (match 84584) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | URUGUAY | HONG KONG | |
| 3N | W | ♦J | +2 | 460 | 73% | 3N | W | ♦J | +1 | 430 | 54% | 2 | ||||
| 4♥ | W | ♣K | +1 | 450 | 60% | 4♥ | W | ♣K | +1 | 450 | 60% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.7 | NS-0.1 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | W | +2 | 460 | 73% | 2 | |||
| 3N | W | +1 | 430 | 54% | ||||
| 4♥ | W | +1 | 450 | 60% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♥ | W | +1 | 450 | 60% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.7 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CROATIA U16 vs ITALIA U26W 0 : 4 VP (match 84585) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CROATIA U16 | ITALIA U26W | |
| Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 93% | 4♣ | W | ♦J | -1 | 50 | 98% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | E | ♦4 | +2 | 460 | 93% | 3♥ | W | ♣K | = | 140 | 94% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS0.0 | NS+1.8 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 93% | 2 | |||
| 4♣ | W | -1 | 50 | 98% | ||||
| 3N | E | +2 | 460 | 93% | 2 | |||
| 3♥ | W | = | 140 | 94% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS0.0 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
| ♠ 965 ♥ 97 ♦ JT972 ♣ 764 | ||
| ♠ A82 ♥ QJ ♦ KQ4 ♣ T9853 | 11 Dlr S None | ♠ KT4 ♥ A8632 ♦ 86 ♣ AKJ |
| ♠ QJ73 ♥ KT54 ♦ A53 ♣ Q2 |
| NT | ♠ | ♥ | ♦ | ♣ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 2 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 2 |
| S | 2 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 2 |
| E | 11 | 9 | 10 | 9 | 11 |
| W | 11 | 9 | 10 | 8 | 11 |
| ♠ 75 ♥ 643 ♦ JT52 ♣ KQ85 | ||
| ♠ KQ ♥ AQJT75 ♦ Q976 ♣ J | 12 Dlr W N-S | ♠ T9863 ♥ K9 ♦ A3 ♣ AT96 |
| ♠ AJ42 ♥ 82 ♦ K84 ♣ 7432 |
| NT | ♠ | ♥ | ♦ | ♣ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 3 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
| S | 3 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
| E | 10 | 9 | 10 | 9 | 8 |
| W | 10 | 9 | 10 | 9 | 8 |