Round 20 — U26 BAM Qualification
25 matches. → cumulative standings · → board records
Round 20 results↑ top
Every match of the round — teams, board-a-match points and VPs. Click a table number or ‘protocol’ for the full board-by-board scorecard below.
| Table | Home team | Visiting team | BAM (home) | BAM (visit) | VP (home) | VP (visit) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | INDIA-B U26 | HONG KONG | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 2 | CHINA RDFZ HOPE | ITALIA U26W | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 3 | DABROWKA PO | BYE | 0 | 0 | 2.40 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 4 | SXSTARLORD | TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 5 | PRISM FALCONS | SXNEBULA | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 6 | GERMANY | GREISNOR | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 7 | JAPAN U26 | FRANCE FUNBRIDGE | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 8 | SERBALICIOUS | ITALIA U21 | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 9 | AZS WRATISLAVIA | INDIA U21 | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 10 | SERBIA U26W | HAPPY BRIDGE | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 11 | DABROWKA | SXTULIP | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 12 | CHINA RDFZ | INDIA-A U26 | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 13 | INDIA U16 | RDFZ ZHIHAOLE | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 14 | ISRAEL | AUSTRIA | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 15 | ZHIHAOLE | MAN EATING COBRAS | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 16 | CS21MSCHOOL | EYE OF THE TIGER | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 17 | SXSPARK | CHINA RDFZ HU | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 18 | CHILE U26W | SHSLLS1 | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 19 | 50 50 | SERBIA U21 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 2.40 | protocol → |
| 20 | JAPAN U21 | ITALIA U26 | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 21 | SXDAISY | CHILE | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 22 | RDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT | ITALIA 2 | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 23 | CROATIA | BELGIUM | 1 | 3 | 2.40 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 24 | URUGUAY | POLAND KIDS | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 25 | CROATIA U16 | CAPRISUN | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
Standings after round 20↑ top
Cumulative board-a-match points through round 20 — the league table as it stood after this round. → full standings, every round & players
| Place | Team | Pts | R20 | Pld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GREISNOR | 93.60 | 3.00 | 20 |
| 1 | ITALIA U26 | 93.60 | 1.00 | 20 |
| 3 | ITALIA U21 | 91.20 | 0.00 | 20 |
| 4 | ISRAEL | 88.60 | 3.00 | 20 |
| 5 | SXNEBULA | 88.20 | 4.00 | 20 |
| 6 | JAPAN U26 | 87.60 | 4.00 | 20 |
| 7 | CHINA RDFZ HU | 86.40 | 4.00 | 20 |
| 8 | INDIA-A U26 | 84.80 | 1.00 | 20 |
| 9 | SERBALICIOUS | 84.40 | 4.00 | 20 |
| 10 | AUSTRIA | 84.00 | 1.00 | 20 |
| 11 | CHINA RDFZ | 80.20 | 3.00 | 20 |
| 12 | CROATIA | 80.00 | 2.40 | 20 |
| 13 | SXSTARLORD | 78.60 | 4.00 | 20 |
| 14 | JAPAN U21 | 78.40 | 3.00 | 20 |
| 15 | SERBIA U21 | 78.20 | 2.40 | 20 |
| 16 | GERMANY | 77.80 | 1.00 | 20 |
| 17 | SXDAISY | 77.40 | 4.00 | 20 |
| 18 | ITALIA U26W | 76.60 | 3.00 | 20 |
| 19 | AZS WRATISLAVIA | 75.80 | 2.00 | 20 |
| 20 | CHILE U26W | 75.40 | 4.00 | 20 |
| 21 | RDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT | 75.00 | 4.00 | 20 |
| 22 | FRANCE FUNBRIDGE | 74.20 | 0.00 | 20 |
| 23 | INDIA-B U26 | 72.40 | 2.00 | 20 |
| 24 | EYE OF THE TIGER | 71.20 | 3.00 | 20 |
| 24 | POLAND KIDS | 71.20 | 4.00 | 20 |
| 24 | SHSLLS1 | 71.20 | 0.00 | 20 |
| 27 | DABROWKA | 70.80 | 2.00 | 20 |
| 28 | CHILE | 70.20 | 0.00 | 20 |
| 29 | DABROWKA PO | 69.20 | 2.40 | 20 |
| 29 | SXTULIP | 69.20 | 2.00 | 20 |
| 31 | INDIA U21 | 69.00 | 2.00 | 20 |
| 32 | RDFZ ZHIHAOLE | 68.40 | 2.00 | 20 |
| 33 | MAN EATING COBRAS | 67.80 | 2.00 | 20 |
| 34 | HONG KONG | 63.60 | 2.00 | 20 |
| 35 | ITALIA 2 | 63.40 | 0.00 | 20 |
| 36 | SXSPARK | 60.20 | 0.00 | 20 |
| 37 | SERBIA U26W | 57.00 | 2.00 | 20 |
| 38 | ZHIHAOLE | 56.00 | 2.00 | 20 |
| 39 | PRISM FALCONS | 55.40 | 0.00 | 20 |
| 40 | INDIA U16 | 54.60 | 2.00 | 20 |
| 41 | URUGUAY | 51.40 | 0.00 | 20 |
