Round 23 — U26 BAM Qualification
25 matches. → cumulative standings · → board records
Round 23 results↑ top
Every match of the round — teams, board-a-match points and VPs. Click a table number or ‘protocol’ for the full board-by-board scorecard below.
| Table | Home team | Visiting team | BAM (home) | BAM (visit) | VP (home) | VP (visit) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | INDIA-B U26 | BELGIUM | 4 | 0 | 2.40 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 2 | CHINA RDFZ HOPE | POLAND KIDS | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 3 | DABROWKA PO | CAPRISUN | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 4 | SXSTARLORD | HONG KONG | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 5 | PRISM FALCONS | ITALIA U26W | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 6 | GERMANY | BYE | 0 | 0 | 2.40 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 7 | JAPAN U26 | TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 8 | SERBALICIOUS | SXNEBULA | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 9 | AZS WRATISLAVIA | GREISNOR | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 10 | SERBIA U26W | FRANCE FUNBRIDGE | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 11 | DABROWKA | ITALIA U21 | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 12 | CHINA RDFZ | INDIA U21 | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 13 | INDIA U16 | HAPPY BRIDGE | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 14 | ISRAEL | SXTULIP | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 15 | ZHIHAOLE | INDIA-A U26 | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 16 | CS21MSCHOOL | RDFZ ZHIHAOLE | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 17 | SXSPARK | AUSTRIA | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 18 | CHILE U26W | MAN EATING COBRAS | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 19 | 50 50 | EYE OF THE TIGER | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 2.40 | protocol → |
| 20 | JAPAN U21 | CHINA RDFZ HU | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 21 | SXDAISY | SHSLLS1 | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 22 | RDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT | SERBIA U21 | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 23 | CROATIA | ITALIA U26 | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 24 | URUGUAY | CHILE | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 25 | CROATIA U16 | ITALIA 2 | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
Standings after round 23↑ top
Cumulative board-a-match points through round 23 — the league table as it stood after this round. → full standings, every round & players
| Place | Team | Pts | R23 | Pld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ITALIA U21 | 100.20 | 2.00 | 23 |
| 2 | GREISNOR | 99.60 | 2.00 | 23 |
| 3 | ITALIA U26 | 98.60 | 2.00 | 23 |
| 4 | ISRAEL | 97.60 | 3.00 | 23 |
| 5 | SXNEBULA | 97.20 | 4.00 | 23 |
| 6 | CHINA RDFZ HU | 94.80 | 3.00 | 23 |
| 7 | AUSTRIA | 93.00 | 2.00 | 23 |
| 8 | JAPAN U26 | 91.60 | 2.00 | 23 |
| 9 | INDIA-A U26 | 90.80 | 3.00 | 23 |
| 10 | SERBALICIOUS | 89.40 | 0.00 | 23 |
| 11 | CHINA RDFZ | 88.20 | 4.00 | 23 |
| 12 | SXDAISY | 86.40 | 3.00 | 23 |
| 13 | SXSTARLORD | 86.00 | 3.00 | 23 |
| 14 | CROATIA | 85.00 | 2.00 | 23 |
| 15 | GERMANY | 84.20 | 2.40 | 23 |
| 15 | SERBIA U21 | 84.20 | 4.00 | 23 |
| 17 | JAPAN U21 | 82.40 | 1.00 | 23 |
| 18 | ITALIA U26W | 81.60 | 2.00 | 23 |
| 19 | FRANCE FUNBRIDGE | 80.20 | 1.00 | 23 |
| 20 | RDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT | 80.00 | 0.00 | 23 |
