Round 15 — U26 BAM Qualification
25 matches. → cumulative standings · → board records
Round 15 results↑ top
Every match of the round — teams, board-a-match points and VPs. Click a table number or ‘protocol’ for the full board-by-board scorecard below.
| Table | Home team | Visiting team | BAM (home) | BAM (visit) | VP (home) | VP (visit) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | INDIA-B U26 | GREISNOR | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 2 | CHINA RDFZ HOPE | FRANCE FUNBRIDGE | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 3 | DABROWKA PO | ITALIA U21 | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 4 | SXSTARLORD | INDIA U21 | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 5 | PRISM FALCONS | HAPPY BRIDGE | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 6 | GERMANY | SXTULIP | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 7 | JAPAN U26 | INDIA-A U26 | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 8 | SERBALICIOUS | RDFZ ZHIHAOLE | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 9 | AZS WRATISLAVIA | AUSTRIA | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 10 | SERBIA U26W | MAN EATING COBRAS | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 11 | DABROWKA | EYE OF THE TIGER | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 12 | CHINA RDFZ | CHINA RDFZ HU | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 13 | INDIA U16 | SHSLLS1 | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 14 | ISRAEL | SERBIA U21 | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 15 | ZHIHAOLE | ITALIA U26 | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 16 | CS21MSCHOOL | CHILE | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 17 | SXSPARK | ITALIA 2 | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 18 | CHILE U26W | BELGIUM | 0 | 0 | 2.40 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 19 | 50 50 | POLAND KIDS | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 2.40 | protocol → |
| 20 | JAPAN U21 | CAPRISUN | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 21 | SXDAISY | HONG KONG | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 22 | RDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT | ITALIA U26W | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 23 | CROATIA | BYE | 0 | 0 | 2.40 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 24 | URUGUAY | TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 25 | CROATIA U16 | SXNEBULA | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
Standings after round 15↑ top
Cumulative board-a-match points through round 15 — the league table as it stood after this round. → full standings, every round & players
| Place | Team | Pts | R15 | Pld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GREISNOR | 80.60 | 4.00 | 15 |
| 2 | ITALIA U21 | 80.20 | 2.00 | 15 |
| 3 | ITALIA U26 | 78.20 | 4.00 | 15 |
| 4 | INDIA-A U26 | 75.80 | 2.00 | 15 |
| 5 | ISRAEL | 74.60 | 4.00 | 15 |
| 6 | JAPAN U26 | 73.60 | 2.00 | 15 |
| 7 | AUSTRIA | 72.00 | 2.00 | 15 |
| 8 | CHINA RDFZ | 71.20 | 0.00 | 15 |
| 8 | SXNEBULA | 71.20 | 2.00 | 15 |
| 10 | CHINA RDFZ HU | 69.40 | 4.00 | 15 |
| 10 | SERBALICIOUS | 69.40 | 0.00 | 15 |
| 12 | SXSTARLORD | 68.60 | 3.00 | 15 |
| 13 | FRANCE FUNBRIDGE | 67.20 | 3.00 | 15 |
| 14 | JAPAN U21 | 66.00 | 2.00 | 15 |
| 15 | AZS WRATISLAVIA | 65.80 | 2.00 | 15 |
| 16 | ITALIA U26W | 65.60 | 2.00 | 15 |
| 17 | CHILE U26W | 65.40 | 2.40 | 15 |
| 18 | SERBIA U21 | 64.80 | 0.00 | 15 |
| 19 | SXDAISY | 64.00 | 3.00 | 15 |
| 20 | GERMANY | 63.80 | 2.00 | 15 |
| 21 | CHILE | 62.80 | 2.00 | 15 |
| 22 | CROATIA | 62.60 | 2.40 | 15 |
| 22 | RDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT | 62.60 | 2.00 | 15 |
| 24 | SXTULIP | 62.20 | 2.00 | 15 |
| 25 | INDIA-B U26 | 62.00 | 0.00 | 15 |
| 26 | SHSLLS1 | 61.20 | 4.00 | 15 |
| 27 | DABROWKA | 60.80 | 4.00 | 15 |
| 28 | INDIA U21 | 60.00 | 1.00 | 15 |
| 29 | DABROWKA PO | 59.80 | 2.00 | 15 |
| 30 | EYE OF THE TIGER | 59.20 | 0.00 | 15 |
| 30 | POLAND KIDS | 59.20 | 2.40 | 15 |
| 32 | MAN EATING COBRAS | 58.80 | 3.00 | 15 |
| 33 | SXSPARK | 56.20 | 2.00 | 15 |
| 34 | ITALIA 2 | 56.00 | 2.00 | 15 |
| 35 | RDFZ ZHIHAOLE | 54.40 | 4.00 | 15 |
| 36 | SERBIA U26W | 52.00 | 1.00 | 15 |
| 36 | ZHIHAOLE | 52.00 | 0.00 | 15 |
| 38 | HONG KONG | 51.60 | 1.00 | 15 |
| 39 | 50 50 | 50.80 | 0.00 | 15 |
| 40 | PRISM FALCONS | 50.40 | 4.00 | 15 |
| 41 | URUGUAY | 47.00 | 2.00 | 15 |
| 42 | INDIA U16 | 45.60 | 0.00 | 15 |
| 43 | HAPPY BRIDGE | 40.00 | 0.00 | 15 |
| 44 | CROATIA U16 | 37.80 | 2.00 | 15 |
| 45 | CS21MSCHOOL | 35.40 | 2.00 | 15 |
| 46 | CAPRISUN | 29.40 | 2.00 | 15 |
| 47 | CHINA RDFZ HOPE | 28.80 | 1.00 | 15 |
| 48 | TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL | 28.40 | 2.00 | 15 |
| 49 | BELGIUM | 0.00 | 0.00 | 15 |
Board-a-match over this round's field — each pair's net boards won per board (2-0 win / 1-1 tie), shown as a board-a-match %.
