Round 9 — U26 BAM Qualification
25 matches. → cumulative standings · → board records
Round 9 results↑ top
Every match of the round — teams, board-a-match points and VPs. Click a table number or ‘protocol’ for the full board-by-board scorecard below.
| Table | Home team | Visiting team | BAM (home) | BAM (visit) | VP (home) | VP (visit) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | INDIA-B U26 | INDIA-A U26 | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 2 | CHINA RDFZ HOPE | RDFZ ZHIHAOLE | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 3 | DABROWKA PO | AUSTRIA | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 4 | SXSTARLORD | MAN EATING COBRAS | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 5 | PRISM FALCONS | EYE OF THE TIGER | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 6 | GERMANY | CHINA RDFZ HU | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 7 | JAPAN U26 | SHSLLS1 | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 8 | SERBALICIOUS | SERBIA U21 | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 9 | AZS WRATISLAVIA | ITALIA U26 | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 10 | SERBIA U26W | CHILE | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 11 | DABROWKA | ITALIA 2 | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 12 | CHINA RDFZ | BELGIUM | 3 | 1 | 2.40 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 13 | INDIA U16 | POLAND KIDS | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 14 | ISRAEL | CAPRISUN | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 15 | ZHIHAOLE | HONG KONG | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 16 | CS21MSCHOOL | ITALIA U26W | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 2.40 | protocol → |
| 17 | SXSPARK | BYE | 0 | 0 | 2.40 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 18 | CHILE U26W | TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL | 0 | 0 | 2.40 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 19 | 50 50 | SXNEBULA | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 20 | JAPAN U21 | GREISNOR | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 21 | SXDAISY | FRANCE FUNBRIDGE | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 22 | RDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT | ITALIA U21 | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 23 | CROATIA | INDIA U21 | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 24 | URUGUAY | HAPPY BRIDGE | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 25 | CROATIA U16 | SXTULIP | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
Standings after round 9↑ top
Cumulative board-a-match points through round 9 — the league table as it stood after this round. → full standings, every round & players
| Place | Team | Pts | R9 | Pld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | INDIA-A U26 | 62.80 | 4.00 | 9 |
| 2 | CHINA RDFZ | 62.20 | 2.40 | 9 |
| 2 | ITALIA U21 | 62.20 | 4.00 | 9 |
| 4 | SXNEBULA | 61.20 | 3.00 | 9 |
| 5 | GREISNOR | 60.60 | 0.00 | 9 |
| 6 | ISRAEL | 60.20 | 4.00 | 9 |
| 7 | JAPAN U26 | 59.60 | 3.00 | 9 |
| 8 | SERBALICIOUS | 58.40 | 2.00 | 9 |
| 9 | ITALIA U26 | 58.20 | 1.00 | 9 |
| 10 | AZS WRATISLAVIA | 56.80 | 3.00 | 9 |
| 11 | CHINA RDFZ HU | 55.40 | 1.00 | 9 |
| 12 | AUSTRIA | 55.00 | 1.00 | 9 |
| 13 | FRANCE FUNBRIDGE | 54.20 | 2.00 | 9 |
| 14 | JAPAN U21 | 53.20 | 4.00 | 9 |
| 15 | SERBIA U21 | 52.80 | 2.00 | 9 |
| 16 | ITALIA U26W | 52.60 | 2.40 | 9 |
| 16 | SXSTARLORD | 52.60 | 2.00 | 9 |
| 18 | EYE OF THE TIGER | 52.20 | 1.00 | 9 |
| 18 | SXDAISY | 52.20 | 2.00 | 9 |
| 20 | GERMANY | 50.80 | 3.00 | 9 |
| 20 | POLAND KIDS | 50.80 | 4.00 | 9 |
| 22 | SHSLLS1 | 50.20 | 1.00 | 9 |
| 22 | SXTULIP | 50.20 | 3.00 | 9 |
| 24 | INDIA U21 | 50.00 | 4.00 | 9 |
| 25 | CHILE U26W | 49.60 | 2.40 | 9 |
| 26 | INDIA-B U26 | 49.00 | 0.00 | 9 |
| 27 | CROATIA | 48.20 | 0.00 | 9 |
| 28 | CHILE | 46.80 | 2.00 | 9 |
| 28 | MAN EATING COBRAS | 46.80 | 2.00 | 9 |
| 30 | RDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT | 46.20 | 0.00 | 9 |
| 31 | 50 50 | 46.00 | 1.00 | 9 |
| 32 | DABROWKA | 45.80 | 2.00 | 9 |
| 33 | ITALIA 2 | 45.00 | 2.00 | 9 |
| 33 | SERBIA U26W | 45.00 | 2.00 | 9 |
| 35 | DABROWKA PO | 43.80 | 3.00 | 9 |
| 36 | ZHIHAOLE | 43.60 | 2.00 | 9 |
| 37 | RDFZ ZHIHAOLE | 42.40 | 3.00 | 9 |
| 38 | PRISM FALCONS | 41.40 | 3.00 | 9 |
| 39 | INDIA U16 | 41.20 | 0.00 | 9 |
| 40 | URUGUAY | 41.00 | 2.00 | 9 |