| 21 | AZS WRATISLAVIA | 79.80 | 2.00 | 23 |
| 22 | INDIA-B U26 | 78.80 | 2.40 | 23 |
| 23 | EYE OF THE TIGER | 78.60 | 2.40 | 23 |
| 24 | CHILE | 78.20 | 4.00 | 23 |
| 25 | DABROWKA | 77.80 | 2.00 | 23 |
| 26 | SHSLLS1 | 77.60 | 1.00 | 23 |
| 27 | POLAND KIDS | 77.20 | 2.00 | 23 |
| 28 | CHILE U26W | 76.40 | 0.00 | 23 |
| 29 | DABROWKA PO | 76.20 | 4.00 | 23 |
| 29 | SXTULIP | 76.20 | 1.00 | 23 |
| 31 | MAN EATING COBRAS | 74.80 | 4.00 | 23 |
| 32 | ITALIA 2 | 73.40 | 4.00 | 23 |
| 33 | HONG KONG | 72.60 | 1.00 | 23 |
| 34 | RDFZ ZHIHAOLE | 71.40 | 1.00 | 23 |
| 35 | INDIA U21 | 70.00 | 0.00 | 23 |
| 36 | SXSPARK | 69.20 | 2.00 | 23 |
| 37 | PRISM FALCONS | 63.80 | 2.00 | 23 |
| 38 | SERBIA U26W | 63.00 | 3.00 | 23 |
| 39 | ZHIHAOLE | 59.00 | 1.00 | 23 |
| 40 | INDIA U16 | 57.60 | 0.00 | 23 |
| 41 | HAPPY BRIDGE | 56.00 | 4.00 | 23 |
| 42 | URUGUAY | 54.80 | 0.00 | 23 |
| 43 | 50 50 | 50.80 | 0.00 | 23 |
| 44 | CROATIA U16 | 48.60 | 0.00 | 23 |
| 45 | CS21MSCHOOL | 43.40 | 3.00 | 23 |
| 46 | CAPRISUN | 42.40 | 0.00 | 23 |
| 47 | TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL | 38.40 | 2.00 | 23 |
| 48 | CHINA RDFZ HOPE | 38.20 | 2.00 | 23 |
| 49 | BELGIUM | 0.00 | 0.00 | 23 |
Board-a-match over this round's field — each pair's net boards won per board (2-0 win / 1-1 tie), shown as a board-a-match %.
Round 23 board-a-match standings↑ top
| Place | Player | Team | Boards | R23 | BAM% |
|---|
INDIA-B U26 vs BELGIUM 2.4 : 0 VP (match 84686) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | INDIA-B U26 | BELGIUM | |
| 2N | S | ♣4 | = | 120 | 93% | 1N | W | ♠4 | -1 | 50 | 60% | 2 | ||||
| 5♥ | E | ♣A | -1 | 100 | 56% | 4♠ | W | ♣T | +1 | 650 | 90% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.8 | NS-0.6 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2N | S | = | 120 | 93% | 2 | |||
| 1N | W | -1 | 50 | 60% | ||||
| 5♥ | E | -1 | 100 | 56% | 2 | |||
| 4♠ | W | +1 | 650 | 90% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.8 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CHINA RDFZ HOPE vs POLAND KIDS 2 : 2 VP (match 84687) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHINA RDFZ HOPE | POLAND KIDS | |
| 1N | E | ♣K | = | 90 | 66% | 1N | S | ♦K | = | 90 | 79% | 2 | ||||
| 4♠ | W | ♣T | -2 | 200 | 71% | 4♣ | S | ♠A | = | 130 | 56% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.1 | NS+0.7 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 1N | E | = | 90 | 66% | 2 | |||
| 1N | S | = | 90 | 79% | ||||
| 4♠ | W | -2 | 200 | 71% | 2 | |||
| 4♣ | S | = | 130 | 56% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.1 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
DABROWKA PO vs CAPRISUN 4 : 0 VP (match 84688) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | DABROWKA PO | CAPRISUN | |
| 1N | S | ♣6 | +2 | 150 | 97% | 1N | W | ♠4 | -1 | 50 | 60% | 2 | ||||
| 5♥ | E | ♣K | -2 | 200 | 71% | 4♥ | W | ♣T | = | 620 | 80% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.4 | NS-0.4 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 1N | S | +2 | 150 | 97% | 2 | |||
| 1N | W | -1 | 50 | 60% | ||||
| 5♥ | E | -2 | 200 | 71% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | W | = | 620 | 80% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.4 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SXSTARLORD vs HONG KONG 3 : 1 VP (match 84689) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SXSTARLORD | HONG KONG | |
| 1N | W | ♠4 | -1 | 50 | 60% | 1N | W | ♦5 | = | 90 | 66% | 2 | ||||