Round 15 board-a-match standings↑ top
| Place | Player | Team | Boards | R15 | BAM% |
|---|
INDIA-B U26 vs GREISNOR 0 : 4 VP (match 84486) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | INDIA-B U26 | GREISNOR | |
| 4♠x | S | ♥6 | -1 | 200 | 87% | 3♣ | S | ♦6 | = | 110 | 60% | 2 | ||||
| 2♥ | E | ♦K | +1 | 140 | 81% | 3♦ | N | ♠A | = | 110 | 72% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.4 | NS+0.7 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♠x | S | -1 | 200 | 87% | 2 | |||
| 3♣ | S | = | 110 | 60% | ||||
| 2♥ | E | +1 | 140 | 81% | 2 | |||
| 3♦ | N | = | 110 | 72% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.4 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CHINA RDFZ HOPE vs FRANCE FUNBRIDGE 1 : 3 VP (match 84487) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHINA RDFZ HOPE | FRANCE FUNBRIDGE | |
| 5♣ | S | ♥6 | -3 | 300 | 95% | 3♥ | E | ♣A | -4 | 200 | 81% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | W | ♦2 | -1 | 100 | 54% | 3N | E | ♦A | -1 | 100 | 54% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.8 | NS+0.7 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 5♣ | S | -3 | 300 | 95% | 2 | |||
| 3♥ | E | -4 | 200 | 81% | ||||
| 3N | W | -1 | 100 | 54% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3N | E | -1 | 100 | 54% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.8 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
DABROWKA PO vs ITALIA U21 2 : 2 VP (match 84488) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | DABROWKA PO | ITALIA U21 | |
| 3♠ | N | ♦8 | = | 140 | 69% | 3N | S | ♠6 | = | 600 | 92% | 2 | ||||
| 5♣x | E | ♦A | -2 | 500 | 100% | 3N | E | ♦5 | -1 | 100 | 54% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.4 | NS+0.9 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♠ | N | = | 140 | 69% | 2 | |||
| 3N | S | = | 600 | 92% | ||||
| 5♣x | E | -2 | 500 | 100% | 2 | |||
| 3N | E | -1 | 100 | 54% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.4 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.9 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SXSTARLORD vs INDIA U21 3 : 1 VP (match 84489) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SXSTARLORD | INDIA U21 | |
| 4♥x | E | ♣A | -3 | 500 | 86% | 3♠ | N | ♥A | = | 140 | 69% | 2 | ||||
| 4♥ | W | ♣7 | -2 | 200 | 83% | 4♠ | E | ♦A | -2 | 200 | 83% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.4 | NS+1.0 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♥x | E | -3 | 500 | 86% | 2 | |||
| 3♠ | N | = | 140 | 69% | ||||
| 4♥ | W | -2 | 200 | 83% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♠ | E | -2 | 200 | 83% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.4 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
PRISM FALCONS vs HAPPY BRIDGE 4 : 0 VP (match 84490) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | PRISM FALCONS | HAPPY BRIDGE | |
| 3♣ | S | ♦6 | = | 110 | 60% | 4♠ | N | ♦8 | -2 | 200 | 87% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | E | ♦A | -1 | 100 | 54% | 4♠ | E | ♦A | = | 620 | 98% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.3 | NS-1.7 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♣ | S | = | 110 | 60% | 2 | |||
| 4♠ | N | -2 | 200 | 87% | ||||
| 3N | E | -1 | 100 | 54% | 2 | |||
| 4♠ | E | = | 620 | 98% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.3 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
GERMANY vs SXTULIP 2 : 2 VP (match 84491) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | GERMANY | SXTULIP | |
| 3N | S | ♥6 | -2 | 200 | 87% | 3♠ | N | ♥A | = | 140 | 69% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | E | ♦A | -1 | 100 | 54% | 3♦x | S | ♥K | -2 | 300 | 90% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.7 | NS-0.4 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | S | -2 | 200 | 87% | 2 | |||
| 3♠ | N | = | 140 | 69% | ||||
| 3N | E | -1 | 100 | 54% | 2 | |||
| 3♦x | S | -2 | 300 | 90% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.7 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
JAPAN U26 vs INDIA-A U26 2 : 2 VP (match 84492) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | JAPAN U26 | INDIA-A U26 | |
