Round 24 — U26 BAM Qualification
25 matches. → cumulative standings · → board records
Round 24 results↑ top
Every match of the round — teams, board-a-match points and VPs. Click a table number or ‘protocol’ for the full board-by-board scorecard below.
| Table | Home team | Visiting team | BAM (home) | BAM (visit) | VP (home) | VP (visit) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | INDIA-B U26 | ITALIA 2 | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 2 | CHINA RDFZ HOPE | BELGIUM | 1 | 3 | 2.40 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 3 | DABROWKA PO | POLAND KIDS | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 4 | SXSTARLORD | CAPRISUN | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 5 | PRISM FALCONS | HONG KONG | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 6 | GERMANY | ITALIA U26W | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 7 | JAPAN U26 | BYE | 0 | 0 | 2.40 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 8 | SERBALICIOUS | TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 9 | AZS WRATISLAVIA | SXNEBULA | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 10 | SERBIA U26W | GREISNOR | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 11 | DABROWKA | FRANCE FUNBRIDGE | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 12 | CHINA RDFZ | ITALIA U21 | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 13 | INDIA U16 | INDIA U21 | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 14 | ISRAEL | HAPPY BRIDGE | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 15 | ZHIHAOLE | SXTULIP | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 16 | CS21MSCHOOL | INDIA-A U26 | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 17 | SXSPARK | RDFZ ZHIHAOLE | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 18 | CHILE U26W | AUSTRIA | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 19 | 50 50 | MAN EATING COBRAS | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 2.40 | protocol → |
| 20 | JAPAN U21 | EYE OF THE TIGER | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 21 | SXDAISY | CHINA RDFZ HU | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 22 | RDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT | SHSLLS1 | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 23 | CROATIA | SERBIA U21 | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 24 | URUGUAY | ITALIA U26 | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 25 | CROATIA U16 | CHILE | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
Standings after round 24↑ top
Cumulative board-a-match points through round 24 — the league table as it stood after this round. → full standings, every round & players
| Place | Team | Pts | R24 | Pld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GREISNOR | 102.60 | 3.00 | 24 |
| 1 | ITALIA U26 | 102.60 | 4.00 | 24 |
| 3 | ITALIA U21 | 102.20 | 2.00 | 24 |
| 4 | ISRAEL | 100.60 | 3.00 | 24 |
| 5 | SXNEBULA | 98.20 | 1.00 | 24 |
| 6 | CHINA RDFZ HU | 96.80 | 2.00 | 24 |
| 7 | AUSTRIA | 95.00 | 2.00 | 24 |
| 8 | JAPAN U26 | 94.00 | 2.40 | 24 |
| 9 | INDIA-A U26 | 92.80 | 2.00 | 24 |
| 10 | SERBALICIOUS | 92.40 | 3.00 | 24 |
| 11 | CHINA RDFZ | 90.20 | 2.00 | 24 |
| 12 | SXSTARLORD | 89.00 | 3.00 | 24 |
| 13 | SXDAISY | 88.40 | 2.00 | 24 |
| 14 | GERMANY | 88.20 | 4.00 | 24 |
| 15 | CROATIA | 87.00 | 2.00 | 24 |
| 16 | SERBIA U21 | 86.20 | 2.00 | 24 |
| 17 | JAPAN U21 | 84.40 | 2.00 | 24 |
| 18 | FRANCE FUNBRIDGE | 83.20 | 3.00 | 24 |
| 19 | AZS WRATISLAVIA | 82.80 | 3.00 | 24 |
| 19 | INDIA-B U26 | 82.80 | 4.00 | 24 |
| 21 | RDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT | 82.00 | 2.00 | 24 |