| 42 | 50 50 | 50.80 | 0.00 | 20 |
| 43 | HAPPY BRIDGE | 47.00 | 2.00 | 20 |
| 44 | CROATIA U16 | 44.20 | 2.00 | 20 |
| 45 | CS21MSCHOOL | 38.40 | 1.00 | 20 |
| 46 | CAPRISUN | 36.40 | 2.00 | 20 |
| 47 | CHINA RDFZ HOPE | 36.20 | 1.00 | 20 |
| 48 | TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL | 34.40 | 0.00 | 20 |
| 49 | BELGIUM | 0.00 | 0.00 | 20 |
Board-a-match over this round's field — each pair's net boards won per board (2-0 win / 1-1 tie), shown as a board-a-match %.
Round 20 board-a-match standings↑ top
| Place | Player | Team | Boards | R20 | BAM% |
|---|
INDIA-B U26 vs HONG KONG 2 : 2 VP (match 84611) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | INDIA-B U26 | HONG KONG | |
| 3N | S | ♣8 | +2 | 660 | 82% | 3N | S | ♠6 | +2 | 660 | 82% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 3N | S | ♠2 | +2 | 460 | 71% | 3N | S | ♠2 | +2 | 460 | 71% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.1 | NS+1.1 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | S | +2 | 660 | 82% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3N | S | +2 | 660 | 82% | ||||
| 3N | S | +2 | 460 | 71% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3N | S | +2 | 460 | 71% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.1 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CHINA RDFZ HOPE vs ITALIA U26W 1 : 3 VP (match 84612) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHINA RDFZ HOPE | ITALIA U26W | |
| 3N | S | ♥6 | +1 | 630 | 51% | 3N | S | ♠A | +1 | 630 | 51% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 3N | S | ♠2 | +1 | 430 | 62% | 3N | S | ♠2 | +3 | 490 | 98% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.3 | NS+0.9 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | S | +1 | 630 | 51% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3N | S | +1 | 630 | 51% | ||||
| 3N | S | +1 | 430 | 62% | 2 | |||
| 3N | S | +3 | 490 | 98% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.3 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.9 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
DABROWKA PO vs BYE 2.4 : 0 VP (match 84613)↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | DABROWKA PO | BYE | |
| – | — | – | — | |||||||||||||
| – | — | – | — | |||||||||||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS0.0 | NS0.0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| – | ||||||||
| – | ||||||||
| – | ||||||||
| – | ||||||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS0.0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SXSTARLORD vs TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL 4 : 0 VP (match 84614) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SXSTARLORD | TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL | |
| 3N | S | ♠A | +2 | 660 | 82% | 3N | S | ♠6 | -1 | 100 | 89% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | S | ♠2 | +2 | 460 | 71% | 4♣ | N | ♠8 | +1 | 150 | 84% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.1 | NS-1.5 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | S | +2 | 660 | 82% | 2 | |||
| 3N | S | -1 | 100 | 89% | ||||
| 3N | S | +2 | 460 | 71% | 2 | |||
| 4♣ | N | +1 | 150 | 84% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.1 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
PRISM FALCONS vs SXNEBULA 0 : 4 VP (match 84615) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | PRISM FALCONS | SXNEBULA | |
| 5♦ | S | ♠A | -1 | 100 | 89% | 3N | S | ♠6 | +2 | 660 | 82% | 2 | ||||
| 3♦ | E | ♠A | -1 | 100 | 87% | 3N | S | ♠2 | +2 | 460 | 71% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.5 | NS+1.1 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 5♦ | S | -1 | 100 | 89% | 2 | |||
| 3N | S | +2 | 660 | 82% | ||||
| 3♦ | E | -1 | 100 | 87% | 2 | |||
| 3N | S | +2 | 460 | 71% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.5 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
GERMANY vs GREISNOR 1 : 3 VP (match 84616) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | GERMANY | GREISNOR | |
| 3N | S | ♣8 | -2 | 200 | 99% | 3N | S | ♠6 | +2 | 660 | 82% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | S | ♠2 | +2 | 460 | 71% | 3N | S | ♠2 | +2 | 460 | 71% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.6 | NS+1.1 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | S | -2 | 200 | 99% | 2 | |||
| 3N | S | +2 | 660 | 82% | ||||