| 3♠ | N | ♦9 | -1 | 100 | 69% | 3♥ | E | ♣A | -3 | 150 | 76% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | E | ♠9 | -1 | 100 | 54% | 2♥ | E | ♦A | +1 | 140 | 81% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.3 | NS-0.1 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♠ | N | -1 | 100 | 69% | 2 | |||
| 3♥ | E | -3 | 150 | 76% | ||||
| 3N | E | -1 | 100 | 54% | 2 | |||
| 2♥ | E | +1 | 140 | 81% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.3 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SERBALICIOUS vs RDFZ ZHIHAOLE 0 : 4 VP (match 84493) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SERBALICIOUS | RDFZ ZHIHAOLE | |
| 5♣x | S | ♥Q | -2 | 500 | 98% | 4♥ | E | ♣A | -2 | 100 | 51% | 2 | ||||
| 2♦ | N | ♠A | = | 90 | 65% | 4♥ | W | ♦2 | -1 | 100 | 54% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.3 | NS+0.1 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 5♣x | S | -2 | 500 | 98% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | E | -2 | 100 | 51% | ||||
| 2♦ | N | = | 90 | 65% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | W | -1 | 100 | 54% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.3 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
AZS WRATISLAVIA vs AUSTRIA 2 : 2 VP (match 84494) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | AZS WRATISLAVIA | AUSTRIA | |
| 3N | S | ♥6 | -1 | 100 | 69% | 3♣ | S | ♠6 | = | 110 | 60% | 2 | ||||
| 3Nx | W | ♦2 | -1 | 200 | 83% | 3♣ | E | ♦A | = | 110 | 73% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.3 | NS-0.3 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | S | -1 | 100 | 69% | 2 | |||
| 3♣ | S | = | 110 | 60% | ||||
| 3Nx | W | -1 | 200 | 83% | 2 | |||
| 3♣ | E | = | 110 | 73% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.3 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SERBIA U26W vs MAN EATING COBRAS 1 : 3 VP (match 84495) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SERBIA U26W | MAN EATING COBRAS | |
| 3♥ | E | ♣A | -1 | 50 | 58% | 3N | S | ♣Q | = | 600 | 92% | 2 | ||||
| 2♥ | W | ♦2 | -1 | 100 | 54% | 3N | E | ♦A | -1 | 100 | 54% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.1 | NS+0.9 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♥ | E | -1 | 50 | 58% | 2 | |||
| 3N | S | = | 600 | 92% | ||||
| 2♥ | W | -1 | 100 | 54% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3N | E | -1 | 100 | 54% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.1 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.9 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
DABROWKA vs EYE OF THE TIGER 4 : 0 VP (match 84496) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | DABROWKA | EYE OF THE TIGER | |
| 4♠ | N | ♦9 | = | 620 | 97% | 4♠ | N | ♥A | -1 | 100 | 69% | 2 | ||||
| 2♣ | E | ♦A | +1 | 110 | 73% | 3♥ | W | ♣7 | = | 140 | 81% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.5 | NS-1.0 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♠ | N | = | 620 | 97% | 2 | |||
| 4♠ | N | -1 | 100 | 69% | ||||
| 2♣ | E | +1 | 110 | 73% | 2 | |||
| 3♥ | W | = | 140 | 81% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.5 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CHINA RDFZ vs CHINA RDFZ HU 0 : 4 VP (match 84497) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHINA RDFZ | CHINA RDFZ HU | |
| 3♥ | E | ♣A | -2 | 100 | 51% | 4♥ | W | ♣2 | -3 | 150 | 76% | 2 | ||||
| 2♥ | E | ♦A | = | 110 | 73% | 3♥ | W | ♣7 | -2 | 200 | 83% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.4 | NS+1.2 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♥ | E | -2 | 100 | 51% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | W | -3 | 150 | 76% | ||||
| 2♥ | E | = | 110 | 73% | 2 | |||
| 3♥ | W | -2 | 200 | 83% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.4 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
INDIA U16 vs SHSLLS1 0 : 4 VP (match 84498) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | INDIA U16 | SHSLLS1 | |
| 3♥ | E | ♣A | -2 | 100 | 51% | 5♥x | E | ♠4 | -3 | 500 | 86% | 2 | ||||
| 3♣ | E | ♦A | = | 110 | 73% | 4♣ | E | ♦A | -1 | 100 | 54% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.4 | NS+0.8 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♥ | E | -2 | 100 | 51% | 2 | |||