| 22 | ITALIA U26W | 81.60 | 0.00 | 24 |
| 23 | CHILE | 81.20 | 3.00 | 24 |
| 24 | EYE OF THE TIGER | 80.60 | 2.00 | 24 |
| 25 | DABROWKA PO | 80.20 | 4.00 | 24 |
| 26 | SHSLLS1 | 79.60 | 2.00 | 24 |
| 27 | DABROWKA | 78.80 | 1.00 | 24 |
| 28 | CHILE U26W | 78.40 | 2.00 | 24 |
| 29 | SXTULIP | 78.20 | 2.00 | 24 |
| 30 | MAN EATING COBRAS | 77.20 | 2.40 | 24 |
| 30 | POLAND KIDS | 77.20 | 0.00 | 24 |
| 32 | HONG KONG | 73.60 | 1.00 | 24 |
| 33 | ITALIA 2 | 73.40 | 0.00 | 24 |
| 34 | INDIA U21 | 73.00 | 3.00 | 24 |
| 35 | RDFZ ZHIHAOLE | 72.40 | 1.00 | 24 |
| 36 | SXSPARK | 72.20 | 3.00 | 24 |
| 37 | PRISM FALCONS | 66.80 | 3.00 | 24 |
| 38 | SERBIA U26W | 64.00 | 1.00 | 24 |
| 39 | ZHIHAOLE | 61.00 | 2.00 | 24 |
| 40 | INDIA U16 | 58.60 | 1.00 | 24 |
| 41 | HAPPY BRIDGE | 57.00 | 1.00 | 24 |
| 42 | URUGUAY | 54.80 | 0.00 | 24 |
| 43 | 50 50 | 50.80 | 0.00 | 24 |
| 44 | CROATIA U16 | 49.60 | 1.00 | 24 |
| 45 | CS21MSCHOOL | 45.40 | 2.00 | 24 |
| 46 | CAPRISUN | 43.40 | 1.00 | 24 |
| 47 | CHINA RDFZ HOPE | 40.60 | 2.40 | 24 |
| 48 | TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL | 39.40 | 1.00 | 24 |
| 49 | BELGIUM | 0.00 | 0.00 | 24 |
Board-a-match over this round's field — each pair's net boards won per board (2-0 win / 1-1 tie), shown as a board-a-match %.
Round 24 board-a-match standings↑ top
| Place | Player | Team | Boards | R24 | BAM% |
|---|
INDIA-B U26 vs ITALIA 2 4 : 0 VP (match 84711) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | INDIA-B U26 | ITALIA 2 | |
| 2♦ | S | ♥3 | +3 | 150 | 83% | 3♥ | E | ♠5 | = | 140 | 66% | 2 | ||||
| 4♠ | N | ♥A | +1 | 450 | 59% | 6♠ | N | ♦K | -1 | 50 | 81% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.8 | NS-0.9 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2♦ | S | +3 | 150 | 83% | 2 | |||
| 3♥ | E | = | 140 | 66% | ||||
| 4♠ | N | +1 | 450 | 59% | 2 | |||
| 6♠ | N | -1 | 50 | 81% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.8 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.9 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CHINA RDFZ HOPE vs BELGIUM 2.4 : 0 VP (match 84712) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHINA RDFZ HOPE | BELGIUM | |
| 3♥ | E | ♦4 | +1 | 170 | 88% | 3♥ | E | ♦2 | -1 | 100 | 68% | 2 | ||||
| Pass | — | 0 | 70% | Pass | — | 0 | 70% | 1 | 1 | |||||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.2 | NS-0.0 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♥ | E | +1 | 170 | 88% | 2 | |||
| 3♥ | E | -1 | 100 | 68% | ||||
| Pass | 0 | 70% | 1 | 1 | ||||
| Pass | 0 | 70% | ||||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.2 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
DABROWKA PO vs POLAND KIDS 4 : 0 VP (match 84713) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | DABROWKA PO | POLAND KIDS | |
| 3♦ | S | ♥3 | +2 | 150 | 83% | 5♦x | S | ♥3 | -1 | 200 | 91% | 2 | ||||
| 4♠ | N | ♥A | +1 | 450 | 59% | 6♠ | N | ♦K | -1 | 50 | 81% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.8 | NS-1.4 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♦ | S | +2 | 150 | 83% | 2 | |||
| 5♦x | S | -1 | 200 | 91% | ||||
| 4♠ | N | +1 | 450 | 59% | 2 | |||
| 6♠ | N | -1 | 50 | 81% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.8 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SXSTARLORD vs CAPRISUN 3 : 1 VP (match 84714) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SXSTARLORD | CAPRISUN | |
| 4♥x | E | ♦2 | -1 | 200 | 92% | 3♥ | E | ♣6 | = | 140 | 66% | 2 | ||||
| 5♠ | N | ♥A | = | 450 | 59% | 4♠ | N | ♠3 | +1 | 450 | 59% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.0 | NS-0.1 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♥x | E | -1 | 200 | 92% | 2 | |||