| 6♥ | E | ♣A | -2 | 200 | 71% | 5♥x | W | ♣T | -1 | 200 | 71% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.6 | NS+0.1 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 1N | W | -1 | 50 | 60% | 2 | |||
| 1N | W | = | 90 | 66% | ||||
| 6♥ | E | -2 | 200 | 71% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 5♥x | W | -1 | 200 | 71% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.6 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
PRISM FALCONS vs ITALIA U26W 2 : 2 VP (match 84690) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | PRISM FALCONS | ITALIA U26W | |
| 1N | W | ♠4 | +2 | 150 | 89% | 3N | W | ♥7 | -3 | 150 | 97% | 2 | ||||
| 4♠ | W | ♣T | -2 | 200 | 71% | 5♥ | W | ♣T | -1 | 100 | 56% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.4 | NS+0.8 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 1N | W | +2 | 150 | 89% | 2 | |||
| 3N | W | -3 | 150 | 97% | ||||
| 4♠ | W | -2 | 200 | 71% | 2 | |||
| 5♥ | W | -1 | 100 | 56% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.4 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
GERMANY vs BYE 2.4 : 0 VP (match 84691)↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | GERMANY | BYE | |
| – | — | – | — | |||||||||||||
| – | — | – | — | |||||||||||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS0.0 | NS0.0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| – | ||||||||
| – | ||||||||
| – | ||||||||
| – | ||||||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS0.0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
JAPAN U26 vs TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL 2 : 2 VP (match 84692) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | JAPAN U26 | TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL | |
| 2♥ | S | ♦K | -1 | 100 | 81% | 2♣ | W | ♦5 | = | 90 | 66% | 2 | ||||
| 2♠ | W | ♣T | = | 110 | 67% | 4♥ | E | ♣A | = | 620 | 80% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.0 | NS-0.9 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2♥ | S | -1 | 100 | 81% | 2 | |||
| 2♣ | W | = | 90 | 66% | ||||
| 2♠ | W | = | 110 | 67% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | E | = | 620 | 80% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.0 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.9 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SERBALICIOUS vs SXNEBULA 0 : 4 VP (match 84693) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SERBALICIOUS | SXNEBULA | |
| 1N | W | ♥7 | = | 90 | 66% | 1N | W | ♠9 | -1 | 50 | 60% | 2 | ||||
| 7♣x | S | ♠A | -4 | 800 | 98% | 4♥x | E | ♣K | = | 790 | 94% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.3 | NS-0.7 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 1N | W | = | 90 | 66% | 2 | |||
| 1N | W | -1 | 50 | 60% | ||||
| 7♣x | S | -4 | 800 | 98% | 2 | |||
| 4♥x | E | = | 790 | 94% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.3 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
AZS WRATISLAVIA vs GREISNOR 2 : 2 VP (match 84694) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | AZS WRATISLAVIA | GREISNOR | |
| 1N | W | ♥7 | = | 90 | 66% | 1N | W | ♠4 | -1 | 50 | 60% | 2 | ||||
| 5♥xx | E | ♣A | -2 | 1000 | 100% | 5♥ | W | ♣T | -2 | 200 | 71% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.7 | NS+0.6 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 1N | W | = | 90 | 66% | 2 | |||
| 1N | W | -1 | 50 | 60% | ||||
| 5♥xx | E | -2 | 1000 | 100% | 2 | |||
| 5♥ | W | -2 | 200 | 71% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.7 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SERBIA U26W vs FRANCE FUNBRIDGE 3 : 1 VP (match 84695) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SERBIA U26W | FRANCE FUNBRIDGE | |