| 41 | SXSPARK | 40.80 | 2.40 | 9 |
| 42 | HONG KONG | 39.20 | 2.00 | 9 |
| 43 | HAPPY BRIDGE | 33.00 | 2.00 | 9 |
| 44 | CROATIA U16 | 32.80 | 1.00 | 9 |
| 45 | CS21MSCHOOL | 27.00 | 0.00 | 9 |
| 46 | TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL | 26.40 | 0.00 | 9 |
| 47 | CHINA RDFZ HOPE | 25.80 | 1.00 | 9 |
| 48 | CAPRISUN | 18.00 | 0.00 | 9 |
| 49 | BELGIUM | 0.00 | 0.00 | 9 |
Board-a-match over this round's field — each pair's net boards won per board (2-0 win / 1-1 tie), shown as a board-a-match %.
Round 9 board-a-match standings↑ top
| Place | Player | Team | Boards | R9 | BAM% |
|---|
INDIA-B U26 vs INDIA-A U26 0 : 4 VP (match 84336) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | INDIA-B U26 | INDIA-A U26 | |
| 4♥ | S | ♦2 | = | 420 | 66% | 4♥ | S | ♦2 | +1 | 450 | 75% | 2 | ||||
| 2♥ | E | ♣A | -2 | 100 | 98% | 2♥ | E | ♣A | -3 | 150 | 80% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.3 | NS-0.1 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♥ | S | = | 420 | 66% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | S | +1 | 450 | 75% | ||||
| 2♥ | E | -2 | 100 | 98% | 2 | |||
| 2♥ | E | -3 | 150 | 80% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.3 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CHINA RDFZ HOPE vs RDFZ ZHIHAOLE 1 : 3 VP (match 84337) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHINA RDFZ HOPE | RDFZ ZHIHAOLE | |
| 3♥ | N | ♦4 | +1 | 170 | 86% | 4♥ | S | ♠T | +1 | 450 | 75% | 2 | ||||
| 2♥ | E | ♣A | -3 | 150 | 80% | 3♥ | E | ♣A | -3 | 150 | 80% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.3 | NS-0.1 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♥ | N | +1 | 170 | 86% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | S | +1 | 450 | 75% | ||||
| 2♥ | E | -3 | 150 | 80% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3♥ | E | -3 | 150 | 80% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.3 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
DABROWKA PO vs AUSTRIA 3 : 1 VP (match 84338) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | DABROWKA PO | AUSTRIA | |
| 4♥ | N | ♠3 | +1 | 450 | 75% | 4♥ | S | ♠T | +1 | 450 | 75% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 3N | S | ♦5 | +1 | 630 | 90% | 3♠ | N | ♣T | = | 140 | 93% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.3 | NS-0.4 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♥ | N | +1 | 450 | 75% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♥ | S | +1 | 450 | 75% | ||||
| 3N | S | +1 | 630 | 90% | 2 | |||
| 3♠ | N | = | 140 | 93% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.3 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SXSTARLORD vs MAN EATING COBRAS 2 : 2 VP (match 84339) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SXSTARLORD | MAN EATING COBRAS | |
| 6♥ | N | ♣7 | -2 | 100 | 97% | 3♥ | N | ♣7 | +1 | 170 | 86% | 2 | ||||
| 4♠ | S | ♥7 | = | 620 | 67% | 3♥ | E | ♣K | -3 | 150 | 80% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.6 | NS-1.3 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 6♥ | N | -2 | 100 | 97% | 2 | |||
| 3♥ | N | +1 | 170 | 86% | ||||
| 4♠ | S | = | 620 | 67% | 2 | |||
| 3♥ | E | -3 | 150 | 80% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.6 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
PRISM FALCONS vs EYE OF THE TIGER 3 : 1 VP (match 84340) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | PRISM FALCONS | EYE OF THE TIGER | |
| 4♥ | N | ♠3 | +1 | 450 | 75% | 4♥ | N | ♠3 | = | 420 | 66% | 2 | ||||
| 4♠ | N | ♦T | = | 620 | 67% | 4♠ | N | ♦T | = | 620 | 67% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.8 | NS+0.0 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♥ | N | +1 | 450 | 75% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | N | = | 420 | 66% | ||||
| 4♠ | N | = | 620 | 67% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♠ | N | = | 620 | 67% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.8 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
GERMANY vs CHINA RDFZ HU 3 : 1 VP (match 84341) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | GERMANY | CHINA RDFZ HU | |
| 4♥ | N | ♣7 | +1 | 450 | 75% | 4♥ | S | ♣T | +1 | 450 | 75% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 3N | N | ♦T | +1 | 630 | 90% | 4♠ | N | ♦T | = | 620 | 67% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.3 | NS+0.8 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♥ | N | +1 | 450 | 75% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♥ | S | +1 | 450 | 75% | ||||