| 3♥ | E | = | 140 | 66% | ||||
| 5♠ | N | = | 450 | 59% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♠ | N | +1 | 450 | 59% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.0 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
PRISM FALCONS vs HONG KONG 3 : 1 VP (match 84715) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | PRISM FALCONS | HONG KONG | |
| 2♥ | E | ♦7 | +1 | 140 | 66% | 3♥ | E | ♠6 | = | 140 | 66% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 5♠ | N | ♦K | = | 450 | 59% | 7♠x | N | ♥A | -2 | 300 | 100% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.1 | NS-1.3 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2♥ | E | +1 | 140 | 66% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3♥ | E | = | 140 | 66% | ||||
| 5♠ | N | = | 450 | 59% | 2 | |||
| 7♠x | N | -2 | 300 | 100% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.1 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
GERMANY vs ITALIA U26W 4 : 0 VP (match 84716) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | GERMANY | ITALIA U26W | |
| 4♥x | E | ♦2 | -1 | 200 | 92% | 3♥ | W | ♥5 | -1 | 100 | 68% | 2 | ||||
| 6♠ | S | ♠7 | -1 | 50 | 81% | 6♠x | N | ♦K | -1 | 100 | 93% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.2 | NS-0.5 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♥x | E | -1 | 200 | 92% | 2 | |||
| 3♥ | W | -1 | 100 | 68% | ||||
| 6♠ | S | -1 | 50 | 81% | 2 | |||
| 6♠x | N | -1 | 100 | 93% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.2 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
JAPAN U26 vs BYE 2.4 : 0 VP (match 84717)↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | JAPAN U26 | BYE | |
| – | — | – | — | |||||||||||||
| – | — | – | — | |||||||||||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS0.0 | NS0.0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| – | ||||||||
| – | ||||||||
| – | ||||||||
| – | ||||||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS0.0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SERBALICIOUS vs TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL 3 : 1 VP (match 84718) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SERBALICIOUS | TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL | |
| 3♥ | E | ♠6 | -1 | 100 | 68% | 3♥ | E | ♠6 | = | 140 | 66% | 2 | ||||
| 4♠ | N | ♦K | +1 | 450 | 59% | 4♠ | N | ♣3 | +1 | 450 | 59% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.5 | NS-0.1 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♥ | E | -1 | 100 | 68% | 2 | |||
| 3♥ | E | = | 140 | 66% | ||||
| 4♠ | N | +1 | 450 | 59% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♠ | N | +1 | 450 | 59% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.5 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
AZS WRATISLAVIA vs SXNEBULA 3 : 1 VP (match 84719) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | AZS WRATISLAVIA | SXNEBULA | |
| 3Nx | W | ♦8 | -2 | 500 | 100% | 3♥ | E | ♣6 | -1 | 100 | 68% | 2 | ||||
| 5♠ | N | ♥A | = | 450 | 59% | 4♠ | N | ♣3 | +1 | 450 | 59% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.2 | NS+0.5 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3Nx | W | -2 | 500 | 100% | 2 | |||
| 3♥ | E | -1 | 100 | 68% | ||||
| 5♠ | N | = | 450 | 59% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♠ | N | +1 | 450 | 59% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.2 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SERBIA U26W vs GREISNOR 1 : 3 VP (match 84720) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SERBIA U26W | GREISNOR | |