| 1N | W | ♥7 | = | 90 | 66% | 2♦x | S | ♥K | -2 | 500 | 98% | 2 | ||||
| 4♥ | W | ♣T | = | 620 | 80% | 4♥ | E | ♣A | = | 620 | 80% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.9 | NS-1.6 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 1N | W | = | 90 | 66% | 2 | |||
| 2♦x | S | -2 | 500 | 98% | ||||
| 4♥ | W | = | 620 | 80% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♥ | E | = | 620 | 80% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.9 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
DABROWKA vs ITALIA U21 2 : 2 VP (match 84696) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | DABROWKA | ITALIA U21 | |
| 2♣x | S | ♥K | -3 | 800 | 100% | 1N | W | ♠4 | -1 | 50 | 60% | 2 | ||||
| 5♠x | W | ♣T | -2 | 500 | 93% | 5♥x | E | ♣A | -1 | 200 | 71% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.1 | NS+0.6 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2♣x | S | -3 | 800 | 100% | 2 | |||
| 1N | W | -1 | 50 | 60% | ||||
| 5♠x | W | -2 | 500 | 93% | 2 | |||
| 5♥x | E | -1 | 200 | 71% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.1 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CHINA RDFZ vs INDIA U21 4 : 0 VP (match 84697) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHINA RDFZ | INDIA U21 | |
| 1N | W | ♠4 | -1 | 50 | 60% | 2N | S | ♣6 | -3 | 300 | 93% | 2 | ||||
| 3♠ | W | ♣T | -3 | 300 | 87% | 5♥ | E | ♣A | -1 | 100 | 56% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.9 | NS-1.0 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 1N | W | -1 | 50 | 60% | 2 | |||
| 2N | S | -3 | 300 | 93% | ||||
| 3♠ | W | -3 | 300 | 87% | 2 | |||
| 5♥ | E | -1 | 100 | 56% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.9 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
INDIA U16 vs HAPPY BRIDGE 0 : 4 VP (match 84698) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | INDIA U16 | HAPPY BRIDGE | |
| 3N | S | ♣6 | -4 | 400 | 96% | 1N | W | ♥7 | = | 90 | 66% | 2 | ||||
| 3♠ | S | ♠A | -6 | 300 | 70% | 4♠ | W | ♣T | -2 | 200 | 71% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.3 | NS+0.1 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | S | -4 | 400 | 96% | 2 | |||
| 1N | W | = | 90 | 66% | ||||
| 3♠ | S | -6 | 300 | 70% | 2 | |||
| 4♠ | W | -2 | 200 | 71% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.3 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
ISRAEL vs SXTULIP 3 : 1 VP (match 84699) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ISRAEL | SXTULIP | |
| 1N | S | ♣6 | = | 90 | 79% | 1N | S | ♣6 | = | 90 | 79% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 4♠ | W | ♣T | -1 | 100 | 56% | 4♠ | W | ♣T | = | 620 | 80% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.5 | NS-0.0 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 1N | S | = | 90 | 79% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 1N | S | = | 90 | 79% | ||||
| 4♠ | W | -1 | 100 | 56% | 2 | |||
| 4♠ | W | = | 620 | 80% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.5 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
ZHIHAOLE vs INDIA-A U26 1 : 3 VP (match 84700) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ZHIHAOLE | INDIA-A U26 | |
| 1N | W | ♥7 | = | 90 | 66% | 1N | W | ♠4 | -1 | 50 | 60% | 2 | ||||
| 4♥ | E | ♣K | -1 | 100 | 56% | 4♥ | E | ♣A | -1 | 100 | 56% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.4 | NS+0.1 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 1N | W | = | 90 | 66% | 2 | |||
| 1N | W | -1 | 50 | 60% | ||||