| 3N | N | +1 | 630 | 90% | 2 | |||
| 4♠ | N | = | 620 | 67% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.3 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
JAPAN U26 vs SHSLLS1 3 : 1 VP (match 84342) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | JAPAN U26 | SHSLLS1 | |
| 4♥ | N | ♣7 | = | 420 | 66% | 4♥ | N | ♣7 | = | 420 | 66% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 4♠ | N | ♣T | = | 620 | 67% | 3N | S | ♦5 | = | 600 | 52% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.0 | NS-0.3 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♥ | N | = | 420 | 66% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♥ | N | = | 420 | 66% | ||||
| 4♠ | N | = | 620 | 67% | 2 | |||
| 3N | S | = | 600 | 52% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.0 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SERBALICIOUS vs SERBIA U21 2 : 2 VP (match 84343) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SERBALICIOUS | SERBIA U21 | |
| 4♥ | N | ♣7 | = | 420 | 66% | 4♥ | S | ♠T | +1 | 450 | 75% | 2 | ||||
| 3♠ | N | ♦T | +1 | 170 | 61% | 3♥ | E | ♣A | -3 | 150 | 80% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.5 | NS-0.1 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♥ | N | = | 420 | 66% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | S | +1 | 450 | 75% | ||||
| 3♠ | N | +1 | 170 | 61% | 2 | |||
| 3♥ | E | -3 | 150 | 80% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.5 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
AZS WRATISLAVIA vs ITALIA U26 3 : 1 VP (match 84344) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | AZS WRATISLAVIA | ITALIA U26 | |
| 4♥ | N | ♣7 | +1 | 450 | 75% | 3♦x | E | ♠A | -1 | 100 | 91% | 2 | ||||
| 4♠ | S | ♥7 | = | 620 | 67% | 4♠ | N | ♦T | = | 620 | 67% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.8 | NS-0.5 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♥ | N | +1 | 450 | 75% | 2 | |||
| 3♦x | E | -1 | 100 | 91% | ||||
| 4♠ | S | = | 620 | 67% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♠ | N | = | 620 | 67% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.8 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SERBIA U26W vs CHILE 2 : 2 VP (match 84345) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SERBIA U26W | CHILE | |
| 4♥ | S | ♠T | +1 | 450 | 75% | 4♥ | S | ♣6 | +1 | 450 | 75% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 4♠ | S | ♥7 | = | 620 | 67% | 4♠ | N | ♦T | = | 620 | 67% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.8 | NS+0.8 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♥ | S | +1 | 450 | 75% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♥ | S | +1 | 450 | 75% | ||||
| 4♠ | S | = | 620 | 67% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♠ | N | = | 620 | 67% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.8 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
DABROWKA vs ITALIA 2 2 : 2 VP (match 84346) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | DABROWKA | ITALIA 2 | |
| 4♥ | S | ♦2 | = | 420 | 66% | 4♥ | S | ♠T | +1 | 450 | 75% | 2 | ||||
| 4♠ | S | ♥7 | = | 620 | 67% | 2♠ | N | ♦T | +2 | 170 | 61% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.0 | NS+0.3 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♥ | S | = | 420 | 66% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | S | +1 | 450 | 75% | ||||
| 4♠ | S | = | 620 | 67% | 2 | |||
| 2♠ | N | +2 | 170 | 61% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.0 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CHINA RDFZ vs BELGIUM 2.4 : 0 VP (match 84347) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHINA RDFZ | BELGIUM | |
| 4♥ | S | ♦2 | = | 420 | 66% | 4♥ | S | ♦2 | = | 420 | 66% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 3N | S | ♦3 | +1 | 630 | 90% | 3♣ | S | ♥7 | = | 110 | 95% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.5 | NS-1.2 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♥ | S | = | 420 | 66% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♥ | S | = | 420 | 66% | ||||
| 3N | S | +1 | 630 | 90% | 2 | |||
| 3♣ | S | = | 110 | 95% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.5 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
INDIA U16 vs POLAND KIDS 0 : 4 VP (match 84348) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | INDIA U16 | POLAND KIDS | |