| 3N | S | +2 | 460 | 71% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3N | S | +2 | 460 | 71% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.6 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
JAPAN U26 vs FRANCE FUNBRIDGE 4 : 0 VP (match 84617) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | JAPAN U26 | FRANCE FUNBRIDGE | |
| 3N | S | ♠6 | +2 | 660 | 82% | 3N | S | ♠6 | -1 | 100 | 89% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | S | ♦3 | +2 | 460 | 71% | 3N | S | ♥5 | +1 | 430 | 62% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.1 | NS-1.0 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | S | +2 | 660 | 82% | 2 | |||
| 3N | S | -1 | 100 | 89% | ||||
| 3N | S | +2 | 460 | 71% | 2 | |||
| 3N | S | +1 | 430 | 62% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.1 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SERBALICIOUS vs ITALIA U21 4 : 0 VP (match 84618) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SERBALICIOUS | ITALIA U21 | |
| 3N | S | ♠5 | +2 | 660 | 82% | 3N | S | ♣9 | +1 | 630 | 51% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | S | ♠2 | +2 | 460 | 71% | 3N | S | ♠2 | +1 | 430 | 62% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.1 | NS-0.3 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | S | +2 | 660 | 82% | 2 | |||
| 3N | S | +1 | 630 | 51% | ||||
| 3N | S | +2 | 460 | 71% | 2 | |||
| 3N | S | +1 | 430 | 62% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.1 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
AZS WRATISLAVIA vs INDIA U21 2 : 2 VP (match 84619) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | AZS WRATISLAVIA | INDIA U21 | |
| 3N | S | ♥2 | +1 | 630 | 51% | 3N | S | ♠6 | +2 | 660 | 82% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | N | ♥2 | +3 | 490 | 98% | 3N | S | ♠2 | +2 | 460 | 71% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.9 | NS+1.1 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | S | +1 | 630 | 51% | 2 | |||
| 3N | S | +2 | 660 | 82% | ||||
| 3N | N | +3 | 490 | 98% | 2 | |||
| 3N | S | +2 | 460 | 71% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.9 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SERBIA U26W vs HAPPY BRIDGE 2 : 2 VP (match 84620) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SERBIA U26W | HAPPY BRIDGE | |
| 7♦ | N | ♣7 | -2 | 200 | 99% | 3N | S | ♥9 | +1 | 630 | 51% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | S | ♠2 | +2 | 460 | 71% | 3N | S | ♠2 | +1 | 430 | 62% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.6 | NS-0.3 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7♦ | N | -2 | 200 | 99% | 2 | |||
| 3N | S | +1 | 630 | 51% | ||||
| 3N | S | +2 | 460 | 71% | 2 | |||
| 3N | S | +1 | 430 | 62% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.6 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
DABROWKA vs SXTULIP 2 : 2 VP (match 84621) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | DABROWKA | SXTULIP | |
| 3N | S | ♥2 | +1 | 630 | 51% | 3N | S | ♠6 | +1 | 630 | 51% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 3N | S | ♠2 | +2 | 460 | 71% | 3N | S | ♠2 | +2 | 460 | 71% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.4 | NS+0.4 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | S | +1 | 630 | 51% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3N | S | +1 | 630 | 51% | ||||
| 3N | S | +2 | 460 | 71% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3N | S | +2 | 460 | 71% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.4 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CHINA RDFZ vs INDIA-A U26 3 : 1 VP (match 84622) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHINA RDFZ | INDIA-A U26 | |
| 3N | S | ♠6 | +2 | 660 | 82% | 2♠x | W | ♥A | -3 | 500 | 76% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | S | ♠2 | +2 | 460 | 71% | 3N | S | ♠2 | +2 | 460 | 71% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.1 | NS-0.1 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | S | +2 | 660 | 82% | 2 | |||
| 2♠x | W | -3 | 500 | 76% | ||||
| 3N | S | +2 | 460 | 71% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3N | S | +2 | 460 | 71% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.1 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
INDIA U16 vs RDFZ ZHIHAOLE 2 : 2 VP (match 84623) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | INDIA U16 | RDFZ ZHIHAOLE | |