| 4♥ | E | -1 | 100 | 56% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♥ | E | -1 | 100 | 56% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.4 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CS21MSCHOOL vs RDFZ ZHIHAOLE 3 : 1 VP (match 84701) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CS21MSCHOOL | RDFZ ZHIHAOLE | |
| 1N | W | ♠4 | = | 90 | 66% | 2♦ | S | ♥K | -2 | 200 | 91% | 2 | ||||
| 3♠ | W | ♣T | -2 | 200 | 71% | 4♠ | W | ♣T | -2 | 200 | 71% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.1 | NS-0.4 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 1N | W | = | 90 | 66% | 2 | |||
| 2♦ | S | -2 | 200 | 91% | ||||
| 3♠ | W | -2 | 200 | 71% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♠ | W | -2 | 200 | 71% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.1 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SXSPARK vs AUSTRIA 2 : 2 VP (match 84702) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SXSPARK | AUSTRIA | |
| 1N | W | ♦5 | -2 | 100 | 86% | 2♥ | S | ♠3 | = | 110 | 90% | 2 | ||||
| 6♠ | W | ♣T | -2 | 200 | 71% | 5♦x | N | ♥4 | -6 | 1400 | 100% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.1 | NS-0.2 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 1N | W | -2 | 100 | 86% | 2 | |||
| 2♥ | S | = | 110 | 90% | ||||
| 6♠ | W | -2 | 200 | 71% | 2 | |||
| 5♦x | N | -6 | 1400 | 100% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.1 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CHILE U26W vs MAN EATING COBRAS 0 : 4 VP (match 84703) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHILE U26W | MAN EATING COBRAS | |
| 2N | S | ♣6 | -1 | 100 | 81% | 1N | S | ♣6 | = | 90 | 79% | 2 | ||||
| 5♥ | E | ♣A | = | 650 | 90% | 5♥ | W | ♣T | -1 | 100 | 56% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.4 | NS+0.5 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2N | S | -1 | 100 | 81% | 2 | |||
| 1N | S | = | 90 | 79% | ||||
| 5♥ | E | = | 650 | 90% | 2 | |||
| 5♥ | W | -1 | 100 | 56% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.4 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
50 50 vs EYE OF THE TIGER 0 : 2.4 VP (match 84704)↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | 50 50 | EYE OF THE TIGER | |
| – | — | – | — | |||||||||||||
| – | — | – | — | |||||||||||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS0.0 | NS0.0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| – | ||||||||
| – | ||||||||
| – | ||||||||
| – | ||||||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS0.0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
JAPAN U21 vs CHINA RDFZ HU 1 : 3 VP (match 84705) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | JAPAN U21 | CHINA RDFZ HU | |
| 1N | W | ♥7 | -1 | 50 | 60% | 1N | W | ♦5 | -1 | 50 | 60% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 5♣x | S | ♠A | -2 | 300 | 70% | 5♥x | E | ♣A | -2 | 500 | 93% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.2 | NS+1.1 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 1N | W | -1 | 50 | 60% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 1N | W | -1 | 50 | 60% | ||||
| 5♣x | S | -2 | 300 | 70% | 2 | |||
| 5♥x | E | -2 | 500 | 93% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.2 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SXDAISY vs SHSLLS1 3 : 1 VP (match 84706) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SXDAISY | SHSLLS1 | |
| 2N | S | ♣6 | -1 | 100 | 81% | 1N | E | ♦3 | +1 | 120 | 87% | 2 | ||||
| 4♥ | W | ♣T | = | 620 | 80% | 4♠ | W | ♣T | = | 620 | 80% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.2 | NS-1.3 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2N | S | -1 | 100 | 81% | 2 | |||