| 5♥x | E | -3 | 500 | 86% | ||||
| 3♣ | E | = | 110 | 73% | 2 | |||
| 4♣ | E | -1 | 100 | 54% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.4 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
ISRAEL vs SERBIA U21 4 : 0 VP (match 84499) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ISRAEL | SERBIA U21 | |
| 4♥x | E | ♣A | -3 | 500 | 86% | 3♠ | N | ♥A | +1 | 170 | 79% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | W | ♦2 | -1 | 100 | 54% | 3♥ | E | ♦A | +1 | 170 | 86% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.8 | NS-0.1 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♥x | E | -3 | 500 | 86% | 2 | |||
| 3♠ | N | +1 | 170 | 79% | ||||
| 3N | W | -1 | 100 | 54% | 2 | |||
| 3♥ | E | +1 | 170 | 86% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.8 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
ZHIHAOLE vs ITALIA U26 0 : 4 VP (match 84500) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ZHIHAOLE | ITALIA U26 | |
| 5♣x | S | ♥6 | -3 | 800 | 100% | 4♠ | N | ♦9 | -2 | 200 | 87% | 2 | ||||
| 3♦x | S | ♥A | -2 | 300 | 90% | 3N | W | ♦2 | -1 | 100 | 54% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.8 | NS-0.7 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 5♣x | S | -3 | 800 | 100% | 2 | |||
| 4♠ | N | -2 | 200 | 87% | ||||
| 3♦x | S | -2 | 300 | 90% | 2 | |||
| 3N | W | -1 | 100 | 54% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.8 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CS21MSCHOOL vs CHILE 2 : 2 VP (match 84501) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CS21MSCHOOL | CHILE | |
| 3♥ | E | ♣A | -2 | 100 | 51% | 4♠ | N | ♦7 | -1 | 100 | 69% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | E | ♦A | = | 600 | 94% | 4♥ | W | ♦3 | -2 | 200 | 83% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.9 | NS+0.3 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♥ | E | -2 | 100 | 51% | 2 | |||
| 4♠ | N | -1 | 100 | 69% | ||||
| 3N | E | = | 600 | 94% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | W | -2 | 200 | 83% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.9 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SXSPARK vs ITALIA 2 2 : 2 VP (match 84502) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SXSPARK | ITALIA 2 | |
| 4♠ | N | ♥A | -2 | 200 | 87% | 3N | S | ♠3 | +1 | 630 | 100% | 2 | ||||
| 4♠ | E | ♦A | -4 | 400 | 98% | 3N | E | ♦5 | -1 | 100 | 54% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.2 | NS+1.1 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♠ | N | -2 | 200 | 87% | 2 | |||
| 3N | S | +1 | 630 | 100% | ||||
| 4♠ | E | -4 | 400 | 98% | 2 | |||
| 3N | E | -1 | 100 | 54% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.2 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CHILE U26W vs BELGIUM 2.4 : 0 VP (match 84503)↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHILE U26W | BELGIUM | |
| – | — | – | — | |||||||||||||
| – | — | – | — | |||||||||||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS0.0 | NS0.0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| – | ||||||||
| – | ||||||||
| – | ||||||||
| – | ||||||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS0.0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
50 50 vs POLAND KIDS 0 : 2.4 VP (match 84504)↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | 50 50 | POLAND KIDS | |
| – | — | – | — | |||||||||||||
| – | — | – | — | |||||||||||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS0.0 | NS0.0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| – | ||||||||
| – | ||||||||
| – | ||||||||
| – | ||||||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS0.0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
JAPAN U21 vs CAPRISUN 2 : 2 VP (match 84505) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | JAPAN U21 | CAPRISUN | |
| 4♠ | N | ♦7 | -1 | 100 | 69% | 4♠ | N | ♥A | = | 620 | 97% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | W | ♦2 | -1 | 100 | 54% | 4♥ | E | ♠9 | +1 | 650 | 100% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.3 | NS-0.1 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♠ | N | -1 | 100 | 69% | 2 | |||