| 5♦ | S | ♠A | = | 600 | 71% | 3N | S | ♠A | +2 | 660 | 82% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | S | ♠2 | +2 | 460 | 71% | 3N | S | ♦Q | +1 | 430 | 62% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS0.0 | NS+0.4 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 5♦ | S | = | 600 | 71% | 2 | |||
| 3N | S | +2 | 660 | 82% | ||||
| 3N | S | +2 | 460 | 71% | 2 | |||
| 3N | S | +1 | 430 | 62% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS0.0 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
ISRAEL vs AUSTRIA 3 : 1 VP (match 84624) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ISRAEL | AUSTRIA | |
| 3N | S | ♦6 | +2 | 660 | 82% | 3N | S | ♠6 | -1 | 100 | 89% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | N | ♥2 | +2 | 460 | 71% | 3N | S | ♦3 | +2 | 460 | 71% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.1 | NS-0.4 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | S | +2 | 660 | 82% | 2 | |||
| 3N | S | -1 | 100 | 89% | ||||
| 3N | N | +2 | 460 | 71% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3N | S | +2 | 460 | 71% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.1 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
ZHIHAOLE vs MAN EATING COBRAS 2 : 2 VP (match 84625) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ZHIHAOLE | MAN EATING COBRAS | |
| 3N | S | ♠6 | +2 | 660 | 82% | 3N | S | ♥9 | +1 | 630 | 51% | 2 | ||||
| 5♣ | N | ♦7 | -2 | 100 | 96% | 3N | N | ♥2 | = | 400 | 76% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.3 | NS-0.5 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | S | +2 | 660 | 82% | 2 | |||
| 3N | S | +1 | 630 | 51% | ||||
| 5♣ | N | -2 | 100 | 96% | 2 | |||
| 3N | N | = | 400 | 76% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.3 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CS21MSCHOOL vs EYE OF THE TIGER 1 : 3 VP (match 84626) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CS21MSCHOOL | EYE OF THE TIGER | |
| 3N | S | ♠A | +1 | 630 | 51% | 3N | S | ♣5 | +1 | 630 | 51% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 3N | N | ♥2 | = | 400 | 76% | 3N | S | ♠3 | +2 | 460 | 71% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.5 | NS+0.4 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | S | +1 | 630 | 51% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3N | S | +1 | 630 | 51% | ||||
| 3N | N | = | 400 | 76% | 2 | |||
| 3N | S | +2 | 460 | 71% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.5 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SXSPARK vs CHINA RDFZ HU 0 : 4 VP (match 84627) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SXSPARK | CHINA RDFZ HU | |
| 3N | S | ♠6 | -1 | 100 | 89% | 3N | S | ♠K | +1 | 630 | 51% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | N | ♦7 | +1 | 430 | 62% | 3N | N | ♦7 | +2 | 460 | 71% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.0 | NS+0.4 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | S | -1 | 100 | 89% | 2 | |||
| 3N | S | +1 | 630 | 51% | ||||
| 3N | N | +1 | 430 | 62% | 2 | |||
| 3N | N | +2 | 460 | 71% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.0 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CHILE U26W vs SHSLLS1 4 : 0 VP (match 84628) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHILE U26W | SHSLLS1 | |
| 3N | S | ♠K | +2 | 660 | 82% | 3N | S | ♠6 | -1 | 100 | 89% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | N | ♥2 | +3 | 490 | 98% | 3N | S | ♦Q | -2 | 100 | 96% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.6 | NS-1.7 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | S | +2 | 660 | 82% | 2 | |||
| 3N | S | -1 | 100 | 89% | ||||
| 3N | N | +3 | 490 | 98% | 2 | |||
| 3N | S | -2 | 100 | 96% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.6 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
50 50 vs SERBIA U21 0 : 2.4 VP (match 84629)↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | 50 50 | SERBIA U21 | |
| – | — | – | — | |||||||||||||
| – | — | – | — | |||||||||||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS0.0 | NS0.0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| – | ||||||||
| – | ||||||||
| – | ||||||||
| – | ||||||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS0.0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
JAPAN U21 vs ITALIA U26 3 : 1 VP (match 84630) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | JAPAN U21 | ITALIA U26 | |