| 2♥ | E | ♣9 | +1 | 140 | 66% | 3♥ | E | ♠5 | = | 140 | 66% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 6♠x | N | ♦K | -1 | 100 | 93% | 5♠ | N | ♥A | +1 | 480 | 90% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.2 | NS+0.5 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2♥ | E | +1 | 140 | 66% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3♥ | E | = | 140 | 66% | ||||
| 6♠x | N | -1 | 100 | 93% | 2 | |||
| 5♠ | N | +1 | 480 | 90% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.2 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
DABROWKA vs FRANCE FUNBRIDGE 1 : 3 VP (match 84721) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | DABROWKA | FRANCE FUNBRIDGE | |
| 3♥ | E | ♦4 | +1 | 170 | 88% | 4♥ | E | ♠5 | -1 | 100 | 68% | 2 | ||||
| 5♠ | N | ♦K | = | 450 | 59% | 5♠ | N | ♣3 | = | 450 | 59% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.6 | NS+0.5 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♥ | E | +1 | 170 | 88% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | E | -1 | 100 | 68% | ||||
| 5♠ | N | = | 450 | 59% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 5♠ | N | = | 450 | 59% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.6 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CHINA RDFZ vs ITALIA U21 2 : 2 VP (match 84722) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHINA RDFZ | ITALIA U21 | |
| 2♥x | N | ♥A | -3 | 800 | 100% | 3♥x | E | ♦2 | = | 730 | 97% | 2 | ||||
| 4♠ | N | ♦K | +1 | 450 | 59% | 6♠x | N | ♠3 | -1 | 100 | 93% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.8 | NS-1.8 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2♥x | N | -3 | 800 | 100% | 2 | |||
| 3♥x | E | = | 730 | 97% | ||||
| 4♠ | N | +1 | 450 | 59% | 2 | |||
| 6♠x | N | -1 | 100 | 93% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.8 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
INDIA U16 vs INDIA U21 1 : 3 VP (match 84723) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | INDIA U16 | INDIA U21 | |
| 3♥ | E | ♠5 | = | 140 | 66% | 3♥ | E | ♠5 | = | 140 | 66% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 6♠ | N | ♦K | -1 | 50 | 81% | 5♠ | N | ♦K | = | 450 | 59% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.9 | NS-0.1 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♥ | E | = | 140 | 66% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3♥ | E | = | 140 | 66% | ||||
| 6♠ | N | -1 | 50 | 81% | 2 | |||
| 5♠ | N | = | 450 | 59% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.9 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
ISRAEL vs HAPPY BRIDGE 3 : 1 VP (match 84724) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ISRAEL | HAPPY BRIDGE | |
| 4♦ | S | ♥3 | = | 130 | 80% | 3♥ | E | ♦2 | = | 140 | 66% | 2 | ||||
| 4♠ | N | ♦K | +1 | 450 | 59% | 4♠ | N | ♦K | +1 | 450 | 59% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.8 | NS-0.1 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♦ | S | = | 130 | 80% | 2 | |||
| 3♥ | E | = | 140 | 66% | ||||
| 4♠ | N | +1 | 450 | 59% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♠ | N | +1 | 450 | 59% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.8 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
ZHIHAOLE vs SXTULIP 2 : 2 VP (match 84725) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ZHIHAOLE | SXTULIP | |
| 4♥ | E | ♣6 | -1 | 100 | 68% | 3♥x | E | ♠8 | = | 730 | 97% | 2 | ||||
| 4♠ | N | ♥A | +1 | 450 | 59% | 4♠ | N | ♣2 | +2 | 480 | 90% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.5 | NS-0.1 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♥ | E | -1 | 100 | 68% | 2 | |||
| 3♥x | E | = | 730 | 97% | ||||
| 4♠ | N | +1 | 450 | 59% | 2 | |||