| 4♥ | S | ♦6 | = | 420 | 66% | 4♥ | N | ♣7 | +1 | 450 | 75% | 2 | ||||
| 2♥ | W | ♠A | -3 | 150 | 80% | 3♠ | N | ♦T | +1 | 170 | 61% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.9 | NS+0.3 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♥ | S | = | 420 | 66% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | N | +1 | 450 | 75% | ||||
| 2♥ | W | -3 | 150 | 80% | 2 | |||
| 3♠ | N | +1 | 170 | 61% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.9 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
ISRAEL vs CAPRISUN 4 : 0 VP (match 84349) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ISRAEL | CAPRISUN | |
| 4♥ | N | ♣7 | +1 | 450 | 75% | 3N | S | ♦6 | -2 | 100 | 97% | 2 | ||||
| 4♠ | N | ♥Q | = | 620 | 67% | 4♠ | N | ♦T | -2 | 200 | 100% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.8 | NS-1.9 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♥ | N | +1 | 450 | 75% | 2 | |||
| 3N | S | -2 | 100 | 97% | ||||
| 4♠ | N | = | 620 | 67% | 2 | |||
| 4♠ | N | -2 | 200 | 100% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.8 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.9 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
ZHIHAOLE vs HONG KONG 2 : 2 VP (match 84350) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ZHIHAOLE | HONG KONG | |
| 3♥ | N | ♣7 | +1 | 170 | 86% | 4♥ | S | ♠T | +1 | 450 | 75% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | S | ♣6 | +1 | 630 | 90% | 4♠ | N | ♦T | = | 620 | 67% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.1 | NS+0.8 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♥ | N | +1 | 170 | 86% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | S | +1 | 450 | 75% | ||||
| 3N | S | +1 | 630 | 90% | 2 | |||
| 4♠ | N | = | 620 | 67% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.1 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CS21MSCHOOL vs ITALIA U26W 0 : 2.4 VP (match 84351)↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CS21MSCHOOL | ITALIA U26W | |
| – | — | – | — | |||||||||||||
| – | — | – | — | |||||||||||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS0.0 | NS0.0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| – | ||||||||
| – | ||||||||
| – | ||||||||
| – | ||||||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS0.0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SXSPARK vs BYE 2.4 : 0 VP (match 84352)↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SXSPARK | BYE | |
| – | — | – | — | |||||||||||||
| – | — | – | — | |||||||||||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS0.0 | NS0.0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| – | ||||||||
| – | ||||||||
| – | ||||||||
| – | ||||||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS0.0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CHILE U26W vs TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL 2.4 : 0 VP (match 84353)↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHILE U26W | TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL | |
| – | — | – | N | — | 420 | 66% | ||||||||||
| – | — | – | N | — | 630 | 90% | ||||||||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS0.0 | NS+0.5 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| – | ||||||||
| – | N | 420 | 66% | |||||
| – | ||||||||
| – | N | 630 | 90% | |||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS0.0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
50 50 vs SXNEBULA 1 : 3 VP (match 84354) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | 50 50 | SXNEBULA | |
| 4♥ | N | ♠3 | +1 | 450 | 75% | 4♥ | N | ♠6 | +1 | 450 | 75% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 3♥ | E | ♣K | -4 | 200 | 52% | 2♠x | S | ♥7 | +1 | 870 | 100% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.5 | NS+1.5 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♥ | N | +1 | 450 | 75% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♥ | N | +1 | 450 | 75% | ||||
| 3♥ | E | -4 | 200 | 52% | 2 | |||
| 2♠x | S | +1 | 870 | 100% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.5 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
JAPAN U21 vs GREISNOR 4 : 0 VP (match 84355) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | JAPAN U21 | GREISNOR | |
| 4♥ | S | ♠T | +1 | 450 | 75% | 4♥ | N | ♣7 | = | 420 | 66% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | S | ♦5 | +1 | 630 | 90% | 3♥ | E | ♣K | -5 | 250 | 50% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.3 | NS-0.3 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♥ | S | +1 | 450 | 75% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | N | = | 420 | 66% | ||||