| 3N | S | ♠5 | +2 | 660 | 82% | 3N | S | ♠6 | +2 | 660 | 82% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 3N | S | ♠5 | +2 | 460 | 71% | 3N | N | ♦7 | -2 | 100 | 96% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.1 | NS-0.3 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | S | +2 | 660 | 82% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3N | S | +2 | 660 | 82% | ||||
| 3N | S | +2 | 460 | 71% | 2 | |||
| 3N | N | -2 | 100 | 96% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.1 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SXDAISY vs CHILE 4 : 0 VP (match 84631) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SXDAISY | CHILE | |
| 3N | S | ♣9 | +1 | 630 | 51% | 5♦ | N | ♠4 | = | 600 | 71% | 2 | ||||
| 3♦x | E | ♠A | -1 | 200 | 81% | 3N | N | ♦7 | -2 | 100 | 96% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.6 | NS-1.3 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | S | +1 | 630 | 51% | 2 | |||
| 5♦ | N | = | 600 | 71% | ||||
| 3♦x | E | -1 | 200 | 81% | 2 | |||
| 3N | N | -2 | 100 | 96% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.6 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
RDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT vs ITALIA 2 4 : 0 VP (match 84632) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | RDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT | ITALIA 2 | |
| 3♠x | W | ♥A | -4 | 800 | 100% | 3N | S | ♠K | +1 | 630 | 51% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | S | ♠3 | +2 | 460 | 71% | 3N | S | ♥5 | +1 | 430 | 62% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.4 | NS-0.3 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♠x | W | -4 | 800 | 100% | 2 | |||
| 3N | S | +1 | 630 | 51% | ||||
| 3N | S | +2 | 460 | 71% | 2 | |||
| 3N | S | +1 | 430 | 62% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.4 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CROATIA vs BELGIUM 2.4 : 0 VP (match 84633) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CROATIA | BELGIUM | |
| 3♦ | S | ♠A | +1 | 130 | 80% | 3N | S | ♣9 | +1 | 630 | 51% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | S | ♦3 | +1 | 430 | 62% | 3N | N | ♦9 | +1 | 430 | 62% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.8 | NS-0.3 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♦ | S | +1 | 130 | 80% | 2 | |||
| 3N | S | +1 | 630 | 51% | ||||
| 3N | S | +1 | 430 | 62% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3N | N | +1 | 430 | 62% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.8 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
URUGUAY vs POLAND KIDS 0 : 4 VP (match 84634) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | URUGUAY | POLAND KIDS | |
| 2♠ | W | ♥A | -3 | 150 | 78% | 3N | S | ♣9 | +1 | 630 | 51% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | S | ♥8 | -1 | 50 | 89% | 3N | S | ♦T | = | 400 | 76% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.3 | NS-0.5 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2♠ | W | -3 | 150 | 78% | 2 | |||
| 3N | S | +1 | 630 | 51% | ||||
| 3N | S | -1 | 50 | 89% | 2 | |||
| 3N | S | = | 400 | 76% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.3 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CROATIA U16 vs CAPRISUN 2 : 2 VP (match 84635) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CROATIA U16 | CAPRISUN | |
| 3N | S | ♠A | = | 600 | 71% | 5♦ | S | ♠A | -1 | 100 | 89% | 2 | ||||
| 4♠ | S | ♣A | -2 | 100 | 96% | 3♦ | E | ♠A | -2 | 200 | 81% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.3 | NS-1.4 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | S | = | 600 | 71% | 2 | |||
| 5♦ | S | -1 | 100 | 89% | ||||
| 4♠ | S | -2 | 100 | 96% | 2 | |||
| 3♦ | E | -2 | 200 | 81% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.3 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
| ♠ 9 ♥ AKJ5 ♦ T9532 ♣ A43 | ||
| ♠ AK865 ♥ 9632 ♦ 6 ♣ 985 | 15 Dlr S N-S | ♠ T74 ♥ T84 ♦ Q87 ♣ KT72 |
| ♠ QJ32 ♥ Q7 ♦ AKJ4 ♣ QJ6 |
| NT | ♠ | ♥ | ♦ | ♣ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 10 | 7 | 10 | 11 | 9 |
| S | 10 | 7 | 10 | 11 | 9 |
| E | 3 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 4 |
| W | 3 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 4 |
| ♠ Q96 ♥ Q93 ♦ K2 ♣ K7432 | ||
| ♠ J532 ♥ J85 ♦ QT3 ♣ AQ6 | 16 Dlr W E-W | ♠ 84 ♥ KT62 ♦ J98765 ♣ 8 |
| ♠ AKT7 ♥ A74 ♦ A4 ♣ JT95 |
| NT | ♠ | ♥ | ♦ | ♣ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 11 | 10 | 8 | 6 | 11 |
| S | 11 | 10 | 8 | 6 | 11 |
| E | 2 | 2 | 4 | 7 | 2 |
| W | 2 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 2 |