| 1N | E | +1 | 120 | 87% | ||||
| 4♥ | W | = | 620 | 80% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♠ | W | = | 620 | 80% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.2 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
RDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT vs SERBIA U21 0 : 4 VP (match 84707) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | RDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT | SERBIA U21 | |
| 1N | W | ♠4 | = | 90 | 66% | 1N | W | ♠4 | -1 | 50 | 60% | 2 | ||||
| 4♥x | E | ♣A | = | 790 | 94% | 4♥ | E | ♣A | -1 | 100 | 56% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.2 | NS+0.1 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 1N | W | = | 90 | 66% | 2 | |||
| 1N | W | -1 | 50 | 60% | ||||
| 4♥x | E | = | 790 | 94% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | E | -1 | 100 | 56% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.2 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CROATIA vs ITALIA U26 2 : 2 VP (match 84708) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CROATIA | ITALIA U26 | |
| 2♠ | S | ♦K | = | 110 | 90% | 1N | W | ♥7 | -1 | 50 | 60% | 2 | ||||
| 4♠ | W | ♣T | -1 | 100 | 56% | 4♠ | W | ♣T | -4 | 400 | 89% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.7 | NS+1.0 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2♠ | S | = | 110 | 90% | 2 | |||
| 1N | W | -1 | 50 | 60% | ||||
| 4♠ | W | -1 | 100 | 56% | 2 | |||
| 4♠ | W | -4 | 400 | 89% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.7 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
URUGUAY vs CHILE 0 : 4 VP (match 84709) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | URUGUAY | CHILE | |
| 2N | S | ♣6 | -1 | 100 | 81% | 3♦ | E | ♥5 | -1 | 50 | 60% | 2 | ||||
| 5♥ | E | ♣A | -2 | 200 | 71% | 6♥x | E | ♦9 | -2 | 500 | 93% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.2 | NS+1.1 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2N | S | -1 | 100 | 81% | 2 | |||
| 3♦ | E | -1 | 50 | 60% | ||||
| 5♥ | E | -2 | 200 | 71% | 2 | |||
| 6♥x | E | -2 | 500 | 93% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.2 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CROATIA U16 vs ITALIA 2 0 : 4 VP (match 84710) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CROATIA U16 | ITALIA 2 | |
| 1N | W | ♥7 | -2 | 100 | 86% | 4N | W | ♦5 | -5 | 250 | 100% | 2 | ||||
| 6♥ | E | ♣A | -2 | 200 | 71% | 4♥x | E | ♣A | -3 | 800 | 98% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.1 | NS+2.0 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 1N | W | -2 | 100 | 86% | 2 | |||
| 4N | W | -5 | 250 | 100% | ||||
| 6♥ | E | -2 | 200 | 71% | 2 | |||
| 4♥x | E | -3 | 800 | 98% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.1 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+2.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
| ♠ K984 ♥ AT87 ♦ 52 ♣ J73 | ||
| ♠ 763 ♥ KQ ♦ KQ6 ♣ AT864 | 21 Dlr N N-S | ♠ QJ5 ♥ 6432 ♦ AT98 ♣ 52 |
| ♠ AT2 ♥ J95 ♦ J743 ♣ KQ9 |
| NT | ♠ | ♥ | ♦ | ♣ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 6 | 8 | 7 | 6 | 5 |
| S | 7 | 8 | 7 | 6 | 5 |
| E | 6 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 |
| W | 6 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 |
| ♠ T85 ♥ Q973 ♦ AQT32 ♣ T | ||
| ♠ AKQJ97 ♥ AT5 ♦ K64 ♣ Q | 22 Dlr E E-W | ♠ – ♥ KJ8642 ♦ J85 ♣ 8765 |
| ♠ 6432 ♥ – ♦ 97 ♣ AKJ9432 |
| NT | ♠ | ♥ | ♦ | ♣ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 4 | 5 | 3 | 6 | 9 |
| S | 1 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 9 |
| E | 4 | 8 | 9 | 7 | 4 |
| W | 4 | 7 | 10 | 7 | 4 |