| 3N | S | +1 | 630 | 90% | 2 | |||
| 3♥ | E | -5 | 250 | 50% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.3 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SXDAISY vs FRANCE FUNBRIDGE 2 : 2 VP (match 84356) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SXDAISY | FRANCE FUNBRIDGE | |
| 4♥ | S | ♠T | +1 | 450 | 75% | 4♥ | S | ♦2 | = | 420 | 66% | 2 | ||||
| 2♥ | W | ♠A | -3 | 150 | 80% | 3♠ | S | ♥7 | +1 | 170 | 61% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.1 | NS-0.5 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♥ | S | +1 | 450 | 75% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | S | = | 420 | 66% | ||||
| 2♥ | W | -3 | 150 | 80% | 2 | |||
| 3♠ | S | +1 | 170 | 61% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.1 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
RDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT vs ITALIA U21 0 : 4 VP (match 84357) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | RDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT | ITALIA U21 | |
| 4♥ | S | ♦2 | = | 420 | 66% | 4♥ | S | ♠T | +1 | 450 | 75% | 2 | ||||
| 2N | S | ♥7 | +2 | 180 | 55% | 3N | N | ♦T | +1 | 630 | 90% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.4 | NS+1.3 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♥ | S | = | 420 | 66% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | S | +1 | 450 | 75% | ||||
| 2N | S | +2 | 180 | 55% | 2 | |||
| 3N | N | +1 | 630 | 90% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.4 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CROATIA vs INDIA U21 0 : 4 VP (match 84358) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CROATIA | INDIA U21 | |
| 4♥ | N | ♣7 | = | 420 | 66% | 4♥ | S | ♠T | +1 | 450 | 75% | 2 | ||||
| 2♥ | E | ♣A | -3 | 150 | 80% | 3♠ | S | ♥7 | +1 | 170 | 61% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.9 | NS+0.3 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♥ | N | = | 420 | 66% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | S | +1 | 450 | 75% | ||||
| 2♥ | E | -3 | 150 | 80% | 2 | |||
| 3♠ | S | +1 | 170 | 61% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.9 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
URUGUAY vs HAPPY BRIDGE 2 : 2 VP (match 84359) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | URUGUAY | HAPPY BRIDGE | |
| 6♥ | N | ♦J | -2 | 100 | 97% | 4♥ | N | ♦7 | = | 420 | 66% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | S | ♦5 | +1 | 630 | 90% | 3♥ | E | ♣A | -3 | 150 | 80% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.1 | NS-0.9 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 6♥ | N | -2 | 100 | 97% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | N | = | 420 | 66% | ||||
| 3N | S | +1 | 630 | 90% | 2 | |||
| 3♥ | E | -3 | 150 | 80% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.1 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.9 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CROATIA U16 vs SXTULIP 1 : 3 VP (match 84360) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CROATIA U16 | SXTULIP | |
| 3N | S | ♦6 | -2 | 100 | 97% | 4♥ | S | ♣6 | +2 | 480 | 100% | 2 | ||||
| 2♥ | E | ♣A | -3 | 150 | 80% | 3♦ | W | ♠A | -3 | 150 | 80% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.5 | NS+0.4 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | S | -2 | 100 | 97% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | S | +2 | 480 | 100% | ||||
| 2♥ | E | -3 | 150 | 80% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3♦ | W | -3 | 150 | 80% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.5 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
| ♠ 72 ♥ A9643 ♦ A5 ♣ Q853 | ||
| ♠ T5 ♥ K8 ♦ QT862 ♣ KT96 | 17 Dlr N None | ♠ J9863 ♥ Q5 ♦ KJ74 ♣ 74 |
| ♠ AKQ4 ♥ JT72 ♦ 93 ♣ AJ2 |
| NT | ♠ | ♥ | ♦ | ♣ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 8 | 7 | 10 | 5 | 9 |
| S | 8 | 7 | 10 | 5 | 9 |
| E | 4 | 5 | 2 | 8 | 4 |
| W | 4 | 5 | 2 | 8 | 4 |
| ♠ AKT2 ♥ J54 ♦ KJ6 ♣ 532 | ||
| ♠ Q97 ♥ 7 ♦ AQ8543 ♣ J76 | 18 Dlr E N-S | ♠ J3 ♥ AQ9862 ♦ T7 ♣ T94 |
| ♠ 8654 ♥ KT3 ♦ 92 ♣ AKQ8 |
| NT | ♠ | ♥ | ♦ | ♣ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 10 | 10 | 8 | 7 | 9 |
| S | 10 | 10 | 8 | 7 | 9 |
| E | 3 | 3 | 5 | 6 | 3 |
| W | 3 | 3 | 5 | 6 | 3 |