| 4♠ | N | +2 | 480 | 90% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.5 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CS21MSCHOOL vs INDIA-A U26 2 : 2 VP (match 84726) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CS21MSCHOOL | INDIA-A U26 | |
| 2♥ | E | ♠5 | +1 | 140 | 66% | 2♥ | E | ♠5 | +1 | 140 | 66% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 4♠ | N | ♥A | +1 | 450 | 59% | 5♠ | N | ♣Q | = | 450 | 59% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.1 | NS-0.1 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2♥ | E | +1 | 140 | 66% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 2♥ | E | +1 | 140 | 66% | ||||
| 4♠ | N | +1 | 450 | 59% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 5♠ | N | = | 450 | 59% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.1 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SXSPARK vs RDFZ ZHIHAOLE 3 : 1 VP (match 84727) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SXSPARK | RDFZ ZHIHAOLE | |
| 3♥ | E | ♣6 | -1 | 100 | 68% | 4♥ | E | ♠6 | -1 | 100 | 68% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 6♠ | N | ♥A | = | 980 | 100% | 5♣x | E | ♠A | -3 | 500 | 97% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.4 | NS+1.3 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♥ | E | -1 | 100 | 68% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♥ | E | -1 | 100 | 68% | ||||
| 6♠ | N | = | 980 | 100% | 2 | |||
| 5♣x | E | -3 | 500 | 97% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.4 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CHILE U26W vs AUSTRIA 2 : 2 VP (match 84728) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHILE U26W | AUSTRIA | |
| 3♥ | W | ♥5 | = | 140 | 66% | 3♥ | E | ♠5 | = | 140 | 66% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 4♠ | N | ♠8 | +1 | 450 | 59% | 5♠ | N | ♥A | = | 450 | 59% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.1 | NS-0.1 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♥ | W | = | 140 | 66% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3♥ | E | = | 140 | 66% | ||||
| 4♠ | N | +1 | 450 | 59% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 5♠ | N | = | 450 | 59% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.1 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
50 50 vs MAN EATING COBRAS 0 : 2.4 VP (match 84729)↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | 50 50 | MAN EATING COBRAS | |
| – | — | – | — | |||||||||||||
| – | — | – | — | |||||||||||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS0.0 | NS0.0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| – | ||||||||
| – | ||||||||
| – | ||||||||
| – | ||||||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS0.0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
JAPAN U21 vs EYE OF THE TIGER 2 : 2 VP (match 84730) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | JAPAN U21 | EYE OF THE TIGER | |
| 4♥x | E | ♦2 | -1 | 200 | 92% | 2♥ | E | ♠6 | = | 110 | 56% | 2 | ||||
| 6♠ | N | ♦K | -1 | 50 | 81% | 5♠ | N | ♦K | = | 450 | 59% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.2 | NS+0.3 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♥x | E | -1 | 200 | 92% | 2 | |||
| 2♥ | E | = | 110 | 56% | ||||
| 6♠ | N | -1 | 50 | 81% | 2 | |||
| 5♠ | N | = | 450 | 59% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.2 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SXDAISY vs CHINA RDFZ HU 2 : 2 VP (match 84731) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SXDAISY | CHINA RDFZ HU | |
| 3♥ | E | ♣6 | = | 140 | 66% | 4♥x | E | ♠5 | -1 | 200 | 92% | 2 | ||||