| 4♠ | N | = | 620 | 97% | ||||
| 3N | W | -1 | 100 | 54% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | E | +1 | 650 | 100% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.3 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SXDAISY vs HONG KONG 3 : 1 VP (match 84506) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SXDAISY | HONG KONG | |
| 4♠ | N | ♥5 | -1 | 100 | 69% | 4♠ | S | ♠3 | -1 | 100 | 69% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 4♥ | W | ♦3 | -3 | 300 | 94% | 4♦x | S | ♥A | -1 | 100 | 67% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.5 | NS-0.7 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♠ | N | -1 | 100 | 69% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♠ | S | -1 | 100 | 69% | ||||
| 4♥ | W | -3 | 300 | 94% | 2 | |||
| 4♦x | S | -1 | 100 | 67% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.5 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
RDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT vs ITALIA U26W 2 : 2 VP (match 84507) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | RDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT | ITALIA U26W | |
| 3♥ | E | ♣A | = | 140 | 79% | 2♠ | N | ♦9 | +1 | 140 | 69% | 2 | ||||
| 4♥ | W | ♦3 | -3 | 300 | 94% | 3♠ | E | ♦A | -2 | 200 | 83% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.3 | NS+1.0 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♥ | E | = | 140 | 79% | 2 | |||
| 2♠ | N | +1 | 140 | 69% | ||||
| 4♥ | W | -3 | 300 | 94% | 2 | |||
| 3♠ | E | -2 | 200 | 83% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.3 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CROATIA vs BYE 2.4 : 0 VP (match 84508)↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CROATIA | BYE | |
| – | — | – | — | |||||||||||||
| – | — | – | — | |||||||||||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS0.0 | NS0.0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| – | ||||||||
| – | ||||||||
| – | ||||||||
| – | ||||||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS0.0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
URUGUAY vs TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL 2 : 2 VP (match 84509) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | URUGUAY | TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL | |
| 2♦ | S | ♥T | = | 90 | 56% | 4♥ | E | ♠T | -2 | 100 | 51% | 2 | ||||
| 4♥ | W | ♦2 | -2 | 200 | 83% | 3N | E | ♦A | = | 600 | 94% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.5 | NS-0.9 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2♦ | S | = | 90 | 56% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | E | -2 | 100 | 51% | ||||
| 4♥ | W | -2 | 200 | 83% | 2 | |||
| 3N | E | = | 600 | 94% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.5 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.9 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CROATIA U16 vs SXNEBULA 2 : 2 VP (match 84510) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CROATIA U16 | SXNEBULA | |
| 4♣ | S | ♥6 | -2 | 200 | 87% | 4♠ | N | ♠5 | -1 | 100 | 69% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | W | ♦2 | -2 | 200 | 83% | 3N | E | ♦6 | -1 | 100 | 54% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.1 | NS-0.3 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♣ | S | -2 | 200 | 87% | 2 | |||
| 4♠ | N | -1 | 100 | 69% | ||||
| 3N | W | -2 | 200 | 83% | 2 | |||
| 3N | E | -1 | 100 | 54% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.1 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
| ♠ A982 ♥ 932 ♦ AJ2 ♣ 952 | ||
| ♠ J63 ♥ QT6 ♦ 63 ♣ QJ843 | 5 Dlr N N-S | ♠ Q75 ♥ AJ8754 ♦ Q987 ♣ – |
| ♠ KT4 ♥ K ♦ KT54 ♣ AKT76 |
| NT | ♠ | ♥ | ♦ | ♣ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 7 | 9 | 6 | 8 | 9 |
| S | 7 | 9 | 6 | 8 | 9 |
| E | 6 | 4 | 7 | 5 | 4 |
| W | 6 | 4 | 7 | 5 | 4 |
| ♠ QT753 ♥ 62 ♦ Q832 ♣ 74 | ||
| ♠ J2 ♥ AKJT4 ♦ 94 ♣ T952 | 6 Dlr E E-W | ♠ AK864 ♥ Q7 ♦ JT ♣ AQ63 |
| ♠ 9 ♥ 9853 ♦ AK765 ♣ KJ8 |
| NT | ♠ | ♥ | ♦ | ♣ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 4 | 5 | 4 | 9 | 4 |
| S | 4 | 5 | 4 | 9 | 4 |
| E | 8 | 8 | 9 | 4 | 9 |
| W | 8 | 8 | 9 | 4 | 9 |