| 4♠ | N | ♦K | +1 | 450 | 59% | 6♠ | N | ♦K | -1 | 50 | 81% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.1 | NS+0.2 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♥ | E | = | 140 | 66% | 2 | |||
| 4♥x | E | -1 | 200 | 92% | ||||
| 4♠ | N | +1 | 450 | 59% | 2 | |||
| 6♠ | N | -1 | 50 | 81% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.1 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
RDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT vs SHSLLS1 2 : 2 VP (match 84732) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | RDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT | SHSLLS1 | |
| 2♥ | E | ♠5 | +1 | 140 | 66% | 3♥x | E | ♦2 | -1 | 200 | 92% | 2 | ||||
| 5♠ | N | ♦Q | = | 450 | 59% | 6♠ | N | ♦K | -1 | 50 | 81% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.1 | NS+0.2 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2♥ | E | +1 | 140 | 66% | 2 | |||
| 3♥x | E | -1 | 200 | 92% | ||||
| 5♠ | N | = | 450 | 59% | 2 | |||
| 6♠ | N | -1 | 50 | 81% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.1 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CROATIA vs SERBIA U21 2 : 2 VP (match 84733) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CROATIA | SERBIA U21 | |
| 3♥ | E | ♦2 | = | 140 | 66% | 4♥ | E | ♠6 | -1 | 100 | 68% | 2 | ||||
| 4♠ | N | ♥A | +1 | 450 | 59% | 6♠xx | N | ♦K | -1 | 200 | 98% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.1 | NS-0.6 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♥ | E | = | 140 | 66% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | E | -1 | 100 | 68% | ||||
| 4♠ | N | +1 | 450 | 59% | 2 | |||
| 6♠xx | N | -1 | 200 | 98% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.1 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
URUGUAY vs ITALIA U26 0 : 4 VP (match 84734) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | URUGUAY | ITALIA U26 | |
| 3♥ | E | ♦2 | = | 140 | 66% | 3♥x | E | ♠5 | -1 | 200 | 92% | 2 | ||||
| 6♠ | N | ♦K | -1 | 50 | 81% | 4♣x | W | ♠K | -3 | 500 | 97% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.9 | NS+1.8 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♥ | E | = | 140 | 66% | 2 | |||
| 3♥x | E | -1 | 200 | 92% | ||||
| 6♠ | N | -1 | 50 | 81% | 2 | |||
| 4♣x | W | -3 | 500 | 97% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.9 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CROATIA U16 vs CHILE 1 : 3 VP (match 84735) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CROATIA U16 | CHILE | |
| 4♥ | W | ♥5 | = | 620 | 93% | 2♥ | E | ♠5 | -1 | 100 | 68% | 2 | ||||
| 5♠ | N | ♥A | +1 | 480 | 90% | 4♠ | N | ♦K | +2 | 480 | 90% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.1 | NS+1.2 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♥ | W | = | 620 | 93% | 2 | |||
| 2♥ | E | -1 | 100 | 68% | ||||
| 5♠ | N | +1 | 480 | 90% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♠ | N | +2 | 480 | 90% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.1 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
| ♠ AQ94 ♥ 5 ♦ A86 ♣ AQT83 | ||
| ♠ KJ32 ♥ K943 ♦ K9 ♣ K72 | 23 Dlr S Both | ♠ T7 ♥ AQJ876 ♦ J53 ♣ 54 |
| ♠ 865 ♥ T2 ♦ QT742 ♣ J96 |
| NT | ♠ | ♥ | ♦ | ♣ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 6 | 8 | 5 | 10 | 10 |
| S | 6 | 8 | 5 | 10 | 10 |
| E | 6 | 5 | 8 | 3 | 2 |
| W | 7 | 5 | 8 | 3 | 3 |
| ♠ KQJ96 ♥ KQ4 ♦ AJ732 ♣ – | ||
| ♠ T7 ♥ 9653 ♦ 96 ♣ J9754 | 24 Dlr W None | ♠ 83 ♥ A7 ♦ KQ85 ♣ QT632 |
| ♠ A542 ♥ JT82 ♦ T4 ♣ AK8 |
| NT | ♠ | ♥ | ♦ | ♣ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 11 | 11 | 10 | 10 | 6 |
| S | 11 | 11 | 10 | 10 | 6 |
| E | 2 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 7 |
| W | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 7 |